Jump to content

The Athletic's #1 reason the Bills won't hoist Lombardi (note the final paragraph)


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, 4merper4mer said:

It happens in places other than journalism but two, nine, or seventeen wrongs don’t make a right.  IMO the article is a pile of simplistic garbage.  You may have a different opinion. 

 

How is it simplistic?

 

There's a bunch of stuff in there I hadn't heard before or didn't know.

 

Did you know Allen’s gotten hit 219 times in games since entering the league?

 

Did you know Mahomes wasn't sacked in preseason?

 

Did you know the Bills blitzed the 8th most in the NFL last season and had the 23rd most hurries on the QB?

 

Did you know that Allen’s completion percentage was actually higher on the road than at home last year?

 

I think some of you just hate the idea that our low vaccination rate could legitimately hurt the team and so you resort to silly ad hominem attacks of an established and credible sports journalist.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Boatdrinks said:

Yawn, awful take but not surprising. The Bills biggest obstacle is the Chiefs, period end of story. Every team has to deal with the silly NFL protocols and those are the issue. I respect the Bills players and their personal medical decisions. Nothing could be more personal, and that comes before anything you do on a football field or other place of employment. 

 

As of this moment, teams that are 100% vaccinated (I know of the Falcons and Bucs at the moment) have eliminated all or most of the "silly NFL protocols" related to Covid for the upcoming season

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

if these unvaxxed players cost us games or a playoff spot this year,  they should be gone.  end of story.  dont care who it is outside of a handful of guys.   yes thats a double standard,  well,  much of life is.    these people have a choice to make,   protect the team,  or dont play.   u dont believe in the shots,   time to find another job.    the rest of the world has to put up with this crap all the time.   playin football is a privilege, not a right.    i respect your decision to not be vaxxed,  gl with your next job.

Edited by bigduke6
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
  • Dislike 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bigduke6 said:

if these unvaxxed players cost us games or a playoff spot this year,  they should be gone.  end of story.  dont care who it is outside of a handful of guys.   yes thats a double standard,  well,  much of life is.    these people have a choice to make,   play,  or get the shots.   u dont believe in the shots,   time to find another job.    the rest of the world has to put up with this crap all the time.   playin football is a privilege, not a right.    i respect your decision to not be vaxxed,  gl with your next job.

It’s a lot harder to find great football players to replace them with than it is to replace other workers though. Privilege or not , fans don’t want to watch Joe Mediocre play football. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, eball said:

Nailed it, @Richard Noggin.  I simply can’t believe players like Beasley, Davis, Milano, Klein, and Star — guys who see the best chance they’ve ever had to win a SB before them — letting their teammates and coaches (and fans) down out of sheer ignorance.

 

So first of all, reminder that players who are in the process of being vaccinated still have to quarantine, so we don't know for a fact that all these players are not in the process of getting vaccinated.

 

To be fair to Beasley, I think (one of) his point(s) would be he is making a private medical decision that is legitimately allowed by the NFL/NFLPA CBA, but that the current NFL protocols aren't sufficient to protect those who make that legitimately allowed decision

 

As far as "sheer ignorance", I'll let Riverboat Ron do the talking:

Quote

“Gen Z is relying on [their cell phones]," Rivera said. "And you got some, quite frankly, f------ a-------, that are putting a bunch of misinformation out there, leading people to die. That’s frustrating to me, that these people are allowed to have a platform. And then, one specific news agency, every time they have someone on, I’m not a doctor, but the vaccines don’t work. Or, I’m not an epidemiologist, but vaccines are going to give you a third nipple and make you sterile. Come on. That, to me? That should not be allowed."

 

Chris Simms and Peter King had a segment where they pointed out that the team provides information for an hour in the facility, but then players can go home to people they trust (spouse, or other family members, personal trainer or wellness coach) who say "here are all these reasons, it's a bad idea to get the vaccine, I don't want you to get it."  The reasons don't hold up when they're pressure-tested by legitimate experts in the field, but they look very legitimate to lay people who are "doing their own research".  The way Simms and King presented it, it seemed pretty clear that they had actually spoken to and had off-the-record knowledge of what was going on in the background of some of these decisions.

 

My point is it's probably far too simplistic in our current environment to cast these players' decisions as "sheer ignorance".

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

How is it simplistic?

 

There's a bunch of stuff in there I hadn't heard before or didn't know.

 

Did you know Allen’s gotten hit 219 times in games since entering the league?

 

Did you know Mahomes wasn't sacked in preseason?

 

Did you know the Bills blitzed the 8th most in the NFL last season and had the 23rd most hurries on the QB?

 

Did you know that Allen’s completion percentage was actually higher on the road than at home last year?

 

I think some of you just hate the idea that our low vaccination rate could legitimately hurt the team and so you resort to silly ad hominem attacks of an established and credible sports journalist.

This time last year a significant portion of the people on this board and the sports press at large were certain the season would eventually be canceled.  It’s panic porn.

1 hour ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

If Beasley or Gabe Davis or Star or Milano or any combination of them or other important players (I don't think it'll be Josh... I'd bet he got the shot at this point) misses the Super Bowl or a playoff game, I'll do someone else a favor and fall on the sword and take your title of "douche" and bump this thread :thumbsup:

And in doing so you won’t be able to verify:

 

A.  Their actual vaccination status

B.  Whether they would have become sick even if vaccinated

C.  Whether their absence caused a loss

 

but by all means feel free to reach conclusions and declare them certainties.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bigduke6 said:

if these unvaxxed players cost us games or a playoff spot this year,  they should be gone.  end of story.  dont care who it is outside of a handful of guys.   yes thats a double standard,  well,  much of life is.    these people have a choice to make,   protect the team,  or dont play.   u dont believe in the shots,   time to find another job.    the rest of the world has to put up with this crap all the time.   playin football is a privilege, not a right.    i respect your decision to not be vaxxed,  gl with your next job.

 

The thing is...back when my kid was playing CYC ball in 6th grade and stressing "if I'd hit that free throw (or 3 pointer, or blocked that shot, or not fouled the shooter)  we'd have won the game", they were (rightly) told they really couldn't make that conclusion because when one play is different, the whole game is different.

 

So I don't know how one reasonably concludes that a particular player or players cost us a game or a spot.  I think it could be a point that we could have won the AFCCG or at least made it a much far closer battle if we hadn't been playing with an injured WR corps, but even there....compare and contrast to the Bucs, if our D gives Mahomes time to stand in the pocket and manipulate our zone coverage with his eyes, he's going to pick us apart in between bites of the Jimmy Johns sammich he had time to dial up and order.

 

I mean, people were all "Josh Allen single handedly cost us the win in the Houston playoff game" and I thought that was clearly bunk - if our D hadn't folded like a cheap set of lawn chairs, if Knox and whoever that was hadn't whiffed their block, if Knox and Singletary and D-Dawk hadn't all failed to block Mercilus or even just get in his way for another second etc etc etc.

 

Personally, if we lose games or a playoff spot, I'm going right to the root cause ....I'm gonna blame Mr Miyagi

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said:

McKenzie, at least, had an epiphany.

 

I had an epiphany once that I should contribute to some guy's personal charity after he pulled a gun on me in an alley.

 

Disregarding everything else, having #1 reason being they are one of the 31 teams above 80% and below 100% as the main cause for not winning? Seriously? This sounds like a reporter with an agenda. I expect better from The Athletic.

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Ralonzo said:

 

I had an epiphany once that I should contribute to some guy's personal charity after he pulled a gun on me in an alley.

 

Disregarding everything else, having #1 reason being they are one of the 31 teams above 80% and below 100% as the main cause for not winning? Seriously? This sounds like a reporter with an agenda. I expect better from The Athletic.

 

I doubt Buffalo is still above 80% vaccinated after cutting the roster. We were around 80%, according to Beane, when we had 93 on the roster.

 

On a whole I'd put money on our rate dropping significantly after cutdowns since the fringe players might have viewed getting the shot as a potential reason for McBeane to keep them on the 53 man roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

I doubt Buffalo is still above 80% vaccinated after cutting the roster. We were around 80%, according to Beane, when we had 93 on the roster.

