Jump to content

Is There So Little Love for Tremaine Edmunds?


Shaw66

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Eastport bills said:

Here’s a question for all the Edmunds detractors. How do you feel about a game like tomorrow’s, knowing you have Tremaine running down backs and covering underneath patterns? If your answer is very confident, you must paying this guy with the highest paid lbs in the league.

I'm stoked to watch him whiff on backs at the LOS, get dragged 5 yards downfield and make zero plays on the ball in those underneath patterns.

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

I'm stoked to watch him whiff on backs at the LOS, get dragged 5 yards downfield and make zero plays on the ball in those underneath patterns.

You’re delusional and an embarrassment to objective observers. If you’ve watched the games without the predisposition of being a hater, which is sad because the guy is a top 10  lb in the game, you would arrive at the same appreciation that every broadcast team has for Edmunds. We don’t have more than a few top players in the game, this guy is one of them. It took him a few seasons to get there, but at 24 he’s there.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Eastport bills said:

You’re delusional and an embarrassment to objective observers. If you’ve watched the games without the predisposition of being a hater, which is sad because the guy is a top 10  lb in the game, you would arrive at the same appreciation that every broadcast team has for Edmunds. We don’t have more than a few top players in the game, this guy is one of them. It took him a few seasons to get there, but at 24 he’s there.

it took him 5 seasons to get to average-above average. Saying he's top 10 is laughable. You either don't watch any games that don't involve Buffalo or have a completely biased perspective. It's blatantly disrespectful to actual top 10 players to say he's anywhere near that list. Milano's on the outside edge of it and he's far superior to Edmunds.

People are grossly overcompensating for Edmunds having a single season that is far better than any season he's ever had (in a contract year of course), and even still what has he done in that season? 1 sack, 5 TFL, 0 Int, 0 fumbles, 4 pass deflections.

There's only so much a being a rodeo clown standing in the middle of a backfield is worth.

Just say he's played great this season and I won't fight you on it. Why isn't that enough? Some people have to ballwash every player around here like they have no competition in the league, when it's nowhere close to true. People did the same thing a couple years ago calling Beasley the #1 slot receiver in the NFL and that turned out rather predictably.

There are a lot of talented players in this league, a small number of them are elite.

Edited by BullBuchanan
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Vomit 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i will say my fav player, but i cringe when we give up third and long, when the defence should make a stop, that i believe is Leslie Frazier scheme.

the whole defence is at fault.

now going forward, we look at costs and do we keep the defence together or go cheaper option in draft.

measure situation after playoffs, the o line needs to be better for sure, we cant keep still, we have to get stronger all round.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

it took him 5 seasons to get to average-above average. Saying he's top 10 is laughable. You either don't watch any games that don't involve Buffalo or have a completely biased perspective. It's blatantly disrespectful to actual top 10 players to say he's anywhere near that list. Milano's on the outside edge of it and he's far superior to Edmunds.

People are grossly overcompensating for Edmunds having a single season that is far better than any season he's ever had (in a contract year of course), and even still what has he done in that season? 1 sack, 5 TFL, 0 Int, 0 fumbles, 4 pass deflections.

There's only so much a being a rodeo clown standing in the middle of a backfield is worth.

Just say he's played great this season and I won't fight you on it. Why isn't that enough? Some people have to ballwash every player around here like they have no competition in the league, when it's nowhere close to true. People did the same thing a couple years ago calling Beasley the #1 slot receiver in the NFL and that turned out rather predictably.

There are a lot of talented players in this league, a small number of them are elite.

