Jump to content

Can teams void a trade if a player refuses to report?


Recommended Posts

This whole AB situation got me thinking.   What happens if the Bills pulled the trigger on Brown and traded for him, despite the fact that he said he wouldn’t report.

 

Once the trade is consummated, if a player refuses to report to the team that traded for him and sits out an entire season (a la Bell) can the team void the trade?  

 

If they can’t void the trade then it shows how players ultimately hold the power....not the GM or team.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This would be tough because if brown sat out the year, what would happen to the pick the Steelers made with the traded asset?  I guess technically the trade could maybe have language that says something about buffalo getting Pitts 1st in 2020 if Brown doesn’t report, and Pitt gets his contract back and rights back?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, unbillievable said:

Every trade has language about passing a physical

If the player never shows up, he doesn't pass, and the trade is voided.

 

 

I believe this is correct-I know it has happened before but I am not certain it is in every contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Bray Wyatt said:

I dont know, what happened when Darwin Walker did it to us? I feel like we still lost our picks, but got some back when we traded him to a team he wanted to play for, think it was the Bears?

 

Amazing that the guy didn't show up - we dumped him for a 5th that we used to package to get stroud.  

 

But the original trade was walker + 7th for takeo spikes and holcomb.  And somehow that 7th was Stevie Johnson.  So I think we won a trade, where the guy we traded for didn't even show up.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BillyWhiteShows said:

This whole AB situation got me thinking.   What happens if the Bills pulled the trigger on Brown and traded for him, despite the fact that he said he wouldn’t report.

 

Once the trade is consummated, if a player refuses to report to the team that traded for him and sits out an entire season (a la Bell) can the team void the trade?  

 

If they can’t void the trade then it shows how players ultimately hold the power....not the GM or team.  

Great question.. I would GUESS every team has one of their attorneys review every contract..at least I would hope they would.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BillyWhiteShows said:

This whole AB situation got me thinking.   What happens if the Bills pulled the trigger on Brown and traded for him, despite the fact that he said he wouldn’t report.

 

Once the trade is consummated, if a player refuses to report to the team that traded for him and sits out an entire season (a la Bell) can the team void the trade?  

 

If they can’t void the trade then it shows how players ultimately hold the power....not the GM or team.  

 

If he were to report for a physical and pass he could still refuse to play.  In that scenario, the team a player is traded to has to deal with that issue.  

 

That's why it makes sense that the Bills said no to the deal because they didn't talk to Brown's camp. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man.. sometimes being a genius and knowing how to use google/wikipedia is a curse....

 

On March 3, 2007, Plummer was traded to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers for a 2008 conditional draft pick. However, rumors began to surface that Plummer was going to choose retirement over competition with the Buccaneers' four other quarterbacks on the roster (Bruce Gradkowski, Tim Rattay, Jeff Garcia, and Luke McCown).[14] On March 9, Plummer ended the speculation by announcing his decision to retire.[2]Plummer also confirmed his retirement through the Jake Plummer Foundation's website.[15] Since he was still under contract to the Buccaneers and had already been given his contract signing bonus, Tampa Bay coach Jon Gruden met with Plummer in July to try to convince him to reconsider and report for training camp.[2][16] However, the attempt was unsuccessful and the team sued for recovery of the bonus. A settlement was finally reached on June 10, 2008 in which Plummer was required to pay back $3.5 million to the Buccaneers.[17]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, gobills1212 said:

Man.. sometimes being a genius and knowing how to use google/wikipedia is a curse....

 

On March 3, 2007, Plummer was traded to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers for a 2008 conditional draft pick. However, rumors began to surface that Plummer was going to choose retirement over competition with the Buccaneers' four other quarterbacks on the roster (Bruce Gradkowski, Tim Rattay, Jeff Garcia, and Luke McCown).[14] On March 9, Plummer ended the speculation by announcing his decision to retire.[2]Plummer also confirmed his retirement through the Jake Plummer Foundation's website.[15] Since he was still under contract to the Buccaneers and had already been given his contract signing bonus, Tampa Bay coach Jon Gruden met with Plummer in July to try to convince him to reconsider and report for training camp.[2][16] However, the attempt was unsuccessful and the team sued for recovery of the bonus. A settlement was finally reached on June 10, 2008 in which Plummer was required to pay back $3.5 million to the Buccaneers.[17]

 

That’s real nice but the article says nothing about compensation getting returned

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, gobills1212 said:

Man.. sometimes being a genius and knowing how to use google/wikipedia is a curse....

 

On March 3, 2007, Plummer was traded to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers for a 2008 conditional draft pick. However, rumors began to surface that Plummer was going to choose retirement over competition with the Buccaneers' four other quarterbacks on the roster (Bruce Gradkowski, Tim Rattay, Jeff Garcia, and Luke McCown).[14] On March 9, Plummer ended the speculation by announcing his decision to retire.[2]Plummer also confirmed his retirement through the Jake Plummer Foundation's website.[15] Since he was still under contract to the Buccaneers and had already been given his contract signing bonus, Tampa Bay coach Jon Gruden met with Plummer in July to try to convince him to reconsider and report for training camp.[2][16] However, the attempt was unsuccessful and the team sued for recovery of the bonus. A settlement was finally reached on June 10, 2008 in which Plummer was required to pay back $3.5 million to the Buccaneers.[17]

If you were a genius, you would have understood that the original question was regarding the compensation the other team received for him in the trade, not salary or bonus money paid.

 

And unless specifically specified in the deal (which no ones going to agree to), once the trade is official, it's a done deal, unless it can be found that the other team committed some kind of fraud or they agree to alter the terms of the deal. Most players will at least report because they don't want to lose money or be seen as being an issue and try to work out a deal with the new team to get flipped, or a better deal to make them happy. If AB didn't say last night he would refuse to play in Buffalo, there's a chance the Bills could have lost a pick and draft position just to hold ABs rights.....

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man... now i gotta post the rest of it too?!? ;)

 

On March, 2, 2007, Plummer faxed a letter to the NFL office stating his intention to retire. The next day, the Broncos traded his contractual rights to the Bucs in exchange for a fourth-round selection in the 2008 draft if he played, or a seventh-rounder if he didn’t. Plummer indeed retired, and the Broncos used the seventh-round draft choice they acquired from Tampa Bay to select fullback Peyton Hillis. The Bucs, in return, are expected to get $3.5 million of Plummer’s signing bonus for a seventh-round pick

 

 

 

Conditions conditions conditions... i guess i just kinda thought it was assumed as it was mentioned and the money stuff w the bonuses is the interesting part.

Edited by gobills1212
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, gobills1212 said:

Man... now i gotta post the rest of it too?!? ;)

 

On March, 2, 2007, Plummer faxed a letter to the NFL office stating his intention to retire. The next day, the Broncos traded his contractual rights to the Bucs in exchange for a fourth-round selection in the 2008 draft if he played, or a seventh-rounder if he didn’t. Plummer indeed retired, and the Broncos used the seventh-round draft choice they acquired from Tampa Bay to select fullback Peyton Hillis. The Bucs, in return, are expected to get $3.5 million of Plummer’s signing bonus for a seventh-round pick

 

 

 

Conditions conditions conditions... i guess i just kinda thought it was assumed as it was mentioned and the money stuff w the bonuses is the interesting part.

 

And that's how Peyton Hillis, one of the best one hit wonders, got into the NFL... I love the circles of the NFL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, BillyWhiteShows said:

This whole AB situation got me thinking.   What happens if the Bills pulled the trigger on Brown and traded for him, despite the fact that he said he wouldn’t report.

 

Once the trade is consummated, if a player refuses to report to the team that traded for him and sits out an entire season (a la Bell) can the team void the trade?  

 

If they can’t void the trade then it shows how players ultimately hold the power....not the GM or team.  

From what Sal said... the Bills were the ones that backed out of the deal because once they got word from AB's agent that there's a chance he might not report...the Bills didn't want the media frenzy. If the trade had went through & AB didn't show, then the Bills would have been screwed. They would have his rights...So if AB wanted to play in the NFL again, he'll have to report. 

 

The player doesn't have too much power in this sense... cause you don't make it to the NFL if you don't have a love for the game. Most players will not...just not show up. AB said he wouldn't to scare the Bills & it worked. But if Beane said screw it & still made the deal... I think AB would have reported, got fined, & it would have been a media dumpster fire for months at OBD. I think that was enough for the Bills to back out. Not saying the player had the power... but what team really want to go through all that???  Its a business...at the end of the day.

Edited by Scorp83
Typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, buffalo2218 said:

I think you may be right there, I can't really remember. Seems like it was so long ago

 

Yeah Dri Archer did that... the Bills owned his rights for 2 years... then released him. But that was so bad for him...no team picked him up again. Just a bad move on his part. He wasn't even establish in the league yet. 

6 hours ago, buffalo2218 said:

With all this being said, didn’t Dri Archer do the same thing to us?

 

6 hours ago, MJS said:

 

Wasn't he just a waiver claim though?

Yeah Dri Archer did that... the Bills owned his rights for 2 years... then released him. But that was so bad for him...no team picked him up again. Just a bad move on his part. He wasn't even establish in the league yet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, BarleyNY said:

Technically teams trade contracts - not players - so if a deal was made in good faith, then there would have to be a clause regarding alternate compensation or reversal.  I do not know how common that is. 

For any player who has manifested diva like traits, I would guess it's pretty common.  I would also guess that a conditional clause is also pretty common for players who have had certain kinds of injuries/health issues, that they have to be able to pass the new team's physical.

Edited by TigerJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe if the negotiations had continued the Bills would have put a clause about him reporting by a certain date.  If not then the trade would have been void.  But why waste everyone's time if it looks like the player either will not report or would need to be talked in to reporting.  I didn't want him here so I am glad it fell through.  He's 31 and he is a cancer to the locker room.  Let's get players that want to be here and help bring a Super Bowl to Orchard Park.  

Edited by Mark92
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/8/2019 at 3:34 PM, BillyWhiteShows said:

This whole AB situation got me thinking.   What happens if the Bills pulled the trigger on Brown and traded for him, despite the fact that he said he wouldn’t report.

 

Once the trade is consummated, if a player refuses to report to the team that traded for him and sits out an entire season (a la Bell) can the team void the trade?  

 

If they can’t void the trade then it shows how players ultimately hold the power....not the GM or team.  

I'm pretty sure they can't as I remember when we traded for DT Darwin Walker and he failed to report we were stuck with him until we shipped him to the Bears.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  i was   surprised  buffalo   was  even   thinking about   getting  such a  drama  Queen .    i   have no idea   what  buffalo was offering   and perhaps we  will never know .  That  being said ,   i  thought   what would  have  been   cool  or  call ABs   bluff   would  have  been  a    poison pill  type of trade.     Swap   7th  rounders  this  year          with a  conditional  pick  next  year of a     first or second   if  AB    showed and  performed.     AB    wouldnt  have  to   show   but i think  he would  have to  mail  in  his  10  million    dollar   cheque  for     deciding to retire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, singlezero said:

  i was   surprised  buffalo   was  even   thinking about   getting  such a  drama  Queen .    i   have no idea   what  buffalo was offering   and perhaps we  will never know .  That  being said ,   i  thought   what would  have  been   cool  or  call ABs   bluff   would  have  been  a    poison pill  type of trade.     Swap   7th  rounders  this  year          with a  conditional  pick  next  year of a     first or second   if  AB    showed and  performed.     AB    wouldnt  have  to   show   but i think  he would  have to  mail  in  his  10  million    dollar   cheque  for     deciding to retire.

Your space bar is working.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/8/2019 at 4:42 PM, Misterbluesky said:

Great question.. I would GUESS every team has one of their attorneys review every contract..at least I would hope they would.

 

Yes but the guy who reviews contracts for Bills has not done a good job in past putting in clauses protecting the Bills.  He was NOT a baby dumped with bath water like the coaches, players and scouts.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Limeaid said:

 

Yes but the guy who reviews contracts for Bills has not done a good job in past putting in clauses protecting the Bills.  He was NOT a baby dumped with bath water like the coaches, players and scouts.

Wow..unreal when you 're dealing with tens of millions of dollars.Our last home purchase was around 200k,I made darn sure our attorney reviewed everything including tax evaluations with a fine tooth comb.

Sounds like some teams know how to get through loopholes and others don't?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...