SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffaloboyinATL Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 I thought Epenesa would take a number in the 90’s. He does not seem like a 57. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kmart128 Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 Surprised Epenesa isnt using 94. I dont see anyone on roster with that number unless Jefferson or Butler already took it and its not annouced yet. Also so weird to see Davis as 3. Im sure that will change after cuts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maybe Someday Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 Have they released the numbers the FAs we signed will take? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Hammersticks Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 57 for Epenesa is doo doo ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 Is Peko still technically on the roster at this point? Feels like 94 for Epenesa makes more sense unless it’s been promised to one of the other signees? Does Fromm taking 10 mean Beas is going back to 11? And what’s keeping Davis from having 13? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kmart128 Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 2 minutes ago, Maybe Someday said: Have they released the numbers the FAs we signed will take? Nope... just Diggs cause he was a trade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 1 minute ago, Johnny Hammersticks said: 57 for Epenesa is doo doo ? Concur. I was excited for him in 94. Hope this is temporary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kmart128 Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 Just now, whatdrought said: Is Peko still technically on the roster at this point? Feels like 94 for Epenesa makes more sense unless it’s been promised to one of the other signees? Does Fromm taking 10 mean Beas is going back to 11? And what’s keeping Davis from having 13? Guessing Butler, Addison or Jefferson took 94 . The numbers for free agents hasnt been revealed yet. In fact theyre not even listed on roster yet. Maybe Ray Ray McCloud switched to 13 after he gave 14 to Diggs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 1 minute ago, Kmart128 said: Guessing Butler, Addison or Jefferson took 94 . The numbers for free agents hasnt been revealed yet. In fact theyre not even listed on roster yet. Maybe Ray Ray McCloud switched to 13 after he gave 14 to Diggs I guess that makes sense, but it’s stupid. It could all work out perfectly: Jefferson: 90 Addison: 97 Butler: 96 Epenesa: 94 And yes, I obsess about numbers. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
junior Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 Available #'s in the 90's: 90 94 95 (I'm not sure I see the team giving this number up so quickly) 97 Defensive linemen signed: Mario Addison (was 97 in Carolina) Vernon Butler (was 92 in Carolina) Quinton Jefferson (was 99 in Seattle) This is probably why Epenesa picked #57. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 1 minute ago, junior12thman92 said: Available #'s in the 90's: 90 94 95 (I'm not sure I see the team giving this number up so quickly) 97 Defensive linemen signed: Mario Addison (was 97 in Carolina) Vernon Butler (was 92 in Carolina) Quinton Jefferson (was 99 in Seattle) This is probably why Epenesa picked #57. Also, 96 may not be available, but it will be. I’m not too worried about it as we all remember seeing Motor in that ugly ass #40 during the preseason last year before he switched to the very crisp looking #26. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gugny Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 I wouldn't mind seeing Moss wear #22. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Vader Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 21 minutes ago, whatdrought said: Also, 96 may not be available, but it will be. I’m not too worried about it as we all remember seeing Motor in that ugly ass #40 during the preseason last year before he switched to the very crisp looking #26. I think Vincent Taylor has 96. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted April 30, 2020 Author Share Posted April 30, 2020 50 minutes ago, Johnny Hammersticks said: 57 for Epenesa is doo doo ? maybe it is a year he thinks is important??? 29 minutes ago, Gugny said: I wouldn't mind seeing Moss wear #22. what's wrong with 20? or do you want him to wear Fred Jackson's number? 20 is / was Gore's number Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 31 minutes ago, Mark Vader said: I think Vincent Taylor has 96. Yeah, but he’ll be cut by seasons start. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAJBobby Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 I will never buy a Rookie Jersey until they are on the team a year, but then they likely have the number they want and wont get hammered with a Number Change 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffaloboyinATL Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 (edited) Maybe 57 was his Dad's number? I searched but couldn't find it. (edit: I found it, he was #72) Edited April 30, 2020 by buffaloboyinATL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logic Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 I was eagerly looking forward to this. Jersey numbers are only slightly less important to a player's career than what team he ends up with. First, the good: Moss chose wisely. 20 is great for a short, tough bruiser. Travis Henry redux. Bass with 2 is perfect. Steve Christie mojo. Elite kicker number. Hodgins will look good in 87. It's a tall guy number. I'm team "make jerseys in the 80s cool for WRs again!" all the way. Now, the not so good: Epenesa in 57? Yuck. I don't like hand-in-the-dirt-only guys wearing numbers in the 50s. Maybe it'll grow on me, like Edmunds in 49 did, but I'd rather he get 94 somehow. Davis in number 3? I mean... I guess that's only temporary. He'll wind up with 13 when it's all said and done. Jackson in 30 is wrong. 30 is not a good number for a corner. Boooooo. Fromm in 10 is...fine, I guess. Beasley must be switching back to 11. I guess I can live with it. Fromm in 11 has a better career than Fromm in 10, though. I'm just sayin'. Listen guys, jersey numbers are important. Really important. Don't @ me. 