Jump to content

LeSean McCoy allegations


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Tsaikotic said:

most or all states might have gotten rid of common law marriage but they cant seem to get rid of stupid tenant laws...you live somewhere for a certain amount of time and even if your name isnt on anything, its still legally your dwelling until the courts say otherwise

 

The flip side of that is landlords kicking people out on to the street without any semblance of due process.  Which, despite all the legal protections lessees have, still happens rather frequently.

 

It's not the easiest collection of rights and responsibilities to balance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DC Tom said:

 

The flip side of that is landlords kicking people out on to the street without any semblance of due process.  Which, despite all the legal protections lessees have, still happens rather frequently.

 

It's not the easiest collection of rights and responsibilities to balance.

yea, my aunt and uncle owned an apt. building and they were in court often trying to get rid of ppl...it sucks for the landlords but it is a protection for ppl that had no reason for being evicted

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, The Wiz said:

Look man, I ain't falling for no banana in the tailpipe!

Has anyone actually tried it?  Does it really work (well except for Eddie Murphy in Beverly Hills Cop)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

It sucks that he's going to get a lifetime suspension over this...

His kid, too. Goodell will ban him as well, stating that if I can ban your dad for being a falsely accused victim in a domestic abuse case, I have to ban you, too. You were named in the Instagram post that was deleted and debunked!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Kelly the Dog said:

His kid, too. Goodell will ban him as well, stating that if I can ban your dad for being a falsely accused victim in a domestic abuse case, I have to ban you, too. You were named in the Instagram post that was deleted and debunked!

 

Hey, once one member of the family has shown a propensity to be falsely accused, you know it's only a matter of time before his offspring will also be falsely accused.  Better to nip that in the bud now.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

She was invited to reside there.  That's not "squatting."  Legally, she's a tenant.

 

Tenant? 

Guest maybe, but not tenant.

Even if she were considered to be a "tenant," at best, she has month-to-month tenancy unless there is something in writing with LKM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

The 16 year old wasn’t there at 3am? Is this Marcus vick’s Kid? Read somewhere she has a kid with him and a kid with Shady, she’s only been with Shady for 2 yrs

Shady's probably on a pretty healthy dose of penicillin.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an aside, if the jewelry belonged to a jeweler that lent it to Shady, it would have been beyond stupid to hire someone to pistol whip a woman to take the jewelry to return it to the jeweler.

 

I don't think that Shady is stupid.

 

Update:

 

Another post now says the jewelry was lent to her.  That conflicts with other reports.  Nevertheless, if it were lent directly to her, why would Shady care if she returned it or not.

Edited by Peter
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Peter said:

 

Tenant? 

Guest maybe, but not tenant.

Even if she were considered to be a "tenant," at best, she has month-to-month tenancy unless there is something in writing with LKM.

 

Legally, tenant-at-will.

 

We went through this already.  Read the whole topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, rodneykm said:

 

Kids.

 

Listen to me here....this is the best advice you will EVER get in life

will just take it one more step......"crazy" can mask itself at first for a while.....be aware....once seen get the hell out of dodge quick!

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Peter said:

 

It doesn't?!?

 

 

 

No.  Could mean he was hiding under the bed.  "Missing," in that context, is "did not see after a cursory search."

 

When and where they finally found him, that is meaningful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JPP said:

will just take it one more step......"crazy" can mask itself at first for a while.....be aware....once seen get the hell out of dodge quick!

 

Re-posting as a Public Service.... 

 

 

 

Edited by Lurker
  • Like (+1) 3
  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what we know now I think it's logical to believe it was a random robbery and she told the cops it may have something to do with my ex(because he was asking for said jewelry) The person that posted the Instagram post may have had her own agenda in trying to get her friend a huge payday.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, rodneykm said:

 

Kids.

 

Listen to me here....this is the best advice you will EVER get in life

The problem is you have to date crazy one to know you should never date crazy. It’s like a child touching a hot stove. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Kelly the Dog said:

His kid, too. Goodell will ban him as well, stating that if I can ban your dad for being a falsely accused victim in a domestic abuse case, I have to ban you, too. You were named in the Instagram post that was deleted and debunked!

 

And ban Colt McCoy, just to be safe.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Starr Almighty said:

From what we know now I think it's logical to believe it was a random robbery and she told the cops it may have something to do with my ex(because he was asking for said jewelry) The person that posted the Instagram post may have had her own agenda in trying to get her friend a huge payday.

 

This is exactly what it sounds like, I agree. 

 

We just went from maybe 4 wins to probably 7 or 8. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Starr Almighty said:

From what we know now I think it's logical to believe it was a random robbery and she told the cops it may have something to do with my ex(because he was asking for said jewelry) The person that posted the Instagram post may have had her own agenda in trying to get her friend a huge payday.

 

So...four game suspension by Goodell, then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GaryPinC said:

 

Or the 16 year old kid snuck out for the night when he wasn't supposed to.  Gave the thief an easy way in.  Neighbors' cameras might be helpful.  Pretty hard to believe the kid would go through all the trouble and beat up his own mom when he lived there and would have plenty of opportunities to steal the jewelry.

 

Yeah, there's just something weird to the window thing. Maybe there's a logical explanation for it but it seems to me that there's a couple possibilities:

 

1. The attacker had been inside the house already at some point (maybe some sort of contract work where he also scoped things out) and left the son's window cracked to come back later on and used this as both the entry and exit point for the attack.

 

2. The son is involved in some way.

 

3. The attacker was able to waltz right in through the front door, but for some reason decided to grab a bed sheet, tie it something, and use that window as his exit point for no real good reason.

 

It just seems very strange to me, but if they have video surveillance of the outside of the house, that should help a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Legally, tenant-at-will.

 

We went through this already.  Read the whole topic.

 

How long is the tenancy of a tenant at will?

 

4 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

No.  Could mean he was hiding under the bed.  "Missing," in that context, is "did not see after a cursory search."

 

When and where they finally found him, that is meaningful.

 

How many days out of the year has this woman been pistol whipped and had her jewelry taken?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DCOrange said:

 

Yeah, there's just something weird to the window thing. Maybe there's a logical explanation for it but it seems to me that there's a couple possibilities:

 

1. The attacker had been inside the house already at some point (maybe some sort of contract work where he also scoped things out) and left the son's window cracked to come back later on and used this as both the entry and exit point for the attack.

 

2. The son is involved in some way.

 

3. The attacker was able to waltz right in through the front door, but for some reason decided to grab a bed sheet, tie it something, and use that window as his exit point for no real good reason.

 

It just seems very strange to me, but if they have video surveillance of the outside of the house, that should help a lot.

Son is 16....shimmied down from window in bed sheet so could go out with friends without mom knowing...perp saw open window with bed sheet....Damn!! isnt that Shady's home?  Lets go rob him....

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DCOrange said:

 

Yeah, there's just something weird to the window thing. Maybe there's a logical explanation for it but it seems to me that there's a couple possibilities:

 

1. The attacker had been inside the house already at some point (maybe some sort of contract work where he also scoped things out) and left the son's window cracked to come back later on and used this as both the entry and exit point for the attack.

 

2. The son is involved in some way.

 

3. The attacker was able to waltz right in through the front door, but for some reason decided to grab a bed sheet, tie it something, and use that window as his exit point for no real good reason.

 

It just seems very strange to me, but if they have video surveillance of the outside of the house, that should help a lot.

As to #2, I agree. It’s interesting that the 16 yr old son was the one who was served the eviction papers last month. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Peter said:

As an aside, if the jewelry belonged to a jeweler that lent it to Shady, it would have been beyond stupid to hire someone to pistol whip a woman to take the jewelry to return it to the jeweler.

 

I don't think that Shady is stupid.

 

Update:

 

Another post now says the jewelry was lent to her.  That conflicts with other reports.  Nevertheless, if it were lent directly to her, why would Shady care if she returned it or not.

He would care because he's probably the one that loaned it out/rented it and is responsible to pay for it if it's not returned to the jeweler.

Edited by The Wiz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Wiz said:

He would care because he's probably the one that loaned it out/rented it and is responsible to pay for it if it's not returned to the jeweler.

 

That is the point.  He would only care if it were loaned to him.  In such case, he would have been stupid to hire someone to pistol whip her, take the jewelry, and then return it.  I don't think he is stupid.

 

If the jewelry had been lent to her (as the one report states, perhaps incorrectly), Shady would not have cared at all and why would she insinuate that he was responsible for pistol whipping her and taking the jewelry.

 

Neither scenario makes much sense to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...