Jump to content

Anonymous Agents Rank Buffalo The Worst FA Destination


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, thurst44 said:

They do realize that if you sign with a team, you don't use the "visitors locker room," right?

 

No, I'm sure they have no idea of that.

 

Seriously though, the point that I made was that it leaves a really lousy impression on visiting players. It hardly reeks of a first-class organization.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BillsRdue said:

Taxes too.  Florida has no state tax and nice weather. CA and NY taxes are horrible. When you make that much taxes can add hundreds of thousands in lost revenue, so the "crap" cities in high tax states like Oakland and Buffalo are going to rank higher.  You mean I have to pay more to live here and not get laid. Hello Miami.

You can always tell the posters who couldn’t get laid in WNY. I had no problems and I’m sure most of the pro athletes didn’t either.  Sorry you struggled. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

It's not "anonymous sources".  The sources are obviously known--they were specifically were asked to poll by SI.  For obvious reasons, SI promised them anonymity.

 

You're saying that Si fabricated the results?  The entire story?

 

I'm saying anonymous sources in any type of "journalism" is BS. Yep, that's what I'm saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said:

Taxes don't help.

Minnesota is higher and I think they have been pretty good at signing FA.  They also have worse weather yet people say how wonderful it is (I’ve never been).  Again, this is lazy journalism.  

 

Mid we didn’t suck for 2 decades, we won’t have these problems.  And for as bad as people say it is, what major FA that mattered have we missed out on?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If a player is on the market and doesn't want to play in Buffalo that's his prerogative. I'm not going to feel slighted about it. There is another side to this preference equation: That is the Bills aren't interested in a certain type of player and personality. If a player requires a more lively night life compared to what LA or NYC has to offer then he shouldn't come to Buffalo because it would be a bad fit. 

 

The main consideration for players is the salary. And included in that picture is a reality that Buffalo has to play a premium to get a player to come here. So what! Another factor that historically has hurt the appeal is that the Bills have been a historically losing franchise. That certainly isn't an appealing factor to a player who wants to play playoff games and more. 

 

This market has more appeal to some than to others. What's so surprising?

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Nelius said:

Western NY summers are highly underrated. Gimme that over the Madmax feel of the Southwest and ridiculous butt sweat of the Southeast during the same period any day.

The summers and early fall in WNY are perfect.  Winters aren’t as bad as they are made out to be but they drag on forever.  February and March suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Golden Goat said:

 

I'm saying anonymous sources in any type of "journalism" is BS. Yep, that's what I'm saying.

 

You must not read a lot of journalism.

 

Sources for obvious reasons often speak only anonymously.  To you, this means the author of the article, and his editor, simply "made up" the story they are reporting in all cases?

 

Wow.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, thurst44 said:

They do realize that if you sign with a team, you don't use the "visitors locker room," right?

But that is a player’s first visual of what the Bills offer.  I like giving opponents crappy locker rooms but I do believe some organizations (I think Mavs in basketball) have great visitors locker rooms because it might help with FAs.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, SCBills said:

 

Yup... If it's truly all about "weather and sex", places like Green Bay, Pittsburgh, Cinci etc.. are similar to Buffalo.  Just have to win and everything works out.

None of those places did particularly well in the survey either.  Let’s face it, if this survey is any indication, weather and glamor are far and away the biggest factors.

Edited by mannc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

The summers and early fall in WNY are perfect.  Winters aren’t as bad as they are made out to be but they drag on forever.  February and March suck.

I will never forget  Roscoe and his fear of snow LOL

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, JohnC said:

If a player is on the market and doesn't want to play in Buffalo that's his prerogative. I'm not going to feel slighted about it. There is another side to this preference equation: That is the Bills aren't interested in a certain type of player and personality. If a player requires a more lively night life compared to what LA or NYC has to offer then he shouldn't come to Buffalo because it would be a bad fit. 

 

 

 

 

 

I agree with this. I've often thought Miami gets a lot of guys who I think go there for nightlife first, football second.

 

With Buffalo, you either came to play, or came for the money. Beaches and babes weren't a factor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Nelius said:

Western NY summers are highly underrated. Gimme that over the Madmax feel of the Southwest and ridiculous butt sweat of the Southeast during the same period any day.

You’re right but How is this relevant to FA’s? The players are in their respective cities for a sliver of summer on the back end....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rest of the worst teams list debunks the weather thing.  New England got honorable mention.  And jets/giants certainly should not lose the stuff to do / nightlife argument. 

 

And the Bottom 5:

1. Buffalo, 12 votes
2. Oakland, 11
3. Cincinnati, 8
4. Detroit, 7
5. Cleveland, 6

Others receiving votes: Jacksonville (5), N.Y. Giants (3), N.Y. Jets (4), Green Bay (3), New England (3), San Francisco (3), Washington (3), L.A. Chargers (2), Arizona, Denver, Minnesota, New Orleans, Tampa Bay

 

 

It’s probably more about, how nice the creature comforts are, how nice facilities are, and how the public worships the players around town and the long term history of dealing with the front office. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

Minnesota is higher and I think they have been pretty good at signing FA.  They also have worse weather yet people say how wonderful it is (I’ve never been).  Again, this is lazy journalism.  

 

Mid we didn’t suck for 2 decades, we won’t have these problems.  And for as bad as people say it is, what major FA that mattered have we missed out on?

The twin cities are a booming metropolis. This helps shapes perception. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Golden Goat said:

 

Seriously? How about for the sake of getting clicks? You're aware that anonymous sources were once (not-too-long-ago) frowned upon en masse, yes?

Actually, anonymous sources are widely used and not frowned upon, so long as certain journalistic standards are maintained.   The most important media stories of the past century were based in large part on anonymous sources.  

 

Are you suggesting that the anonymous agents are making stuff up about NFL teams “for clicks” or that Sports Illustrated is making everything up and there are no sources?   Either way, your strange little conspiracy theory makes zero sense, but that’s America today, i guess.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheFunPolice said:

Weather?

 

It's winter for maybe a month of the season. I could see if they played here in March or February.

True but I''ve seen southerners react to weather we all think is a normal in say, March...they act like it's snowmageddon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bottom line:

 

Sorry to say there will be some FA's that will not want to play in a city like Buffalo. Even winning might not change this.

 

Honestly, if I am 25 and in perfect shape and can go out and have fun with nightlife, have lots of money, some other NFL markets are more attractive. Not much will change this. And this is OK!

 

However, there are players that would like to come here. Plenty available. And regardless, if you don't' win at the NFL draft consistently, FA does not matter all that much.

 

Win the draft most years, players will stay, more players, not all, will start coming.

 

The end.

Edited by Like A Mofo
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...