Jump to content

Why do the gays love the dems so much ?


Teddy KGB

Recommended Posts

57 minutes ago, BillStime said:

Classic conservative cult - sweep the gays under the rug and don’t question why suicide rates skyrocket and catch more GQP closet case Larry Craig’s of the world.

 

 

Hey Billsy….honest question: Who is this Ron Filipkowski that you’re constantly retweeting? Is he actually somebody? Or just a guy who likes to share his opinion on everything? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Hey Billsy….honest question: Who is this Ron Filipkowski that you’re constantly retweeting? Is he actually somebody? Or just a guy who likes to share his opinion on everything? 


Ron is no different than you and me - just sharing his opinion.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BillStime said:


Ron is no different than you and me - just sharing his opinion.

 

 

Thanks….you quote him an awful lot but I’ve never heard of him. I thought maybe he had a resume of some kind. Apparently not. Now I know I can REALLY ignore him. 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/24/2023 at 5:04 PM, SoCal Deek said:

THAT is what your comments are about? I see very little pushback on Trans folks if that’s what you’re prattling on about. I do see concern for irreversible sexuality discussions and procedures being pushed on children who are too young to make such decisions. The two topics are not in any way related. 

 

They love to conflate issues to rile-up themselves and their base. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We’ve reached critical mass.  
 

Society is going collapse and this country is going to tear itself apart because, shocker, it wasn’t just about making sure a same sex couple had the same “rights” as heterosexual couples. 
 

 


 

Yep:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/30/2023 at 5:55 PM, BillStime said:

Classic conservative cult - sweep the gays under the rug and don’t question why suicide rates skyrocket and catch more GQP closet case Larry Craig’s of the world.

 

 

You gotta love that. MTG and boyfriend, MTG having just dumped husband after openly banging her personal trainer. And now lecturing us on traditional morality. 
Didn’t someone here just tell us that Tucker treated us to a monologue about the slippery slope of a decline in traditional morality?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

You gotta love that. MTG and boyfriend, MTG having just dumped husband after openly banging her personal trainer. And now lecturing us on traditional morality. 
Didn’t someone here just tell us that Tucker treated us to a monologue about the slippery slope of a decline in traditional morality?


Yes - but no one on the right is the problem

 

giphy.gif?cid=2154d3d7u9188ndgeheysa818i

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

 

 

GREAT MOMENTS IN INTERSECTIONALITY: 

 

The Left Can Have Islam or LGBTQA+. Not Both. The Democrat coalition is falling apart.

 

 

Hamtramck legalized animal sacrifice in homes, and made Eid a paid holiday, as did Dearborn. Despite their protestations, Muslim elected officials in cities on track to have an Islamic majority are representing their community and not anyone else’s. They are the most obvious example that the notion of multicultural “communities” that transcend identities through collective solidarity is a myth. And so is the entire majority of minorities coalition that claims “brown people” or the “oppressed” have anything in common beyond a hostility toward white people.

 

Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan lashed out at Hamtramck by declaring, “The City of Detroit proudly raises our Pride Flag at the start of every Pride Month.” And it will until it has a Muslim majority.

 

Democrats have dismantled tolerance and opened the door to a gold rush by members of its coalition to impose their most extreme agendas on the public with no regard to everyone else.

 

A leftist majority will force pride flags and LGBT pornography in schools on everyone. A Muslim majority will force sharia on everyone. That is what happens in a country that has abandoned both its traditional consensus on values and its respect for individual beliefs leaving regions with a choice between female genital mutilation and transgender masectomies, between marrying 7-year-old girls and grooming first graders.

 

America has three choices, either imposing sharia or sexual identity politics, or returning to what we were before we had to choose which group of extremists to allow to abuse our children.

 

https://www.frontpagemag.com/the-left-can-have-islam-or-lgbtqa-not-both/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/12/2018 at 7:49 AM, Teddy KGB said:

All my gay friends are in love with everything Obama, Hillary, Pelosi, etc etc etc 

 

What is the mass appeal to the LGBQTRSTUVWXYZ ? 

 

Someone explain it to me ? 

 

Because they tell them everything they want to here, give them what ever they need to advance their group, and it's all in order to get their votes .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This whole thread is hilarious. 
 

“Why don’t gays support the people who hate them?”


On the one hand, the Dems are imperfect allies who often only support LGBTQ when it’s convenient. 
 

On the other hand, the GOP wants to pretend LGBTQ people don’t exist and is perfectly happy pushing policies that will kill them. 

 

Geez, no idea. That’s a tough one!

  • Haha (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

GREAT MOMENTS IN INTERSECTIONALITY: 

 

The Left Can Have Islam or LGBTQA+. Not Both. The Democrat coalition is falling apart.

 

 

Hamtramck legalized animal sacrifice in homes, and made Eid a paid holiday, as did Dearborn. Despite their protestations, Muslim elected officials in cities on track to have an Islamic majority are representing their community and not anyone else’s. They are the most obvious example that the notion of multicultural “communities” that transcend identities through collective solidarity is a myth. And so is the entire majority of minorities coalition that claims “brown people” or the “oppressed” have anything in common beyond a hostility toward white people.

