Jump to content

Liberal Protests


B-Man

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Magox said:

Clearly Matt Parrino is part of the thought police.

 

 

 

 

There was absolutely nothing wrong with Brees' response. People can agree with the sentiments without agreeing with the manner in which those sentiments might be  expressed.

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, billsfan1959 said:

 

There was absolutely nothing wrong with Brees' response. People can agree with the sentiments without agreeing with the manner in which those sentiments might be  expressed.

 

 

It's not even about what he said for me.  It's his opinion, people can form their own thoughts but this reporter felt the need to castigate him for his thoughts.  In other words, what he is saying is "Submit to my views, if not, shut the hell up!"

 

The thought police seems to be a main component of the modern day left.

  • Like (+1) 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Magox said:

This guy is the chair of New York City Council health committee. 

 

These are the guys that are involved in the decision making process of who remains sheltered and who doesn't.

 

Remember that.

 

 

 

Let's be clear? Ok Mark.  It's clear.  Very clear.  Extremely clear.  I've not seen anything this CLEAR in a long time.  It's clear you're a ***** idiot!

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Justice said:

Here’s something you won’t find in your stats. I owned a c-store in a predominantly black neighborhood for over 10 years. It was a common sight to see police harass my customers on a regular basis as they left my establishment. Too many times to count. I’ve also had customers tell me how they just got pulled over on their way to my store and were searched for no reason and not ticketed at all. 
 

I rented out my business and moved to the next one in a non-black, high income neighborhood that consisted mainly of Cuban Americans and white Americans. There was a police precinct no more than 150 yards away. The customers in this store drank beer in front of the business all day every day and nobody ever got harassed or pulled over. Take it for what it’s worth. 

 

Did you ever get robbed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It remains a shocking failure that many African Americans, especially young African American men, are harassed and threatened in their own country. It is a strength when protesters, protected by responsible law enforcement, march for a better future. This tragedy — in a long series of similar tragedies — raises a long overdue question: How do we end systemic racism in our society? The only way to see ourselves in a true light is to listen to the voices of so many who are hurting and grieving. Those who set out to silence those voices do not understand the meaning of America — or how it becomes a better place.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Magox said:

This guy is the chair of New York City Council health committee. 

 

These are the guys that are involved in the decision making process of who remains sheltered and who doesn't.

 

Remember that.

 

 

 

File this under “Tweets that didn’t age so well”:

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

It remains a shocking failure that many African Americans, especially young African American men, are harassed and threatened in their own country. It is a strength when protesters, protected by responsible law enforcement, march for a better future. This tragedy — in a long series of similar tragedies — raises a long overdue question: How do we end systemic racism in our society? The only way to see ourselves in a true light is to listen to the voices of so many who are hurting and grieving. Those who set out to silence those voices do not understand the meaning of America — or how it becomes a better place.


Who, in your opinion, is silencing those voices the most?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Did you ever get robbed?

Yes and no. I wasn’t there the one time it happened in 10 plus years. I was on vacation. Thankfully nobody was hurt. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Justice said:

Yes and no. I wasn’t there the one time it happened in 10 plus years. I was on vacation. Thankfully nobody was hurt. 

 

That's good.  Do you think the police presence helped deter crime?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Magox said:

 

 

It's not even about what he said for me.  It's his opinion, people can form their own thoughts but this reporter felt the need to castigate him for his thoughts.  In other words, what he is saying is "Submit to my views, if not, shut the hell up!"

 

The thought police seems to be a main component of the modern day left.

 

 

This exactly what these people are about, and the main reason I dropped my support for the Left.

 

Social media is filled with little tests and groupthink challenges to get everyone to conform, or "be exposed".

 

"Everyone should turn their profile black, in support of the protesters"...if you don't you are clearly a racist POS. Social media is filled with this stuff and kids are particularly pressured by these tactics.

 

Even the "I Voted" stickers are a mild form of this. It's nobody's business whether I voted or not. It's a shaming tool.

 

***** them all. 

 

 

 

Edited by Prickly Pete
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Doc said:

 

That's good.  Do you think the police presence helped deter crime?