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sherlock Holmes Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 I would be paying for 69 if I were Epenesa 1 hour ago, Gugny said: I wouldn't mind seeing Moss wear #22. Everybody knows that's reserved for McCaffrey! 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wppete Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 Why didnt Gabriel Davis not take #13? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJB Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 Really wanted Fromm in 11. Only one that's disappointing. Espy taking 57 is ....odd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giuseppe Tognarelli Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 42 minutes ago, Logic said: I was eagerly looking forward to this. Jersey numbers are only slightly less important to a player's career than what team he ends up with. First, the good: Moss chose wisely. 20 is great for a short, tough bruiser. Travis Henry redux. Bass with 2 is perfect. Steve Christie mojo. Elite kicker number. Hodgins will look good in 87. It's a tall guy number. I'm team "make jerseys in the 80s cool for WRs again!" all the way. Now, the not so good: Epenesa in 57? Yuck. I don't like hand-in-the-dirt-only guys wearing numbers in the 50s. Maybe it'll grow on me, like Edmunds in 49 did, but I'd rather he get 94 somehow. Davis in number 3? I mean... I guess that's only temporary. He'll wind up with 13 when it's all said and done. Jackson in 30 is wrong. 30 is not a good number for a corner. Boooooo. Fromm in 10 is...fine, I guess. Beasley must be switching back to 11. I guess I can live with it. Fromm in 11 has a better career than Fromm in 10, though. I'm just sayin'. Listen guys, jersey numbers are important. Really important. Don't @ me. Couldn't agree more on Fromm and Jackson. Davis is in danger of being cut in #3. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WMDman Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 I guess Beas is going back to 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronxbomber21 Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 1 hour ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said: maybe it is a year he thinks is important??? what's wrong with 20? or do you want him to wear Fred Jackson's number? 20 is / was Gore's number I like 20 for Moss ... Gore / Henry just seems right 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dkollidas Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 I’m hoping Epenesa takes a number in the 90’s or 70’s after pre-season cuts and all that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brianmoorman4jesus Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 I really hope Fromm keeps 10, something about 11 just doesn’t work. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mountain Man Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 I quite like the Epenesa choice, it's like a torch passing from Lorenzo Alexander. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalophil1948 Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 24 minutes ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said: I really hope Fromm keeps 10, something about 11 just doesn’t work. Son of a @&$#! My Beasley # 10 jersey disagrees 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rico Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 WR's should have #'s in the 80's, nice to see Hodgins with #87. Now get the ***** off my lawn. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBills1998 Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 3 hours ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said: maybe it is a year he thinks is important??? what's wrong with 20? or do you want him to wear Fred Jackson's number? 20 is / was Gore's number Also it was Joe Cribbs number Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEra Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 Happy to see #20 finally go to a good RB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brianmoorman4jesus Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 1 hour ago, Buffalophil1948 said: Son of a @&$#! My Beasley # 10 jersey disagrees ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 Glad to see I’m not the only one ( @Logic, @Rico) who thinks WR’s in the 80’s should come back. I like some of the teens, but there needs to be a balance. Numbers matter, but eventually they become commonplace. I wanted Allen in #9, and Edmunds in a 50’s #, but I got over it. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maddenboy Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 Jake Fromm State Farm should have taken 15 (%) for his marketing. To compete with Geico's 15% thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logic Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 53 minutes ago, whatdrought said: Glad to see I’m not the only one ( @Logic, @Rico) who thinks WR’s in the 80’s should come back. I like some of the teens, but there needs to be a balance. Numbers matter, but eventually they become commonplace. I wanted Allen in #9, and Edmunds in a 50’s #, but I got over it. Edmunds in 49 really ***** me up. I came around to it, especially since he’s half way between a LB and a DB anyway. I actually think 17 is perfect for Allen. Plus, if he turns out to be a great one, he’ll “own” that number, as there has never been a truly great #17 in the NFL. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poleshifter Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 3 hours ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said: I really hope Fromm keeps 10, something about 11 just doesn’t work. Watching Roscoe Parrish #11 in that 2007 MNF game was painful. What a weak individual - well, he was quite small, and not powerful at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted May 1, 2020 Share Posted May 1, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giuseppe Tognarelli Posted May 1, 2020 Share Posted May 1, 2020 #87 is the number of a crappy receiver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted May 1, 2020 Author Share Posted May 1, 2020 5 hours ago, Buffalophil1948 said: Son of a @&$#! My Beasley # 10 jersey disagrees 39 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: I should have read the whole page first. knew you’d cover it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts