B-Man Posted December 12, 2016 Share Posted December 12, 2016 Now 'Global Warming' Shrinking Reindeer! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted December 12, 2016 Share Posted December 12, 2016 Now 'Global Warming' Shrinking Reindeer! Global Warming Cooling Climate Change: Is there anything it can't do? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 12, 2016 Share Posted December 12, 2016 Now 'Global Warming' Shrinking Reindeer! "The reindeer starve, aborting their calves or giving birth to much lighter young," said the BES. Reindeer numbers have increased over the past two decades, said the research team, so greater competition for food likely also contributed to their smaller size. So...reindeer are shrinking, which cuts into the birth rate, because...reindeer herds are growing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted December 12, 2016 Share Posted December 12, 2016 So...reindeer are shrinking, which cuts into the birth rate, because...reindeer herds are growing? yet reindeer sell for over $10k at weaning. I looked in to buying one last month Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 yet reindeer sell for over $10k at weaning. I looked in to buying one last month She wouldn't sign the pre-nup, huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 I'm pretty sure there's some science related to pig nipples. But the last thing I'm going to do is google "pig nipple science" to find out. I wouldn't worry about it. If reports are true, that's actually fairly standard usage of a government computer. You're likely tripping a search screen by not doing exactly that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 She wouldn't sign the pre-nup, huh?Hahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCinBuffalo Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 Ah yes, this thread. Hanging around, while it ranks between #22-27 on the American people's list of important issues, which basically means it's not on that list at all. I wonder when this thread will end? Perhaps time kills it? Certainly the left had a great political vehicle in it, and its hard to give that up. But, given the election, they don't get to decide when it dies. I remember when the Rain Forest was the big issue. Nobody talks about it now. Is that because it stopped being the "lungs of the world"? Or because it stopped getting the media ratings? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 Follow Watts Up With That@wattsupwiththat #standupforscience rally at #AGU16 – another Manntastic production http://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/12/13/standupforscience-rally-at-agu16-another-manntastic-production … Readily identifiable as scientists by the scientific white laboratory coats and experimental hashtag signs ........Scientist I was skeptical until I spotted this gem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 (edited) The New York TimesVerified account @nytimes 9h9 hours ago Reversing course, the EPA says fracking can contaminate drinking water http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/reversing-course-epa-says-fracking-can-contaminate-drinking-water.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur&_r=0 Just in time to attack Republicans for the next four years............ If you don't realize this was done for purely political reasons by activists at EPA freaking out about Trump, you don't understand Washington. . Edited December 19, 2016 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 19, 2016 Share Posted December 19, 2016 (edited) YOU WENT FULL SALON. MAN, NEVER GO FULL SALON. The dirty deplorables: Who’s who on Donald Trump’s team and how they’ll destroy the environment. Sorry Global Warming Alarmists, The Earth Is Cooling. Mind you, I never understood WHY one would be scared of global warming. When the Earth warms up, humanity prospers. When the Earth cools, humanity suffers. Unless of course, they don’t like humanity. Oh, wait… . Edited December 19, 2016 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TH3 Posted December 19, 2016 Share Posted December 19, 2016 YOU WENT FULL SALON. MAN, NEVER GO FULL SALON. The dirty deplorables: Who’s who on Donald Trump’s team and how they’ll destroy the environment. Sorry Global Warming Alarmists, The Earth Is Cooling. Mind you, I never understood WHY one would be scared of global warming. When the Earth warms up, humanity prospers. When the Earth cools, humanity suffers. Unless of course, they don’t like humanity. Oh, wait… . Still haven't figured out how to sift the message and source huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 19, 2016 Share Posted December 19, 2016 Just in time to attack Republicans for the next four years............ If you don't realize this was done for purely political reasons by activists at EPA freaking out about Trump, you don't understand Washington. . The coal barons must be happy about this. They have been the biggest opponents of fracking and have spent a lot of money to propagandize the issue. Trump has vowed to push fracking while also vowing to bring back coal? Right... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCinBuffalo Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 (edited) Still haven't figured out how to sift the message and source huh? Still waiting for you to disprove the scientific analysis, from a team of scientists that includes 2 Nobel laureates, that debunks the 3 main premises behind the Global Warming theory. These 3 are the same premises behind the EPA's regulations, AND, IPCC policy. They used 13 different data sets, and mathematically proved that not only is Global Warming bunk, but that the modeling used to prove it is bunk. You've had since September to disprove their work. Why are we waiting? The difference between these scientists, and the Global Warming liars, is that they put ALL their data, and their methodology, on the internet, for free. Go look it up. I'm not giving you a link, precisely because you can easily search for this work for yourself. read it yourself, and download their paper yourself, all for free. It simply requires you to act. Act. I dare you to act. Do your own work. Read the paper. If you can use the internet to get here, you can certainly find the paper I'm talking about. Contrast: If you want the Global Warming version of "science", you have to pay, a lot, and you have to be somebody who already agrees with the results. Which "science" should we believe? The people who are completely transparent, or, the sanitation engineer's famous friends who refuse to expose their work to scrutiny? Edited December 20, 2016 by OCinBuffalo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 21, 2016 Share Posted December 21, 2016 It's never too early to start draining the swamp. Trump team asks State Dept. what it spends on international environmental efforts Washington Post, by Juliet Eilperin and Carol Morello Original Article Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 21, 2016 Share Posted December 21, 2016 It's never too early to start draining the swamp. Trump team asks State Dept. what it spends on international environmental effortsWashington Post, by Juliet Eilperin and Carol Morello Original Article Republicans hate the environment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 21, 2016 Share Posted December 21, 2016 (edited) House probe: Obama attacked own scientists to advance climate agenda By John Siciliano The Obama administration engaged in a calculated effort to dismantle an Energy Department program so it could focus on meeting the goals of the president's climate change agenda, even going as far as to fire scientists that disobeyed strict orders not to talk to members of Congress, according to a Tuesday report issued by the House Science, Space and Technology Committee. The report showed the administration even attacked one of its own Energy Department scientists who stepped out of line with strict orders to deny lawmakers with information on a nuclear radiation program that it was seeking to scuttle to pursue its global warming programs more aggressively. "Instead of working to understand the value of the [radiation program] for emergency situations, [Energy Department] management engaged in a campaign to terminate research programs that could divert funds from the President's Climate Action Plan," the House committee's report said. "Management and senior DOE employees privately discussed congressional support for the [radiation program] and its nexus to regulatory limits yet still maintained their agenda to close the program." The report concluded that the Energy Department's actions are a reflection of an "institutional problem that must be corrected by overhauling its management practices with respect to its relationship with the Congress," it read. "Instead of providing the type of scientific information needed by Congress to legislate effectively, senior departmental officials sought to hide information, lobbied against legislation, and retaliated against a scientist for being forthcoming," said Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, chairman of the committee. http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/house-probe-obama-attacked-own-scientists-to-advance-climate-agenda/article/2610126#.WFoASGWgNV8.twitter ANALYSIS: ARE YOU KIDDING ME? The electoral college is thwarting our ability to battle global warming. . Edited December 21, 2016 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted December 21, 2016 Share Posted December 21, 2016 Republicans hate the environment. And old ladies! And feeding children! And Muslims! And Ikea! And Beyonce! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 21, 2016 Share Posted December 21, 2016 And old ladies! If they could get away with ending Soc Sec, they would! And feeding children! Yes, are you being sarcastic? And Muslims! Duh And Ikea! Well... And Beyonce! Good . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted December 21, 2016 Share Posted December 21, 2016 And the Shah's spleen! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts