Jump to content

Most Boring Super Bowl Ever?


/dev/null

Most Boring Super Bowl Ever?  

150 members have voted

  1. 1. Most Boring Super Bowl Ever?



Recommended Posts

That was a stinker. I'm good with defensive games, but this was beyond that. Goff was absolutely miserable. Yes, BB had a great gameplan that make the rams offense struggle, but even when there were opportunities, Goff usually blew it. Brady didn't look good most of the game, most of his yards were to wide open receivers. 

 

Edited by elroy16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, mattynh said:

It was low scoring but not boring at all.   In the 80's and  90's most SB's were total blowouts....those were boring.

 

second play of the game?

 

Young to Rice

 

do do-do-do  do-do

 

IT'S OVER!!!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  For me it was a defensive struggle that could have changed during any point in the game.  I enjoyed it being a close game devoid of gaudy offensive production by only one side.   I liked the chess game between Bill B and Wade.  I don't like the Pats in the SB but this was a pretty good one.  I did not bother with the half time.  The few seconds I saw before heading into the den just looked like a commercial within a commercial aimed at teens 13-15.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voted yes.

 

The actual football game on the field was ok.  

 

Tony Romo's prediction act is getting old quick for me.  

 

The rest of the NFL "experience" was terrible.  Halftime show.  An abomination of mediocre menagerie. 

 

Why can't the NFL find somebody to sing the national anthem without being weird about it.  Just sing the song.  

 

The ads were a reflection of modern society.  Recreational outrage, overly political, taking ourselves often way too seriously, and everyone is too afraid to offend.  The result:  Lots and lots of vanilla and mostly unfunny commercials. The Washington Post could literally make people cry at a birthday for an eight year old.  

Edited by dpberr
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The whole point is to watch one team win and one team lose. Not the fashion they do it in. A team just won a Super Bowl. I don't think they care how 'boring' it was. Not every game is going to be a masterpiece.

 

I also don't care about the halftime show or commercials. I'm watching to see a sport played. I hate mixing concerts in with a football game. 

 

Edited by suorangefan4
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I only saw about 10 minutes real time of the third quarter. Wasn’t interested at all. It was 3-3 and you could see at that point the pats would put together one drive good enough to score and win the game.

I love watching defensive battles. Probably would have been entertained but as I said before, uninterested in watching the patriots, random shots of their owner with Bon Jovi, and announcers raving about Brady Belichick and Gilmore.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just gonna copy and paste what I wrote in another thread below. And by the way, with as many BLOWOUTS as there have been in Super Bowl history, it's pretty much ridiculous that anyone would call this the most boring Super Bowl ever. A low scoring but close affair is more interesting than a high scoring blowout every time. Anyway:

I hate the Pats as much as anyone on earth.

But anyone who says that was the most boring Super Bowl ever must have been watching a different game than me.

That was a master class of coaching, schemes, and in-game adjustments and counter-moves. It was a constant chess match all game long. An even battle between two excellently well-prepared teams. A slugfest between two of the NFL's all time greatest defensive minds. In the end, the game came down to tendency breakers and the 4th quarter discovery by the Patriots that forcing the Rams into their base defense would allow them passing game advantages, which led to the only touchdown of the game. 

There have been so many blowout or otherwise uninteresting Super Bowls throughout history. To say that tonight's game was the most boring ever just because it was not high scoring is just...yeah...I don't even know. I can't get on board with it at all. I completely disagree. Even WITH the Patriots being the victors, I found it to be one of the more tense and interesting Super Bowls I can ever remember watching.

?‍♂️

Edited by Logic
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Joe in Winslow said:

I LOVE the fact that all the offense-first people hated it.

 

Love that. This is how football's meant to be played, on a razor edge with NO margin for error.

 

 

I'm surprised so many people found it boring. The entire game was coming down to, pretty much, one play in either direction. If Goff had more a little more experience and a slightly faster delivery, it was the Rams game to win.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And one more thing: There's a difference between a game containing lots of punts because the offenses are inept and a game containing lots of punts because both defenses and defensive play callers are elite. Last night was one of the latter, not one of the former. Most fans don't like watching quality defense, I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Logic said:

And one more thing: There's a difference between a game containing lots of punts because the offenses are inept and a game containing lots of punts because both defenses and defensive play callers are elite. Last night was one of the latter, not one of the former. Most fans don't like watching quality defense, I guess.

 

Exactly. It's the curse of fantasy football.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Logic said:

And one more thing: There's a difference between a game containing lots of punts because the offenses are inept and a game containing lots of punts because both defenses and defensive play callers are elite. Last night was one of the latter, not one of the former. Most fans don't like watching quality defense, I guess.

 

 

the Rams D was an 8 against a 6 Pats O

 

the Pats D was a 6 against a 4 Rams O

 

 

23 minutes ago, suorangefan4 said:

The whole point is to watch one team win and one team lose. Not the fashion they do it in. A team just won a Super Bowl. I don't think they care how 'boring' it was. Not every game is going to be a masterpiece.

 

I also don't care about the halftime show or commercials. I'm watching to see a sport played. I hate mixing concerts in with a football game. 

 

 

most on here wanted the Pats to lose 98-0 with 10 Pats carted off forever

 

so they look for penalties not called and whine the whole game about how boring it is

 

must be hell to think like that about an unnecessary leisure time activitiy

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NoHuddleKelly12 said:

Agree with many upthread that watching a blowout is worse than what we got last night, but it was still bad because you knew despite how close it was, that the Pats would engineer a late drive against a gassed D line, to put it effectively out of reach as the Rams O was out of sync all night. 

 

true but with a blowout you get to see some points scored.  

 

 

 

When all the talk is about It being a passing league, and you get last nights game ...  It is / was boring. 

Edited by ShadyBillsFan
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Logic said:

And one more thing: There's a difference between a game containing lots of punts because the offenses are inept and a game containing lots of punts because both defenses and defensive play callers are elite. Last night was one of the latter, not one of the former. Most fans don't like watching quality defense, I guess.

  To add to this Wade's defense was not stacked with talent and last night was one of the lesser NE defenses talent-wise.  Both sides leaned heavily on their respective coordinators and their abilities.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RochesterRob said:

  To add to this Wade's defense was not stacked with talent and last night was one of the lesser NE defenses talent-wise.  Both sides leaned heavily on their respective coordinators and their abilities.


And to add to that: Each offense came out for their next drive trying new personnel groupings and play concepts to counter the defense they'd seen up until then. Each defense then accordingly adjusted, both staying one step ahead of the opposing offense. It was move, counter-move all night long. A chess match. It was beautiful, and tense, and close, and awesome. Boring? Psssshhhh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Success said:

Blowouts are more boring - but it wasn’t a well played SB.  I like good defense, but both offenses were inept for much of the game and both blew easy plays.


That's not what I saw at all. The teams were so well prepared for the opposition and the defensive gameplans were so spot-on that neither offense could execute. Not due to "poor play", but due to excellent coaching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Rico said:

That one was pretty enjoyable, watching Peyton Gump (the Big Game Chump) go down in flames. Remember back in the day, when some people would say he’s better than Brady? :lol:

 

Yesterday’s game was good, love seeing tough defenses that hit hard.

Manning is better than Brady.

3 hours ago, DallasBillsFan1 said:

Yes, it was boring ... the most boring because it was the most recent.  The NFL needs to step in at this point and ensure the Pats don't win anymore ... it's bad for the game.

So you did not see last year's Super Bowl?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not only boring - heard on TV - worst ratings in the last decade.  What it amounts to is America is getting tired of New England.  Lot's of fans probably figured New England was going to win, so why bother watching.  If the NFL wants to have a healthier outlook, they need to figure out some way to hasten the demise of the Patriot dynasty.  Just my opinion.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Joe in Winslow said:

I LOVE the fact that all the offense-first people hated it.

 

Love that. This is how football's meant to be played, on a razor edge with NO margin for error.

 

No margin for error?

Did we watch the same game. neither QB was good at all, missing throws all over the place.

 

It was an awful game, It wasnt good defense. It was Terrible bad offenses playing football.

 

Goff has regressed back to his rookie year.

Goff was the worst rsted QB for teh last month of teh season. Thanks NFL for F(_*^ this up so bad because of how your NFL OT rules work.

Edited by CountDorkula
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...