Jump to content

WGR-550 Dust-up Today: Schopp vs. Capaccio!


Nextmanup

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, bbb said:

The first 22 minutes of this is basically these two going at it again.  I now understand why I didn't understand the post game Sunday.  I never thought the Bills actually decided with 50 seconds or so that they were happy with taking the field goal right there............And, S & B I now understand think that..............And, this is Sal saying that's not what happened.  It ends at exactly 22 minutes.  If you just want a summary of how douchy Schopp is thoughout, you can just listen from 21 minutes for the last minute..............Yeah, Mike, Sal is saying the O linemen were at their set positions.  What an ahole.

 

https://wgr550.radio.com/media/audio-channel/11-11-hr-4-schopp-bulldog  

 

 

 

He is an Ahole. I thought the same thing when i heard it. Sal is usually right and its not hard when Dopp is the antagonist.

 

Please WGR get rid of mike for Sal.

 

 

On 11/4/2019 at 8:21 PM, umang_a_desai said:

Pretty sure this says it all

FC56C3AF-BCE7-44CC-911A-4CB9114EAD61.jpeg

 

This dweeb hates everything that is manly,  i think he might be transitioning.

 

 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On November 3, 2019 at 12:19 PM, Irv said:

 

Agree. The Coach was a complete douche.  Go Bonas. 

Loved the Coach!! He spoke the truth about the team.

On November 4, 2019 at 8:26 PM, BillsFanForReal said:

Listened to his show today and was unsurpised to hear him talk about how he wished we took Jackson over Allen. 

Sad part is that Jackson wouldn't have been long for Bills fans. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, the skycap said:

Loved the Coach!! He spoke the truth about the team.

 

 

No. Coach put into voice to the frustrations of Bills fans who wanted a pound of someone's flesh after a bad game. He pushed buttons. Don't confuse that with truth. 

Edited by PromoTheRobot
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, the skycap said:

Loved the Coach!! He spoke the truth about the team.

Sad part is that Jackson wouldn't have been long for Bills fans. 

 

Jackson would have looked awful here.

McDermott and Beane were very very clear that what they wanted was a QB who could perform from the pocket.

 

Roman and Harbaugh have been succeeding with Jackson by designing the offense around his specific skills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, bbb said:

The first 22 minutes of this is basically these two going at it again.  I now understand why I didn't understand the post game Sunday.  I never thought the Bills actually decided with 50 seconds or so that they were happy with taking the field goal right there............And, S & B I now understand think that..............And, this is Sal saying that's not what happened.  It ends at exactly 22 minutes.  If you just want a summary of how douchy Schopp is thoughout, you can just listen from 21 minutes for the last minute..............Yeah, Mike, Sal is saying the O linemen were at their set positions.  What an ahole.

 

https://wgr550.radio.com/media/audio-channel/11-11-hr-4-schopp-bulldog  

 

 

I happened to catch this exchange while driving yesterday and couldn’t stop laughing. Sal is literally watching the film of the series while on air and telling schopp what happened and he couldn’t accept it. Sal has to explain it to him like he’s in preschool.  Then at the end he just says “ok bye.” I kind of felt bad for him. 

Edited by YoloinOhio
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Jackson would have looked awful here.

McDermott and Beane were very very clear that what they wanted was a QB who could perform from the pocket.

 

Roman and Harbaugh have been succeeding with Jackson by designing the offense around his specific skills.

 

It didn't hurt that both were very familiar with Tyrod & Kaep before Jackson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t get why people are hating on Schopp here. We looked grossly incompetent in that situation. Schopp argues whether it was intentional to kill time and if not then why doesn’t anyone call a timeout. Sal then gives his opinion that it wasn’t intentional and we (either the coaching staff or Allen) simply just messed up. 

Schopp has a legit argument here and Sal is simply giving his opinion on why we looked so dumb there (I don’t think he did a good job of it either).

 

Edited by Bangarang
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Bangarang said:

I don’t get why people are hating on Schopp here. We looked grossly incompetent in that situation. Schopp argues whether it was intentional to kill time and if not then why doesn’t anyone call a timeout. Sal then gives his opinion that it wasn’t intentional and we (either the coaching staff or Allen) simply just messed up. 

Schopp has a legit argument here and Sal is simply giving his opinion on why we looked so dumb there (I don’t think he did a good job of it either).

 

 

Sal said exactly what happened: they screwed it up. They botched it. 

