Jauronimo Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 14 minutes ago, BuffaloSol said: Thank god people are finally strong enough to proclaim on a message board that women don't deserve to be beaten just because they are crazy. But let's also be clear: Water is Wet What argument could you possibly have that she deserved this? I'll wait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: This is true, and surprisingly perspicacious. But - and this is important to note - that still doesn't mean that crazy women deserve to be beaten. That's not how it works. That's not how any of this works. Go argue with yourself then. There is a word for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real Buffalo Joe Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 1 minute ago, Jauronimo said: What argument could you possibly have that she deserved this? I'll wait. Because I'm a nice guy that respects the **** out of women. But she probably would have ignored me for some good looking douchebag. [end sarcasm] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 Just now, Peter said: Go argue with yourself then. There is a word for that. Why would I argue with myself? I'm right, and you're wrong. There is NOT a "ticking clock," there is a process, which is open ended, during which a tenant has a right of residency. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 17 minutes ago, BuffaloSol said: Thank god people are finally strong enough to proclaim on a message board that women don't deserve to be beaten just because they are crazy. But let's also be clear: Water is Wet Water itself is not wet actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloSol Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 Just now, DC Tom said: I'm not acting like a white knight. I'm protecting myself from overreactive fools. Read the rest of my post..... Yes you are acting like a white knight, overly protecting a woman from scrutiny. People are suggesting that she may have set this up or mad at her for squatting; and those are legit theories or speculations at this point because we only have a little information, nothing tying McCoy to it and little Motivation for a multimillionaire with a bunch of money left on the table to commit the crime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 2 minutes ago, Jauronimo said: What argument could you possibly have that she deserved this? I'll wait. There might actually be some thing that one could argue, but it would have to be more grotesque and disturbing than what happened to her. Just now, 26CornerBlitz said: Water itself is not wet actually. Yes- I love it when threads devolve into fluid dynamics! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 1 minute ago, BuffaloSol said: Read the rest of my post..... Yes you are acting like a white knight, overly protecting a woman from scrutiny. People are suggesting that she may have set this up or mad at her for squatting; and those are legit theories or speculations at this point because we only have a little information, nothing tying McCoy to it and little Motivation for a multimillionaire with a bunch of money left on the table to commit the crime. No, I'm not. It is not protecting her from scrutiny to say she doesn't deserve to be beaten because she's nuts. Scrutinize her all you want. It is protecting me from the idiocy of people who think "she's crazy" is "victim blaming." Which we've already had happen in this very thread, which is why I posted it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dablitzkrieg Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 That's more like it guys. Getting closer...#200 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 49 minutes ago, gr8billsfan said: Also, police recovered the jewelry. It was lent to her by jewelry companies. https://twitter.com/mpetchenikwsb/status/1017474089563377664?s=21 They did? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 13 minutes ago, DC Tom said: It would take a low-watt light bulb like McCoy to order a hit and have it end up with the target literally being hit with a gun. No, that was because they're married... I feel like everyone here needs to watch "I, Tonja." We are in the process of living that movie (vicariously!) right now, I suspect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 25 minutes ago, Gugny said: It's becoming clearer and clearer that McCoy had something to do with orchestrating this hit. Yeah, no. It's actually looking like the complete opposite of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 Just now, Doc said: They did? No. That's not what that tweet said. I think the bigger problem in discussions like this isn't the rampant speculation so much as the rampant illiteracy. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce_Stools Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 Battered women.......sounds delicious. Doesn’t make it right 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 Just now, Doc said: Yeah, no. It's actually looking like the complete opposite of that. Pretty sure, given that he's calling it a hit, that he's kidding. Just now, Bruce_Stools said: Battered women.......sounds delicious. Doesn’t make it right Stop being a white knight and scrutinize her! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayne Cubed Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 This thread is finally getting good... I’m just here to learn about tenants rights! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 Just now, DC Tom said: No. That's not what that tweet said. I think the bigger problem in discussions like this isn't the rampant speculation so much as the rampant illiteracy. Yeah, that's what I thought. Just wanted to clarify. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 Just now, Wayne Cubed said: This thread is finally getting good... I’m just here to learn about tenants rights! Then read the WHOLE thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 1 minute ago, Doc said: Yeah, no. It's actually looking like the complete opposite of that. I wouldn't say that at all. There's a fair bit of conflicting info out there, now, but some definitely points to McCoy. None of us know yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real Buffalo Joe Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 1 minute ago, dave mcbride said: I feel like everyone here needs to watch "I, Tonja." We are in the process of living that movie (vicariously!) right now, I suspect. Yep. Shady's girlfriend was his biggest competition for a the #1 RB role on the team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloSol Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 11 minutes ago, Jauronimo said: What argument could you possibly have that she deserved this? I'll wait. When did I say she deserved it? I'm being sarcastic about someone proclaiming it on a message board like it needs to be said. We all know that she didn't deserve it but, some people think that questioning her motives and suggesting theories about the crime mean that those people think she deserved it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heitz Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: No. That's not what that tweet said. I think the bigger problem in discussions like this isn't the rampant speculation so much as the rampant illiteracy. R.I.F. Reading Is...F'n Hard? ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayne Cubed Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 Just now, DC Tom said: Then read the WHOLE thread. I have! I like the recaps happening every 10 pages or so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 Just now, dave mcbride said: I wouldn't say that at all. There's a fair bit of conflicting info out there, now, but some definitely points to McCoy. None of us know yet. The only thing I've seen pointing to McCoy is the woman's friend's instagram post and her lawyer's press release. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebandit27 Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 4 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: There might actually be some thing that one could argue, but it would have to be more grotesque and disturbing than what happened to her. Yes- I love it when threads devolve into fluid dynamics! I've had more than my share of fluid dynamics for one day--I've spent the last 10 hours working on a metalimnetic discharge manifold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 1 minute ago, Wayne Cubed said: I have! I like the recaps happening every 10 pages or so. Be sure to come back this time tomorrow, when we discuss Georgia tenant law again... 1 minute ago, thebandit27 said: I've had more than my share of fluid dynamics for one day--I've spent the last 10 hours working on a metalimnetic discharge manifold. And I, for one, deeply appreciate your dedication to solving this nation's great metalimnetic discharge manifold crisis. Thank You For Your Service. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloSol Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 10 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: Water itself is not wet actually. When you touch water you get wet actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 2 minutes ago, DC Tom said: The only thing I've seen pointing to McCoy is the woman's friend's instagram post and her lawyer's press release. It appears that McCoy was an intermediary for the jewelry loan, which is pretty suggestive. I'm not saying that'll get him convicted or anything like that, but he's hardly out of the woods. Who turned off the cameras? We haven't found that out yet either. If she didn't, it's also suggestive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 1 minute ago, BuffaloSol said: When you touch water you get wet actually. That makes YOU wet. Not the water. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real Buffalo Joe Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 Just now, BuffaloSol said: When you touch water you get wet actually. Yes. But your claim was that water, is in fact, wet. When in fact, objects being touched by water is wet, not the water itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Royale with Cheese Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 1 minute ago, BuffaloSol said: When you touch water you get wet actually. Then you’re wet, not the water. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 Just now, dave mcbride said: It appears that McCoy was an intermediary for the jewelry loan, which is pretty suggestive. I'm not saying that'll get him convicted or anything like that, but he's hardly out of the woods. Who turned off the cameras? We haven't found that out yet either. If she didn't, it's also suggestive. The problem is that there's a hell of a lot that's "suggestive," but doesn't become evidentiary without something else corroborating it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebandit27 Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: And I, for one, deeply appreciate your dedication to solving this nation's great metalimnetic discharge manifold crisis. Thank You For Your Service. These regulators want to effectively stuff 100 lbs of poop in a 10 lb bag, and their going to fine my client under order of consent if they don't manage to do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 1 minute ago, BuffaloSol said: When you touch water you get wet actually. Water molecules adhere to surfaces to produce the condition or feeling of being wet. The water itself is not wet as I posted the 1st time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloSol Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 8 minutes ago, DC Tom said: No, I'm not. It is not protecting her from scrutiny to say she doesn't deserve to be beaten because she's nuts. Scrutinize her all you want. It is protecting me from the idiocy of people who think "she's crazy" is "victim blaming." Which we've already had happen in this very thread, which is why I posted it. Well that makes more sense and I agree with you except I don't think we need to proclaim something that 99.9% of people agree with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 Just now, The Real Buffalo Joe said: Yes. But your claim was that water, is in fact, wet. When in fact, objects being touched by water is wet, not the water itself. Ah, but is the water wet because it's touching itself? I know you are...but we're talking about water here... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 Just now, DC Tom said: The problem is that there's a hell of a lot that's "suggestive," but doesn't become evidentiary without something else corroborating it. I never said he wouldn't get off! I just think that it's ridiculous to conclude that he's out of the woods because of a couple of murky tweets involving lawyer statements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 Just now, BuffaloSol said: Well that makes more sense and I agree with you except I don't think we need to proclaim something that 99.9% of people agree with. We do if we're talking to that 0.1% bunch of !@#$heads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real Buffalo Joe Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 Just now, DC Tom said: Ah, but is the water wet because it's touching itself? I know you are...but we're talking about water here... But what if the water is coming from the faucet of a shared family home? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 1 minute ago, thebandit27 said: These regulators want to effectively stuff 100 lbs of poop in a 10 lb bag, and their going to fine my client under order of consent if they don't manage to do it. So what are those called, then? Rob Ryan manifolds? 1 minute ago, The Real Buffalo Joe said: But what if the water is coming from the faucet of a shared family home? Then the ex-girlfriend gets wet, because when the house floods you can't kick her out because you married her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts