Jump to content

Fredex's Role in the Bears Game


The Dean

Recommended Posts

With Marshawn out, isn't it interesting Freddie only got two carries and two receptions? If this is being discussed somewhere else, I apologize. I didn't see it and couldn't find it. Please move it to the appropriate thread.

 

This isn't an "I told you so" post, as I was quite upset when Fred was dealt. But unlike a few here, I understood it and got over it. Fred is clearly reaching the end of a great career. Too bad he didn't get to finish it in Buffalo. This isn't to say Fred may not contribute in meaningful ways for Seattle. But when they needed someone to step up and fill in for Marshawn, who did they look to? Not the aging Jackson, but rather a relatively unknown rookie (Relatively? Who the hell ever heard of Thomas Rawls?).

 

Anyway, hopefully some here will lay off the lambasting of Whaley for this move, and refrain from pointing out, every time a Bills' back makes a less-than-ideal play, that it's all Whaley's fault for trading Fred.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Marshawn out, isn't it interesting Freddie only got two carries and two receptions? If this is being discussed somewhere else, I apologize. I didn't see it and couldn't find it. Please move it to the appropriate thread.

 

This isn't an "I told you so" post, as I was quite upset when Fred was dealt. But unlike a few here, I understood it and got over it. Fred is clearly reaching the end of a great career. Too bad he didn't get to finish it in Buffalo. This isn't to say Fred may not contribute in meaningful ways for Seattle. But when they needed someone to step up and fill in for Marshawn, who did they look to? Not the aging Jackson, but rather a relatively unknown rookie (Relatively? Who the hell ever heard of Thomas Rawls?).

 

Anyway, hopefully some here will lay off the lambasting of Whaley for this move, and refrain from pointing out, every time a Bills' back makes a less-than-ideal play, that it's all Whaley's fault for trading Fred.

 

Amen... Though now it might be cool to see him in the Superbowl... Unless he is playing the Bills. I do hope he retires as a Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amen... Though now it might be cool to see him in the Superbowl... Unless he is playing the Bills. I do hope he retires as a Bill

 

And that he is playing for Seattle--2nd smuggest team in the league.

Love Fred but I too got over it after about the third day and I questioned some people at work, how would you feel about Fred being inactive? I don't want to see that. We did the honorable thing with him.

 

 

Amen to that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was surprised they didn't go with Fred. He would have been more productive than Rawls, but coaches a lot of times like the potential explosiveness of younger guys.

 

Might want to go with "might have" for something that you can't possibly know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rawls is a Marshawn clone. Off the field issues resulted in his transfer from Michigan. He gives Seattle a nice insurance policy. I'm afraid Fred will be relegated to 3rd down duty due to his proficiency as a pass blocker.

Given the way that Karlos has been playing, it takes the sting out of cutting Fred, at least as far as production goes. Keeping Fred around would have just buried Karlos on the depth chart.

Rex stated in a presser, IIRC, that Karlos was #2 prior to Fred being released.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Somehow I doubt he would have been inactive this week ...

 

 

True. But last week? Week before? I only mentioned one week. Can you imagine how we all would feel if Fred was inactive multiple weeks at a time? I puke. Love the man way too much to see it end like that for him here. Would he be active this week? Seems likely but that's the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Karlos had a great camp, he would be playing the same as he is now with fred here.

 

Dixon was kept for special teams I assume, because that's the only possible justification for not having Fred in his place. No way is Boobie a better runner or pass catcher or qb protector or team leader than Fred. He blocked a few punts which is huge, and we must have needed more special teams help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with letting Jackson and Brown go is that Shady was injured at the time and isn't healthy now. So the Bills will have to go into a game with Dixon as the primary backup and that's not a good thing. That's a chunk of the carries going to a guy I want to see get 1 or 2 carries a game. And if anything happens to Williams, ouch, I don't even want to think about where the running game will be.

 

Not sure why the Bills didn't keep a 4th back when their starter was injured.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given the way that Karlos has been playing, it takes the sting out of cutting Fred, at least as far as production goes. Keeping Fred around would have just buried Karlos on the depth chart.

No it would have buried Jackson on the depth chart and seen him inactive a lot of games...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given the way that Karlos has been playing, it takes the sting out of cutting Fred, at least as far as production goes. Keeping Fred around would have just buried Karlos on the depth chart.

 

I think you've got it mixed, Doc. Karlos had already moved past Fred on the depth chart, Boobie dresses for ST, that's 3 active RB on game day plus Felton. Fred would have been a healthy scratch.

Would have been nice to see him retire here. I still would rather have him than BOOBIE

 

You wouldn't if you were the ST coach

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amen... Though now it might be cool to see him in the Superbowl... Unless he is playing the Bills. I do hope he retires as a Bill

 

Would love to see him retire as a Bill, then lead the charge at next year's home opener.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its a produce now league and Fred cant produce like he used to. I love the hell out of the man but Karlos softens the blow. I know I may sound insane but I dont think there is a better roster top to bottom right now than the Bills and it made the move to release FJ that much easier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was surprised they didn't go with Fred. He would have been more productive than Rawls, but coaches a lot of times like the potential explosiveness of younger guys.

 

You think Freddy would have averaged more than the 6.1 yards per carry Rawls has this year? I like Freddy but I feel people here are dismissing Rawls because they've never heard of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

You think Freddy would have averaged more than the 6.1 yards per carry Rawls has this year? I like Freddy but I feel people here are dismissing Rawls because they've never heard of him.

My issue with Rawls goes back to his U of M days. I never was enamored with his running style, and didn't think he would make a very good pro. But maybe he's a different back. I didn't like Marshawn when he was here too, and he changed into a totally different back in Seattle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My issue with Rawls goes back to his U of M days. I never was enamored with his running style, and didn't think he would make a very good pro. But maybe he's a different back. I didn't like Marshawn when he was here too, and he changed into a totally different back in Seattle.

 

Fair, and not liking his running style is definitely a good reason. He definitely performed well though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...