/dev/null Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Data doesn't analyse itself, you !@#$ing monkey. In Soviet Russia data analyzes you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LB3 Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Data doesn't analyse itself, you !@#$ing monkey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 DATA! STATUS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Obviously every (good) scientist wants to take all presumptions out of their analysis. You are not the first to think that way. A ton of work over many years has gone to building a reproducible system or workbench or whatever on climate change Aaaaaand...there we go. The old, connerific debate strategy of making a statement, then providing a link that disproves your random synapse firing masquerading as a "point." You're special. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Aaaaaand....there we go. The DC Tom strategy of ignoring reality, flinging some insults, and stating things as facts that are actually not true at all. I feel like your existence is proof of alternate realities. It is entirely obvious you live in one. I'm not ignoring reality, I'm mocking you. And still waiting for you to show your work, since you've looked closely at the data. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Obviously every (good) scientist wants to take all presumptions out of their analysis. You are not the first to think that way. A ton of work over many years has gone to building a reproducible system or workbench or whatever on climate change You can think whatever you want, but anyone who believes that anything as fluid as climate science is even close to being settled is the one who has their head in the sand, and are proving nothing more than they don't know %$#@ about science. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Data doesn't analyse itself, you !@#$ing monkey. :worthy : Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 (edited) You can think whatever you want, but anyone who believes that anything as fluid as climate science is even close to being settled is the one who has their head in the sand, and are proving nothing more than they don't know %$#@ about science. No no no. Don't you know that we came out of an ice age and then shortly before man started burning things the earth's climate stabilized (absolutely stable without even a wobble) and "change" only occurred once the burning/farting/eating animals by man began. Now there is a runaway threat of doom, and Florida will be under water by 2025. However, if we stop the burning (especially in China) the climate will return to it's absolutely stable wobble free state and then and only then will it be safe to legalize weed across the globe. Edited November 18, 2016 by keepthefaith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 It does. That's why they call it data. I'll even paste the definition for you "facts and statistics collected together for reference or analysis." That's great, except you don't actually have any data for 99.9999% of the pertinent time frame. Assumptions piled on top of more assumptions (multiplied by political agenda) doesn't = data. But good internet meme. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Apparently there is a group of climate change protesters who have an issue with Trump’s pick for EPA on his transition team, Myron Ebell. Although Myron shouldn’t take it personally, seems these people have an issue with anyone who doubts their climate change faith. And hey, they’re organized but talk about boring and uninspiring … Click on to enlarge.. "Do not touch police".......good advice there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grinreaper Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/07/070705153019.htm Ancient Greenland was green. New Danish research has shown that it was covered in conifer forest and had a relatively mild climate. The research is painting a picture which is overturning all previous assumptions about biological life and the climate in Greenland. The findings also show evidence of ice in Greenland during the Eemian interglacial period 125,000 years ago, which indicates that although we are now confronted with global warming, the whole ice sheet will probably not melt and bring about the tremendous sea-level rises which have been the subject of so much discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 19, 2016 Share Posted November 19, 2016 https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/07/070705153019.htm Ancient Greenland was green. New Danish research has shown that it was covered in conifer forest and had a relatively mild climate. The research is painting a picture which is overturning all previous assumptions about biological life and the climate in Greenland. The findings also show evidence of ice in Greenland during the Eemian interglacial period 125,000 years ago, which indicates that although we are now confronted with global warming, the whole ice sheet will probably not melt and bring about the tremendous sea-level rises which have been the subject of so much discussion. : The scientists do not want to put into question the rise in sea level predicted to occur due to global warming. "Because if we don't explicitly state that we comply with orthodoxy, we can't get published." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted November 19, 2016 Share Posted November 19, 2016 Apparently there is a group of climate change protesters who have an issue with Trump’s pick for EPA on his transition team, Myron Ebell. Although Myron shouldn’t take it personally, seems these people have an issue with anyone who doubts their climate change faith. And hey, they’re organized but talk about boring and uninspiring … Click on to enlarge.. "Do not touch police".......good advice there. "When you deny / People die" How many casualties have we had already from Global Warming/Climate Change? It must be in the hundreds of thousands by now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keukasmallies Posted November 19, 2016 Share Posted November 19, 2016 All I have as a fact in the global warming debate is that my Halloween pumpkin rotted about a week earlier than last year's pumpkin - due to a warmer October/November. Granted, this post is neither peer, nor jury reviewed, but I offer it in the most humble of terms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted November 19, 2016 Share Posted November 19, 2016 (edited) Here is what it's all about in the end. Just a mechanism to control and tax. Yet another government scam. Coming soon taxing us by the mile when we drive. https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/11/19/uk-researchers-tax-food-to-reduce-climate-change/ Edited November 19, 2016 by Dante Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted November 20, 2016 Share Posted November 20, 2016 Here is what it's all about in the end. Just a mechanism to control and tax. Yet another government scam. Coming soon taxing us by the mile when we drive. https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/11/19/uk-researchers-tax-food-to-reduce-climate-change/ 40% surtax on beef. I don't know that it will make many people consume less of it than they currently do. But the government will use that money expressly for what - bludgeoning the public with ads about their eating habits? Oh yes. They're hot to do that too (tax you for the miles you drive). It's not like there's already a user tax in the form of how much gasoline/diesel fuel you purchase. Libtards never met a tax they didn't LOVE. And they never miss an opportunity to try to control your life and behavior and give you instructions on how to do so correctly... according to their concept of how things should run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted November 20, 2016 Share Posted November 20, 2016 Excellent! Save the planet by greatly increasing how much poor people have to pay for milk? I thought smart people went to Oxford. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted November 20, 2016 Share Posted November 20, 2016 Excellent! Save the planet by greatly increasing how much poor people have to pay for milk? I thought smart people went to Oxford. Don't forget that they'll probably couple that with increased subsidies to dairy farmers to make up for the sharp drop in demand. Oh, and higher healthcare costs to deal with the effects of all those kids who have to switch to cheaper, sugar-filled juice and soda. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted November 20, 2016 Share Posted November 20, 2016 Don't forget that they'll probably couple that with increased subsidies to dairy farmers to make up for the sharp drop in demand. Oh, and higher healthcare costs to deal with the effects of all those kids who have to switch to cheaper, sugar-filled juice and soda. Oh no the sugar filled soft drinks are already being taxed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted November 21, 2016 Share Posted November 21, 2016 So the millions of Buffalo and other wildlife were drinking lots of beano? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts