Jump to content

Super Bowl Ratings Hit 10-Year Low


Recommended Posts

Just now, RalphWilson'sNewWar said:

I think it's more "Rams! Rams!" than "Defense! Defense!" The Rams-Cowboys game in LA was for all intents and purposes a Cowboys home game, and the ratings for the Pats-KC game blew away the Rams-NO game. If the Saints had been in the SB, the ratings would have been a lot higher. It's hilarious to me that the league thinks that a team in LA improves their ratings. It very clearly doesn't as of yet because people in LA largely don't care about the Rams - at least not enough to regularly watch them. Just wait until the Chargers make the SB - then you'll see the lowest ratings of all time!!

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dave mcbride said:

 Just wait until the Chargers make the SB - then you'll see the lowest ratings of all time!!

 

Mercifully, I'll die before THAT happens. Much as I love Rivers, he's a choker.


Also, I'm SHOCKED that the OP posted this thread. SHOCKED, I say.

 

 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People are tired of the same old Patriots script. You had to know after the neutral zone call to save them in the AFC Championship game that the NFL wasn’t going to let them lose the Super Bowl. I didn’t bother to watch as I’m sure millions of others felt the same way.

Edited by Troll Toll
  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only hope we really have for fellow Buffalo Fans to snap them out of this Defense Matters Crutch...is for Josh Allen to light it up in 2019.  Only when Buffalo has an offense for the first time in the 21st Century...hopefully the old guard of defense defense defense will fade away and we can start enjoying football in the 21st Century.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ironically LA as a football city might be the smallest ‘market’ in The league- Lots of people but most of them don’t care. 

 

Patriots must be the most reviled team in the game. 

 

 Game it’s self was boring and slow with few big name stars and not much in the big play dept. 

 

The ratings miss isn’t a surprise.  First Super Bowl I stopped watching in a very very long time. 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Troll Toll said:

People are tired of the same old Patriots script. You had to know after the neutral zone call to save them in the AFC Championship game that the NFL wasn’t going to let them lose the Super Bowl. I didn’t bother to watch as I’m sure millions of others felt the same way.

It has little to do with the presence of the Patriots. They've been in a ton of highly rated SBs, including last year's. It's the presence of the Rams that's the problem. 

Edited by dave mcbride
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

Ironically LA as a football city might be the smallest ‘market’ in The league- Lots of people but most of them don’t care. 

 

Patriots must be the most reviled team in the game. 

 

 Game it’s self was boring and slow with few big name stars and not much in the big play dept. 

 

The ratings miss isn’t a surprise.  First Super Bowl I stopped watching in a very very long time. 

 

LA *only* got a 44.6 rating, which was LOWER the national average. That's terrible because LA had a team in the freaking game! https://www.si.com/nfl/2019/02/04/super-bowl-53-patriots-rams-low-ratings The SBs in which the Pats' faced off against Seattle and Philly were extremely high.  Again, LA is the problem.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

It has little to do with the presence of the Patriots. They've been in a ton of highly rated SBs, including last year's. It's the presence of the Rams that's the problem. 

 

wouldn't have cared that much if the Pats weren't in it

 

i wasn't going to watch the Saints or Rams just because

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, RalphWilson'sNewWar said:

The only hope we really have for fellow Buffalo Fans to snap them out of this Defense Matters Crutch...is for Josh Allen to light it up in 2019.  Only when Buffalo has an offense for the first time in the 21st Century...hopefully the old guard of defense defense defense will fade away and we can start enjoying football in the 21st Century.

I love watching great defensive play.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

It has little to do with the presence of the Patriots. They've been in a ton of highly rated SBs, including last year's. It's the presence of the Rams that's the problem. 

It was the first SB in 17 years that I didn't watch. It was due to the Patriots, and I know other people felt the same way. 

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ProcessAccepted said:

It was the first SB in 17 years that I didn't watch. It was due to the Patriots, and I know other people felt the same way. 

No offense, but that's a sample size of less than ten. See above about the ratings in LA. That's what is driving this. New Orleans only had a 26.1 rating, which is abysmal for a football-crazy city. I of course understand why they had low ratings there ...

 

Brady vs. Brees would have resulted in sky-high ratings. 

Edited by dave mcbride
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ProcessAccepted said:

It was the first SB in 17 years that I didn't watch. It was due to the Patriots, and I know other people felt the same way. 

Most people I know who claimed not to watch this year, did so specifically because they were sick of watching the pats. Not that accounts for the majority,  definitely part of it was due to the pats. 

Edited by teef
  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, teef said:

Most people I know who claimed not to watch this year, did so specifically because they were sick of watching the pats. Not that accounts for the majority,  definitely part of it was due to the pats. 

 

 

 

football fans don't boycott the Super Bowl....

 

[or they don't realize they are acting like they don't care about the trophy girlfriend that just dumped them, so they are drinking to black out the last 21 nights, but they are over her totally]

 

nobody watches the Stanley Cup or World Series unless the Yankees or their team is playing....

Edited by row_33
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

 

 

football fans don't boycott the Super Bowl....

 

[or they don't realize they are acting like they don't care about the trophy girlfriend that just dumped them, so they are drinking to black out the last 21 nights, but they are over her totally]

 

nobody watches the Stanley Cup or World Series unless the Yankees or their team is playing....

I certainly was more “meh” this year because the pats were playing, but it would never stop me from watching.  I didn’t however, watch the ceremonies after. I have no desire to see that again.  Last year I watched almost all of it when the eagles won. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the Pats in the SB is not garbage

 

the Bills bumbling and fumbling and stumbling for 20 years and counting, now that is garbage

 

9 minutes ago, teef said:

I certainly was more “meh” this year because the pats were playing, but it would never stop me from watching.  I didn’t however, watch the ceremonies after. I have no desire to see that again.  Last year I watched almost all of it when the eagles won. 

 

i dig

 

hopefully the AFC mans up and some team tries to beat them when it matters in the 2019 season....

 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Marv's Neighbor said:

No surprise here!  As exciting as re-runs.  Add the tree huger commercials, and?:doh:

 

high percentage of sucky baby football fans is understandable

 

couldn't they watch until they fantasize the first holding call missed by the refs and then declare their disgust and turn it off?

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, row_33 said:

 

high percentage of sucky baby football fans is understandable

 

couldn't they watch until they fantasize the first holding call missed by the refs and then declare their disgust and turn it off?

 

 

Not all of us are patriot fans like you are 33.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, ProcessAccepted said:

It was the first SB in 17 years that I didn't watch. It was due to the Patriots, and I know other people felt the same way. 

It was the first SB I didn't watch at all and until yesterday I had watched every one. I couldn't care less about the Rams, but it was NE that I cannot stomach any more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

No offense, but that's a sample size of less than ten. See above about the ratings in LA. That's what is driving this. New Orleans only had a 26.1 rating, which is abysmal for a football-crazy city. I of course understand why they had low ratings there ...

 

Brady vs. Brees would have resulted in sky-high ratings. 

Not sure how much any of you were following the “Boycott Bowl” Festivities but...

 

 

 

Edited by Kirby Jackson
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Lurker said:

LOL.   One of life's truisms:   People who say "...I didn't watch it so nobody else must have either?"   

 

https://www.kansascity.com/sports/nfl/kansas-city-chiefs/article225503050.html

 

 

Buffalo, BTW, ranked second in the country--trailing only Boston (scroll down to bottom of the article)...

The Bills are the third most important reason the Pats have had this 16 year run , after HC and QB.   Of course we are interested. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, teef said:

Most people I know who claimed not to watch this year, did so specifically because they were sick of watching the pats. Not that accounts for the majority,  definitely part of it was due to the pats.  

I even live in Atlanta and didn't check out any of the week's activities. No desire to wade into the sea of #12 and #87 jerseys. 

 

Can't wait to see how many of their die hard fans bail after Belichick's retirement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like the Packers before them, the Patriots prove one thing about cold weather cities: long term success is predicated on exceptional coaching and player selection.  No matter what you may lose to free agency because you're a cold weather city, and even if you have little to offer such as Green Bay, what you bring in and how you coach it up is what matters most.  The Pats continually pick late in the draft, yet they come up with guys like Michel, who become major contributors early on.  It's a lesson for any city considered somewhat unattractive, lest we forget the Levy/Kelly years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

No offense, but that's a sample size of less than ten. See above about the ratings in LA. That's what is driving this. New Orleans only had a 26.1 rating, which is abysmal for a football-crazy city. I of course understand why they had low ratings there ...

 

Brady vs. Brees would have resulted in sky-high ratings. 

I agree the ratings would have been higher but I still believe that there's a lot more people than you think who couldn't be arsed watching Brady in the Superbowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RalphWilson'sNewWar said:

https://deadline.com/2019/02/super-bowl-ratings-patriots-rams-marron-5-worlds-best-cbs-1202548893/

 

Defense!  Defense!

????

 

Quote

To put that in the starkest light of day, that’s a dip of more than 5% from Super Bowl LII February 4, 2018

 

Defense!  Defense!  may have hit the rating #'s in the later time slots. With the expectations of a 33 to 30 type game people would have kept watching.  With a 0 - 0 score at the half, then people would turn the channel. 

 

Los Angeles is supposed to be THE biggest TV market.  So what happened? 

 

I'd venture to say that the ratings were bad because  America is sick and tired of watching Tainted Tom Brady and Bill Belicheat all the time

 

Edited by ShadyBillsFan
  • Like (+1) 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

?‍♂️ I watched the first half, turned to something else through the halftime show, and watched the second half until the 4th quarter pick. It was pretty enjoyable football to watch while it was still in reach for both teams. I cant say any of the commercials were memorable, and I had absolutely 0 interest in the halftime show.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

First super bowl I did not watch in over 20 years. Basically since I was in middle school. It was awesome grocery shopping in such a quiet store. Just watched Netflix when I got home. The Patriots could have lost 50-0 and I still would have been happy I didn't watch it. So sick of the Patriots, and don't want them in the Super Bowl win or lose.

Edited by wagon127
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RalphWilson'sNewWar said:

The only hope we really have for fellow Buffalo Fans to snap them out of this Defense Matters Crutch...is for Josh Allen to light it up in 2019.  Only when Buffalo has an offense for the first time in the 21st Century...hopefully the old guard of defense defense defense will fade away and we can start enjoying football in the 21st Century.

did you watch the game yesterday?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Lurker said:

LOL.   One of life's truisms:   People who say "...I didn't watch it so nobody else must have either?"   

 

https://www.kansascity.com/sports/nfl/kansas-city-chiefs/article225503050.html

 

 

Buffalo, BTW, ranked second in the country--trailing only Boston (scroll down to bottom of the article)...

Isn't this traditionally the way it goes?  Buffalo is top 5 every year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...