One would think yes, but no. It’s not like they stuck around. I rarely seen them unless they came around to question and harass people. That’s why the guys from the area referred to them as “the jump out boys”. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Magox said:

 

 

It's not even about what he said for me.  It's his opinion, people can form their own thoughts but this reporter felt the need to castigate him for his thoughts.  In other words, what he is saying is "Submit to my views, if not, shut the hell up!"

 

The thought police seems to be a main component of the modern day left.

This my issue with BLM movement. They are not interested in communicating. You can only agree with them or you're a racist. If you are a white and agree with them you still need to not speak on the subject. It is blatantly over the top insulting. 

 

I have done some research on BLM because I wanted to see what it was about. At least I wanted to see more than just BLM spray painted on a building or car. The truth is that it has zero substance whatsoever. The website literally has one idea or demand on it, "defund police". The other content is t-shirts.

 

It is a sham. It is just an angry rant for black people to tee off on white society. It is also a woke badge for white millennials on Facebook. Literally no dialogue, no substance, and no advancement for the black community.

 

The NAACP and ACLU are everything BLM is not. I don't always agree with them but you can see their dedication to bettering minorities through education, housing, legal funding, etc.

 

BLM is a bumper sticker for soccer moms and something to carve into a cop car. Pointless

Edited by Needle
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LB3 said:

That's a good smattering of videos. Almost no context other than claims that they were peaceful. I guess we should "believe all protesters" that they did nothing wrong. ?‍♂️

Draw your own conclusions. 

 

I haven't seen any demands for context on the dozens of other videos posted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jauronimo said:

Draw your own conclusions. 

 

I haven't seen any demands for context on the dozens of other videos posted.

I specifically questioned a tweet earlier that the Dallas man that was viciously assaulted had died. Context is everything.

Edited by LB3
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Retired Admiral Michael Mullen, who served as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under both Bush and President Barack Obama, wrote a piece for The Atlantic titled “I Cannot Remain Silent”:

It sickened me yesterday to see security personnel—including members of the National Guard—forcibly and violently clear a path through Lafayette Square to accommodate the president's visit outside St. John's Church. I have to date been reticent to speak out on issues surrounding President Trump's leadership, but we are at an inflection point, and the events of the past few weeks have made it impossible to remain silent.
Whatever Trump’s goal in conducting his visit, he laid bare his disdain for the rights of peaceful protest in this country, gave succor to the leaders of other countries who take comfort in our domestic strife, and risked further politicizing the men and women of our armed forces.
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LB3 said:

I specifically questioned a tweet earlier that the Dallas man that was viciously assaulted had died.

Contrary to most posts, I have seen no evidence that individual was a store owner. He was apparently "protecting his neighborhood" with a short sword or gladius which remained sheathed.  Earlier videos show he was being pelted by rocks and trash before singling out of one of the crowd and chasing a guy down.  He was savagely beaten before he could do much of anything to the guy he was chasing.  

 

And hes still alive.

 

https://www.star-telegram.com/news/local/dallas/article243153526.html

Edited by Jauronimo
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jauronimo said:

Contrary to most posts, I have seen no evidence that individual was a store owner. He was apparently "protecting his neighborhood" with a short sword or gladius which remained sheathed.  Earlier videos show he was being pelted by rocks and trash before singling out of one of the crowd and chasing a guy down.  He was savagely beaten before he could do much of anything to the guy he was chasing.  

From what I saw, the guy was tweeting that it was silly of him to go protect his favorite bar. He didn't deserve the beating he took.  He was also definitely dumb for bringing a short sword to a rock fight.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

And this can help him win the election rather easily. I already believe he will win. But if he squashes this whole thing without violence he will gain a great deal of support. 

Furthermore there is a little bit of a gamble involved in this strategy of deploying the National Guard and maybe this is the reason why President Trump has yet to do it in other states. If there’s violence he would lose support. If there isn’t he will gain a ton of support. Same is to be said about the other side. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

And just as people are starting to see it, and the righteous protests are dying down -- time for a narrative switch: 

 

Yes, .stay away from  the Cuomo's especially Chris.

Edited by Wacka
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

 

I’m the one asking the question right now, not you, big boy.  I await your response. 

 

 

You're too lazy or ignorant to connect the dots of what's been happening since 2008 because it will spoil your narrative.