 

Schopp could not accept that and just ended up embarrassing himself. Oddly, the "they screwed it up" point Sal was making (and McDermott pretty much said as well after the game) would seemingly be exactly what Schopp would want to hear. 

 

But he just kept saying they meant to drain the clock. It was sort of pathetic. 

 

The rematch wasn't even as close as the original battle. Schopp got embarrassed this time around. 

 

TKO

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheFunPolice said:

 

Sal said exactly what happened: they screwed it up. They botched it. 

 

Schopp could not accept that and just ended up embarrassing himself. Oddly, the "they screwed it up" point Sal was making (and McDermott pretty much said as well after the game) would seemingly be exactly what Schopp would want to hear. 

 

But he just kept saying they meant to drain the clock. It was sort of pathetic. 

 

The rematch wasn't even as close as the original battle. Schopp got embarrassed this time around. 

 

TKO


Schopp didn’t embarrass himself. In fact, I think Sal was the one who embarrassed himself. Schopp was looking for an explanation as to how something so incompetent could happen and Sal is just shrugging his shoulders and saying we goofed and that’s it. No kidding we goofed. The bigger question is why and how could someone let it happen. People hate on Schopp because he’s a douche to the morons who constantly call and trashes the Bills for being bad when they were in fact bad. He says a lot of things fans don’t want to hear and it’s the same reason those same fans hated on Jerry Sullivan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Bangarang said:


Schopp didn’t embarrass himself. In fact, I think Sal was the one who embarrassed himself. Schopp was looking for an explanation as to how something so incompetent could happen and Sal is just shrugging his shoulders and saying we goofed and that’s it. No kidding we goofed. The bigger question is why and how could someone let it happen. People hate on Schopp because he’s a douche to the morons who constantly call and trashes the Bills for being bad when they were in fact bad. He says a lot of things fans don’t want to hear and it’s the same reason those same fans hated on Jerry Sullivan. 

And I'll ask the same question here as I asked Leo Roth and Jerry Sullivan a few years back. Why in the world would you continue to bite the hand that feeds you? I get that these guys think that it's good radio to stir up the animals. I also get that you guys don't like Murph and Chris Brown because they frame commentary to be beneficial to the team. But why for Christ's sake do people feel the need to generate so much hate for the coaches, players and management of the team we all supposedly love?

 

It makes no sense to me.

Edited by clayboy54
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Jackson would have looked awful here.

McDermott and Beane were very very clear that what they wanted was a QB who could perform from the pocket.

 

Roman and Harbaugh have been succeeding with Jackson by designing the offense around his specific skills.

 

Having innovative offensive minds as your coaches helps. 

 

Mahomes: Reid is a mastermind at offense. Sadly, he cannot stop making stupid decisions in terms of game management. Still, the guy is an all-time offensive mind.

 

Jackson: Harbaugh is a proven commodity as a HC, and an offensive minded guy. Roman has had success with mediocre mobile QBs (Kap and Tyrod) and now has a super talented guy who puts both of them to shame. Faster, more dangerous running, and twice the passer either of those guys are/were. Plus the intangibles of the guy are off the charts. 

 

Goff: A mediocre to bad QB whose head coach uses him like he's playing Madden. McVay is supposedly a genius (I don't buy it) but you can't argue Goff's success once he took over versus before he did.

 

Mayfield: he has an utter imbecile for a HC. Record shows that. Last year when Greggg was playing dictator and keeping everyone in line it worked. Coaching matters. The talent is obviously there based on last season. 

 

Allen: has a "set up the punt and play defense" guy setting the tone for the team as HC. McDermott says he wants to score more points. I'm sure he does. I want to get in shape someday. But this Buffalo weather...

 

Rosen: The attitude of Rogers with the resume of Nathan Peterman. Not sure there's anything there to work with.

 

Rudolph: Has a head coach who IMO is totally underrated. Imagine being a "failure" for "only" having 1 SB ring and going to another SB and losing to Rogers. Tomlin somehow managed to keep Bell and Brown from self-destructing, which in retrospect is pretty amazing. That team is playing tough after they were left for dead. Again, coaching matters. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7 minutes ago, Bangarang said:


Schopp didn’t embarrass himself. In fact, I think Sal was the one who embarrassed himself. Schopp was looking for an explanation as to how something so incompetent could happen and Sal is just shrugging his shoulders and saying we goofed and that’s it. No kidding we goofed. The bigger question is why and how could someone let it happen. People hate on Schopp because he’s a douche to the morons who constantly call and trashes the Bills for being bad when they were in fact bad. He says a lot of things fans don’t want to hear and it’s the same reason those same fans hated on Jerry Sullivan. 