Why would you even care how long it’s taken  him to be good? A rodeo clown? You’re just an angry red hot trying to rip anyone who’s getting recognition for being an overachiever. Predictable that you invoke Beasley, who produced big time until last season when he played thru injury. Who cares about his comps around the league? You’re not being forced to support Bills players. There are a host of great lbs around the league. Edmunds is a young guy who’s  becoming great and he plays for us. Deal with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Eastport bills said:

Why would you even care how long it’s taken  him to be good? A rodeo clown? You’re just an angry red hot trying to rip anyone who’s getting recognition for being an overachiever. Predictable that you invoke Beasley, who produced big time until last season when he played thru injury. Who cares about his comps around the league? You’re not being forced to support Bills players. There are a host of great lbs around the league. Edmunds is a young guy who’s  becoming great and he plays for us. Deal with it.

Why would I care about how long it's taken him to get good?
Because he's had 4 awful seasons and one good one. He's the center of a defense that repeatedly falls apart in crunch time. I think the player he is is much closer to that player he's been the first 61 games of his career and not the last 10. I don't want to see our staff reward his one-year wonder play with a long term contract and be saddled with a middle linebacker that can't hit, can't tackle, can't shed a block, can't rush the passer, can't play the football, can't cover a TE, and most of all who I can't count on to make 1 play to win a game.

A rodeo clown?
Yes. A rodeo clown. When all of his flaws are laid bare, as they have been in this thread, people defer to the fact that he's a deterrent in the middle of the field. That he some how causes QBs to not make plays just by virtue of being present. To me, that's saying that he's playing the role of a rodeo clown. He's absolutely no threat to the bull, but maybe he can distract him long enough to protect another player from getting burned. If true (i haven't seen much data to suggest it is) it's a noble endeavor, but not worthy of an "elite" moniker or top LB money.

I'm not looking to rip anyone for being an overachiever. I love overachievers - Freddie, Stevie, Kyle, George Wilson, Ryan Bates, Jim Leonhard, Jon DiGiorgio, MATT MILANO etc. Overachievers are people that weren't supposed to be any good, but carved out a role for themselves based on determination and effort. Soemtimes that role is niche and in the case of Kyle and Milano they became elite stars. That's to be commended.

I rip underachievers - players like Edmunds that have all world ability and don't put in the work to reach their potential. There is nothing about Edmunds 6'5" 250lb 4.54 body that prevents him from laying a jarring hit on anyone. The reason he can't shed a block, intercept a pass, force a fumble or sack the quarterback isn't because he doesn't possess the physical attributes to do so, it's because he doesn't have the technique to do so. In my eyes that's either a lack of effort/practice or a lack of football IQ.

Regarding Beasley - again please try to hold off on the ballwashing. I never said he was a bad football player (though he was objectively bad in 2021). His first couple of years here the hype around him was far far overblown. He was a competent player with solid strengths and significant weaknesses. He was a valuable asset, but some in Bills fandom crowned him the best slot wr in the league. That statement was just as ridiculous then as a statement about Edmunds being top 10 now.

Who cares about his comps around the league?
You do apparently, because this entire discussion is based off your statement he's a top 10 player. If you said we was a top 20 player, we aren't having this discussion.

I don't need to "deal" with Edmunds being good. I want nothing more than for it to be true.

I just don't see it happening. Finding a great MLB is tough, and it would be best if we had one on the roster. I watched him last week fail to wrap up Carter in the flat because he tried to tackle him around the shoulders and he bounced right off him. He's been int he NFL 5 years and he still has ***** tackling form. He still can't shed a block, but thankfully the massive improvement on the DL has prevented him from having to worry about it. He still can't catch a football.

There's a reason he's playing on his 5th year without a contract extension on  a team in win-now mode.

  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

Why would I care about how long it's taken him to get good?
Because he's had 4 awful seasons and one good one. He's the center of a defense that repeatedly falls apart in crunch time. I think the player he is is much closer to that player he's been the first 61 games of his career and not the last 10. I don't want to see our staff reward his one-year wonder play with a long term contract and be saddled with a middle linebacker that can't hit, can't tackle, can't shed a block, can't rush the passer, can't play the football, can't cover a TE, and most of all who I can't count on to make 1 play to win a game.