 

Obama did all the things that Trump is being slammed for, but as always received a pass .  It's not hard to see the dominoes falling from his initial stab at starting a much needed dialogue based on personal experience, with the gravitas of the Presidency behind him, to the full on ***** show that remained when he left the office.

 

If you want to walk down memory lane, go ahead with the grandma anecdote, and then a hard pivot to calling Boston PD irresponsible for responding to a routine call.  Then personally inserting himself into highly charged legal battles (all on one side) and then not by standing up for LE, which led to riots and multiple officers executed in the line of duty.  When the results didn't fall his way, his DoJ suddenly appeared on the scene to adjudicate the wrong verdicts handed down by local juries.  Funny how nobody cared about Presidential interference in judicial affairs back then.

 

You also can't look at the isolated incidents, but the culmination of how his actions derailed what was a noble BLM cause into another shouting match that made things worse by siding with life long hucksters and race baiting peddlers.  That's how all the false narratives became enshrined in the vernacular, and why half the country immediately tuned it out. 

 

BLM movement morphed from shining a light at what the black community faces on a daily basis, and how the ingrained prejudice influences many conscious and subconscious responses, into arguing that the only issue that needed to be discussed was black deaths at the hands of law enforcement.  By positioning BLM into this box, the movement turned off everyone who dared ask why would not all lives matter, did black lives matter if they were killed by fellow blacks, or are there solutions other than pandering to the cause.  And then nobody in his administration or DNC dared to introduce the valid counterarguments or to extend the topics beyond blue check shame blaming.

 

Obama had ample opportunities to begin the healing in 2008 and was in the best position that anyone in the history of this country has ever had to push a frank discussion, and like everything else in his tenure, he shrunk to the challenge.  

Edited by GG
  • Like (+1) 6
  • Awesome! (+1) 4
  • Thank you (+1) 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

REASONS.........

 

 

 

Beneath the Surface 2

 

That cop who killed Mr. Floyd and the other cops who watched - all from the institutionally racist Minny police department -  that precipitated the protests and riots came from broken families? 

 

I did not know that...makes sense tho....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

REASONS.........

 

 

 

Beneath the Surface 2

Not sure why this is significant or actually effective.

Could say

Speeding on highway up as a result of broken families

Murders up as a result of broken families

Drug use up as a result of broken families

Broken families up as a result of broken families

Church donations down as a result of broken families

 

The art work is better than the message

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GG said:

 

You're too lazy or ignorant to connect the dots of what's been happening since 2008 because it will spoil your narrative.

 

Obama did all the things that Trump is being slammed for, but as always received a pass .  It's not hard to see the dominoes falling from his initial stab at starting a much needed dialogue based on personal experience, with the gravitas of the Presidency behind him, to the full on ***** show that remained when he left the office.

 

If you want to walk down memory lane, go ahead with the grandma anecdote, and then a hard pivot to calling Boston PD for responding to a routine call.  Then personally inserting himself into highly charged legal battles (all on one side) and then not by standing up for LE, which led to riots and multiple officers executed in the line of duty.  When the results didn't fall his way, his DoJ suddenly appeared on the scene to adjudicate the wrong verdicts handed down by local juries.  Funny how nobody cared about Presidential interference in judicial affairs back then.

 

You also can't look at the isolated incidents, but the culmination of how his actions derailed what was a noble BLM cause into another shouting match that made things worse by siding with life long hucksters and race baiting peddlers.  That's how all the false narratives became enshrined in the vernacular, and why half the country immediately tuned it out. 

 

BLM movement morphed from shining a light at what the black community faces on a daily basis, and how the ingrained prejudice influences many conscious and subconscious responses, into arguing that the only issue that needed to be discussed was black deaths at the hands of law enforcement.  By positioning BLM into this box, the movement turned off everyone who dared ask why would not all lives matter, did black lives matter if they were killed by fellow blacks, or are there solutions other than pandering to the cause.  And then nobody in his administration or DNC dared to introduce the valid counterarguments or to extend the topics beyond blue check shame blaming.

 

Obama had ample opportunities to begin the healing in 2008 and was in the best position that anyone in the history of this country has ever had to push a frank discussion, and like everything else in his tenure, he shrunk to the challenge.  