 

If the answer is that they screwed it up what is Sal supposed to say?

 

He isn't on the team. Schopp badgering him about how something so incompetent could happen was plain stupid. Sal isn't the coach. What is he supposed to say?

 

100% obvious they had a play called, went to the line, and then something happened. Did Josh get confused? Did Daboll decide to change the play? Did Singletary tossing the ball to Josh while he was likely listening to Daboll in his helmet throw him off and necessitate a huddle?

 

It was totally incompetent game management, and that falls on the coaches, not Sal, to explain. It happens all the time. Andy Reid literally lost a game Sunday by botching a simple time management scenario that every 10 year old Madden player knows. 

 

 

  • Awesome! (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, clayboy54 said:

And I'll ask the same question here as I asked Leo Roth and Jerry Sullivan a few years back. Why in the world would you continue to bite the hand that feeds you? I get that these guys think that it's good radio to stir up the animals. I also get that you guys don't like Murph and Chris Brown because they frame commentary to be beneficial to the team. But why for Christ's sake do people feel the need to generate so much hate for the coaches, players and management of the team we all supposedly love?

 

It makes no sense to me.


Schopp isn’t a mouthpiece for the Bills and he’s not there to make excuses. Football isn’t his favorite sport and I don’t even think he’s a fan of the team, they are just part of his job. If anything, he’s fairly unbiased when it comes to this team and it hurts the people who love this team and want to pretend everything will be fine when it generally hasn’t been.

 

1 hour ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Jackson would have looked awful here.

 

Because you say so?

 

1 hour ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

McDermott and Beane were very very clear that what they wanted was a QB who could perform from the pocket.

 

Roman and Harbaugh have been succeeding with Jackson by designing the offense around his specific skills.


Heaven forbid we have a coaching staff who designs their game plans around what the players do well. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bangarang said:


Schopp isn’t a mouthpiece for the Bills and he’s not there to make excuses. Football isn’t his favorite sport and I don’t even think he’s a fan of the team, they are just part of his job. If anything, he’s fairly unbiased when it comes to this team and it hurts the people who love this team and want to pretend everything will be fine when it generally hasn’t been.

 

So why would WGR hire a guy like this to cover the Bills then? This game is supposed to be fun!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TheFunPolice said:

 

Having innovative offensive minds as your coaches helps. 

 

Mahomes: Reid is a mastermind at offense. Sadly, he cannot stop making stupid decisions in terms of game management. Still, the guy is an all-time offensive mind.

 

Jackson: Harbaugh is a proven commodity as a HC, and an offensive minded guy. Roman has had success with mediocre mobile QBs (Kap and Tyrod) and now has a super talented guy who puts both of them to shame. Faster, more dangerous running, and twice the passer either of those guys are/were. Plus the intangibles of the guy are off the charts. 

 

Goff: A mediocre to bad QB whose head coach uses him like he's playing Madden. McVay is supposedly a genius (I don't buy it) but you can't argue Goff's success once he took over versus before he did.

 

Mayfield: he has an utter imbecile for a HC. Record shows that. Last year when Greggg was playing dictator and keeping everyone in line it worked. Coaching matters. The talent is obviously there based on last season. 

 

Allen: has a "set up the punt and play defense" guy setting the tone for the team as HC. McDermott says he wants to score more points. I'm sure he does. I want to get in shape someday. But this Buffalo weather...

 

Rosen: The attitude of Rogers with the resume of Nathan Peterman. Not sure there's anything there to work with.

 

Rudolph: Has a head coach who IMO is totally underrated. Imagine being a "failure" for "only" having 1 SB ring and going to another SB and losing to Rogers. Tomlin somehow managed to keep Bell and Brown from self-destructing, which in retrospect is pretty amazing. That team is playing tough after they were left for dead. Again, coaching matters. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If the answer is that they screwed it up what is Sal supposed to say?

 

He isn't on the team. Schopp badgering him about how something so incompetent could happen was plain stupid. Sal isn't the coach. What is he supposed to say?

 

100% obvious they had a play called, went to the line, and then something happened. Did Josh get confused? Did Daboll decide to change the play? Did Singletary tossing the ball to Josh while he was likely listening to Daboll in his helmet throw him off and necessitate a huddle?