 

On a whole I'd put money on our rate dropping significantly after cutdowns since the fringe players might have viewed getting the shot as a potential reason for McBeane to keep them on the 53 man roster.

 

You may be correct. 

 

Still, @Ralonzo hopefully has a point.  Many things can derail a season - injuries (avert!), getting "solved" by offensive or defensive coordinators and taking some games to come up with an effective counter, etc. 

 

Fixating on one set of NFL protocols that could eliminate a significant number of our core, starting players for one or more key games is probably a bit myopic.

 

On the other hand, "control what you can control" - eliminating possible impact of those protocols, as well as implementing extra team rules as precautions, seems to me like a sign that the Bucs are "All In" it to win it in a way that our beloved Buffalo Bills are not.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, transplantbillsfan said:

As of this moment, teams that are 100% vaccinated (I know of the Falcons and Bucs at the moment) have eliminated all or most of the "silly NFL protocols" related to Covid for the upcoming season

I get the argument, I just don't agree that it will be a significantly greater risk than last season for the Bills. It's never possible to completely remove risk. The Bills could have some players deal with COVID-19 this year, in fact they probably will, but that's also going to happen to most teams, including the ones with high vaccination numbers. The difference between 80% vaccination and 90% vaccination is only about 6 guys. It's just not that different to make a claim that one team having a handful of guys not vaccinated is going to keep them from the Superbowl.

 

The Titans just had a big outbreak among fully vaccinated players because they went out for dinner. These things are going to happen.

 

The Bills followed the protocols pretty well last year and had minimal impact from COVID. I think they can do the same thing this year. They just need to follow the protocols. After their preseason scare I bet McDermott has a pretty short leash now on players not following the protocols.

 

We'll see.

24 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

I doubt Buffalo is still above 80% vaccinated after cutting the roster. We were around 80%, according to Beane, when we had 93 on the roster.

 

On a whole I'd put money on our rate dropping significantly after cutdowns since the fringe players might have viewed getting the shot as a potential reason for McBeane to keep them on the 53 man roster.

That was the assumption for the entire NFL, but the vaccination rates held steady after cut downs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

The thing is...back when my kid was playing CYC ball in 6th grade and stressing "if I'd hit that free throw (or 3 pointer, or blocked that shot, or not fouled the shooter)  we'd have won the game", they were (rightly) told they really couldn't make that conclusion because when one play is different, the whole game is different.

 

So I don't know how one reasonably concludes that a particular player or players cost us a game or a spot.  I think it could be a point that we could have won the AFCCG or at least made it a much far closer battle if we hadn't been playing with an injured WR corps, but even there....compare and contrast to the Bucs, if our D gives Mahomes time to stand in the pocket and manipulate our zone coverage with his eyes, he's going to pick us apart in between bites of the Jimmy Johns sammich he had time to dial up and order.

 

I mean, people were all "Josh Allen single handedly cost us the win in the Houston playoff game" and I thought that was clearly bunk - if our D hadn't folded like a cheap set of lawn chairs, if Knox and whoever that was hadn't whiffed their block, if Knox and Singletary and D-Dawk hadn't all failed to block Mercilus or even just get in his way for another second etc etc etc.

 

Personally, if we lose games or a playoff spot, I'm going right to the root cause ....I'm gonna blame Mr Miyagi

 

u do realize that this is different tho right?  this is off the field stuff that can affect the team.    if u drop a pass on the field,  least u were there competing.  if yer off the field due to being sick,   which could have been prevented, thats costing the team due to selfishness, u choose u over the team.   which is fine,  but u are no longer reliable and need to be replaced.

Edited by bigduke6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im calling my shot (no pun intended). Covid is going to cost the Bills 0 games (that is something that can be controlled by Buffalo. You good argue that Covid effected the Bills last year, but it was totally out of their control with all the rescheduling with TN & KC. The Bills did nothing wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Scott7975 said:

I completely respect peoples choice to get vaccinated or not but ffs follow the rules and stop making a mockery of it.  Unprofessional and selfish to do that IMO.

 

I personally don't respect people's right not to get vaccinated.  I know veterans - war heroes - who have died of COVID presumably because some unvaccinated person gave it to them.  I know innocent, beautiful children who have died of COVID because some unvaccinated person gave it to them.   No American has the right to kill other Americans.  

 

The scourge of smallpox was eliminated from the world because enough people got vaccinated. But good people are going to continue to die from COVID 19 because idiots like Beasley provide a breeding ground for new variants and spread the disease.  Beasley's uneducated selfishness just doesn't put the Bills championship hopes at risk, he puts lives at risk.  

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Boatdrinks said:

It’s a lot harder to find great football players to replace them with than it is to replace other workers though. Privilege or not , fans don’t want to watch Joe Mediocre play football. 

 

True, but we also don't want to watch Joe Backup play because Joe Starter was sidelined, especially if it's due to a non-football issue that Joe Starter could have prevented.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, hondo in seattle said:

 

I personally don't respect people's right not to get vaccinated.  I know veterans - war heroes - who have died of COVID presumably because some unvaccinated person gave it to them.  I know innocent, beautiful children who have died of COVID because some unvaccinated person gave it to them.   No American has the right to kill other Americans.  

 

The scourge of smallpox was eliminated from the world because enough people got vaccinated. But good people are going to continue to die from COVID 19 because idiots like Beasley provide a breeding ground for new variants and spread the disease.  Beasley's uneducated selfishness just doesn't put the Bills championship hopes at risk, he puts lives at risk.  

 

I am personally vaccinated.  AFAIK, and I could be wrong, you can still get the virus if you are vaccinated.  You can still give someone else the virus if you are vaccinated.  The people that died from the virus likely were not vaccinated because AFAIK that is the main benefit from getting vaxed in the first place is that you are less likely to die.  

 

That is all I am going to say on the subject because I do not know if what I said broke the rules here or not.  If it did I am sorry.  A.so, I am sorry for your losses.  It is a terrible thing.

Edited by Scott7975
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My question in all of this is how many games did Covid cost us last year, prior to the vaccine release? But we are to believe this year is the year it's going to cost us, because some of the guys didn't get the vaccine? 🤔 There are multiple reasons the Bills might not hoist a Lombardi this year and Covid is nowhere near #1 on that list. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ralonzo said:

 

I had an epiphany once that I should contribute to some guy's personal charity after he pulled a gun on me in an alley.

 

Disregarding everything else, having #1 reason being they are one of the 31 teams above 80% and below 100% as the main cause for not winning? Seriously? This sounds like a reporter with an agenda. I expect better from The Athletic.

I mean, it’s definitely not outside the realm of possibility that we lose a starter for one of the postseason games because of testing positive or being a close contact to a positive case.   Now, will losing that starter cause us to lose the game?  Who knows.  But it is a competitive disadvantage.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, H2o said:

My question in all of this is how many games did Covid cost us last year, prior to the vaccine release? But we are to believe this year is the year it's going to cost us, because some of the guys didn't get the vaccine? 🤔 There are multiple reasons the Bills might not hoist a Lombardi this year and Covid is nowhere near #1 on that list. 

 

Not because they didn't get the vaccine but because some players weren't following the protocols.  Whether they changed their attitude or not, I do not know. I am not worried about it personally but I would be pissed if players miss games because they are breaking protocols.

 

 I can see it now.  I was pissed about the Titans game last year because they all got to play after obviously breaking protocols multiple times.  It would just be so NFLish our players getting suspended heading into the Titans game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Scott7975 said:

 

I am personally vaccinated.  AFAIK, and I could be wrong, you can still get the virus if you are vaccinated.  You can still give someone else the virus if you are vaccinated.  The people that died from the virus likely were not vaccinated because AFAIK that is the main benefit from getting vaxed in the first place is that you are less likely to die.  

 

That is all I am going to say on the subject because I do not know if what I said broke the rules here or not.  If it did I am sorry.  A.so, I am sorry for your losses.  It is a terrible thing.

 

You can still get the virus if you are vaccinated. 

 

The data the NFL has released from intake and preseason testing is that 7x fewer vaccinated players or staff have tested positive than unvaccinated (anyone with any symptoms is tested immediately and must test daily for some period of time):

 

Quote

The released data showed that from Aug. 1-21, 68 players and staff tested positive out of 7,190 tests. The rate of positive tests among the unvaccinated was seven times higher than the rate among the vaccinated.

 

The vaccine reduces, but does not eliminate, the risk of infection. 

 

IMO if there were treatment that had solid studies showing it reduced the risk of a knee injury by 7x or 5x or even 3x, the players would be lining up for it.

 

(It's a judgement call that we're still working out, how much discussion we can allow without it "fanning the flames" and taking over a thread or the board.  This question is directly relevant to this discussion, which is a football-relevant issue)

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

So first of all, reminder that players who are in the process of being vaccinated still have to quarantine, so we don't know for a fact that all these players are not in the process of getting vaccinated.

 

To be fair to Beasley, I think (one of) his point(s) would be he is making a private medical decision that is legitimately allowed by the NFL/NFLPA CBA, but that the current NFL protocols aren't sufficient to protect those who make that legitimately allowed decision

 

As far as "sheer ignorance", I'll let Riverboat Ron do the talking:

 

Chris Simms and Peter King had a segment where they pointed out that the team provides information for an hour in the facility, but then players can go home to people they trust (spouse, or other family members, personal trainer or wellness coach) who say "here are all these reasons, it's a bad idea to get the vaccine, I don't want you to get it."  The reasons don't hold up when they're pressure-tested by legitimate experts in the field, but they look very legitimate to lay people who are "doing their own research".  The way Simms and King presented it, it seemed pretty clear that they had actually spoken to and had off-the-record knowledge of what was going on in the background of some of these decisions.

 

My point is it's probably far too simplistic in our current environment to cast these players' decisions as "sheer ignorance".


I can’t believe you are dragging me into this thread!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

You can still get the virus if you are vaccinated. 

 

The data the NFL has released from intake and preseason testing is that 7x fewer vaccinated players or staff have tested positive than unvaccinated (anyone with any symptoms is tested immediately and must test daily for some period of time):

 

 

The vaccine reduces, but does not eliminate, the risk of infection. 

 

IMO if there were treatment that had solid studies showing it reduced the risk of a knee injury by 7x or 5x or even 3x, the players would be lining up for it.

 

(It's a judgement call that we're still working out, how much discussion we can allow without it "fanning the flames" and taking over a thread or the board.  This question is directly relevant to this discussion, which is a football-relevant issue)

 

 

Thats actually a really good point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

He may be over-rated, he may not be over-rated, but he's one of the 5 guys on the team at his position this season, meaning his replacement may not be on the roster. Injuries also happen.  If an absence of Star due to Covid protocol happens to coincide with an injury or illness of another of the 1TDTs, then "next man up" is our 3rd string at that position, or playing out of position.  It's a disadvantage.

 

Beasley's replacement list would not involve Kumerow.  McKenzie is listed on the depth chart behind him, but it's notable that in the 2020 playoffs, the Bills considered Beasley on a broken leg > McKenzie.  Other choices would include putting Sanders in that role (he can play slot).  Getting further down, Tanner Gentry has some of that "sneaky speed" quickness, and has been honing his slot skills working with Bease and showed some stuff, apparently.

 

I think a off the street space eater could fill in for Star.  He really brings nothing special, IMO.  Just a average space eater.  And we should have obtained one in Fa or the draft.  

 

In terms of Bease replacement, I think a healthy McKenzie would be better than broken leg Beasley, and Sanders is also a great option at depth.  Point being, I’m not worried about these two guys.  They are guys who if you can’t replace via personnel and game plan you have issues.  

8 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said:

 

I disagree.  The fanbase here has always under appreciated the value Star brings, and I think they are going to see that this year when our defense makes a very noticeable improvement with the only major change being Star is back.  

 

His ability to eat space impacts the edge rushers, Oliver, and our LBs...and the success of our front 7 substantially impacts the pressure put on our secondary.  

 

Im not saying Star is some sort of irreplaceable elite player, but he is very good, and not as easy to just replace as I think you alluded to in your post.  

 

He def helps, but can be replaced with another average DT space eater. I think the big improvement will be Groot and actual pass rushers.  Star is an average space eater, IMO.  For whatever reason we never obtained an actual backup for him, really bizarre.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My list of what has to happen in order to lift the Lombardi this season..... Most important to least.

 

1) must avoid injuries.

2) These three players need to man up and make plays: Tremaine Edmunds, Ed Oliver And Dawson Knox.

3) Rookies have to be good and make a sizable impact. This is a hard ask but true. Our defense must step up, so, the DL with the rookies, Star and Ed, Butler And Harrison, everybody in waves on the DL must step up.

4) I summed it up in three really.... The offense WILL be great if healthy. The STs will be sound if healthy. A top 8 unit, imho.

The big questions all fall upon the defense if injuries don't strike.... Even if Knox can't answer the bell, the O can find a way without him being clutch,

We NEED Tremaine Edmunds to be clutch. We need the DL to step up. We need a defensive game plan that is tough and aggressive and we need to play tough and aggressive. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, The Firebaugh Kid said:

Vaccinated and non-vaccinated people are getting Covid. 

 

How does your team being 100% vaccinated make your players less likely to contact the virus? 

 

I have nothing against vaccinated people, or unvacciated people, fyi. 

 

 

This was answered in the media [edit: by NFL's chief medical officer Dr. Allen Stills] the other when Bill Belichick put forth the same argument.  Your chances of getting COVID are 7 times less if you are vaccinated.

 

Also if unvaccinated, close contacts have to sit for 5 days.   Vaccinated players do not.  So if a player test positive for COVID on Friday, any unvaccinated close contacts are not able to play Sunday - even if they test negative 
 

There’s no doubt a competitive advantage for vaccinated players and the NFL purposely set it up that way.  I can only hope more players wake up like McKenzie did and quietly get vaccinated.  It would suck to have a season ended by COVID

11 hours ago, galept said:

If we lose a game and had players sitting at home during that game because they didn't get vaxxed, I'm not sure how those players could look their team, or the fans in the eye after that and be proud of their decision.

 

These players have sacrificed their bodies for this game, some of which may have brain issues later in life that leads to an early decline. No physician would recommend doing what they're doing because of the risks. But a shot? A shot is where they draw the line, which is probably recommended by just about all physicians.

 

It defies all logic.


Agree 💯 Forget the politics and get vaccinated to give your team the best chance to win 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said:

https://theathletic.com/2805597/2021/09/03/graham-these-are-the-bills-biggest-hurdles-to-reaching-the-super-bowl-in-2021?source=user-shared-article

1. COVID-19

Buffalo’s locker room became the place to fly your anti-vaccination flag this offseason.

Two weeks before opening what’s supposed to be a vision-quest season, some Bills starters were barred from the facility for five days a pop and fined for their COVID-19 impudence.

 

McDermott remained diplomatic at his next news conference. He measured his words carefully. His body language, however, belonged to that of a man who was about to flip the eff out.

 

“Very frustrating. Very frustrating,” McDermott said. “There’s people’s livelihoods at stake. … Our performance is judged off of wins and losses or how well a person does ‘X’ or ‘Y,’ and some of that is dependent upon other members of the team.

 

“That’s why this is a team game. Being able to count on people is important.”

 

Unvaccinated players create negative competitive consequences. Restrictions are eased for those who have been vaccinated. Unvaccinated players still are subject to quarantine through contact tracing.

 

Even after Dawkins revealed he’d spent four days at Buffalo General Hospital and that he was afraid the coronavirus was killing him and two days after receivers Cole Beasley and Gabriel Davis and defensive tackles Star Lotulelei and Vernon Butler were sent home, Beasley and receiver Isaiah McKenzie publicly mocked the collectively bargained safety protocols.