 

All of this is your typical hoaxy complaining.  If I can deign to interpret what you wrote, it seems to be that you’re upset that Obama didn’t do enough to address this issue.  So your complaint essentially distills to the point that his inaction fanned the flames of this problem.  

 

You also attempted to make me smile in the balance of your post.  That I appreciate.  

 

The complaints about a president inserting himself into “highly charged legal battles” (hello, Paul Manafort and Mike Flynn) are simply gems.  And I really enjoyed your non-specific point that “the culmination of how his actions derailed what was a noble BLM cause into another shouting match that made things worse by siding with life long hucksters and race baiting peddlers.”  I have no idea how Obama’s actions derailed that movement, and I’m left with one unfortunate but unavoidable observation: you’ve invented a talking point (namely, that Obama’s actions fanned the flames of racial divide) and are unable or unwilling to support it with non-alternative facts.  Bravo, sir, for bringing a smile to my face!

10 minutes ago, Wacka said:

Yes, .stay away from  thee Cuomo's especially Chris.

Fun fact.  A majority of illegal immigrants from Mexico practice better grammar than you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Niagara Bill said:

Not sure why this is significant or actually effective.

Could say

Speeding on highway up as a result of broken families

Murders up as a result of broken families

Drug use up as a result of broken families

Broken families up as a result of broken families

Church donations down as a result of broken families

 

The art work is better than the message

 

 

 

It fits his narrative:beer:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Retired Admiral Michael Mullen, who served as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under both Bush and President Barack Obama, wrote a piece for The Atlantic titled “I Cannot Remain Silent”:

It sickened me yesterday to see security personnel—including members of the National Guard—forcibly and violently clear a path through Lafayette Square to accommodate the president's visit outside St. John's Church. I have to date been reticent to speak out on issues surrounding President Trump's leadership, but we are at an inflection point, and the events of the past few weeks have made it impossible to remain silent.
Whatever Trump’s goal in conducting his visit, he laid bare his disdain for the rights of peaceful protest in this country, gave succor to the leaders of other countries who take comfort in our domestic strife, and risked further politicizing the men and women of our armed forces.

Silence is complicity.  Trumpy is a wannabe authoritarian douche.  I’m glad others are beginning to get off the sidelines and get into the game here. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we have systemic racism...can someone please tell me what 'system' they're talking about? If I'm tp assume they're referring to local Police Departments, then one would think that the 'system' would have fixed the problem years ago. Unfortunately for the narrative, this is NOT a systemic problem. There is no 'system' training or teaching ANYONE to act in a racist manner towards any particular race, creed, or religion. Oh yes, there are some bad police officers who act with a racist chip on their shoulder for sure. Other officers have chips on their shoulders for other things (my WHITE daughter was once pulled over and then brought to tears for the kind of car she was driving)  But just because those bad officers work within a 'system'....it doesn't make the 'system' racist.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, GG said:

 

You're too lazy or ignorant to connect the dots of what's been happening since 2008 because it will spoil your narrative.

 

Obama did all the things that Trump is being slammed for, but as always received a pass .  It's not hard to see the dominoes falling from his initial stab at starting a much needed dialogue based on personal experience, with the gravitas of the Presidency behind him, to the full on ***** show that remained when he left the office.

 

If you want to walk down memory lane, go ahead with the grandma anecdote, and then a hard pivot to calling Boston PD for responding to a routine call.  Then personally inserting himself into highly charged legal battles (all on one side) and then not by standing up for LE, which led to riots and multiple officers executed in the line of duty.  When the results didn't fall his way, his DoJ suddenly appeared on the scene to adjudicate the wrong verdicts handed down by local juries.  Funny how nobody cared about Presidential interference in judicial affairs back then.

 

You also can't look at the isolated incidents, but the culmination of how his actions derailed what was a noble BLM cause into another shouting match that made things worse by siding with life long hucksters and race baiting peddlers.  That's how all the false narratives became enshrined in the vernacular, and why half the country immediately tuned it out. 