 

Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan lashed out at Hamtramck by declaring, “The City of Detroit proudly raises our Pride Flag at the start of every Pride Month.” And it will until it has a Muslim majority.

 

Democrats have dismantled tolerance and opened the door to a gold rush by members of its coalition to impose their most extreme agendas on the public with no regard to everyone else.

 

A leftist majority will force pride flags and LGBT pornography in schools on everyone. A Muslim majority will force sharia on everyone. That is what happens in a country that has abandoned both its traditional consensus on values and its respect for individual beliefs leaving regions with a choice between female genital mutilation and transgender masectomies, between marrying 7-year-old girls and grooming first graders.

 

America has three choices, either imposing sharia or sexual identity politics, or returning to what we were before we had to choose which group of extremists to allow to abuse our children.

 

https://www.frontpagemag.com/the-left-can-have-islam-or-lgbtqa-not-both/

That's because Diversity at its core is simply tribalism.  Where common culture is replaced by multiple sub-cultures operating with different cultural norms and beliefs.  The myth is this will lead to some sort of social Utopia.  But in reality, its the driving force in the Balkanization of America.

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

That's because Diversity at its core is simply tribalism.  Where common culture is replaced by multiple sub-cultures operating with different cultural norms and beliefs.  The myth is this will lead to some sort of social Utopia.  But in reality, its the driving force in the Balkanization of America.

Thank You! 
Please repeat this post every day…forever! That’s about as succinct as I’ve seen anyone put it. The reality is that in order to have a successful American experiment we need to be celebrating our “Unum” not our “Pluribas”! 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

LOL, come on. reality called.

 

I guess I "should actually try listening to liberals sometime instead of being told what to think of them by people who are incentivized to make them look bad."

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Thank You! 
Please repeat this post every day…forever! That’s about as succinct as I’ve seen anyone put it. The reality is that in order to have a successful American experiment we need to be celebrating our “Unum” not our “Pluribas”! 

The other thing I've come to understand is what I'll call "Cultural Extremism".  Every social issue is defined and viewed as a binary decision.  Yes or No.  One or Zero.  There is no continuum of views that might fall on the point plot at some point between the two extremes.  There are no definitions or terms to describe any view in between.  If you carefully read many of the conversations here on PPP you can easily pick that up.  Posters try to put you into one or the other despite your best efforts to be objective and define your own independent and personal view of issues.  There's just no place for that sort of thinking in the social ideologies of today.   

 

LGBTQ for example.  If you voice agreement with the entirety of the movement then you support LGBTQ.  In other words you score 100% in compliance.  You score a Yes or a One.  But if you disagree with anything, or question anything, you score anywhere between 1 and 99.  A 1 to 99 gets you a No or a Zero.  You're anti-LGBTQ. 

If you're like me and have LGBTQ family members, and relationships at work with LGBTQ community persons, or if you have friends and friends of friends that are LGBTQ that you socialize with and can carry on civil conversations and follow customs of good social behavior while treating people with kindness but you disagree with transsexual efforts to groom children they you're anti-LGBTQ.  Even if you score a 90 that's still ultimately a zero. 

 

Trump is another classic example.  If you disagree with everything Trump then you're for Democracy.  If you might agree with something like 20% of what Trump represents or question officials seen as representing pro-Democracy then you're un-democratic and a MAGA extremist.  As much of an extremist as somebody that agrees with 100% of what Trump says.  The 80% you disagree with doesn't matter.  Its a binary decision.  You're either for us or against us and there ain't no in-between.  There's no room for independent thought or views.     

 

    

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
  • Agree 4
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

The other thing I've come to understand is what I'll call "Cultural Extremism".  Every social issue is defined and viewed as a binary decision.  Yes or No.  One or Zero.  There is no continuum of views that might fall on the point plot at some point between the two extremes.  There are no definitions or terms to describe any view in between.  If you carefully read many of the conversations here on PPP you can easily pick that up.  Posters try to put you into one or the other despite your best efforts to be objective and define your own independent and personal view of issues.  There's just no place for that sort of thinking in the social ideologies of today.   

 

LGBTQ for example.  If you voice agreement with the entirety of the movement then you support LGBTQ.  In other words you score 100% in compliance.  You score a Yes or a One.  But if you disagree with anything, or question anything, you score anywhere between 1 and 99.  A 1 to 99 gets you a No or a Zero.  You're anti=LGBTQ. 

If you're like me and have LGBTQ family members, and relationships at work with LGBTQ community persons, or if you have friends and friends of friends that are LGBTQ that you socialize with and can carry on civil conversations and follow customs of good social behavior while treating people with kindness but you disagree with transsexual efforts to groom children they you're anti-LGBTQ.  Even if you score a 90 that's still ultimately a zero. 

 

Trump is another classic example.  If you disagree with everything Trump then you're for Democracy.  If you might agree with something like 20% of what Trump represents or question officials seen as representing pro-Democracy then you're un-democratic and a MAGA extremist.  As much of an extremist as somebody that agrees with 100% of what Trump says.  The 80% you disagree with doesn't matter.  Its a binary decision.  You're either for us or against us and there ain't no in-between.  There's no room for independent thought or views.     