A rodeo clown?
Yes. A rodeo clown. When all of his flaws are laid bare, as they have been in this thread, people defer to the fact that he's a deterrent in the middle of the field. That he some how causes QBs to not make plays just by virtue of being present. To me, that's saying that he's playing the role of a rodeo clown. He's absolutely no threat to the bull, but maybe he can distract him long enough to protect another player from getting burned. If true (i haven't seen much data to suggest it is) it's a noble endeavor, but not worthy of an "elite" moniker or top LB money.

I'm not looking to rip anyone for being an overachiever. I love overachievers - Freddie, Stevie, Kyle, George Wilson, Ryan Bates, Jim Leonhard, Jon DiGiorgio, MATT MILANO etc. Overachievers are people that weren't supposed to be any good, but carved out a role for themselves based on determination and effort. Soemtimes that role is niche and in the case of Kyle and Milano they became elite stars. That's to be commended.

I rip underachievers - players like Edmunds that have all world ability and don't put in the work to reach their potential. There is nothing about Edmunds 6'5" 250lb 4.54 body that prevents him from laying a jarring hit on anyone. The reason he can't shed a block, intercept a pass, force a fumble or sack the quarterback isn't because he doesn't possess the physical attributes to do so, it's because he doesn't have the technique to do so. In my eyes that's either a lack of effort/practice or a lack of football IQ.

Regarding Beasley - again please try to hold off on the ballwashing. I never said he was a bad football player (though he was objectively bad in 2021). His first couple of years here the hype around him was far far overblown. He was a competent player with solid strengths and significant weaknesses. He was a valuable asset, but some in Bills fandom crowned him the best slot wr in the league. That statement was just as ridiculous then as a statement about Edmunds being top 10 now.

Who cares about his comps around the league?
You do apparently, because this entire discussion is based off your statement he's a top 10 player. If you said we was a top 20 player, we aren't having this discussion.

I don't need to "deal" with Edmunds being good. I want nothing more than for it to be true.

I just don't see it happening. Finding a great MLB is tough, and it would be best if we had one on the roster. I watched him last week fail to wrap up Carter in the flat because he tried to tackle him around the shoulders and he bounced right off him. He's been int he NFL 5 years and he still has ***** tackling form. He still can't shed a block, but thankfully the massive improvement on the DL has prevented him from having to worry about it. He still can't catch a football.

There's a reason he's playing on his 5th year without a contract extension on  a team in win-now mode.

Edmunds has been to two pro bowls and likely will be voted in his third in 5 years but you act like he is bad. You like to promote that Beasley was average but his stats show he was undoubtedly one of the top 3 slot receivers from 2019-2021. I did not even mention that Josh requested Buffalo get him back, which is usually what is required by elite QBs an average WR. Please stop commenting on Edmunds since you clearly don't understand he and Milano allows our 5-2 defense, not to mention that he was the leading tackler on the #1 ranked defense last year. His abilities are so beyond your comprehension that you make it sound like football stopped in 1985 and LBs are primarily run stoppers now. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

Why would I care about how long it's taken him to get good?
Because he's had 4 awful seasons and one good one. He's the center of a defense that repeatedly falls apart in crunch time. I think the player he is is much closer to that player he's been the first 61 games of his career and not the last 10. I don't want to see our staff reward his one-year wonder play with a long term contract and be saddled with a middle linebacker that can't hit, can't tackle, can't shed a block, can't rush the passer, can't play the football, can't cover a TE, and most of all who I can't count on to make 1 play to win a game.

A rodeo clown?
Yes. A rodeo clown. When all of his flaws are laid bare, as they have been in this thread, people defer to the fact that he's a deterrent in the middle of the field. That he some how causes QBs to not make plays just by virtue of being present. To me, that's saying that he's playing the role of a rodeo clown. He's absolutely no threat to the bull, but maybe he can distract him long enough to protect another player from getting burned. If true (i haven't seen much data to suggest it is) it's a noble endeavor, but not worthy of an "elite" moniker or top LB money.