 

BLM movement morphed from shining a light at what the black community faces on a daily basis, and how the ingrained prejudice influences many conscious and subconscious responses, into arguing that the only issue that needed to be discussed was black deaths at the hands of law enforcement.  By positioning BLM into this box, the movement turned off everyone who dared ask why would not all lives matter, did black lives matter if they were killed by fellow blacks, or are there solutions other than pandering to the cause.  And then nobody in his administration or DNC dared to introduce the valid counterarguments or to extend the topics beyond blue check shame blaming.

 

Obama had ample opportunities to begin the healing in 2008 and was in the best position that anyone in the history of this country has ever had to push a frank discussion, and like everything else in his tenure, he shrunk to the challenge.  

Why do people insist on comparing Trump to Obama. That makes the assumption that Obama was something special. HE WAS NOT A GOOD LEADER. The world gave him the Nobel peace prize when he was elected. Why? He did nothing except get elected. Giving him that was close to being racism. 

Trump is questionable as a president ( I would rather have Nixon) and Obama hardly is a candidate for Rushmore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Niagara Bill said:

Why do people insist on comparing Trump to Obama. That makes the assumption that Obama was something special. HE WAS NOT A GOOD LEADER. The world gave him the Nobel peace prize when he was elected. Why? He did nothing except get elected. Giving him that was close to being racism. 

Trump is questionable as a president ( I would rather have Nixon) and Obama hardly is a candidate for Rushmore.

Let me correct you there Niagara....giving Mr Obama the Nobel Prize was not close to...it was RACIST.  Racism works both ways. It can also be used to give people an advantage...which is exactly what the Left is claiming that Whites have been doing for years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, TH3 said:

 

That cop who killed Mr. Floyd and the other cops who watched - all from the institutionally racist Minny police department -  that precipitated the protests and riots came from broken families? 

 

I did not know that...makes sense tho....

 

9 minutes ago, Niagara Bill said:

Not sure why this is significant or actually effective.

Could say

Speeding on highway up as a result of broken families

Murders up as a result of broken families

Drug use up as a result of broken families

Broken families up as a result of broken families

Church donations down as a result of broken families

 

The art work is better than the message

 

 

 

 

6 minutes ago, TH3 said:

It fits his narrative:beer:

 

 

Sorry.

 

I am way too old to fall for the willful ignorance routine

 

 

The fact that the continuing breakup of the American family contributes to the RIOTING...............not the murder as you tried to say.

 

 

is so obvious as to preclude me from trying to explain it to such closed minds as yours.

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by B-Man
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Niagara Bill said:

Why do people insist on comparing Trump to Obama. That makes the assumption that Obama was something special. HE WAS NOT A GOOD LEADER. The world gave him the Nobel peace prize when he was elected. Why? He did nothing except get elected. Giving him that was close to being racism. 

Trump is questionable as a president ( I would rather have Nixon) and Obama hardly is a candidate for Rushmore.

 

You have to look at it from the perspective of expectations.

 

Obama was expected to be a trans-generational leader with huge expectations, and underperformed on nearly every facet.  Trump, OTOH had the lowest expectations from the majority of the electorate, and surprisingly has performed well.

 

But the narrative was, and continues to be, on the expectations, not results. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Let me correct you there Niagara....giving Mr Obama the Nobel Prize was not close to...it was RACIST.  Racism works both ways. It can also be used to give people an advantage...which is exactly what the Left is claiming that Whites have been doing for years.

 

If there was an award for the dumbest thing written on the Internet today, then you sir would have won it.  Awarding Barack “Obama the Nobel Prize . . . was RACIST.”  Now I’ve seen it all.  And people wonder why there were thousands of protestors on the Manhattan Bridge last night.  

1 minute ago, GG said:

 

You have to look at it from the perspective of expectations.

 

Obama was expected to be a trans-generational leader with huge expectations, and underperformed on nearly every facet.  Trump, OTOH had the lowest expectations from the majority of the electorate, and surprisingly has performed well.

 

But the narrative was, and continues to be, on the expectations, not results. 

 

Fake news. Your definition of “well” is confusing. I had a low bar for Trump, to be sure.  But inaction in the face of at least three simultaneous generational crises?  Even I didn’t think he would be this much of a failure. 

Edited by SectionC3
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...