Jump to content

Josh made the right call to go for the TD


Success

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, BarleyNY said:

It obviously wasn’t a sure thing. If it was then it would have been a TD. 

No play is a sure thing...a simple hand off or even kneel down could have negative things happen....but if Dawkins holds his block that's as sure of a td as you will get.....allen doesn't miss that throw without getting contacted just as he was releasing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know what would have been a great call on 2nd and 9?  A screen pass to Cook.  Safe play, would have killed clock even if it didn’t go anywhere, potential to break big. 
 

Plus, it would have caught the Chiefs totally by surprise because we haven’t run a GD RB screen all GD season.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Process said:

Yes. You've mentioned that many times. 

 

 

Yeah, I believe that is now the second time I have mentioned it in regards to a play that hasn't been discussed much.

The first time was right after the game.  "On third down they had three guys running crossers short of the sticks so Allen held it rolling out and ran out of real estate."

Sorry about that; hope you can forgive my relentless crusade of two posts in one week.

 

 

40 minutes ago, Process said:

If it's 4th and 1 or 2 the bills 100% are going for it. I don't think you've grasped that.

 

Despite your assumption of my stupidity, I'm well aware of what the Bills would have done on 4th and short. 

I'm also well aware of the exceedingly large volume of plays Allen has made outside the pocket in critical situations, particularly moving to his right,  and am glad he made an effort to extend the play and not just get rid of it and put the Bills in a 4th down situation. A situation that would have been anywhere between 4th/2 and 4th/9.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Buffalo03 said:

I mean the whole game in totality. Are we really gonna argue over 2 drives that we got lucky enough to not give up 7 or 8 yards a play? The only 2 drives that we gave up nothing on was that fumble out of the endzone which again, had a 35 yard run play to get down there and then one other defensive drive to stop them. Were you watching something else. It was back and forth all game for both offenses. We had the lead at halftime 17-13. What did the Chiefs do the first drive I. The second half? They scored a TD in like 7 plays. The next Chiefs drive, you guessed it another TD. The Chiefs only had to attempt 5 3rd downs all night long because most of the time they were getting enough yardage on first and second down to not need a 3rd down. If you are ok with the night our defense had, getting no pass rush, missing multiple starters and getting gashed MOSTLY all night and giving Mahomes 1:55 and 2 timeouts to work with, I have to question your sanity


JFC. Come on man… 

 

They played like sh-t and stopped them on 2 of their final drives is simply my point. That immediately gives them confidence. 

 

I even told you I agreed with your post with one exception. Literally implied by the “waxing the floor” verbiage I used. 
 

But for arguments sake…

You live in a deluded reality if that’s what you got from my posts. I didn’t state or imply that I am ok with any play the defense made all night just that your “all night” was prior to the fumble out the EZ. 
 

The defense made plays on 2 drives…

1) to stop KC going up a guaranteed 10; they weren’t kicking a FG if we stopped them on 3rd and goal from the 1. 

2) to keep them only up by 3 

 

Ive played sports competitively in a Pro-Am level… American Football and Soccer. Winning or losing, It is how you end a game that matters.

 

 

Edited by BBFL
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Success said:

I am beyond tired of the national hand-wringing about that play.  It was THERE.  I've actually heard fans argue that what Allen SHOULD have done is to just keep picking up small chunks, and then score a TD with just a few seconds left on the clock.

 

As though you can script something like that perfectly.  Then there is a holding penalty, or sack, or turnover, or you just can't get in the endzone.  Allen saw Shakir wide open for 6, and he went for it.  And, as we all know, if Chris Jones gets there a half second later, that's a TD and we're likely up by 4.

 

I'm like, is that the best that you've got, Allen haters?  The guy plays a great game, should have had at least 100 more yards and another TD if his receivers could hang onto the ball - and you're saying "same ol' Allen" because he went for an OPEN TOUCHDOWN.

 

And I hope Mahomes throws 3 picks this week so we can all see the double-standard.  It won't be nearly as analyzed and dissected.