I'm not looking to rip anyone for being an overachiever. I love overachievers - Freddie, Stevie, Kyle, George Wilson, Ryan Bates, Jim Leonhard, Jon DiGiorgio, MATT MILANO etc. Overachievers are people that weren't supposed to be any good, but carved out a role for themselves based on determination and effort. Soemtimes that role is niche and in the case of Kyle and Milano they became elite stars. That's to be commended.

I rip underachievers - players like Edmunds that have all world ability and don't put in the work to reach their potential. There is nothing about Edmunds 6'5" 250lb 4.54 body that prevents him from laying a jarring hit on anyone. The reason he can't shed a block, intercept a pass, force a fumble or sack the quarterback isn't because he doesn't possess the physical attributes to do so, it's because he doesn't have the technique to do so. In my eyes that's either a lack of effort/practice or a lack of football IQ.

Regarding Beasley - again please try to hold off on the ballwashing. I never said he was a bad football player (though he was objectively bad in 2021). His first couple of years here the hype around him was far far overblown. He was a competent player with solid strengths and significant weaknesses. He was a valuable asset, but some in Bills fandom crowned him the best slot wr in the league. That statement was just as ridiculous then as a statement about Edmunds being top 10 now.

Who cares about his comps around the league?
You do apparently, because this entire discussion is based off your statement he's a top 10 player. If you said we was a top 20 player, we aren't having this discussion.

I don't need to "deal" with Edmunds being good. I want nothing more than for it to be true.

I just don't see it happening. Finding a great MLB is tough, and it would be best if we had one on the roster. I watched him last week fail to wrap up Carter in the flat because he tried to tackle him around the shoulders and he bounced right off him. He's been int he NFL 5 years and he still has ***** tackling form. He still can't shed a block, but thankfully the massive improvement on the DL has prevented him from having to worry about it. He still can't catch a football.

There's a reason he's playing on his 5th year without a contract extension on  a team in win-now mode.

Do you realize most of this interminable rant is inaccurate and foolish. The important thing to remember is that Edmunds will be paid the average of the top 3 highest contracts in football, because in reality NFL GMs value his length, speed, physicality and vastly improved instincts. He plays every snap, plays thru injury and calls the signals for a top 4 defense regardless of your misguided and hypercritical assessment. He leads the team in tackles and they are amongst the league leaders in yardage allowed and points.The defense is dependent on Edmunds and Milano making plays on backs and underneath receivers. Who, in your infinite wisdom would you replace him with? When Beane resigns him will you admit that you’re just a fan that can’t acknowledge a players incredible development. Do you think he would still be a leader on this highly rated defense if he was the player you’re describing? He’s a pro bowl lb and you’re an efficiency expert that can’t justify paying him. Thankfully you’re not making personnel decisions. 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Eastport bills said:

Do you realize most of this interminable rant is inaccurate and foolish. The important thing to remember is that Edmunds will be paid the average of the top 3 highest contracts in football, because in reality NFL GMs value his length, speed, physicality and vastly improved instincts. He plays every snap, plays thru injury and calls the signals for a top 4 defense regardless of your misguided and hypercritical assessment. He leads the team in tackles and they are amongst the league leaders in yardage allowed and points.The defense is dependent on Edmunds and Milano making plays on backs and underneath receivers. Who, in your infinite wisdom would you replace him with? When Beane resigns him will you admit that you’re just a fan that can’t acknowledge a players incredible development. Do you think he would still be a leader on this highly rated defense if he was the player you’re describing? He’s a pro bowl lb and you’re an efficiency expert that can’t justify paying him. Thankfully you’re not making personnel decisions. 

 

You just described Preston Brown. I see you're far too biased and set in your opinion to be reasoned with.

I'd replace him with Trenton Simpson who is an athletic freak just like Edmunds but a lot more dynamic. He can actually cover slot receivers, light up running backs and sack the quarterback.

Will you admit you were wrong about Edmunds if he doesnt?

Why does everyone who supports him say he's a leader? What has he done to show that he has any leadership qualities at all?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, BullBuchanan said:

Why would I care about how long it's taken him to get good?
Because he's had 4 awful seasons and one good one. He's the center of a defense that repeatedly falls apart in crunch time. I think the player he is is much closer to that player he's been the first 61 games of his career and not the last 10. I don't want to see our staff reward his one-year wonder play with a long term contract and be saddled with a middle linebacker that can't hit, can't tackle, can't shed a block, can't rush the passer, can't play the football, can't cover a TE, and most of all who I can't count on to make 1 play to win a game.

A rodeo clown?
Yes. A rodeo clown. When all of his flaws are laid bare, as they have been in this thread, people defer to the fact that he's a deterrent in the middle of the field. That he some how causes QBs to not make plays just by virtue of being present. To me, that's saying that he's playing the role of a rodeo clown. He's absolutely no threat to the bull, but maybe he can distract him long enough to protect another player from getting burned. If true (i haven't seen much data to suggest it is) it's a noble endeavor, but not worthy of an "elite" moniker or top LB money.

I'm not looking to rip anyone for being an overachiever. I love overachievers - Freddie, Stevie, Kyle, George Wilson, Ryan Bates, Jim Leonhard, Jon DiGiorgio, MATT MILANO etc. Overachievers are people that weren't supposed to be any good, but carved out a role for themselves based on determination and effort. Soemtimes that role is niche and in the case of Kyle and Milano they became elite stars. That's to be commended.

I rip underachievers - players like Edmunds that have all world ability and don't put in the work to reach their potential. There is nothing about Edmunds 6'5" 250lb 4.54 body that prevents him from laying a jarring hit on anyone. The reason he can't shed a block, intercept a pass, force a fumble or sack the quarterback isn't because he doesn't possess the physical attributes to do so, it's because he doesn't have the technique to do so. In my eyes that's either a lack of effort/practice or a lack of football IQ.

Regarding Beasley - again please try to hold off on the ballwashing. I never said he was a bad football player (though he was objectively bad in 2021). His first couple of years here the hype around him was far far overblown. He was a competent player with solid strengths and significant weaknesses. He was a valuable asset, but some in Bills fandom crowned him the best slot wr in the league. That statement was just as ridiculous then as a statement about Edmunds being top 10 now.

Who cares about his comps around the league?
You do apparently, because this entire discussion is based off your statement he's a top 10 player. If you said we was a top 20 player, we aren't having this discussion.

I don't need to "deal" with Edmunds being good. I want nothing more than for it to be true.

I just don't see it happening. Finding a great MLB is tough, and it would be best if we had one on the roster. I watched him last week fail to wrap up Carter in the flat because he tried to tackle him around the shoulders and he bounced right off him. He's been int he NFL 5 years and he still has ***** tackling form. He still can't shed a block, but thankfully the massive improvement on the DL has prevented him from having to worry about it. He still can't catch a football.

There's a reason he's playing on his 5th year without a contract extension on  a team in win-now mode.

This is all that needs to be said. Dawson Knox got paid before him for god’s sake lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, FireChans said:

This is all that needs to be said. Dawson Knox got paid before him for god’s sake lol

Already wasted too much time and energy with someone who is reluctant to admit they are in the vast minority about Edmunds and won’t concede vast improvement.That’s right replace a pro bowl lb with a 3rd lb from the ACC and describe him with better skills. By the way. Knox was resigned for 35 million guaranteed, it will take more than double to retain Edmunds. That’s why it hasn’t been done yet, so close to Josh’s deal. Just keep rooting against the Bills because of your dug in contempt for Edmunds. What a sorry excuse for someone who trolls our board. I’m finished.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Eastport bills said:

Already wasted too much time and energy with someone who is reluctant to admit they are in the vast minority about Edmunds and won’t concede vast improvement.That’s right replace a pro bowl lb with a 3rd lb from the ACC and describe him with better skills. By the way. Knox was resigned for 35 million guaranteed, it will take more than double to retain Edmunds. That’s why it hasn’t been done yet, so close to Josh’s deal. Just keep rooting against the Bills because of your dug in contempt for Edmunds. What a sorry excuse for someone who trolls our board. I’m finished.