 

    

To quote Seinfeld...."Who doesn't want to wear the ribbon?" 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

The other thing I've come to understand is what I'll call "Cultural Extremism".  Every social issue is defined and viewed as a binary decision.  Yes or No.  One or Zero.  There is no continuum of views that might fall on the point plot at some point between the two extremes.  There are no definitions or terms to describe any view in between.  If you carefully read many of the conversations here on PPP you can easily pick that up.  Posters try to put you into one or the other despite your best efforts to be objective and define your own independent and personal view of issues.  There's just no place for that sort of thinking in the social ideologies of today.   

 

LGBTQ for example.  If you voice agreement with the entirety of the movement then you support LGBTQ.  In other words you score 100% in compliance.  You score a Yes or a One.  But if you disagree with anything, or question anything, you score anywhere between 1 and 99.  A 1 to 99 gets you a No or a Zero.  You're anti-LGBTQ. 

If you're like me and have LGBTQ family members, and relationships at work with LGBTQ community persons, or if you have friends and friends of friends that are LGBTQ that you socialize with and can carry on civil conversations and follow customs of good social behavior while treating people with kindness but you disagree with transsexual efforts to groom children they you're anti-LGBTQ.  Even if you score a 90 that's still ultimately a zero. 

 

Trump is another classic example.  If you disagree with everything Trump then you're for Democracy.  If you might agree with something like 20% of what Trump represents or question officials seen as representing pro-Democracy then you're un-democratic and a MAGA extremist.  As much of an extremist as somebody that agrees with 100% of what Trump says.  The 80% you disagree with doesn't matter.  Its a binary decision.  You're either for us or against us and there ain't no in-between.  There's no room for independent thought or views.     

 

Yup.  It's all or nothing with them.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/25/2023 at 6:51 PM, ChiGoose said:

This whole thread is hilarious. 
 

“Why don’t gays support the people who hate them?”


On the one hand, the Dems are imperfect allies who often only support LGBTQ when it’s convenient. 
 

On the other hand, the GOP wants to pretend LGBTQ people don’t exist and is perfectly happy pushing policies that will kill them. 

 

Geez, no idea. That’s a tough one!

The GOP wants to pretend that everything associated with LGBTQ is a mental illness
 

It’s not

  • Disagree 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

The GOP wants to pretend that everything associated with LGBTQ is a mental illness
 

It’s not


The new trope is that if you acknowledge that gays exist, it means you’re literally grooming children for pedophiles. 
 

It’s disgusting and obviously false. But some people are so far down the internet brain worms rabbit hole enough to believe it. 
 

And then they sit around and wonder why gays won’t vote their way…

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


The new trope is that if you acknowledge that gays exist, it means you’re literally grooming children for pedophiles. 
 

It’s disgusting and obviously false. But some people are so far down the internet brain worms rabbit hole enough to believe it. 
 

And then they sit around and wonder why gays won’t vote their way…

Unlike the GOP the gays, don’t vote against their own self interests

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


The new trope is that if you acknowledge that gays exist, it means you’re literally grooming children for pedophiles. 
 

It’s disgusting and obviously false. But some people are so far down the internet brain worms rabbit hole enough to believe it. 
 

And then they sit around and wonder why gays won’t vote their way…

What’s the thought process by which you came up with such an idiotic and disingenuous mantra? You can repeat it over and over as you have done but who is going to buy it? It’s beyond absurd. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JDHillFan said:

What’s the thought process by which you came up with such an idiotic and disingenuous mantra? You can repeat it over and over as you have done but who is going to buy it? It’s beyond absurd. 

 

It's what they do.  Take an extreme and stupid position to bolster their weak ones.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

The GOP wants to pretend that everything associated with LGBTQ is a mental illness
 

It’s not


Here’s the funny thing about parts of the movement. Nobody has any idea what causes a person to be trans. Nobody. 
 

we have apps for mental health and all these places you can go if you need mental health. But the second you suggest that a trans person has mental health problems you’re trans phobic. 
 

Let’s let teenagers cut their body apart so they don’t kill themselves. Is that a normal way to handle a condition we have no idea what the root cause is?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, aristocrat said:


Here’s the funny thing about parts of the movement. Nobody has any idea what causes a person to be trans. Nobody. 
 

we have apps for mental health and all these places you can go if you need mental health. But the second you suggest that a trans person has mental health problems you’re trans phobic. 
 

Let’s let teenagers cut their body apart so they don’t kill themselves. Is that a normal way to handle a condition we have no idea what the root cause is?  

You can be trans and have mental problems, but there are plenty of people that are trans and don’t have mental problems
 

As far as the teenagers cutting their body parts, parental supervision needs to be a big playing this, although I’m sure if you looked at the statistics, children are not the ones that are getting this procedure

 

I was on YouTube the other day and I saw a video by the epic times where they were trying to make this scenario of a parent suggesting a child might feel better if they were a different gender. This does not happen. This is the type of ***** that the right puts out for fear mongering. 

 

 

  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...