 

100% agreement but try and convince exhausting second guess geniuses. Always try and denigrate a performance that overcame a undermanned defense that couldn’t stop a running game and had wide open receivers all night. Why would an ultra conservative HC try a fake punt at his own 30? He had zero confidence we could stop Mahomes. So Josh leads 4 heroic drives with no regard for his body or health despite no separation by his receivers downfield and 3 drops on game changing pass plays,for scores , and with a frustrating miss of an open receiver after being jostled by Jones, settles for a game tying FG. The mindless criticism of a truly heroic performance for one play, discourages objective people from taking “expert observations “ seriously. It’s like partisans attached to political parties acknowledging weakness. 

  • Vomit 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Success said:

I am beyond tired of the national hand-wringing about that play.  It was THERE.  I've actually heard fans argue that what Allen SHOULD have done is to just keep picking up small chunks, and then score a TD with just a few seconds left on the clock.

 

As though you can script something like that perfectly.  Then there is a holding penalty, or sack, or turnover, or you just can't get in the endzone.  Allen saw Shakir wide open for 6, and he went for it.  And, as we all know, if Chris Jones gets there a half second later, that's a TD and we're likely up by 4.

 

I'm like, is that the best that you've got, Allen haters?  The guy plays a great game, should have had at least 100 more yards and another TD if his receivers could hang onto the ball - and you're saying "same ol' Allen" because he went for an OPEN TOUCHDOWN.

 

And I hope Mahomes throws 3 picks this week so we can all see the double-standard.  It won't be nearly as analyzed and dissected.

 

 

OK...I think this take might get me roasted but...

 

Are you out of your mother loving mind with this take? Are you high? Tell me you got high as a kite as you wrote this so I can ask where  you get your stuff.

 

First off, calling it Allen hate? Josh Allen had overall a fantastic game. Josh Allen is not the reason the Bills lost that game. The reason the Bills lost that game is that throughout the game the defense held up as well as a wet paper bag holding a bowling ball. The Chiefs punted once in that game. Once. On the previous drive. I don't have the exact number, but I think the Chiefs had an 8-0 advantage on 20+ yard plays. AJ Klein was covering a HOF tight end. 

 

With that said, the methodology of how the Bills were moving the ball was clear. They had spent about six minutes taking what the defense gave them. The offense was clicking, with blitz beaters to Kincaid for 3 catches for 21 yards. Time was ticking. Every run or completion is 40 seconds off the clock or a Chiefs timeout. You do that twice when you're not even in the red zone yet and even if you need to kick a field goal the defense should be able to hold. If you want to credit Allen for his skills as a field marshall, then this is something fundamental that he knows.

 

So when the choices are "quick checkdown to a wide open Stef Diggs that is almost certainly a first down and if not makes the Schnowplow a reasonable option to go for it. The worst that happens is he drops it." or "gun a dart 25 yards into the end zone" where the best case scenario is that Mahomes has 1:55 and two timeouts against said tissue paper defense?

 

What gives you the best odds of winning the game are not even close. And it boggled my mind that people don't seem to understand this. Now, if Allen makes it I am still cheering, but I will think the exact same thing when Gabe Davis scored the go ahead in almost the same position in 2021: oh no, we gave them too much time.

 

What on Earth makes you think that our defense would fare any better this time?

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, BBFL said:


JFC. Come on man… 

 

They played like sh-t and stopped them on 2 of their final drives is simply my point. That immediately gives them confidence. 

 

I even told you I agreed with your post with one exception. Literally implied by the “waxing the floor” verbiage I used. 
 

But for arguments sake…

You live in a deluded reality if that’s what you got from my posts. I didn’t state or imply that I am ok with any play the defense made all night just that your “all night” was prior to the fumble out the EZ. 
 

The defense made plays on 2 drives…

1) to stop KC going up a guaranteed 10; they weren’t kicking a FG if we stopped them on 3rd and goal from the 1. 

2) to keep them only up by 3 

 

Ive played sports competitively in a Pro-Am level… American Football and Soccer. Winning or losing, It is how you end a game that matters.

