Jump to content

Hot Button Topic - Will The Bills Bench Josh Allen For Derek Anderson?


Will The Bills Bench Josh Allen For Derek Anderson?  

174 members have voted

  1. 1. Will the Bills Bench Josh Allen for Derek Anderson

    • Yes
      19
    • No
      155


Recommended Posts

40 minutes ago, GreatComeback said:

 

We’ll see.  Sal and Jeremy made it sounds like there’s a very good chance he goes back to the bench if he doesn’t show improvement 

 

No we won’t.  This is a ridiculous thought.  They are all in on a Allen.  Derek is a mentor vet type who can play instead of that train wreck Pickerman if Allen gets hurt.  That’s it.  Everything else is just Allen doubters who want to speculate and ignore the obvious and what the team repeatedly has said.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This organization and McDermott would be repeating the same mistakes of the past if they bench Allen. He shouldn't be starting to begin with but their hand was forced due to Peterman playing poorly. However now that he is in he must be kept in as this is about the future of the team and not about hoping to squeak into the playoffs again. Try to keep things simple for him while he continues to learn on the job and hope for the best.

Edited by billieve420
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uh, no. he's not losing his starting job to a 35 year old they're bringing in to mentor. The "win now" makes no sense. We're not signing Brady. It's Derek Anderson. He's a mentor and a safety valve if something goes wrong. Buffalo media is making a deal out of this because they have articles to write and air time to fill and it's Weds. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, bobm said:

Don't really think they'll bench a healthy Allen over Peterson or Anderson.  But, it seems to me, that Allen has regressed some since his first start when he looked more accurate.

Did we trade for AP? That MUST mean we are trading shady then!!! Smart move Bills, smart..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, he's not getting benched for Anderson.  The only way he comes out is by way of injury or a high sack game. Derek was hired to be a glorified player coach (qb) for Josh. Instill a little wisdom and play only if he has to. The bigger question is why is Peterman still on this roster?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Starting a first round QB is a can of worms... You can't put them back in. 

 

The worst thing that the Bills did to EJ Manuel was bench him in the name of "win-now." 

He likely would not have become a good QB, but that ruined any shred of a chance that he had left.

Edited by whatdrought
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GunnerBill said:

I don't think they will. And if they do they need to go. I was in favour of signing Anderson, very much so in fact. But only to avoid Peterman seeing the fiels and making us a national laughing stock again. 

 

If Allen got hurt, I would put in Peterman. There is no long term benefit to having Anderson play. At least with Peterman you would see if he can at least be counted on to be the back up QB. Otherwise it is just a wasted roster spot and there is no reason why he should be on the active roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, billieve420 said:

 

If Allen got hurt, I would put in Peterman. There is no long term benefit to having Anderson play. At least with Peterman you would see if he can at least be counted on to be the back up QB. Otherwise it is just a wasted roster spot and there is no reason why he should be on the active roster.

 

How can anyone possibly think that this is still a determination to be made? He can't be relied upon to be capable backup. He can't be relied on to be a placeholder. He can't be relied on to be anything other than one of the very worst Quarterbacks to ever play in the league. Why? Because that is what he is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be surprised if Anderson got called in after Allen maybe struggled during the first half of some random game... but nothing permenant...

 

But the only scenario for Allen to be designated as a permenant backup would be if the Bills made a legitimate playoff push and Allen was the one thing holding them back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

How can anyone possibly think that this is still a determination to be made? He can't be relied upon to be capable backup. He can't be relied on to be a placeholder. He can't be relied on to be anything other than one of the very worst Quarterbacks to ever play in the league. Why? Because that is what he is. 

 

He shouldn't be on the roster if that is the case. Obviously the coaching staff does not agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WGR just trying to stir the pot! Would be idiotic for the Bills to play Anderson or Peterman at any point this year unless Josh is injured! The kid is a rookie playing the most important position on the team with few players on offense to lean on. For all the moaning and groaning about his play against the Titans, he wasn’t asked to do a whole lot. He led them to three scores and a game winning drive. Plus a botched FG which would have been four scores against a team that was 3-1. Some of you need patience!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, billieve420 said:

 

If Allen got hurt, I would put in Peterman. There is no long term benefit to having Anderson play. At least with Peterman you would see if he can at least be counted on to be the back up QB. Otherwise it is just a wasted roster spot and there is no reason why he should be on the active roster.

