Jump to content

I guess ESPN is not a fan of the " process "


Iron Maiden

Recommended Posts

I don’t find the number insulting. The Bills had a minus 57 point differential this year. 9 wins is a credit to them. They managed to win games when they had the chance. 

 

They also will look look a lot different this year. I suspect that number can move quite a bit in either direction depending on what happens this offseason.

Edited by Kirby Jackson
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

I don’t find the number insulting. The Bills has a minus 57 point differential this year. 9 wins is a credit to them. They managed to win games when they had the chance. 

 

They also will look look a lot different this year. I suspect that number can move quite a bit in either direction depending on what happens this offseason.

Look back at their predictions.  Almost every single year it is the Bills previous year's win total minus two.  Don't forget to add one for the Jets, two for the fish and the Pats are projected at 16.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also remember, this forecast was Vegas oriented.

 

Bookies make a line that tries to get equal numbers of people betting each side. Bookies then make money on the transaction cost.

 

In different words: Vegas odds are what the bookies think the betting pool will think. In the end, Vegas odds are usually close to the truth, but sometimes they can be skewed by popular and unpopular teams.

 

I hope I made sense there.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well to be fair... we have a fluid situation next year. Outside of safety, there is no position on the team that we dont need more talent in and could benefit from a change in. In my opinion, there arent too many teams with the dearth of talent that Bills have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Iron Maiden said:

 

It's pretty meaningless at this point where many teams have questionmarks at key positions.

 

It's likely based on 1) the Bills lack a QB 2) the Bills have historically lacked willingness to take enough shots and put in enough investment to fix 1)

We overachieved for our current roster.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

It's pretty meaningless at this point where many teams have questionmarks at key positions.

 

It's likely based on 1) the Bills lack a QB 2) the Bills have historically lacked willingness to take enough shots and put in enough investment to fix 1)

We overachieved for our current roster.

 

That's correct....but nothing says we can't do it again....B-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Iron Maiden said:

 

No one said it was written in stone...

 

It's all in good fun...FCOL....

 

FUN? Foolhardy is more like it.  Might as well speculate on the weather for opening day...

Edited by cd1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said:

Look back at their predictions.  Almost every single year it is the Bills previous year's win total minus two.  Don't forget to add one for the Jets, two for the fish and the Pats are projected at 16.

In 2015 the Bills O/u was 8.5 (they won 8), in 2016 it was 8 (they won 7) and in 2017 it was 6 (they won 9). 

 

Vegas doesnt have it out for the Bills. The over/under is set on where they think it will be. That’s how they make the most money. Their goal is to win money. They don’t want to be in a position where a lot of action goes on one side and catches. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Barnwell is hit or miss for me.

He is a pure advanced metrics guy.

The prediction is most likely based on the fact that A) he's a Tyrod homer, and Tyrod is almost certainly gone

   or

B) he isn't using any subjective opinions here, only going by the Pythagorean expectations

 

Either way we overachieved this year, and look to have an even tougher schedule next year.

 

If we draft a QB or go with Peterman, we will most likely see a regression, unless, as he said, the QB we draft/Nate plays amazing.

 

If we get Alex Smith (as a bridge starter, I don't think he's the answer for more than a year or so) then we prob win 8 games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buffalo.  We're such illogical fans sometimes.  2018 is rebuild.  All of those draft picks, maybe a rookie qb, a new OC - it's not about 2018 but about hopes for 2020-2026 as I see it.  

I have no idea how many wins to expect as there's too much unknown - same as for everyone.  I just hope for maybe a second year in a row in which the draft is not the highpoint of the season for us fans and so excitement for 2019 this time 12 months from now. 

Edited by sleeby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Iron Maiden said:

They went 9-7 this past season and backed into the playoffs.  Not spectacular by any stretch of the imagination.  QB is unsettled to say the least.  Most of the teams stars are elderly by NFL standards.  And they just switched OCs again.  On the plus side, the HC seems like a keeper so far and they have a buttload of draft picks to work with.  7 wins is a fair, if not slightly conservative, guess for January.

Edited by CodeMonkey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, bobobonators said:

How can we make a W/L projection for next season when the current season hasnt finished. Its a completely pointless task. Might as well try and predict wins now for the Vegas Raiders’ first season. 

 

There is always a gambling process that never stops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Iron Maiden said:

 

Winston has to stay away from injuries....

I think that Dirk Koetter is one of the worst ever too. I heard a story from my dad that was kind of funny. He has a friend that does the security at the visiting team hotel. The guy said that teams always have strict curfews, certain times they can’t leave the floor, etc... The Bucs were the one exception. He said that they were coming in at all hours of the night, bringing back girls, wandering the lobby and just about anything else that you could imagine. He said that he had never seen anything like it in his time doing the job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kirby Jackson said:

I don’t find the number insulting. The Bills had a minus 57 point differential this year. 9 wins is a credit to them. They managed to win games when they had the chance. 

 

They also will look look a lot different this year. I suspect that number can move quite a bit in either direction depending on what happens this offseason.

Yeah, it's a fair projection. 

 

I still think there's going to be significant roster turnover this offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...