 

 

It was 2 drives. One of which they got extremely lucky on. The Chiefs punted ONE time all night. Their drives were FG, FG, TD, TD, TD, Fumble (after a 35 yard run to get to the 1), Punt, gashed our defense the final to run plays to seal it. Yet, you are ok with Mahomes having 1:55 with 2 TOs, no pass rush and multiple injuries? I have no words, man. You're nuts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, NoSaint said:


he made the right read in the play call

 

in theory the system/play call should have dictated the read be a smaller chunk probably, given that we just milked the clock to two minutes though. 
 

it wasn’t a bad play, but strategically the coaches didn’t sync the clock management and play calling strategy together well

 

 

Then you could argue he made the right call on a similar throw in OT to Gabe against the Eagles.    Blame whoever you want but that ball also ultimately landed well off the mark. 

 

Game lost.  

 

If people are OK with Josh deciding games late by choosing to make throws only he and a handful of others would even attempt...........after proving they could just march their way down in small chunks all game............and as opposed to taking what may be more situationally appropriate like most other QB's would have to.........then that's that fans choice.

 

Honestly,  I'd rather have a spectacular Josh Allen for 10 years and never win a SB and then have to find another QB.........than instead win one SB with a journeyman starter and have a bunch of other run of the mill QB's that I have to watch.    Ideally you get spectacular and SB's........but sometimes superstars and just doing what it takes to win don't align.

 

But I'm not a finish line Bills fan.   My NCAAF team and MLB team have combined for 12 titles during my viewing life so it's not a tragedy to me if the Bills never do.   Being a Bills fan is a lifestyle for me and winning a SB only changes maybe a couple banners or flags I might fly.    That's it.

 

But none of that changes the fact that the decision to hurl that ball 30+ air yards into the end zone on 2nd and 9 just wasn't the right move strategically speaking.    It was the wrong decision on multiple levels.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

So if Chris Jones wasn't a known great pass rusher.........and if Josh completed a specific throw that he has turfed for various reasons in big situations this season even WITHOUT significant pressure.........and completed a throw for more air yards than any other completion of his in the game and more air yards than any Shakir completion all season..........then it was definitely a TD?

 

If you are going to live in the land of make believe that's your prerogative,  but it was a low % completion throw based on all of the most recent Josh/Bills 

I think most of us are basing it off of how he was playing. Playoff Josh is more accurate. Look at the prior deep throws that same game, 2 of them were spot on, and the the 3rd was catchable. The DB wasn't draped to Shakir, it would've been uncontested. No argument that the end result wasn't good, but the decision was right. Especially because it was second down, and we still had a shot at getting the 1st down. I know I could get flamed for this, but based on what we had been seeing from Bass, and how poorly our defense played that night, I  would've preferred going for it on 4th down.  As soon as I saw the kicking team, I knew it was over, whether he made it or not. 

Edited by Allen2Moulds
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This discussion completely misses the point.  The decision was 100% correct.  It was Josh's execution that was poor.  Had he simply slid into the massive pocket to his right, that's a TD. 

 

As talented as he is, Josh still has room for improvement when it comes to the subtleties of QB play.  There's no way  Brady or Manning stands still and lets himself get bumped by his LT when there's a perfect pocket to be had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

Then you could argue he made the right call on a similar throw in OT to Gabe against the Eagles.    Blame whoever you want but that ball also ultimately landed well off the mark. 

 

Game lost.  

 

If people are OK with Josh deciding games late by choosing to make throws only he and a handful of others would even attempt...........after proving they could just march their way down in small chunks all game............and as opposed to taking what may be more situationally appropriate like most other QB's would have to.........then that's that fans choice.

 

Honestly,  I'd rather have a spectacular Josh Allen for 10 years and never win a SB and then have to find another QB.........than instead win one SB with a journeyman starter and have a bunch of other run of the mill QB's that I have to watch.    Ideally you get spectacular and SB's........but sometimes superstars and just doing what it takes to win don't align.

 

But I'm not a finish line Bills fan.   My NCAAF team and MLB team have combined for 12 titles during my viewing life so it's not a tragedy to me if the Bills never do.   Being a Bills fan is a lifestyle for me and winning a SB only changes maybe a couple banners or flags I might fly.    That's it.

 

But none of that changes the fact that the decision to hurl that ball 30+ air yards into the end zone on 2nd and 9 just wasn't the right move strategically speaking.    It was the wrong decision on multiple levels.

 

The bolded doesn't compute w/ me.

 

Once you get in the red zone against a good D, nothing is guaranteed.  I swear, if JA did the "small chunks" thing, and we got stopped, or something worse happened (penalty, turnover), pundits would have spent the past few days talking about how he had an easy TD w/ Shakir open in the EZ, and didn't take it when he had the chance.

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Billl said:

This discussion completely misses the point.  The decision was 100% correct.  It was Josh's execution that was poor.  Had he simply slid into the massive pocket to his right, that's a TD. 

 

As talented as he is, Josh still has room for improvement when it comes to the subtleties of QB play.  There's no way  Brady or Manning stands still and lets himself get bumped by his LT when there's a perfect pocket to be had.

Unfortunately that slide probably throws the timing off, so Shakir is not in the window at that time. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

Then you could argue he made the right call on a similar throw in OT to Gabe against the Eagles.    Blame whoever you want but that ball also ultimately landed well off the mark. 

 

Game lost.  

 

If people are OK with Josh deciding games late by choosing to make throws only he and a handful of others would even attempt...........after proving they could just march their way down in small chunks all game............and as opposed to taking what may be more situationally appropriate like most other QB's would have to.........then that's that fans choice.

 

Honestly,  I'd rather have a spectacular Josh Allen for 10 years and never win a SB and then have to find another QB.........than instead win one SB with a journeyman starter and have a bunch of other run of the mill QB's that I have to watch.    Ideally you get spectacular and SB's........but sometimes superstars and just doing what it takes to win don't align.

 

But I'm not a finish line Bills fan.   My NCAAF team and MLB team have combined for 12 titles during my viewing life so it's not a tragedy to me if the Bills never do.   Being a Bills fan is a lifestyle for me and winning a SB only changes maybe a couple banners or flags I might fly.    That's it.

 

But none of that changes the fact that the decision to hurl that ball 30+ air yards into the end zone on 2nd and 9 just wasn't the right move strategically speaking.    It was the wrong decision on multiple levels.


I enjoy Josh throwing a dart to win the game- and am totally here for it in the right context. 
 

my gripe is I call that play at 2:30 to go instead of burning clock to try to give mahomes the ball with 1:50 left 

 

either we play for that to be our last possession or we play for getting the ball back after a chiefs drive… to milk it down to giving the chiefs the last touch seemed like a much bigger fail than throwing that pass in general 

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Billl said:

This discussion completely misses the point.  The decision was 100% correct.  It was Josh's execution that was poor.  Had he simply slid into the massive pocket to his right, that's a TD. 

 

As talented as he is, Josh still has room for improvement when it comes to the subtleties of QB play.  There's no way  Brady or Manning stands still and lets himself get bumped by his LT when there's a perfect pocket to be had.

 

If he slides right, the throw is late.

Trusting his All-Pro tackle to hold his backside block, which he does 99% of the time, was perfectly acceptable.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 4BillsintheBurgh said:

Unfortunately that slide probably throws the timing off, so Shakir is not in the window at that time. 

No it wouldn't have.  He didn't have to wait until an all Pro pass rusher has pushed the LT into his lap to slide into the pocket.  It was poor pocket management.  

 

Throwing it to Shakir was the correct play.  Throwing it to Diggs would have also been a perfectly reasonable decision.  Standing still while an elite pass rusher wrecks the play was the issue.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Allen2Moulds said:

I think most of us are basing it off of how he was playing. Playoff Josh is more accurate. Look at the prior deep throws that same game, 2 of them were spot on the the 3rd was catchable. The DB wasn't draped to Shakira, it would've been uncontested. No argument that the end result wasn't good, but the decision was right. Especially because it was second down, and we still had a shot at getting the 1st down. I know I could get flamed for this, but based on what we had been seeing from Bass, and how poorly our defense played that night, I  would've preferred going for it on 4th down.