 

It was totally incompetent game management, and that falls on the coaches, not Sal, to explain. It happens all the time. Andy Reid literally lost a game Sunday by botching a simple time management scenario that every 10 year old Madden player knows. 

 

 


Sal is the one in the locker room and at the press conferences asking questions and listening to answers. It’s literally his job to report things back to the audience of the station he works for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bangarang said:


Schopp isn’t a mouthpiece for the Bills and he’s not there to make excuses. Football isn’t his favorite sport and I don’t even think he’s a fan of the team, they are just part of his job. If anything, he’s fairly unbiased when it comes to this team and it hurts the people who love this team and want to pretend everything will be fine when it generally hasn’t been.

 

 

That's fair, but I think the main reason that people find Schopp insufferable is his refusal to give up a point where he's proven to be wrong, such as this topic.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, clayboy54 said:

So why would WGR hire a guy like this to cover the Bills then? This game is supposed to be fun!


They must think he does a good job.

Just now, GG said:

 

That's fair, but I think the main reason that people find Schopp insufferable is his refusal to give up a point where he's proven to be wrong, such as this topic.


How was he proven wrong here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bangarang said:


They must think he does a good job.


How was he proven wrong here?

 By Sal's points, McD's comments and the game tape.   It clearly pointed to confusion, rather than a deliberate attempt to slow the game down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GG said:

 By Sal's points, McD's comments and the game tape.   It clearly pointed to confusion, rather than a deliberate attempt to slow the game down.


You can correct me if I’m wrong because I don’t remember all 22 minutes of the conversation but I think Schopp was willing to accept that it wasn’t intentional. His beef at that point was knowing we were in a hurry up, why the play wasn’t called in quicker and if there was an issue why a TO wasn’t called. He’s obviously asking that question to point out how incompetent we were there instead of looking for a logical explanation (there really isn’t one).

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watch Allen's college highlights in Wyoming. He had a lot of completions for 40-50 yards .

This season problems are mental and due to bad coaches. He can't use his upsides - long runs and cannon arm. His skillset and intangibles (leadership, clutch gene)  are great. Beane must find a good coach/OC for him or this raw talent may become a bust. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bangarang said:


You can correct me if I’m wrong because I don’t remember all 22 minutes of the conversation but I think Schopp was willing to accept that it wasn’t intentional. His beef at that point was knowing we were in a hurry up, why the play wasn’t called in quicker and if there was an issue why a TO wasn’t called. He’s obviously asking that question to point out how incompetent we were there instead of looking for a logical explanation (there really isn’t one).

 

He was asking those questions in the context of trying to prove that they intentionally slowed down the pace.   Whatever the version of the truth, Sal was a lot closer to it based on the replays, yet Schopp refused to concede (even though it was Sal who was looking at the video during the call)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Artem Lipatov said:

Watch Allen's college highlights in Wyoming. He had a lot of completions for 40-50 yards .

This season problems are mental and due to bad coaches. He can't use his upsides - long runs and cannon arm. His skillset and intangibles (leadership, clutch gene)  are great. Beane must find a good coach/OC for him or this raw talent may become a bust. 


He’s had plenty of chances to throw deep and he’s been woefully bad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Bangarang said:


Schopp didn’t embarrass himself. In fact, I think Sal was the one who embarrassed himself. Schopp was looking for an explanation as to how something so incompetent could happen and Sal is just shrugging his shoulders and saying we goofed and that’s it. No kidding we goofed. The bigger question is why and how could someone let it happen. People hate on Schopp because he’s a douche to the morons who constantly call and trashes the Bills for being bad when they were in fact bad. He says a lot of things fans don’t want to hear and it’s the same reason those same fans hated on Jerry Sullivan. 

 

He absolutely embarrassed himself.  And then cried like the B word he is "I gotta go".  Jerry is a prick too.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GG said:

 

He was asking those questions in the context of trying to prove that they intentionally slowed down the pace.   Whatever the version of the truth, Sal was a lot closer to it based on the replays, yet Schopp refused to concede (even though it was Sal who was looking at the video during the call)


I wouldn’t agree Sal was closer to the truth. This really shouldn’t even be a debate. How that much time can be run down in that situation is still just really, really bad. 

2 minutes ago, Dablitzkrieg said:

 

He absolutely embarrassed himself.  And then cried like the B word he is "I gotta go".  Jerry is a prick too.


I don’t think he did. The only ones who embarrassed themselves was our offense and the coaching staff in that situation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bangarang said:


I wouldn’t agree Sal was closer to the truth. This really shouldn’t even be a debate. How that much time can be run down in that situation is still just really, really bad. 

