Jump to content

Matt Araiza


SCBills

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

I’m just saying, we’re taught to believe the accuser.

I don't know if we are taught to believe the accuser nececsarily. For me I just recoil to think that someone would lie about something so horrific.  I have a females perspective as indeed also a former victim. 

 

This girl has some serious mental health issues imo. That seems clear. You can slut shame her to hell and gone but underneath that gal is troubled.....Her lawyer fanned the flames  and this story was reality TV crime drama TABLOID FODDER.

 

In that previous thread I wanted the facts to come to light ...#THETRUTH.

 

If Matt Araizas name had been kept away from the media from the get go what a radically different situation we would have now and in this young mans life.

 

What is the publics right to know of accusations before the Truth is investigated ......I am sad for him after all of his..but hopeful too

 

Matt Araizas' name  is forever tainted in some peoples minds  . that sucks so hard for him.

 

BUT I think he can overcome this situation by having an NFL career and living his best life. I think he can do it. He wasn't called the punt god for nothing.

 

m

Edited by muppy
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, IronMaidenBills said:

You don’t abandon family on allegations. We quit on someone who needed it most. I hope the rest of the players take notice. 


They are not a family. They are likeminded high achievers pursuing a common goal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, IronMaidenBills said:

His job should be with the Buffalo Bills. Make this right. 

But why would he want to play for the team that abandoned him at his lowest point?  I read that right here in this thread.

 

So which is it?  Should the nfl create a roster exemption so the Bills can keep both punters?  Should the bills bite the bullet on the cap and cut Martin while signing Araiza?  Should Araiza say f u to the bills for abandoning him at the lowest point of his life?!  Should Araiza bust out an AK and have fun on those that abandoned him?  

Just now, IronMaidenBills said:

Then I don’t have to hear anymore PR stunts. 

You don’t have to hear anything if you would practice what you preached. Cut ties with this god forsaken franchise. Stop being so soft.  Stand up for Araiza and make a difference!!

 

You’re all talk.  No action.  Just like the rest of this weak organization that you choose to root for

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NewEra said:

But why would he want to play for the team that abandoned him at his lowest point?  I read that right here in this thread.

 

So which is it?  Should the nfl create a roster exemption so the Bills can keep both punters?  Should the bills bite the bullet on the cap and cut Martin while signing Araiza?  Should Araiza say f u to the bills for abandoning him at the lowest point of his life?!  Should Araiza bust out an AK and have fun on those that abandoned him?  

I personally wouldn’t play on the Bills, they abandoned me. So I have no idea what Araiza will do. But shame on Buffalo for this situation, and they will have to deal with the negative karma coming their way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NewEra said:

But why would he want to play for the team that abandoned him at his lowest point?  I read that right here in this thread.

 

So which is it?  Should the nfl create a roster exemption so the Bills can keep both punters?  Should the bills bite the bullet on the cap and cut Martin while signing Araiza?  Should Araiza say f u to the bills for abandoning him at the lowest point of his life?!  Should Araiza bust out an AK and have fun on those that abandoned him?  

I’ve got it!  Sign him back and trade him and Ed Oliver for Hopkins.  It would consolidate so many ridiculous threads into one .  Plus Araiza sort of sounds like Arizona.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NewEra said:

But why would he want to play for the team that abandoned him at his lowest point?  I read that right here in this thread.

 

So which is it?  Should the nfl create a roster exemption so the Bills can keep both punters?  Should the bills bite the bullet on the cap and cut Martin while signing Araiza?  Should Araiza say f u to the bills for abandoning him at the lowest point of his life?!  Should Araiza bust out an AK and have fun on those that abandoned him?  

Every single team would have cut him.

 

I can’t believe I’m talking serious in a punter thread but cmon.

 

Also, he’s a punter. LOL. 

  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, IronMaidenBills said:

I personally wouldn’t play on the Bills, they abandoned me. So I have no idea what Araiza will do. But shame on Buffalo for this situation, and they will have to deal with the negative karma coming their way.

Do you live on planet Earth?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, IronMaidenBills said:

I personally wouldn’t play on the Bills, they abandoned me. So I have no idea what Araiza will do. But shame on Buffalo for this situation, and they will have to deal with the negative karma coming their way.

King Kevin is this you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Mattymafia said:

Bills Reddit banning anyone for talking about Araiza at all. 

I got banned from there when I tried to tell the lynch mob to wait and let the process play out. One fan wanted everyone to donate to a charity to "force the team's hand to release him". Obviously I wasn't righteous enough for them. Screw them. I doubt they learned their lesson.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, IronMaidenBills said:

I personally wouldn’t play on the Bills, they abandoned me. So I have no idea what Araiza will do. But shame on Buffalo for this situation, and they will have to deal with the negative karma coming their way.


To be fair to the Bills Ariza’s release may have been to his benefit, it gave him time and energy to clear his name. The Bills did not want to deal with the distractions and Ariza need to get the situation straightened out. I don’t think Ariza will play for the Bills but there may not be as much bad blood as thought 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It sucks what happened to Araiza, but I don't blame the Bills for cutting him at the time. 

 

Also, out of curiosity, I just checked ESPN.com and there is zero mention of Araiza being cleared.  When I search him up all I find is links to videos of Stephen A criticizing the Bills for drafting him and another from Max Kellerman calling Araiza a rapist.

 

Edit: Bills Reddit has a huge thread about Araiza where people are firing away with the same takes we're seeing here, so I'm not sure what people are complaining about in this thread.

Edited by TheBrownBear
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SirusB said:

I got banned from there when I tried to tell the lynch mob to wait and let the process play out. One fan wanted everyone to donate to a charity to "force the team's hand to release him". Obviously I wasn't righteous enough for them. Screw them. I doubt they learned their lesson.

Lol charity.  Who got that $$$$$$$ and how did the utilize it?

Just now, billsfan89 said:


To be fair to the Bills Ariza’s release may have been to his benefit, it gave him time and energy to clear his name. The Bills did not want to deal with the distractions and Ariza need to get the situation straightened out. I don’t think Ariza will play for the Bills but there may not be as much bad blood as thought 

Uh oh.  Logic.  Brace yourself.  Incoming!!!!!!

1 minute ago, TheBrownBear said:

It sucks what happened to Araiza, but I don't blame the Bills for cutting him at the time. 

 

Also, out of curiosity, I just checked ESPN.com and there is zero mention of Araiza being cleared.  When I search him up all I find is links to videos of Stephen A criticizing the Bills for drafting him and another from Max Kellerman calling Araiza a rapist.

Now THAT Kellerman/ESPN pocket is one deep enough to sue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 4merper4mer said:

Lol charity.  Who got that $$$$$$$ and how did the utilize it?

Thats not important.  What is important is that we as a group donated enough money to get media attention thus proving that we are not a bunch of low class bums.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, IronMaidenBills said:

I personally wouldn’t play on the Bills, they abandoned me. So I have no idea what Araiza will do. But shame on Buffalo for this situation, and they will have to deal with the negative karma coming their way.

giphy.gif

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheBrownBear said:

It sucks what happened to Araiza, but I don't blame the Bills for cutting him at the time. 

 

Also, out of curiosity, I just checked ESPN.com and there is zero mention of Araiza being cleared.  When I search him up all I find is links to videos of Stephen A criticizing the Bills for drafting him and another from Max Kellerman calling Araiza a rapist.

Those are the type of things where this kid can never get his life back. Max himself should talk he literally slugged a woman and is lucky he was only suspended for it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, JoPoy88 said:


Araiza and the Bills are not and never were “family.” They were his employer for a short period of time.

This 

 

it sucks what happened to him and I hope she is charged criminally and in civil court… however the bills did what they needed to do to protect themselves at the time, they are not family with him, like you said they are employer and he is employee, they had to cut ties. Period  

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, IronMaidenBills said:

You don’t abandon family on allegations. We quit on someone who needed it most. I hope the rest of the players take notice. 

 

Most likely some of the players were involved in the decision to let him go.  Now you should let it go.

 

23 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said:

From an objective source or his attorney?

 

Doesn't matter to me, really.  Again from the start her story was bull####, from claiming she told him she was 17 to him having her alone and then deciding to join in a ***** inside with his buddies.  The videos showing no evidence of a) him being there or b) her being intoxicated or forced tell me all I need to know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SirusB said:

I got banned from there when I tried to tell the lynch mob to wait and let the process play out. One fan wanted everyone to donate to a charity to "force the team's hand to release him". Obviously I wasn't righteous enough for them. Screw them. I doubt they learned their lesson.

I got banned from Bills reddit for my views on Vietnam.  Also, I was stealing projectors.

  • Haha (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, TheBrownBear said:

It sucks what happened to Araiza, but I don't blame the Bills for cutting him at the time. 

 

Also, out of curiosity, I just checked ESPN.com and there is zero mention of Araiza being cleared.  When I search him up all I find is links to videos of Stephen A criticizing the Bills for drafting him and another from Max Kellerman calling Araiza a rapist.

The Bills organization was put in a tough spot, and I wasn't in the room for any of their internal discussions.  I'm not going to give them a pass, but this is one for the "file it away and move on" folder.  

 

I am however super-critical of the journalists who were primarily responsible for the punish-first-ask-questions-later approach to this.  Those people should have known better, they failed to do the job they were hired to do, and frankly some of them should be fired.  Stirring up a local mob against somebody who turns out to be innocent ought to be a fireable offense for a journalist.    

Edited by BillsFanSD
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BillsFanSD said:

I am however super-critical of the journalists who were primarily responsible for the punish-first-ask-questions-later approach to this.  Those people should have known better, they failed to do the job they were hired to do, and frankly some of them should be fired.  Stirring up a local mob against somebody who turns out to be innocent ought to be a fireable offense for a journalist.    

You would have to fire the entire mainstream media!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

 

Doesn't matter to me, really.  Again from the start her story was bull####, from claiming she told him she was 17 to him having her alone and then deciding to join in a ***** inside with his buddies.  The videos showing no evidence of a) him being there or b) her being intoxicated or forced tell me all I need to know.

I’m not sure I’m following.  You’re outraged that she made stuff up, then her lawyer made it even worse?  Ok cool I’m with you there.  But if his lawyer simply made up a story that his phone showed him elsewhere, that’s cool?  Shouldn’t truth be important across the board?
 

My point is that there is an objective truth to this whole thing but it doesn’t make it easier to reconstruct.  Over time we can probably get close enough to the real truth to make assumptions, but at no point does that make it ok for one side to make up lies in an effort to sway or expedite.  In the initial reporting of this whole thing, the most iron clad truth I could find is that both lawyers were complete and utter morons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, birdo67 said:

I'm starting to think that IronMaidenBills has absolutely been accused of statutory rape before.

Lol no. I’m simply an American that still values traditional American values like due process. 

Edited by IronMaidenBills
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, IronMaidenBills said:

Lol no. I’m simply an American that still values tradional American values like due process. 

It's unfortunate all around.

Every party involved made mistakes here.

Due process, due diligence, I still wonder how the Bills knew nothing about this before the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be clear, it said it was proven he wasn't there.

 

Nothing ambiguous.  Outright proven innocent.

 

I was one of the ones blasted here for saying I want to wait for actual facts before crucifying the kid.

 

She derailed his career and life.  Both he and the Bills should sue her.  She cost us a potentially legendary punter, and cost him so much more.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, IronMaidenBills said:

Lol no. I’m simply an American that still values traditional American values like due process. 

 

At this point, I think you should lead the charge in breaking Araiza out of whatever cell he's been held in all this time.

 

It sucks that he didn't get due process in court, and they just locked him up and threw away the key. Has he even been allowed to eat?!?

 

I'll help you break him out. Let's do this! 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Doc said:

…Doesn't matter to me, really.  Again from the start her story was bull####, from claiming she told him she was 17 to him having her alone and then deciding to join in a ***** inside with his buddies.  The videos showing no evidence of a) him being there or b) her being intoxicated or forced tell me all I need to know.

As it pertains to Matt Araiza, her lawyer’s best financial target in a civil case, absolutely. The exculpatory evidence showing he wasn't even there at the time of the alleged gang rape cannot be denied and I hope the accuser’s lawyer has the good sense to drop the case against him as, even though the bar for conviction in a civil proceeding is much much lower, the DA’s report makes it a very high hurdle imo.

 

But I don’t think she was lying about the hospital visit, treatment for bruises, bleeding from her *****, the rape kit exam, and the results of that rape kit test released by the SDPD that showed the presence of DNA from multiple sources. Not even her lawyer, whom I blame entirely for the untruths put forth by her, could bull#### that aspect of the story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, BobBelcher said:

So we’re basically backed into a corner and expected to cut this guy, a potentially great draft pick, over something that wasn’t even true in the end. Pisses me off actually. 

Thank you!!! Something needs to be done to people that lie about something so serious. Not only destroying people’s careers, but also facing many years in prison. I don’t no man it just isn’t right….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The Red King said:

To be clear, it said it was proven he wasn't there.

 

Nothing ambiguous.  Outright proven innocent.

 

I was one of the ones blasted here for saying I want to wait for actual facts before crucifying the kid.

 

She derailed his career and life.  Both he and the Bills should sue her.  She cost us a potentially legendary punter, and cost him so much more.

The article said?  The article from Yahoo?  This is now what we must accept as objective truth?  
 

I’m not saying it’s false but it wasn’t exactly unambiguous.  His friend and “other information” indicated he wasn’t there.  I’m not in any way calling anyone a liar but it is not a first hand account or official release.  It is a second hand account likely given by a source with a vested interest.  
 

You were absolutely correct to wait for actual facts but this article does not contain objective facts.  Do I find it likely to be largely accurate?  Sure.  Could I be wrong and could the actual facts be different than what was written in this article?  Yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 4merper4mer said:

The article said?  The article from Yahoo?  This is now what we must accept as objective truth?  
 

I’m not saying it’s false but it wasn’t exactly unambiguous.  His friend and “other information” indicated he wasn’t there.  I’m not in any way calling anyone a liar but it is not a first hand account or official release.  It is a second hand account likely given by a source with a vested interest.  
 

You were absolutely correct to wait for actual facts but this article does not contain objective facts.  Do I find it likely to be largely accurate?  Sure.  Could I be wrong and could the actual facts be different than what was written in this article?  Yes.

Geolocation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...