 

 

I clearly explained why the fans "gut feel" that he would complete it was irrelevant.    He played out of his head in the Eagles game as well and 2 similar throws end up on the turf.   One to Sherfield early and the Gabe one in OT.    You can be OK with the result because you wanted the spectacular completion at the risk of 3rd and 9.......but it wasn't the right move.   That's BEFORE giving the Chiefs the ball back with that much time and 2 timeouts to play 4 down football for the first time all game.  That would have very likely ended just the same as the Eagles game or the 13 seconds game.   The defense had forced a punt only 1 time all game.   The only other possession the Chiefs didn't score on they fumbled at the 1. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Billl said:

No it wouldn't have.  He didn't have to wait until an all Pro pass rusher has pushed the LT into his lap to slide into the pocket.  It was poor pocket management.  

 

Throwing it to Shakir was the correct play.  Throwing it to Diggs would have also been a perfectly reasonable decision.  Standing still while an elite pass rusher wrecks the play was the issue.

Disagree. I think as a qb that's tough to determine where the pass rush is while going through your reads. It didn't help that it was a bull rush so Josh didn't have the advantage of seeing the jersey color in his peripheral vision. By the time he felt the pressure it was time to throw the ball.

 

Dawkins has had problems anchoring on the past, just unfortunate he could not hold up for another 1/2 second.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Simon said:

 

If he slides right, the throw is late.

Trusting his All-Pro tackle to hold his backside block, which he does 99% of the time, was perfectly acceptable.

There isn't a tackle in the league who can consistently stone Chris Jones without help.  And Dawkins, while good, is certainly not elite while Jones is first team all Pro.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Billl said:

There isn't a tackle in the league who can consistently stone Chris Jones without help.  And Dawkins, while good, is certainly not elite while Jones is first team all Pro.

Josh can't quarterback in fear. He has to trust his guys to do the blocking or he would never get through reads.

Jones wasn't the same at DE, tackles had arm length advantages over him, that's why he has mostly played at DT since the experiment KC tried last year.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could not disagree more with the OP. This coaching staff has proven repeatedly to have terrible situational awareness in clutch time. Scoring early would have just been a hope and a prayer that KC would make a mistake as they demolished our D on just about every drive in the second half. Just move the damn chains, burn clock and either score a TD or be much closer for a tying FG. This coach, this team, never seems to learn how to close a game -- and it cost us dearly again.

  • Vomit 1
  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 4BillsintheBurgh said:

Josh can't quarterback in fear. He has to trust his guys to do the blocking or he would never get through reads.

Jones wasn't the same at DE, tackles had arm length advantages over him, that's why he has mostly played at DT since the experiment KC tried last year.

That's not accurate at all.  He struggled at setting the edge as a full time DE.  He regularly kicks out from DT to DE on passing downs and dominates. 

 

Having pocket awareness isn't QBing in fear.  It's what the great ones do.  He let his LT get pushed into his lap when there was a perfect pocket available.  I don't understand why people are questioning which open receiver he chose instead of asking why he didn't step into the pocket.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

I clearly explained why the fans "gut feel" that he would complete it was irrelevant.    He played out of his head in the Eagles game as well and 2 similar throws end up on the turf.   One to Sherfield early and the Gabe one in OT.    You can be OK with the result because you wanted the spectacular completion at the risk of 3rd and 9.......but it wasn't the right move.   That's BEFORE giving the Chiefs the ball back with that much time and 2 timeouts to play 4 down football for the first time all game.  That would have very likely ended just the same as the Eagles game or the 13 seconds game.   The defense had forced a punt only 1 time all game.   The only other possession the Chiefs didn't score on they fumbled at the 1. 