 

 

Isn't your last sentence a tacit agreement with Sal?  He said it was confusion and a screw up, Schopp said it was intentional.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Bangarang said:


He’s had plenty of chances to throw deep and he’s been woefully bad. 

Because they don't give him the right to make mistakes. Remeber Dabol's hysterics at sidelines after one Allen's Int.  

He is cuffed. And he prefers to overthrow WR with a margin to avoid int.

He is talented and coachable. He just needs a good coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bangarang said:


Sal is the one in the locker room and at the press conferences asking questions and listening to answers. It’s literally his job to report things back to the audience of the station he works for.

 

He did. He said exactly the same thing McDermott said: the plan was not to huddle. Anyone who goes back and watches will see that the team ran up to the line, then someone got confused and/or something changed in whatever "plan" they had.

 

Sal's guess was that they (Daboll and/or Allen) screwed it up. That's where your HC calls a TO and saves those 30 seconds. You can spike the ball in 30 seconds. Getting the play right is what matters there. Total cluster. But Mike would not have it for some reason, and insisted the coaches planned to kill the clock, even though they said they didn't and it didn't look on film like they wanted to. 

 

Schopp can yell at and belittle the poor SOB all he wants but Sal can only report what the coaches and players are saying, along with what everyone can see on film

 

It was a little odd that Schopp was getting so personal and nasty with Sal, who was literally just saying what the team said and watching the video of what happened to describe it. Mike sounded like a petulant child. What was his point, exactly? 

 

 

 

 

Basically, Schopp was belittling Sal for not being able to explain McDermott's screw up.

 

Misplaced anger. Sal wasn't calling the plays or managing the game. 

 

GIVE ME AN ANSWER SAL! doesn't make the handling of that situation suddenly make sense. 

 

Reid did the same thing Sunday: up 5, 3rd and 2, around 1:30 left, driving to long FG range, TEN 1 timeout. 

 

Run up the gut, maybe pick it up. IF not, TEN is out of timeouts. Run again, or even punt it if the FG is too long. 

 

Instead, Reid passes the ball on an ill-advised playcall and TEN has time to come back and win. 

 

I could scream at some poor KC beat reporter until I'm red in the face and that call won't make sense.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

1 hour ago, GG said:

 

Isn't your last sentence a tacit agreement with Sal?  He said it was confusion and a screw up, Schopp said it was intentional.

 

I multiquoted a bunch of things going down this thread, most of them from Bangarang, who doesn't get the difference between critical honest reporting and Sully.

 

But, this is the whole answer - in one sentence.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I generally agree with Schopp but he's wrong here. If the Bills really wanted to run the clock, they would have ran the play clock down instead of snapping it with 14 seconds left. And they'd have likely run the ball to keep the clock running and call a timeout to make the kick the last play of the game.

 

Sal's right. Daboll blew it and it's as simple as that. Incompetence, not conservatism - this time, anyway.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sal made so many good points like the ones you mentioned, and Mike just kept blowing them off.........I mean just the idea of Feliciano obviously signaling hurry the F up - if the marching orders were to run down the clock, he wouldn't have done that.

 

I do have to say it's better radio than having Bulldog just agree with everything Schopp says. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, bbb said:

Sal made so many good points like the ones you mentioned, and Mike just kept blowing them off.........I mean just the idea of Feliciano obviously signaling hurry the F up - if the marching orders were to run down the clock, he wouldn't have done that.

 

I do have to say it's better radio than having Bulldog just agree with everything Schopp says. 

Mike didn’t like that facts challenged his agenda. He wanted it to be the case that they purposely were trying to run the clock down because it fit his narrative for the day and said that the huddle was “proof” of that - and then put his fingers in his ears and stomped his feet when Sal described what actually happened. He misspoke because instead of actually looking at everything that happened and drawing a conclusion, he drew his conclusion first and then didn’t like when someone actually presented a different picture. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, YoloinOhio said:

Mike didn’t like that facts challenged his agenda. He wanted it to be the case that they purposely were trying to run the clock down because it fit his narrative for the day and said that the huddle was “proof” of that - and then put his fingers in his ears and stomped his feet when Sal described what actually happened. He misspoke because instead of actually looking at everything that happened and drawing a conclusion, he drew his conclusion first and then didn’t like when someone actually presented a different picture. 

