Jump to content

Philly deadline to get under the cap: Nick Foles


Recommended Posts

Philly has to knock off 9 mill from its cap before 4 pm ET March 14. Can they get there without trading Foles? After losing out in the Tyrod Taylor sweepstakes (felt good saying that), looks like it might come down to the Cardinals as the Bills, main competition.

 

Dark Horse is the Colts who might move down from no. 3 and use part of the returns to reunite Frank Reich with the SB MVP.

 

bottomline: I'd offer good odds on a trade for Foles happening the afternoon of March 14.

Edited by IgotBILLStopay
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Yep. Enough with the retreads.

 

Super Bowl MVP = retread.

 

Tough crowd.

 

I'd be happy with Foles and don't think that getting him prevents us from moving up for a top rookie.

  • Like (+1) 10
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Juice_32 said:

 

Super Bowl MVP = retread.

 

Tough crowd.

 

I'd be happy with Foles and don't think that getting him prevents us from moving up for a top rookie.

 

Does he play like a Super Bowl MVP on a consistent basis?  Nope!

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Juice_32 said:

 

Super Bowl MVP = retread.

 

Tough crowd.

 

I'd be happy with Foles and don't think that getting him prevents us from moving up for a top rookie.

Before the Superbowl he was an average QB and there wasn't much confidence in Foles by Eagles people when playoffs started. Having said that, he played very well in the playoffs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

I have no interest in Foles. Go get a top rookie

A qb such as Bradford would serve his purposes and ours. He may be able to salvage his career and the Bills should be able to get him in a short term deal. I'm also wouldn't mind getting Moore from Miami. He not only can start for the short term but also be a very good mentor and backup. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saw this: "Foles is clearly a player the Eagles don’t want to give away for nothing, but keeping his $7.6 million cap hit doesn’t look like a realistic option either. The team probably has no option but to cash in its chips and trade Foles."

 

So yes, Eagles need to trade him. Yes, I believe we should make a move for him, but don't give up too many picks. I say a 2nd and one other pick. Keep the 1's and the 3's intact (along w/ one of the 2's). Foles can man the ship for a year (the rest of this current contract) and let the drafted rookie QB sit and learn. Bonus, he's very cheap for a starting QB. 

Edited by 707BillsFan
  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Juice_32 said:

 

Super Bowl MVP = retread.

 

Tough crowd.

 

I'd be happy with Foles and don't think that getting him prevents us from moving up for a top rookie.

 

Yes it will. What do you think you are giving up to get Foles???

 

The Ammo need to go get a top rookie. 

 

Just say no to journeymen 

Edited by MAJBobby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, nucci said:

Before the Superbowl he was an average QB and there wasn't much confidence in Foles by Eagles people when playoffs started. Having said that, he played very well in the playoffs

 

He had a great year with Chip K. and looked rough with with Rams. On their playoff run and in the Super Bowl he outplayed Tom* Brady*.

 

Id still get a rookie if we went after him, but the guy deserves some credit.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, IgotBILLStopay said:

Philly has to knock off 9 mill from its cap before 4 pm ET March 14. Can they get there without trading Foles? After losing out in the Tyrod Taylor sweepstakes (felt good saying that), looks like it might come down to the Cardinals as the Bills, main competition.

 

Dark Horse is the Colts who might move down from no. 3 and use part of the returns to reunite Frank Reich with the SB MVP.

 

bottomline: I'd offer good odds on a trade for Foles happening the afternoon of March 14.

Easily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Maybe an inconsistent 29 year old QB is good enough for you, but I'd like the Bills to have better. 

 

Maybe you failed to read where I said he'd not prevent us from getting a rookie and I'd still get one. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BuffaloHokie13 said:

Not what I asked, but no. That's the QB that couldn't even beat the Bengals to get to the Playoffs, remember?

 

What are your thought on him as a QB? I mean, he's a Super Bowl MVP right?

 

Your question was pretty unspecific, I was just trying to clarify. 

 

I'd rather have Foles and a rookie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the Bills would have moved on from Taylor if they weren't nearly complete certain that they had a veteran replacement.  They weren't going into 2018 with Peterman and a rookie.  

 

The news has been that the Eagles want to move Files and there was a rumor the Bills offered a second.  My first thought when I heard about Taylor was that the Bills needed another pick to sweeten the pot for the Eagles.  

 

Foles has played a lot of good football in the NFL, just not consistently.  If the Bills want him, I have to think the Bills can make him a consistent quality starter.  It also means they can go slow on a rookie QB.  No trade up, just get another quality youngster ti compete with Peterman.  Files would be your guy for 2 or 3 or 8byears, depending in how Files and the youngsters pan out.  

 

In the meantime, the Bills will still have at least three picks in the top 65.  

 

I'm still hoping for Cousins.  There's been no news about him for days now, and the reports that he was down to four teams weren't all that firm.  

 

It's going to be an interesting week. 

Edited by Shaw66
  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Juice_32 said:

 

Maybe you failed to read where I said he'd not prevent us from getting a rookie and I'd still get one. 

 

You want to sacrifice draft capital for Foles that will make it harder to get a top rookie.  Nope!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Juice_32 said:

 

Your question was pretty unspecific, I was just trying to clarify. 

 

I'd rather have Foles and a rookie.

I'd rather Foles be a draft day trade or no trade at all. I don't want to give up a 2nd for him, what happens if one of the big 4 comes tumbling down the board and we want to move up? 21 + 53 gets us up to 12, I think that's best case scenario for us and very realistic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Foles could make sense.  At worst you get a similar level (not style) of play as TT, at best you get a Gannon franchise QB for the next 4-6 years.  

 

He has done it before and under the right circumstances could do it again.

 

The concerning part has been his consistency and that would be the calculation, which is basically the calculation you make with a high end rookie.  

 

So it's not a matter if he can but will he.

 

I wouldn't be opposed to gambling on Foles who has proven to be a high  ceiling QB.  It's his consistency that would be the risk.

Edited by Magox
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...