 

The NFL had fined McKenzie and Beasley $14,650 for repeatedly refusing to wear masks and/or tracking devices inside the Bills’ facility. NFL Network reported Beasley was spotted on video, while McKenzie failed to comply in the presence of league officials who were at One Bills Drive to give a presentation on COVID protocols. McKenzie tweeted a photo of his NFL notice and joked about the fine. The U.S. Census Bureau’s latest data estimates the average Erie County resident makes $33,598 a year.

 

McKenzie, at least, had an epiphany. He eventually posted a photo of his vaccination card. Beasley is telling those around him he never will get a shot under any circumstances.

 

Lotulelei’s decision not to get vaccinated is a noggin-scratcher. Lotulelei took the COVID opt-out last season, and while the Bills could have used him against the run at times, they also proved they could win a lot of games without him.

 

Linebackers Matt Milano and Klein were preemptively removed from practice, an indication that they, too, were not vaccinated. The NFL’s investigation determined Milano and Klein weren’t in close-contact jeopardy and could return to practice the next day.

Beane said last week the Bills’ vaccination rate might be below 80 percent. That was before the 53-man cutdown, which was expected to lower the Bills’ percentage because fringe players are more motivated to get the shots.

 

Buccaneers coach Bruce Arians announced Thursday that his defending Super Bowl champions are 100 percent vaccinated, including all players, coaches and staff.

The constant shaming of players isn’t going to make them change if we are stupid enough to cut arguably the best slot receiver in the game over his virus stance he’ll be in New England catching passes from Mac Jones the next day 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There very well could be a week (or even two) where we lose Beasley and Davis because of their brave vaccine stance.  The Bills are prepared for this and it may be why they kept seven on the roster.  It's nice having a deep bench at WR along with Diggs, Sanders, and McKenzie being vaccinated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, 78thealltimegreat said:

The constant shaming of players isn’t going to make them change if we are stupid enough to cut arguably the best slot receiver in the game over his virus stance he’ll be in New England catching passes from Mac Jones the next day 

 

Straw man.  We are not cutting Beasley

 

UNLESS he is in-your-face blatant about not following NFL Covid protocols and gets suspended for 4 games.

In which case, don't bet the rent money Belichick takes him on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Straw man.  We are not cutting Beasley

 

UNLESS he is in-your-face blatant about not following NFL Covid protocols and gets suspended for 4 games.

In which case, don't bet the rent money Belichick takes him on.

Oh Bill will make a Bline to sign him remember it was the Bills and Pats for him last time and if anything he’s been even better in Buffalo then he was in Dallas 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’d trade Beasley for… just about anything at this point and resign Smoke if he’s vaccinated. I realize different skill set, but Sanders can fill Beasley’s role with relative ease, and Davis is ready to step into a bigger role.
 

The Champs are 100%… If I’m Beane and McDermott, I would view anybody not getting vaxxed as someone who simply doesn’t want to win bad enough to be on my team .  Personal beliefs aside, the rules give a competitive advantage to those who are vaccinated, period.  Games in this league are way to close to be giving an opponent any sort of advantage.

 

 The article is 100% right, and I bet a clown like Beasley has little to no trade value- unvaccinated 32 yr old loud mouth distraction isn’t going to be worth much.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Vomit 1
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, eball said:

Nailed it, @Richard Noggin.  I simply can’t believe players like Beasley, Davis, Milano, Klein, and Star — guys who see the best chance they’ve ever had to win a SB before them — letting their teammates and coaches (and fans) down out of sheer ignorance.

Why did Star sit out the whole year if he’s not going to take the vaccine? Seems very odd. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, RyanC883 said:

 

I think a off the street space eater could fill in for Star.  He really brings nothing special, IMO.  Just a average space eater.  And we should have obtained one in Fa or the draft.  

 

In terms of Bease replacement, I think a healthy McKenzie would be better than broken leg Beasley, and Sanders is also a great option at depth.  Point being, I’m not worried about these two guys.  They are guys who if you can’t replace via personnel and game plan you have issues.  

 

He def helps, but can be replaced with another average DT space eater. I think the big improvement will be Groot and actual pass rushers.  Star is an average space eater, IMO.  For whatever reason we never obtained an actual backup for him, really bizarre.  

