Jump to content

Derek Anderson signed; Peterman QB2 week 6; Anderson Presser


YoloinOhio

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Pretty much.  I assume they worked him out and thought he would be passable if put into a game, but they brought him in mostly for mentoring.

 

It depends on the situation.  In a scenario where a team has a starter and they draft another QB high to eventually replace him, no, that older QB likely wouldn't want to mentor him.  If he does, great, but odds are he won't.  In this situation where the Bills drafted a QB high and are playing him and then bring in an older QB, yeah, they're expecting him to mentor Allen.  And I agree, Anderson has been in the league for awhile for a reason.  But his play isn't really one of them.

 

I don't get why people get hung up on Anderson's playing ability.  He wasn't brought in to be a long term QB.  

 

It doesn't matter whether the older QB wants to be a mentor or not.  Many older QBs are naturally threatened by the youngsters and will want nothing to do with actively helping the kid.  But that competitive drive by the veteran will also force him to work and harder to stay in the line up, and that work regimen in itself is a huge benefit to the youngster.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GG said:

I don't get why people get hung up on Anderson's playing ability.  He wasn't brought in to be a long term QB.  

 

It doesn't matter whether the older QB wants to be a mentor or not.  Many older QBs are naturally threatened by the youngsters and will want nothing to do with actively helping the kid.  But that competitive drive by the veteran will also force him to work and harder to stay in the line up, and that work regimen in itself is a huge benefit to the youngster. 

 

Sure a "lead by example" can only help.  But again, in this specific situation, he was brought in primarily to mentor.  At his age he's not anyone's QB of the future and he knows this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

 

See above.

 

 

McD brought in Anderson because he knows he can't keep Peterman on the bench behind Allen.  

 

And Anderson will come in, be the backup QB AND mentor JA.

 

You act as if if you’ve been an NFL QB in multiple locker rooms and have seen backup experienced QBs shun the less experienced starter in every locker room.

 

ONE OF the reasons he was brought in to pass along some of his experiences to JA.  He will do that......along with being the backup QB.  Which was another reason he was signed.  You act as if there’s only

one reason a player is signed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Doc said:

 

Sure a "lead by example" can only help.  But again, in this specific situation, he was brought in primarily to mentor.  At his age he's not anyone's QB of the future and he knows this.

 

In this specific example he was brought in as a mentor AND as a replacement to Peterman.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Pretty much.  I assume they worked him out and thought he would be passable if put into a game, but they brought him in mostly for mentoring.

 

It depends on the situation.  In a scenario where a team has a starter and they draft another QB high to eventually replace him, no, that older QB likely wouldn't want to mentor him.  If he does, great, but odds are he won't.  In this situation where the Bills drafted a QB high and are playing him and then bring in an older QB, yeah, they're expecting him to mentor Allen.  And I agree, Anderson has been in the league for awhile for a reason.  But his play isn't really one of them.

 

So, pretty much, if NP was in the league for 3-4 years (for some veteran "seasoning" which is required to mentor) instead of 2, the Bills would have stood pat with him as the backup, despite his proven lack of ability to play QB if Allen was injured?

Just now, Brianmoorman4jesus said:

If Allen doesn’t get better quick, Anderson will be starting regardless of health

 

 

No way, it will cut into his mentoring time.  They would be just as well off with NP coming in in that scenario, pretty much...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, GG said:

In this specific example he was brought in as a mentor AND as a replacement to Peterman.  

 

Of course.  No one is going to pay a QB just to be a mentor and not be expected to play if the need arises. 

 

8 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

So, pretty much, if NP was in the league for 3-4 years (for some veteran "seasoning" which is required to mentor) instead of 2, the Bills would have stood pat with him as the backup, despite his proven lack of ability to play QB if Allen was injured?

 

No, not 3-4 years.  That's AJM and they shipped him off.  They're looking for someone with more than a decade of experience and someone who has proven not to be looking to be the starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

So, pretty much, if NP was in the league for 3-4 years (for some veteran "seasoning" which is required to mentor) instead of 2, the Bills would have stood pat with him as the backup, despite his proven lack of ability to play QB if Allen was injured?

 

Talk about the ultimate strawman argument. Bravo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Of course.  No one is going to pay a QB just to be a mentor and not be expected to play if the need arises. 

 

 

No, not 3-4 years.  That's AJM and they shipped him off.  They're looking for someone with more than a decade of experience and someone who has proven not to be looking to be the starter.

 

....LOL Doc....he'll be expected to wear a helmet versus cap & gown.........thinking we were "all set" at QB, dumping AJ for a coveted , envious 5th made no sense, despite the assuredness of "5th round blue chippers" in 2019.....played the last pre-season game with expected ring rust as shown through 3 quarters...but did launch a nice comeback in the 4th......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Fadingpain said:

So for all these posters saying John Clayton is wrong, effectively, what will you do when Anderson starts games for the Bills?

 

I firmly believe that time is coming.

 

 

 

Nothing because it won't happen 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Fadingpain said:

So for all these posters saying John Clayton is wrong, effectively, what will you do when Anderson starts games for the Bills?

 

I firmly believe that time is coming.

 

 

I don’t.    McDermott has to stick with Josh.  

 

Josh’s development is more important than expecting an unemployed QB to get back to the playoffs 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

If Anderson gets put in, I’ll have NO reason to watch the rest of the season, and I won’t care one bit...the Bills will have finally pushed me to the brink of my fandom.

That's a little extreme. In a perfect world a vet would be starting until Allen is ready. It didn't work that way, so be it. Andy Reid had the right idea with Mahomes and look at the benefits being reaped. Next year Allen will have way more tools to work with and better knowledge on how to run an offense and read defenses. That being said, he's in the water now so swim Josh... Swim!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, NewEra said:

You can watch the other side of the ball develop.  The foundation on D is set

In all honesty, man, I’ve just been losing interest slowly over the last 30 years...they tried the defensive HC, they tried the offensive HC, they tried having the GM pick the HC, they tried having the HC pick the GM...I actually told myself that if the Bills can’t turn it around with this regime, they never will...this QB selection has my whole fandom riding on it...we’ve had great defenses and it’s gotten us nowhere, so without a good QB, I couldn’t care less how the defense develops...it’s been 30 years and I’m hanging by a very thin thread my friend!??

Edited by JaCrispy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JaCrispy said:

In all honesty, man, I’ve just been losing interest slowly over the last 30 years...they tried the defensive HC, they tried the offensive HC, they tried having the GM pick the HC, they tried having the HC pick the GM...I actually told myself that if the Bills can’t turn it around with this regime, they never will...this QB selection has my whole fandom riding on it...we’ve had great defenses and it’s gotten us nowhere, so without a good QB, I couldn’t care less how the defense develops...it’s been 30 years and I’m hanging by a very thin thread my friend!

I don't think we'll know right away, with some QBs you just don't know for 3-4 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...