Edmunds is having his best year as a pro. There’s a reason he was allowed to play into his fifth year without getting locked in long-term. Both things can be true lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FireChans said:

Edmunds is having his best year as a pro. There’s a reason he was allowed to play into his fifth year without getting locked in long-term. Both things can be true lol.

Sorry I accidentally responded to you when I was trying to finalize a back and forth with an extremely dug in Edmunds denier. He can’t acknowledge the improvement or the guy’s influence on our defense. It’s decision time and I think you’d agree, if we don’t pay him he’s gonna get it from teams that are lined up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, BullBuchanan said:

I'm stoked to watch him whiff on backs at the LOS, get dragged 5 yards downfield and make zero plays on the ball in those underneath patterns.

We’ve been through this bs already. GB game and Dillon drags Edmunds for 4 yds on a tackle. He’s made fun of during the game day thread. Not too long later Dillon does the exact same to Milano. Not a peep. Some of you make sure to catch an Edmunds mistake but never see one by Milano. Ok, got it. If Milano doesn’t drop a sure  pick 6 vs Miami earlier, we win that game. He’s dropped a few of those this year, but it’s fine. Don’t forget Milano gave up the game winning td to KC last year. It’s fine, cuz he’s not this year’s whipping boy. 

Edited by Dopey
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tonight is exhibit A for why I don’t pay Tremaine $14M+/yr on his next contract. He may have played well tonight, but he just doesn’t move the needle for the defense in a way that commands top dollar. He’s not a defender that shifts the game, never has been. Allocate his money to the OL, protect the franchise at all costs.

  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Running back gets through the hole at the line its game over. There is no seconds line of defense verse the run with this middle linebacker. Calling him a middle linebacker doesn't even feel right. He's a safety playing middle linebacker. And even as a safety he's still soft as hell vs the run

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Trock said:

Guy is just too average to pay. He’ll be another like Knox, overly paid for not enough production. 
 

 

 

Absolutely!  He will demand a huge pay day--and get it--from someone.

 

I just hope not us.  He is replaceable for much cheaper than what his next K will command.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Trock said:

Looked terrible in coverage today against hill 

He was actually right there with Hill a couple times, which is pretty impressive for a dude his size.  Problem is he can’t make a play on the ball.  Tua threw a pass behind Hill that Edmunds had good coverage on but he’s so unaware and unable to play the ball that he couldn’t get a hand in there to knock it out.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Trock said:

Looked terrible in coverage today against hill 

Every LB in the league would look terrible against Hill. I won’t fault him for not making a play in those situations, even if he didn’t recognize Hill sprinting into his zone, but as I said, overall Edmunds just doesn’t impact the game in a way that suggests paying him $14M+/yr. He does his 1/11th and that’s fine, but it’s not worthy of a hefty contract. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BuffaloRebound said:

He was actually right there with Hill a couple times, which is pretty impressive for a dude his size.  Problem is he can’t make a play on the ball.  Tua threw a pass behind Hill that Edmunds had good coverage on but he’s so unaware and unable to play the ball that he couldn’t get a hand in there to knock it out.  

 

2 minutes ago, JayBaller10 said:

Every LB in the league would look terrible against Hill. I won’t fault him for not making a play in those situations, even if he didn’t recognize Hill sprinting into his zone, but as I said, overall Edmunds just doesn’t impact the game in a way that suggests paying him $14M+/yr. He does his 1/11th and that’s fine, but it’s not worthy of a hefty contract. 