 

 

Star is a very good space eater. Very good. Now, is he good at rushing the passer? Nah, though he compresses the pocket decently. Is he likely to not only eat space but also go beyond that to make tackles, as some very gifted DTs do? Nope.

 

But does he eat space? Yeah. He's very good at it.

 

Should we have brought in someone else to back Star up? That's a very reasonable argument, particularly as we now can be fairly sure that at least right now he's not vaccinated. But no, an off-the-street guy isn't going to do what Star does nearly as well. We've got backups for him, in Zimmer and Horrible Harry. Could we have brought in another? Yeah, I thought they would draft a long-term replacement this year and was surprised they didn't.

 

But Star is very good at what they need him to do.

 

 

Edited by Thurman#1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, WhoTom said:

 

True, but we also don't want to watch Joe Backup play because Joe Starter was sidelined, especially if it's due to a non-football issue that Joe Starter could have prevented.

 

 

Luck of the draw ,genetically and otherwise. My issue is the rule(s), not that a virus exists or how Bills players made medical decisions. 

14 hours ago, Dr.Mantis_Toboggan said:

I’d trade Beasley for… just about anything at this point and resign Smoke if he’s vaccinated. I realize different skill set, but Sanders can fill Beasley’s role with relative ease, and Davis is ready to step into a bigger role.
 

The Champs are 100%… If I’m Beane and McDermott, I would view anybody not getting vaxxed as someone who simply doesn’t want to win bad enough to be on my team .  Personal beliefs aside, the rules give a competitive advantage to those who are vaccinated, period.  Games in this league are way to close to be giving an opponent any sort of advantage.

 

 The article is 100% right, and I bet a clown like Beasley has little to no trade value- unvaccinated 32 yr old loud mouth distraction isn’t going to be worth much.

You’re correct about the NFL rules. They give an unfair advantage to one group. I’m sure there’s room on the Tampa Champs bandwagon in time for the season. Choices .....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

Luck of the draw ,genetically and otherwise. My issue is the rule(s), not that a virus exists or how Bills players made medical decisions. 

You’re correct about the NFL rules. They give an unfair advantage to one group. I’m sure there’s room on the Tampa Champs bandwagon in time for the season. Choices .....

 

I mean, this is like railing about any other NFL rule..... You can have an issue with a rule and think it gives some group an unfair advantage

The point is, the rule exists

It may even have a good basis for existing (or have had a good basis when it was made)

 

Either way, it exists and all 32 teams have to work with it.

 

Control What You Can Control

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, 78thealltimegreat said:

Oh Bill will make a Bline to sign him remember it was the Bills and Pats for him last time and if anything he’s been even better in Buffalo then he was in Dallas 

 

It's possible but show me the last time Belichick made a bee-line to sign a player facing an 8 game suspension or whatever the next ratchet up is after 4 games.

That was the premise of my post you were responding to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

It's possible but show me the last time Belichick made a bee-line to sign a player facing an 8 game suspension or whatever the next ratchet up is after 4 games.

That was the premise of my post you were responding to.

If it’s 4 Bill will gladly do that so he can watch Beasley rub it in our faces for being idiots for cutting him 

23 hours ago, Dr.Mantis_Toboggan said:

I’d trade Beasley for… just about anything at this point and resign Smoke if he’s vaccinated. I realize different skill set, but Sanders can fill Beasley’s role with relative ease, and Davis is ready to step into a bigger role.
 

The Champs are 100%… If I’m Beane and McDermott, I would view anybody not getting vaxxed as someone who simply doesn’t want to win bad enough to be on my team .  Personal beliefs aside, the rules give a competitive advantage to those who are vaccinated, period.  Games in this league are way to close to be giving an opponent any sort of advantage.

 

 The article is 100% right, and I bet a clown like Beasley has little to no trade value- unvaccinated 32 yr old loud mouth distraction isn’t going to be worth much.

You really shouldn’t bet your house on that that maybe the worst take possible if you don’t think the best slot receiver in football will be signed within a week probably by New England or Kansas City just to rub it in the Bills faces you got another thing coming   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...