Jump to content

How the Pats exploited the Bills Special Teams


Protocal69

Recommended Posts

A dead horse? Move on?

 

This article makes it crystal clear the Bills have had this issue come up twice in the 3 weeks prior to the NE game. Twice. And  3rd time was the charm... in only the 4th week. You guys think it's acceptable? It cost a touchdown and ultimately, the game! Not Brady or whatever, but a blocked punt. Hey, I'm all for giving rookie coaches a chance but this was the 3rd time in 4 weeks! McD and staff are to blame as well.

 

Interesting too that the article mentions that since Bojorquez tried out with the Pats* that they likely knew he wasn't enough good as a passer to take advantage of a guy no one was covering! 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Protocal69 said:

 

This does NOT give me a good feeling that we have fixed our league bottom ST play or even have someone paying enough attention to it.

 

And not to excuse Allen's problems - but at the end of the day, that blocked punt for 6 was the difference in the final score.

10 hours ago, Gugny said:

Image result for dead horse gif

 

Bad take here, Gugny.  This article makes it clear that the Bills showed a ST coverage weakness 3 weeks in a row that the Pats successfully exploited.

It shouldn't have happened twice, let alone still have been there for the Pats to exploit with a blocked punt and a pick-6

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SlimShady'sGhost said:

6 points is an exploitation? 

 

In the context of that game where the Pats had just scored a TD and were leading by 6 points, then exploited a weakness seen on prev. game film to collect 7 more, yes.

 

In the context of any game, if your team puts a weakness on film and you don't fix it, you're not a professional outfit.  Harsh but real.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, wvbillsfan said:

So we (bills) adjusted to it in the previous weeks but for some reason chose not to do it against the pats. Based off 15 years of mind numbing stupidity against the pats I’d say that checks out. 

 

ST outside of Moorman have not been even a tertiary concern of the Bills for 20 years now.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SlimShady'sGhost said:

6 points is an exploitation?  

 

had McD gone for the FG it would / Could have been a 3 point game. 

 

 

Indeed

 

And everyone would feel so much better that they lost 16-13?   :huh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jerome007 said:

A dead horse? Move on?

 

This article makes it crystal clear the Bills have had this issue come up twice in the 3 weeks prior to the NE game. Twice. And  3rd time was the charm... in only the 4th week. You guys think it's acceptable? It cost a touchdown and ultimately, the game! Not Brady or whatever, but a blocked punt. Hey, I'm all for giving rookie coaches a chance but this was the 3rd time in 4 weeks! McD and staff are to blame as well.

 

Interesting too that the article mentions that since Bojorquez tried out with the Pats* that they likely knew he wasn't enough good as a passer to take advantage of a guy no one was covering! 

 

 

 

Even if that was the play - the snap was basically on the ground.  

 

I imagine the teams guys are getting drilled pretty hard this week on what to do in those situations.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dneveu said:

 

Even if that was the play - the snap was basically on the ground.  

 

I imagine the teams guys are getting drilled pretty hard this week on what to do in those situations.  

It was a subpar snap, but the main point of the article remains

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jerome007 said:

It was a subpar snap, but the main point of the article remains

 

 

 

In that situation - I'd bring the guys in and punt it out of bounds... 4th and 15 or whatever is a long conversion and you're backed up.  But if that was 4th and 5 from the 35+?  I'm probably saying take that snap and throw it up to johnson past the sticks... its a what 30 yard throw to the outside with 0 coverage - i can make that throw.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SlimShady'sGhost said:

 

me thinks you missed my point. 

 

They Exploited one play ... whoop de do 

 

 

Or I was trying to give you some credit since your point appears to be that giving up a blocked punt for a TD was no big deal in a game where each defense only gave up one TD and one FG.   And that somehow kicking another FG would have made up for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, KD in CA said:

 

Or I was trying to give you some credit since your point appears to be that giving up a blocked punt for a TD was no big deal in a game where each defense only gave up one TD and one FG.   And that somehow kicking another FG would have made up for it.

thanks ... 

 

Had they made and gotten the FG then the score is down to 3. 

 

Late in the 4th QTR the Bills only needed 3 to tie the game and not 6.   

 

Housch has been very good 50  +.  Take the shot and tie the game and hope to win the toss in OT versus a MUST get TD. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, BringBackFergy said:

Can we please move on from this ***** game?

 

No....embrace the game....talk about the game....discuss how mistakes can be fixed...or pretend it didn't happen and use that cute catch phrase " on to Tennessee".....anyway discussions like these are therapeutic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SlimShady'sGhost said:

thanks ... 

 

Had they made and gotten the FG then the score is down to 3. 

 

Late in the 4th QTR the Bills only needed 3 to tie the game and not 6.   

 

Housch has been very good 50  +.  Take the shot and tie the game and hope to win the toss in OT versus a MUST get TD. 

 

 

Except they never got close enough to try another FG.  They had their backup QB and couldn't stop the Pats pass rush and turned the ball over on their last possession.   How would that have been different?   Not to mention, SH had already missed from 49.  And you're assuming NE couldn't respond.  And you're assuming they'd win in OT without Allen.

 

All that instead of simply getting one yard to actually take the lead in the Q4??   Sorry....they made the right call and couldn't execute.   Sometimes that happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LABILLBACKER said:

No....embrace the game....talk about the game....discuss how mistakes can be fixed...or pretend it didn't happen and use that cute catch phrase " on to Tennessee".....anyway discussions like these are therapeutic. 

 

95% of the threads/posts here are vanilla garbage, here we have an instance of blatant, frankly irrefutable poor coaching and people want to ignore it, we are "beating a dead horse," blah blah blah.

 

That punt was, as the score stands pretty much the game.  We allowed the PAts something which  is unforgivable for a well coached NFL team, a gimme.

 

Special teams coordinator needs to be held accountable.  I think this is borderline a fire-able offense to let this go on week after week.  Not genius on the part of the Pats, hard work and common sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, RoyBatty is alive said:

 

95% of the threads/posts here are vanilla garbage, here we have an instance of blatant, frankly irrefutable poor coaching and people want to ignore it, we are "beating a dead horse," blah blah blah.

 

That punt was, as the score stands pretty much the game.  We allowed the PAts something which  is unforgivable for a well coached NFL team, a gimme.

 

Special teams coordinator needs to be held accountable.  I think this is borderline a fire-able offense to let this go on week after week.  Not genius on the part of the Pats, hard work and common sense.

 

Brady's 46 yard completion, the punt block, Brady's INT at the end of a 90 yard cakewalk drive, those were the main points of the game.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, SlimShady'sGhost said:

 

me thinks you missed my point. 

 

They Exploited one play ... whoop de do 

 

 

A lot of rings have come from exploiting one play.

 

See it’s a football life and the story line about that Russel Wilson pick in the Super Bowl. 

 

It is fascinating how good they are at seeing stuff on film 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LABILLBACKER said:

No....embrace the game....talk about the game....discuss how mistakes can be fixed...or pretend it didn't happen and use that cute catch phrase " on to Tennessee".....anyway discussions like these are therapeutic. 

You have a funny idea of what the word "therapeutic" means.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...