 

Exactly.  And, with Bulldog as his yes man all the time, he's used to not being challenged.  Can't handle it when he is.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Bangarang said:


I wouldn’t agree Sal was closer to the truth. This really shouldn’t even be a debate. How that much time can be run down in that situation is still just really, really bad. 


I don’t think he did. The only ones who embarrassed themselves was our offense and the coaching staff in that situation. 

It was really the way he reacted once he accepted that it wasn’t intentional  - of course he was right that they should not have huddled. Instead of just having an adult conversation, since Sal was agreeing with him over and over and pausing to patiently address his tantrum, he was sniping at Sal as to why they huddled. Sal did not know why. he was brought on to explain what was said in the press conference. Not to be inside the minds of the coaches and players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s fair to think that the team is in a better place than they were under the previous regime.  It’s also fair to tell this regime that maybe they want to shelve the cockiness about thinking their better than them until they prove it by winning something. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just wanted to announce that i am officially done with Dopp and the bulldog !!! 

 

i have listened to these two for 10 years on my way to work and can no longer tolerate this sh!t show. I like BD for the most part so this mostly about Dopp. Sick of his incessant BS about this team and today he was wacking off to Andy Reid, who has not won a SB, about how great he is and then says McDermott is uninspiring at which point i just turned it off. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/12/2019 at 12:18 PM, Bangarang said:


Schopp isn’t a mouthpiece for the Bills and he’s not there to make excuses. Football isn’t his favorite sport and I don’t even think he’s a fan of the team, they are just part of his job. If anything, he’s fairly unbiased when it comes to this team and it hurts the people who love this team and want to pretend everything will be fine when it generally hasn’t been.

 

...

 

That's a big reason it's tough to listen for me.  He doesn't LOVE football, so he doesn't prepare to talk about football.  He's a drive by media type of guy when it comes to football, he wants to talk about anything but the game.  I believe he hates the average Bills fan, but respects the few that agree with him.

 

On 11/12/2019 at 12:19 PM, clayboy54 said:

So why would WGR hire a guy like this to cover the Bills then? This game is supposed to be fun!

 

I think it's part of the format for sports radio.  News and topical talk early, homers (believers) for the work day, haters (doubters) for the drive home.  That's the format I've noticed when I listen to other stations travelling or prepping for upcoming games.  They choose to give all fans a voice maybe?  Not sure but there is always a doubter on every channel.  Doubters make believers love and defend the team even more, making the doubters hate on them even more.

 

I know they have a job to do, they refer to it when things start to get too sticky...'Like this is our job, you don't understand"...I just wish they had someone who loved what they do and spent the time to prepare so they know the roster better than me, cared about preseason battles, love the growth of young players...etc.  I think they could be better at their job if they cared more about the whole thing.  They seem tired and bored with this gig, but nobody stops them.

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/30/2019 at 7:08 PM, Nextmanup said:

Mike Schopp and Sal got into it a little bit today.  More tension here than I have ever heard between them before.

 

It centers on McDermott's comment from earlier today about former "irresponsible decision making."

 

Start listening around the 30:00 mark.  

 

Pretty entertaining.

 

https://wgr550.radio.com/media/audio-channel/10-30-hr-3-schopp-bulldog-0

 

 

Are you saying there’s people who still listen to this buffoon????

i would rather watch the reruns of Don Lemon on  CNN  about the Russian collusion 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/30/2019 at 8:43 PM, Nextmanup said:

Please comment on the linked audio.


If you and others want to attack Mike Schopp with no regard to this thread title, please start your own thread.

 

 

Please create your own Mike Schopp hate thread and don't keep commenting here unless you actually listen to the audio and have something to say relevant to this thread.  

 

Thanks.

 

 

Next man up, here's an idea, stop trying to manage the thread so much and push your pro-schopp narrative.   I've been on this board for a long long time and I've never seen such an opinionated control freak.

 

You must be a joy to live with.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Da webster guy said:

Next man up, here's an idea, stop trying to manage the thread so much and push your pro-schopp narrative.   I've been on this board for a long long time and I've never seen such an opinionated control freak.

 

You must be a joy to live with.

200.webp?cid=790b7611dd4dbb8cba7f39f522b

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been on and off the bills forums since, I think they've existed.

You don't want anti-schopp commentary but want to discuss the schopp vs sal discussion but you didn't say not to keep out the anti-sal commentary.

 

wasn't clever, try harder, and be transparent.... I don't see why you didn't just make this a pro-schopp thread so we didn't have to read through a couple of pages to figure out your agenda?

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...