 

The ONLY sliver of optimism that I would even listen to regarding Peterman... Is he may be able to perform AVERAGE against a Below AVERAGE denfense that didn't game plan for him.. Basically he comes in after an injury against a ****ty defense that can't adjust.

 

Thats it though.  He's trash playing qb in any other scenario.  Maybe he can kick, idk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look if Josh doesn't get much better and fast they have to. McD isn't going to just piss away the season on performances like GB and Tenn (which we almost lost because of Josh). 

 

Allen is so raw right now. There's a good argument to suggest he'd actually benefit from sitting for a few games, and watching a vet QB go through the process of preparing to play and debriefing afterward. He might appreciate the opportunity more next time around.

 

Allen is still the future but you can't completely punt on the present in favour of one guy's future. It sends the wrong message to the team. He can play again when we're out of it.

Edited by VW82
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

41 minutes ago, LABILLBACKER said:

No, he's not getting benched for Anderson.  The only way he comes out is by way of injury or a high sack game. Derek was hired to be a glorified player coach (qb) for Josh. Instill a little wisdom and play only if he has to. The bigger question is why is Peterman still on this roster?

Because he knows the playbook. Give it two weeks for Anderson to learn it and Peterman is on the practice squad or worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Benching Josh Allen is throwing in the towel on him. I won't be fine with the team doing that unless they are pretty sure Josh Allen can't be that guy. 

 

The good news is he has 2 wins as a rookie QB on a low budget team that had a piss poor offence before he arrived. 

 

Just to entertain your hypothetical, this new QB whoever he is probably isn't some game changer to put your hopes on. He would struggle as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voted "YES" but the poll doesn't stipulate "WHEN" the benching takes place.

 

It will take a while for it to happen.

 

BTW:  I think this is a horrible idea and Allen should NOT be benched.  However, I think this coaching staff will add to their comedy of errors and replace Allen with Anderson.

 

This season should be about Allen's development, not treading water with a total nobody like Anderson.  And the only way to develop Allen is for him to play.

 

 

 

 

 

9 minutes ago, ddaryl said:

HELL NO... Allen is the starter unless injured

You seem to be saying you would not bench Allen for Anderson.  

 

That's not the question here.  Will the Bills bench Allen for Anderson?  That's the question! 


I think they will.

 

And yes, that's a huge mistake.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Fadingpain said:

I voted "YES" but the poll doesn't stipulate "WHEN" the benching takes place.

 

It will take a while for it to happen.

 

BTW:  I think this is a horrible idea and Allen should NOT be benched.  However, I think this coaching staff will add to their comedy of errors and replace Allen with Anderson.

 

This season should be about Allen's development, not treading water with a total nobody like Anderson.  And the only way to develop Allen is for him to play.

 

 

 

 

 

You seem to be saying you would not bench Allen for Anderson.  

 

That's not the question here.  Will the Bills bench Allen for Anderson?  That's the question! 


I think they will.

 

And yes, that's a huge mistake.

 

 

 

 

Yes that is exactly what I am saying.. and I do not believe the Bills will bench him either. Anderson is here to be a backup and a mentor. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Anderson is nearly as bad as many on here are making him out to be. I mean I know he's no Tom Brady.. but he's definitely not Peterman. Anybody that's comparing the two does not know what they're talking about. He's a very capable backup in this league, but just that. A backup. I think he's here because they know that if Allen is hurt, we're going to lose by 40 every week with Peterman, and he's a veteran QB that so many have been clamoring for to have Josh learn from. I wouldn't be surprised to see Peterman cut after about 2 weeks of Anderson learning the playbook.

Edited by CLTbills
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...