All_Pro_Bills

Once the fighting starts you cannot throw out the scripted plan. And switch to dynamic mode.. And it's results that matter. There are no style points awarded. After 10 to 14 days Iran has close to zero offensive capability. If we decide to pound them into submission they're at our mercy. What more do you want? Another phony agreement that let's the regime survive to rebuild their ability to cause trouble for everyone in the Middle East? And then repeat the conflict? I say take the kill shot now and get it over. Some support the play nice approach to warfare. But the only way you win is by inflicting more pain and suffering on the enemy than they're wiling to accept.

These guys are like the cops in an action adventure movie that show up after the movie's hero has already killed all the villians.

Can't summarize the political grift any better. https://www.kunstler.com/p/showdown

Some don't understand the dynamic nature of these conflicts and bluntly, lack the patience to let things play out. You don't need to win every battle to win the war. For some the only acceptable outcome is perfect execution. For critics, failures are highlighted and magnified, victories are downplayed and minimized in importance. Casualties are unacceptable but I'll wager if military planners were required to only plan and execute operations that were guaranteed to result in zero casualties there would be no military. I agree, the U.S. blockade of shipping out of points of Iranian origin will starve the country of revenue necessary to continue operations. Without revenue from oil and product exports, the regime will be out of funds to run the government, run and pay the military and the Republican Guard, buy weapons, run factories, and fund their support network of terrorist proxies. Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthis all will be forced to cease operations and capitulate or go into hiding, or be exterminated. Domestic and international detractors of the Trump administration know this and are pissed. They can see the end and it will be something of an unconditional surrender by Iran. At some point in the next 3-4 weeks Tehran will be out of money and the Straits will be open for commerce. Only Iran will be constrained in their ability to navigate the waterway. Negotiations are not complicated at this point either. The U.S. is winning but Iran appears to be unwilling to make any concessions. That's not how real life works. My conclusion is we're pounding the crap out of them and they're demanding we agree to a tie.

Curious. When I argued our involvement in Ukraine was a pointless mess your compatriots on PPP called me a Putin appeaser and a MAGA isolationist. But here you are arguing against involvement in a different pointless war. Have you converted to an America First isolationist or perhaps a Libertarian? 1) Is the Ukraine v Iran difference merely a disdain for direct involvement? 2) Or are the Russians so much more dangerous than the Iranians? 3) Or is it the intervention in Ukraine was initiated by the Biden administration (EDIT - correcting myself. It was initiated under Obama via Dept of State and CIA), so good, and the intervention in Iran was initiated by the Trump administration, so bad? 4) Something else?

In my experience most people are cowards. This guy wouldn't have shoved that women if she was a 6' 5" 240 pound man that could bench 225 pounds 20 times and trained in combat and fighting skills. Because his shove would have resulted in a visit to the local hospital's ICU. This guy meets the definition of a coward. The shape of his head suggests he's some sort of low-IQ mutant. People generally won't pick on somebody that is bigger, stronger, and faster then they are but maybe that's a sign of a rational thinker too. I have a friend that's an example of the 6 foot 5 inch guy. He never looked for trouble because he had nothing to prove. An occasional idiot would start something with him. I'm not sure what they were thinking but it never turned out the way they thought it would. Leftists are all for political violence unless someone is hitting them. Then its crying and shrieking about right wing extremists. I'd like to see what happens when some alt-militia group confronts these lefties or antifa in the streets. My guess is these thugs will get the ass-whipping they deserve but of course the media whores will be circling the story while ignoring it if it went the other way. Oh, and for sure blue sitting mayor's keeping the cops on a leash while men attack women in the streets will sick them on the right. Guaranteed.

Frankly, its not a good use of my time building a case only for you to dismiss my conclusions. I rate it slim to none you'll accept my contention as valid and admit the error of your ways and at least consider it. And sure parties to motions and judgements do forum shopping but they don't defy the odds time after time and get the same judge through what is said to be a random assignment algorithm. Your attempts to demonstrate your intellect aside, here's another vacated motion initiated by King Boasberg attempting to dictate to the executive branch through receiving zero votes in the general election.. https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/appeals-court-terminates-criminal-contempt-proceedings-against-trump-admin-6011728?utm

Here's the thing. All your allegations against Trump at this point are uninformed speculation. Do you have any firsthand knowledge of events? Or do you rely on the opinions and posts of others with clear biases that are also speculating? Whether they're true and can be proven in some court is unknown at this time. Because nobody has come forward to accuse and press for formal charges. And if there is some level of evidence implicating the guy then why isn't some Blue State prosecutor, such as Letitia James, that achieved a conviction on manufacturing a criminal offense without a victim (the banks allegedly being defrauded were witnesses for the defense), an act of pure genius on somebody's part, aggressively engaging anyone claiming to be a victim of sexual abuse and sex with minors charges? So why hasn't anyone pressed for charges? I'll tell you why. And this is speculation too. The reason they don't press for charges is that doing so has a good chance of failing in some court. And if it fails in court the narrative is dead and cannot be used in the media, both social and mainstream. because the idea is not to damage Trump legally, but to damage him through the media where uniformed speculation is a main staple of the resistance. But you know that. And damaging the narrative would mean one more talking point that goes to the trash heap.

Judges such as Boasberg, for example. Dem lawfare attorneys going venue shopping flock to the DC court. Magical random case assignment finds its way to this specific judge. His judicial overreach has been shot down on appeal more times than not. Is that fun enough for you?

Just remember the proper protocol established by liberals in these kind of situations. All women are to be believed and accusation equates to guilt.

There's good guys with guns and bad guys with guns. Good guys follow the law and the proper procedures and rules for acquiring and using firearms. Bad guys do not and are subject to criminal prosecution and imprisonment. The issue of gun control is that the people it will impact are those following the law. The objective of taking guns out of the hands of criminals cannot be achieved by taking guns out of the hands of those following the rules. There are immigrants here legally that follow the law and the proper procedures for entering, working, living, and gaining citizenship in America. There are immigrants here illegally that don't follow the rules that are subject to criminal and legal prosecution and deportation. The issue here is the liberal establishment makes no distinction between legal and illegal immigration. That said, the majority of Americans have few to no issues with legal immigration. Speaking for myself, I have no objection to legal immigration. Almost every poster you might call "racist" has no objection to legal immigration. Its not racism, its objection to illegal law-breakers and the support system that helps illegals enter and stay in the country. As for No Kings, liberals have no problem with Kings in the judiciary that veto Presidential and executive branch actions based on political ideology and then have some 80% of these judicial edicts based on flimsy or non-existent legal interpretations shot down once reviewed by higher courts. Its all politically motivated obstruction of the elected government.

Before that there's work to do. If you haven't heard yet, the next big liberal lovefest is the May Day protests. What they're ultimately unhappy about is not Trump's personal antics or his statements or his "dictator" actions. If he was a liberal doing the things they support being a dictator would be okay. I'm rambling here, but they're pissed because the country elected a President that doesn't follow standard political decorum, is anti-globalist, anti-multicultural President that opposes mass immigration, and the destruction of western civilization. Add in his dislike for the socialist governments in Europe, which is failing right before our eye, that would prefer to keep mooching off the US taxpayer. I should mention criticism of NATO which was established to keep the communists out of Western Europe, but that point is now moot because the communists are now running Western Europe. So, we lost that one.

To the logical thinker it is absolutely comical to suggest Iran is "stronger". Think of how strong the Revolutionary Guard would be if they were all dead! But we should understand by now the liberal intellectuals on the board here are always correct and much smarter than everyone else and they take advantage of every opportunity to remind us all of that during the course of debate and exchange of opinions.

The same can be said of Hillary Clinton but I can't recall a so-called "progressive" voice dare the criticize her. Bill was quite a womanizer in his prime and his connections to Epstein are pretty clear. I think its clear both these guys are in the same boat.

The fact that the minds of most "educated" liberals live in an alternative reality where identity politics is the primary driver of every thought is frightening. In a sense what they say and appear to believe is comical. All that's missing from these videos in the laugh tracks.