I don't disagree with you, and also preferred that we picked up at least another 1st down. But I think we're talking about optimum outcome, which is different to me. Let's bleed the clock all the way down, and now let's score. Chiefs have been a top defense all year, and after they made some halftime adjustments, yards and points were at a lot higher premium. I don't compare it to the Eagles game for 2 reasons. He took that shot on 3rd down vs. the Eagles. Always been a pet peeve of mine, to throw the ball 40 yds, when you only need.a few to keep the drive going. The 2nd thing is, Gabe and Josh hadn't been on the same page all year. I had a lot more trust in Shakir to be were Josh expected him to be in that moment. All that being said.....I get your point, and can't push back to hard on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Success said:

 

The bolded doesn't compute w/ me.

 

Once you get in the red zone against a good D, nothing is guaranteed.  I swear, if JA did the "small chunks" thing, and we got stopped, or something worse happened (penalty, turnover), pundits would have spent the past few days talking about how he had an easy TD w/ Shakir open in the EZ, and didn't take it when he had the chance.

 

 

 

Yeah, makable field goals aren't guaranteed either.

 

I'm living and dying with Josh Allen in the redzone playing 4 down football there.   And I love those chances.  The offense was grinding the Chiefs vulnerable run and short passing defense down.  Killing them with short gains.   They instead played into the strength of the Chiefs defense.........downfield pass defense.........and as much as people want to claim that was a sure TD pass there isn't nearly enough data this season that suggests that to be the case.   Quite the opposite.

 

Impose your will and win or go out with your boots on.   

 

I'm not giving the Chiefs the ball back until I make them use those timeouts..........and preferably not until there is well under a minute left to move the ball 75 yards.   

 

It's how Parcells and Belichick would have done it.     

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Billl said:

He let his LT get pushed into his lap when there was a perfect pocket available.  I don't understand why people are questioning which open receiver he chose instead of asking why he didn't step into the pocket.

 

Because if he adjusts in the pocket the timing is off and the throw is late.

And I'm not exactly sure how Allen let his LT get pushed, but if you had been watching Dawkins for the past month you'd know he has been 100% worthy of Allen's trust. You're simply wrong about a player that you know less about than anybody here.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BullBuchanan said:

Josh scores a TD there and we lose. Mahomes beat us with 13 seconds and a far stronger defense.  He would have had a 1:45 and a pile of timeouts.

 

You're probably right based on how the defense played that night.  However, just food for thought, the last two times we played the Chiefs (in KC) we had the lead and Mahomes threw an interception to lose in 2022 and turnover on downs in 2023.  Nothing is guaranteed.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Success said:

I am beyond tired of the national hand-wringing about that play.  It was THERE.  I've actually heard fans argue that what Allen SHOULD have done is to just keep picking up small chunks, and then score a TD with just a few seconds left on the clock.

 

As though you can script something like that perfectly.  Then there is a holding penalty, or sack, or turnover, or you just can't get in the endzone.  Allen saw Shakir wide open for 6, and he went for it.  And, as we all know, if Chris Jones gets there a half second later, that's a TD and we're likely up by 4.

 

I'm like, is that the best that you've got, Allen haters?  The guy plays a great game, should have had at least 100 more yards and another TD if his receivers could hang onto the ball - and you're saying "same ol' Allen" because he went for an OPEN TOUCHDOWN.

 

And I hope Mahomes throws 3 picks this week so we can all see the double-standard.  It won't be nearly as analyzed and dissected.

 

Doesn’t matter.  McD’s defense wasn’t stopping KC.  As long as there was more than a minute left after the Bills scored it was lights out.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

Then you could argue he made the right call on a similar throw in OT to Gabe against the Eagles.    Blame whoever you want but that ball also ultimately landed well off the mark. 

 

Game lost.  

 

If people are OK with Josh deciding games late by choosing to make throws only he and a handful of others would even attempt...........after proving they could just march their way down in small chunks all game............and as opposed to taking what may be more situationally appropriate like most other QB's would have to.........then that's that fans choice.

 

Honestly,  I'd rather have a spectacular Josh Allen for 10 years and never win a SB and then have to find another QB.........than instead win one SB with a journeyman starter and have a bunch of other run of the mill QB's that I have to watch.    Ideally you get spectacular and SB's........but sometimes superstars and just doing what it takes to win don't align.

 

But I'm not a finish line Bills fan.   My NCAAF team and MLB team have combined for 12 titles during my viewing life so it's not a tragedy to me if the Bills never do.   Being a Bills fan is a lifestyle for me and winning a SB only changes maybe a couple banners or flags I might fly.    That's it.

 

But none of that changes the fact that the decision to hurl that ball 30+ air yards into the end zone on 2nd and 9 just wasn't the right move strategically speaking.    It was the wrong decision on multiple levels.


I feel you on the lifestyle. I’m all in but it’s not the be all-end all of life for me what happens with the team.

 

Statistically it may have been wrong. But the throw was there. Especially after 2 consecutive drives stalling out with one ending in a bizarre choice of fake punt. 
 

More focus needs to be on our #1 letting a 50 yard ball go through both of his hands rather than Josh barely missing a throw. Which if you’re happy for a 10 year career of Josh, you live with. You seem sound enough to know within reason we win and rarely lose games because of him. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Simon said:

 

Because if he adjusts in the pocket the timing is off and the throw is late.

And I'm not exactly sure how Allen let his LT get pushed, but if you had been watching Dawkins for the past month you'd know he has been 100% worthy of Allen's trust. You're simply wrong about a player that you know less about than anybody here.

 

 

17 minutes ago, Simon said:

 

Because if he adjusts in the pocket the timing is off and the throw is late.

And I'm not exactly sure how Allen let his LT get pushed, but if you had been watching Dawkins for the past month you'd know he has been 100% worthy of Allen's trust. You're simply wrong about a player that you know less about than anybody here.

He can't control his LT getting pushed, but he can make sure he's not standing directly in his path by availing himself of the perfect pocket.  

Screenshot2024-01-22122606.thumb.jpg.1ea228ccf19f02ecdbd61d7f23bfc38a.jpg

Edited by Billl
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Low Positive said:

In retrospect, my least favorite play on that drive was the run up the middle to get to the two-minute warning. It felt like wasting a down when the BIlls didn't have downs to waste. 

On the 3rd down throw out of bounds before attempting the FG, Shakir was wide open in the left flat.  He would have easily gotten the lst down inside the 17 yard line.  Unfortunately Josh was looking and rolling to his right and both of our receivers were completely covered in the rt corner of the endzone.

 

I agree about the run up the middle.  Not good.  We had a 1st down at the 27 with two and a half minutes on the clock.  And ended up w no points, and a big L.  That whole sequence just sucked.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Billl said:

 

 

He can't control his LT getting pushed, but he can make sure he's not standing directly in his path by availing himself of the perfect pocket.  

Screenshot2024-01-22122606.thumb.jpg.1ea228ccf19f02ecdbd61d7f23bfc38a.jpg

 

That's a good view.  It is clean.

 

I just hate what it's all become in an age when everyone can watch replays in slo mo for days, from every angle, with close-ups & all that - and a bunch of people on a couch can say "why didn't he do this or that?  So easy!"

 

I get that "it's what separates the great ones."  But I've seen the great ones miss big plays, too.  Mahomes missed a guy wide open in the EZ earlier in the game.  Both QB's do what they can in the moment.

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Billever76 said:

No play is a sure thing...a simple hand off or even kneel down could have negative things happen....but if Dawkins holds his block that's as sure of a td as you will get.....allen doesn't miss that throw without getting contacted just as he was releasing

 

Please refer my initial post regarding that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Billl said:

 

 

He can't control his LT getting pushed, but he can make sure he's not standing directly in his path by availing himself of the perfect pocket.  

Screenshot2024-01-22122606.thumb.jpg.1ea228ccf19f02ecdbd61d7f23bfc38a.jpg

 

You're wasting your time trying to use still photos of active action to try to convince me that Allen is at fault for Chris Jones making a strong play on a LT that Allen rightfully trusts.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Comparing the throw to the end zone Gabe option rt throw vs Philly is a little off IMO. On the 2nd and 9 play vs. KC, the read is very clear, and Josh and Shakir are seeing it the same way as Shakir starts his movement to the post (it was not as clear on the Gabe play in Philly). Its pitch and catch, easy peasy, and not a challenging throw (for Josh) if Josh doesn't get bumped. It's also where the overall play design wants the ball to go based on the defensive look and execution. You could argue about if the read numbering is high to low or low to high if you want, sure... and you could argue that a longer developing route will allow for a slightly higher chance of pocket contact, but also why would you when the Chiefs played the way they did and had like 3 pressures all game... I am 100% good with the decision, just wish the bump didn't happen.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm kind of an old timer.  This kind of nitpicking of every play and nuance in a game simply didn't happen in the ol' days.  

 

The level of scrutiny on JA is at such a ludicrous level.  It adds so much pressure w/ each passing year.  I wouldn't even be able to function w/ that, personally - not sure how anyone plays in front of millions w/ it.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Simon said:

 

You're wasting your time trying to use still photos of active action to try to convince me that Allen is at fault for Chris Jones making a strong play on a LT that Allen rightfully trusts.

If you think Josh demonstrated good pocket awareness here, then you're right (about it being a waste of time).  I guess Josh's trust for Dawkins means that he should elect to stand in the way of a dog-walking instead of the perfect pocket.

 

I guess I'll let the results of the play speak for itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Billl said:

If you think Josh demonstrated good pocket awareness here, then you're right (about it being a waste of time).  I guess Josh's trust for Dawkins means that he should elect to stand in the way of a dog-walking instead of the perfect pocket.

 

I guess I'll let the results of the play speak for itself.

 

Actually it's more of a waste of time to interact with self-important knuckleheads from other fanbases who think they know more than they do and think it's appropriate to come in and crap on threads with nonsense gibberish in a forum where their presence is marginally tolerable after a season-ending loss.

Read the room, know your role and stay in your lane.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Process said:

Yes. You've mentioned that many times. 

 

If it's 4th and 1 or 2 the bills 100% are going for it. I don't think you've grasped that. And if you watch the play Shakir had one guy to beat for the first, he is good at making guys miss. I think he gets it. 

Not to mention Kincaid had a good chance to run for the first if the ball was on him right after his break.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BBFL said:


I feel you on the lifestyle. I’m all in but it’s not the be all-end all of life for me what happens with the team.

 

Statistically it may have been wrong. But the throw was there. Especially after 2 consecutive drives stalling out with one ending in a bizarre choice of fake punt. 
 

More focus needs to be on our #1 letting a 50 yard ball go through both of his hands rather than Josh barely missing a throw. Which if you’re happy for a 10 year career of Josh, you live with. You seem sound enough to know within reason we win and rarely lose games because of him. 
 

 

 

 

I'm with you on Diggs not catching that ball.   If they were going to be taking shot plays like that 2nd and 9 without concern about giving the Chiefs the last possession.........well, hitting that pass at the 8 minute mark would have helped because they might have been able to score with 6 minutes or so left and then have the ball again at the end if the Chiefs had then scored.    

 

The Chiefs were gouging the Bills defense at a near historic rate in that game so it wouldn't have taken them more than 3-4 minutes max to score a TD if they knew that was likely their last possession.  

 

Once the clock got down under 4 minutes the strategy needed to turn to "make this the last possession of the game".     I think to most that seemed to be the objective.

 

But regarding Diggs specifically.........he may be washed........but they almost got 4 GREAT years out of Diggs.   

 

1st round contracts are 4 years cheap and then an option for an expensive season.    They gave away a little more than that in trade but they got good value for the basic value of those picks.

 

Just sucks that the 22nd pick in the 2020 draft ended up being Jefferson and not one of the 4 people selected before him or 2 after.   And that the cap strapped Bills felt compelled to extend him.   I was not in favor of extending him early but in getting a fairly complicated personality in Diggs they weren't going to be able to get by letting him get to his walk year so they probably would have extended him this past offseason even if they declined to do so in spring of 2022.

 

The mistake they made was not addressing WR in the draft before and after the Diggs trade.   That put them in the position to need to trade for him and then to have to extend him.   

 

 

Edited by BADOLBILZ
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...