 

But isn’t his strength coverage? If it is, not good enough. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

I have no freaking clue what the game plan on D was tonight 

 

Let Mostart look like Barry Sanders?

 

Let Waddle and Hill go off?

 

 

 

Classic McDermott/Frazier defense against a good offense. 

 

You can forget about taking the best weapon away from the other team. You can even forget about picking our poison. We let every weapon go off

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Ethan in Cleveland said:

He was terrible tonight. He should and will get paid though. They need to use the draft picks on the OL and WR.

I'm really not sure how he played. I really didn't hear his name called much. That tells me he didn't make any glaring mistakes and very good plays. 

48 minutes ago, Nextmanup said:

Absolutely!  He will demand a huge pay day--and get it--from someone.

 

I just hope not us.  He is replaceable for much cheaper than what his next K will command.

 

 

He's not replaceable with anyone of the Bills current roster. Certainly not Bernard. That draft pick isn't looking so great. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When Edmunds was out earlier this season we saw how many issues the D had.  Tonight was bad run D in the first half, good run D in the second half.   Dolphins have weapons, it’s a division game.  Not surprised it was a dogfight.   Folks can run Edmunds off if they want to.  He wouldn’t be easily replaced.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

I have no freaking clue what the game plan on D was tonight 

 

Let Mostart look like Barry Sanders?

 

Let Waddle and Hill go off?

 

 

I'm not the most knowledgeable when it comes to seeing schemes and coverages. I'm really not sure what the Bills tried to do on defense. It's like they were caught off guard or unprepared that the Dolphins were going to run the ball. 

 

They failed to jam the Dolphins Wrs. Not sure how much zone coverage we were in vs man. 

 

The defense was frustrating to watch but they did come up with some really key stops that allowed Allen the chance to win. 

 

Imho, the Bills got beat on both sides of the line. I was really surprised that Maimi was able to run the ball so well. 

 

The Bills offense looked to be more explosive in the pass game. Injuries to the oline especially Morse hurt. I thought the Bills run game wasn't good until it really counted. Seems like the Bills only ran between the tackles with the exception of Allen. 

41 minutes ago, Gunsgoodtime said:

Amazing, we win a crazy game, but we are upset 

I'm not upset. Just giving constructive criticism. Always room for improvement. Says a lot about your team when they win and don't even come close to playing their best. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ethan in Cleveland said:

He was terrible tonight. He should and will get paid though. They need to use the draft picks on the OL and WR.

They're not extending Edmunds so can we just end this incessant narrative.  Unless Tremaine can play RT, LG or WR2?  Let him walk for 15-20 and spend that on those above positions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Dopey said:

We’ve been through this bs already. GB game and Dillon drags Edmunds for 4 yds on a tackle. He’s made fun of during the game day thread. Not too long later Dillon does the exact same to Milano. Not a peep. Some of you make sure to catch an Edmunds mistake but never see one by Milano. Ok, got it. If Milano doesn’t drop a sure  pick 6 vs Miami earlier, we win that game. He’s dropped a few of those this year, but it’s fine. Don’t forget Milano gave up the game winning td to KC last year. It’s fine, cuz he’s not this year’s whipping boy. 

Because Milano makes infinitely more plays than Edmunds does. He plays every snap like he's shot out of a cannon, so his misses are easier to overlook. We know that over the course of a game, and especially over the course of a season it's going to even out because he never stops impact making plays. The problem with Edmunds is that he's never offset his flaws by any sort of playmaking ability. He either does nothing or gets abused.

We were gashed up the middle all night tonight and his inability to shed a block or read the RB is not an insignificant reason why that is. I'm not interested in an MLB who gets abused on a constant basis like he does. We could sign Deion Jones next year for half his salary to do the same thing.

Edited by BullBuchanan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...