Global warming err Climate change HOAX

[Bob in Mich]

Not trolling at all.  It was a great post or said another way, an astute observation.  Just bumping it in case any folks had missed it.

 

[njbuff]

2 hours ago, B-Man said:

July 2019 Was Not the Warmest on Record

August 2nd, 2019 by Roy W. Spencer, Ph. D.

 

July 2019 was probably the 4th warmest of the last 41 years. Global “reanalysis” datasets need to start being used for monitoring of global surface temperatures.

 

We are now seeing news reports (e.g. CNN, BBC, Reuters) that July 2019 was the hottest month on record for global average surface air temperatures.

One would think that the very best data would be used to make this assessment. After all, it comes from official government sources (such as NOAA, and the World Meteorological Organization [WMO]).

 

But current official pronouncements of global temperature records come from a fairly limited and error-prone array of thermometers which were never intended to measure global temperature trends. The global surface thermometer network has three major problems when it comes to getting global-average temperatures:

 

(1) The urban heat island (UHI) effect has caused a gradual warming of most land thermometer sites due to encroachment of buildings, parking lots, air conditioning units, vehicles, etc. These effects are localized, not indicative of most of the global land surface (which remains most rural), and not caused by increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Because UHI warming “looks like” global warming, it is difficult to remove from the data. In fact, NOAA’s efforts to make UHI-contaminated data look like rural data seems to have had the opposite effect. The best strategy would be to simply use only the best (most rural) sited thermometers. This is currently not done.

 

(2) Ocean temperatures are notoriously uncertain due to changing temperature measurement technologies (canvas buckets thrown overboard to get a sea surface temperature sample long ago, ship engine water intake temperatures more recently, buoys, satellite measurements only since about 1983, etc.)

 

(3) Both land and ocean temperatures are notoriously incomplete geographically. How does one estimate temperatures in a 1 million square mile area where no measurements exist?

 

There’s a better way.

 

More at the link: https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/08/02/july-2019-was-not-the-warmest-on-record/

 

 

 

.

 

Gee, July is the hottest month out of the calendar year.

 

Color me shocked.  

 

Climate change WILL KILL US ALL, I tell you.

 

?

[OldTimeAFLGuy]

On 7/31/2019 at 1:23 PM, B-Man said:

 

DNC Chairman Tom Perez was the opening act at last night’s Dem debate where he said “climate change threatens our universe.”

 

Yeah, we’re confused, too:

 

 

 

 

....how better to categorize this azzclown?....he makes Incognito look sane............

[Koko78]

1 hour ago, njbuff said:

 

Gee, July is the hottest month out of the calendar year.

 

Color me shocked.  

 

Climate change WILL KILL US ALL, I tell you.

 

?

 

Just remember, we've only got just under 11.5 years left on this Earth until the climate crybabies reset their doomsday clock!

Edited August 5, 2019 by Koko78

[njbuff]

37 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Just remember, we've only got just under 11.5 years left on this Earth until the climate crybabies reset their doomsday clock!

 

How people don't see climate change as the second biggest hoax (The Russian Collusion Delusion being number one) is pure insanity.

 

Mother Nature has done what she wants and will continue to do what she wants as humans have ZERO influence over what she wants to do........ EVER.

[Koko78]

30 minutes ago, njbuff said:

 

How people don't see climate change as the second biggest hoax (The Russian Collusion Delusion being number one) is pure insanity.

 

Mother Nature has done what she wants and will continue to do what she wants as humans have ZERO influence over what she wants to do........ EVER.

 

They want to use ~130 years worth of data (of varying degrees of accuracy) to make predictions about an incredibly complex series of interconnected systems that have cycles in the thousands of years.

 

But hey, they have consensus. That makes global warming global cooling climate change a scientifically-proven fact!

[Wacka]

2 hours ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

 

....how better to categorize this azzclown?....he makes Incognito look sane............

Remember, this assclown went to Canisus.

[Tiberius]

33 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

They want to use ~130 years worth of data (of varying degrees of accuracy) to make predictions about an incredibly complex series of interconnected systems that have cycles in the thousands of years.

 

But hey, they have consensus. That makes global warming global cooling climate change a scientifically-proven fact!

I just believe the scientist. They actually study this stuff. Your just following your political bias. 

[DC Tom]

1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

I just believe the scientist. They actually study this stuff. Your just following your political bias. 

 

And "belief" is what makes it a religion, asshat.

[Tiberius]

1 minute ago, DC Tom said:

 

And "belief" is what makes it a religion, asshat.

That's ignorant. But it's you Tom, so...

[B-Man]

IT’S COME TO THIS:

 

“McDonald’s has admitted that its new paper straws, rolled out last year to help ‘protect the environment,’ can’t be recycled

— unlike the plastic versions they replaced.”

 

 

As Steve warned in April of 2015, “McDonald’s is almost certainly doomed. Or at the very least, [Steve] Easterbrook is the wrong guy to head up the burger chain — any burger chain, for that matter. To understand why I’ve come to this conclusion, read the very next line from the story: Easterbrook plans to unveil his plan for turning McDonald’s into a ‘modern, progressive burger company’ on May 4.”

 

 

.

 

[Tiberius]

3 minutes ago, B-Man said:

IT’S COME TO THIS:

 

“McDonald’s has admitted that its new paper straws, rolled out last year to help ‘protect the environment,’ can’t be recycled

— unlike the plastic versions they replaced.”

 

 

As Steve warned in April of 2015, “McDonald’s is almost certainly doomed. Or at the very least, [Steve] Easterbrook is the wrong guy to head up the burger chain — any burger chain, for that matter. To understand why I’ve come to this conclusion, read the very next line from the story: Easterbrook plans to unveil his plan for turning McDonald’s into a ‘modern, progressive burger company’ on May 4.”

 

 

.

 

Lol, this is so stupid on so many levels, but it's B-Man, so...

[Buffalo_Gal]

 

 

[B-Man]

 

 

 

 

 

 

[B-Man]

 

 

 

 

.

[OldTimeAFLGuy]

 

Al Gore: 2006 Global Warming ‘Point of No Return’ Claim Was ‘Accurate’

Trent Baker

11 Aug 2019-BREITBART

 

Former Vice President Al Gore discussed his 2006 warning that unless the nations took “drastic measures, the world would reach a point of no return within 10 years” when it comes to climate change and global warming.

 

Gore said his “point of no return claim” was, unfortunately, “accurate,” but celebrated that the 2020 Democratic presidential candidates have made climate a top priority.

 

“You said back in 2006 the world would reach the point of no return if we didn’t reduce greenhouse gases in 2016. Is it already too late?” asked ABC News’ Jonathan Karl in an interview which aired Sunday on “This Week.”

 

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2019/08/11/al-gore-2006-global-warming-point-of-no-return-claim-was-accurate/

 

[B-Man]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

,

[OldTimeAFLGuy]

...uh oh....sounds like the Eskimos may be drinkings shots instead of "on the rocks" soon.....I did leave Al Gore  voice mail though....

 

 

Arctic could have no ice in September, shocking study says

By Chris Ciaccia | Fox News

A shocking new study says that sea ice in the Arctic could completely disappear through September each summer if average global temperatures increase by as little as 2 degrees Celsius and climate conditions continue to worsen.

"Most likely, September Arctic sea ice will effectively disappear at between approximately 2 and 2.5 [degrees] of global warming," said the abstract of the study, published in Nature Communications. "Yet, limiting the warming to 1.5 [degrees] under the Paris agreement may not be sufficient to prevent the ice-free Arctic."

https://www.foxnews.com/science/arctic-no-ice-in-september

 

 

 

[3rdnlng]

2 hours ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

...uh oh....sounds like the Eskimos may be drinkings shots instead of "on the rocks" soon.....I did leave Al Gore  voice mail though....

 

 

Arctic could have no ice in September, shocking study says

By Chris Ciaccia | Fox News

A shocking new study says that sea ice in the Arctic could completely disappear through September each summer if average global temperatures increase by as little as 2 degrees Celsius and climate conditions continue to worsen.

"Most likely, September Arctic sea ice will effectively disappear at between approximately 2 and 2.5 [degrees] of global warming," said the abstract of the study, published in Nature Communications. "Yet, limiting the warming to 1.5 [degrees] under the Paris agreement may not be sufficient to prevent the ice-free Arctic."

https://www.foxnews.com/science/arctic-no-ice-in-september

 

 

 

Maybe if it all melts we'll be able to see those fossilized palm trees that they also found in Greenland.

[SlimShady'sSpaceForce]

 

this is meant to be fun 

 

Proof Global Warming is real

 

Trump wants to buy Greenland and build golf courses 

 

 

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

3 hours ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

 

this is meant to be fun 

 

Proof Global Warming is real

 

Trump wants to buy Greenland and build golf courses 

 

 

there was probably a time in your life when "fun" included bars, booze and babes, yes?  

 

this is not that time. ?

 

 

[mead107]

https://www.quora.com/Why-is-it-called-Greenland-when-there-is-hardly-any-green-on-Greenland

[B-Man]

 

[DC Tom]

58 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Not shown: Chris Cuomo telling Trump "You don't talk to Moe Greenland like that!"

[OldTimeAFLGuy]

1 hour ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

...great...piss off CNN's "Fredo" even more.....Moe didn't have "it"......

[B-Man]

 

 

FIGHTING THE BLACKLIST

 

It appears that Nature Communications is already backpedaling:

You should be aware that, following a letter from me yesterday to Nature Communications, the “learned” journal in which the “peer-reviewed” “research” “study” that is the subject of your press release was published, that journal has removed all reference to the offending purported “study” from its homepage and has added to the page containing the purported “study” a paragraph indicating that it is investigating “a number of criticisms related to this work”, and has removed altogether the list of names of the alleged “deniers”, including my name.

With respect to climate, as on pretty much every other issue, the Left is losing the argument and responds by trying to silence those who point out the facts. The jury is still out on whether this will prove to be a winning strategy, but on this particular front, it appears that the bad guys are in retreat.

[B-Man]

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

[OldTimeAFLGuy]

2 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

 

...bet they outlawed sno-cones too............

[Hedge]

 

 

[DC Tom]

13 hours ago, Hedge said:

 

 

 

Y'know, if any Democrat had even a shred of a sense of humor, they could probably beat him.

[B-Man]

 

 

The climate change crisis racket

by Taylor Day

 

Original Article

 

Do Democrats really believe in the climate crisis they have dubbed an "emergency," or is it really just a way to make a quick buck? Beto O'Rourke has suggested spending $5 trillion over the next ten years investing in climate change initiatives primarily for "vulnerable communities." Not to be outdone, Kamala Harris was one of the co-sponsors for the "Green New Deal," which proposes $700 billion a year in spending on a utopian garden future. Bernie Sanders, also a loud supporter of the GND, proposes going even farther and banning any new developments that would require fossil fuels.

[Foxx]

https://twitter.com/almostjingo/status/1164076592361922561

 

 

[SoCal Deek]

Let me put it to you all this way:

 

If the ice caps are melting at a rate that’ll end civilization in 11 years, there is less than ZERO chance there’s anything anyone, or everyone, can do ANYTHING about it now!  

 

These people are not serious people. They are hucksters. 

[Chef Jim]

46 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Let me put it to you all this way:

 

If the ice caps are melting at a rate that’ll end civilization in 11 years, there is less than ZERO chance there’s anything anyone, or everyone, can do ANYTHING about it now!  

 

Ya think?  ?

[Tiberius]

The only dupes are the people who swallow all the oil companies paid for propaganda that science is fake. How stupid do you have to be? 

[RochesterRob]

18 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

The only dupes are the people who swallow all the oil companies paid for propaganda that science is fake. How stupid do you have to be? 

  Your kind of stupid.  That's how stupid.

37 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

Ya think?  ?

  Tibs has his air conditioner aimed out from his apartment hoping that the winds blow the cold north.

[Tiberius]

9 minutes ago, RochesterRob said:

  Your kind of stupid.  That's how stupid.

  Tibs has his air conditioner aimed out from his apartment hoping that the winds blow the cold north.

Are you one of the faithful who think the scientists are in a conspiracy about this? 

 

Thats stupid! The oil company money was well spent to tell you what to think. They talk, you walk 

[B-Man]

 

 

THE LEFT DISCOVERS ECO-FASCISM

 

How charming: the left has belatedly discovered something conservatives have known for 50 years or more—that environmentalism, especially in its dominant ideological forms, is prone to fascism.

 

Remember that “environmentalism” very quickly replaced “ecology”—the more generic scientific term—not long after the first Earth Day in 1970. Keep in mind that the left was initially indifferent or even hostile to “the ecology craze” (as some leftist critics called it at the time), but they soon figured out the potential for the issue. “Ecology,”New Republic writer James Ridgeway wrote, “offered liberal-minded people what they had longed for, a safe, rational and above all peaceful way of seeming to remake society . . . [and] developing a more coherent central state. . .” Except for the “safe, rational and peaceful” part, he was on to something! And people think it started with the Green Nude Eel.

 

For a good background to this, see Elizabeth Nickson’s book, Eco-Fascists, or this excerptfrom Rupert Darwall’s fine book Green Tyranny: Exposing the Totalitarian Roots of the Climate Industrial Complex.

 

It has always been considered bad form to point out that the German Nazis had a conscious environmental quotient to their ideology, but what’s this? The Washington Post noted yesterday that two of the recent mass shooters—the New Zealand shooter last year and the El Paso shooter two weeks ago—embraced environmental themes, fusing them together in fact with anti-immigration views.

 

The Post is shocked and befuddled at this seeming anomaly (though to be fair, the Post notes as briefly as possible: “Ecofascism has deep roots. There is a strong element of it in the Nazi emphasis on “blood and soil,” and the fatherland. . .) But this is only anomalous to clueless liberals, who suffer cognitive impairment when it comes to imagining the connection between the anti-natalism of the “population bomb” mentality and seeing immigration as a driver of population growth:

 

 

 

 

.

[row_33]

15 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

THE LEFT DISCOVERS ECO-FASCISM

 

How charming: the left has belatedly discovered something conservatives have known for 50 years or more—that environmentalism, especially in its dominant ideological forms, is prone to fascism.

 

Remember that “environmentalism” very quickly replaced “ecology”—the more generic scientific term—not long after the first Earth Day in 1970. Keep in mind that the left was initially indifferent or even hostile to “the ecology craze” (as some leftist critics called it at the time), but they soon figured out the potential for the issue. “Ecology,”New Republic writer James Ridgeway wrote, “offered liberal-minded people what they had longed for, a safe, rational and above all peaceful way of seeming to remake society . . . [and] developing a more coherent central state. . .” Except for the “safe, rational and peaceful” part, he was on to something! And people think it started with the Green Nude Eel.

 

For a good background to this, see Elizabeth Nickson’s book, Eco-Fascists, or this excerptfrom Rupert Darwall’s fine book Green Tyranny: Exposing the Totalitarian Roots of the Climate Industrial Complex.

 

It has always been considered bad form to point out that the German Nazis had a conscious environmental quotient to their ideology, but what’s this? The Washington Post noted yesterday that two of the recent mass shooters—the New Zealand shooter last year and the El Paso shooter two weeks ago—embraced environmental themes, fusing them together in fact with anti-immigration views.

 

The Post is shocked and befuddled at this seeming anomaly (though to be fair, the Post notes as briefly as possible: “Ecofascism has deep roots. There is a strong element of it in the Nazi emphasis on “blood and soil,” and the fatherland. . .) But this is only anomalous to clueless liberals, who suffer cognitive impairment when it comes to imagining the connection between the anti-natalism of the “population bomb” mentality and seeing immigration as a driver of population growth:

 

 

 

 

.

 

it's a religion without the central tenets of:

 

belief in a superior being

obeying the commands from this being provided by revelation

which usually requires love and kindness towards others, as we want for ourself

 

worse than communism

 

 

[B-Man]

 

 

 

 

Good.............................lowers the price   ?

 

 

 

 

 

.