Jump to content

DeSantis For President in 2024?


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, HomeskillitMoorman said:

I just don't see where the votes are going to come from for DeSantis against Trump. There are so many Trump voters within the Conservative population who refuse to even listen about anyone else. By then, they'll have had their minds made up already for almost a decade. 

 

The Dems are doing their best to make sure Trump gets jailed.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, HomeskillitMoorman said:


Bidens temper is going to help DeSantis beat Trump? Did you actually mean to post that in reply to me? 


 

Team DeSantis is going to completely ignore Trump.  
 

They’re going to approach this like they are running against everyone else.  Turn it in to the long game it’s going to be - UNLESS DeSantis wins Iowa or New Hampshire. 
 

Then it will be over.   
 

 

And it’s the right strategy.  There is zero need to even discuss/attack Trump.  
 

If asked - “my focus is to fix the ***t hole Democrats have turned this country into.”  
 

Full stop.  

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

The Dems are doing their best to make sure Trump gets jailed.

I honestly don't know what D leaders are thinking but it might be that him getting convicted before the election would be bad.  Tons of controversy, the stuff trump thrives in.  A possible constitutional crisis on whether a convict can run or pardon himself.  Possible unrest and riots...I'd sure rather they drag out the trial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

The Dems are doing their best to make sure Trump gets jailed.


I don’t think that’s going to work, I still think it’ll be him that wins the primary. 

36 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:


 

Team DeSantis is going to completely ignore Trump.  
 

They’re going to approach this like they are running against everyone else.  Turn it in to the long game it’s going to be - UNLESS DeSantis wins Iowa or New Hampshire. 
 

Then it will be over.   
 

 

And it’s the right strategy.  There is zero need to even discuss/attack Trump.  
 

If asked - “my focus is to fix the ***t hole Democrats have turned this country into.”  
 

Full stop.  


They’re already not doing this though. They’ve already engaged in going after Trump, it just hasn’t been effective. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BillStime said:

DeSaster

 

 


 

I know he’s winning. 
 

Because you can’t stop posting about him. 
 

We ignore people that aren’t threats.  
 

And he’s being deliberately attacked by State run media in collusion with Team Trump. 
 

 

See any Vivak threads?  Lol.   
 

Anyone care about Nikki Haley?  Lol
 

 


 


This tweet was before Trump attacked her today - I can’t imagine why.  
 

If Iowa is in the bag, why is Trump even talking about her - shhhhhhhh - it isn’t.  

Edited by Big Blitz
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Big Blitz said:

I know he’s winning. 
 

Because you can’t stop posting about him. 


Hahahahahahahahahahahahahah - I post about him because I know you LOVE him.

 

The guy is a pathetic loser. 
 

Al Gore 2.0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

 


 

 

Desperation.  Now do California you hacks.  
 

 


 

Explain the DeSantis policy that led to those companies doing that.   
 

 

I’ll wait.  But it’s going to be a loooooong time.  

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

He should win based on this alone 

 

 


DeSantis entire campaign is based on trying to Out-Trump the Donald. I’m not convinced softball forums will prove how good he is. Let’s wait for the debate stage when the haymakers start flying. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Dr.Sack said:


DeSantis entire campaign is based on trying to Out-Trump the Donald. I’m not convinced softball forums will prove how good he is. Let’s wait for the debate stage when the haymakers start flying. 



 

“He gets results and has been a successful chief executive…..he knows all the issues…..he fights……….but his campaign sucks he isn’t Trump.”  
 

You should stay home Cerno - style is more important then substance and results now?  

 

 

Trump - 2 years with GOP control of DC.  We got the SCOTUS.  Huge absolutely.  His greatest legacy.  
 

What else?  Was MAGA implemented?  Did we purge the Deep State?  How did 2018 go?    

 

Now Trump is somehow going to be able to do these things as a lame duck president and an unknown makeup of Congress.  Yea.  Again, that’s reason enough alone to move on.  

 

 

DeSantis - razor thin win in 2018 - manages to implement most every significant MAGA policy in Florida and wins majorities in the legislature while doing so.   Time to move on Cerno.  If DeSantis actual resume and results aren’t good enough then no one is.  And you bet your **s his Covid policies are what matters most.  Never forget that.  Ever.  Because it reveals much more about the man then any fancy ad or slogan or tweet ever will.  

Edited by Big Blitz
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Big Blitz said:



 

“He gets results and has been a successful chief executive…..he knows all the issues…..he fights……….but his campaign sucks he isn’t Trump.”  
 

You should stay home Cerno - style is more important then substance and results now?  

 

 

Trump - 2 years with GOP control of DC.  We got the SCOTUS.  Huge absolutely.  His greatest legacy.  
 

What else?  Was MAGA implemented?  Did we purge the Deep State?  How did 2018 go?    

 

Now Trump is somehow going to be able to do these things as a lame duck president and an unknown makeup of Congress.  Yea.  Again, that’s reason enough alone to move on.  

 

 

DeSantis - razor thin win in 2018 - manages to implement most every significant MAGA policy in Florida and wins majorities in the legislature while doing so.   Time to move on Cerno.  If DeSantis actual resume and results aren’t good enough then no one is.  And you bet your **s his Covid policies are what matters most.  Never forget that.  Ever.  Because it reveals much more about the man then any fancy ad or slogan or tweet ever will.  

 

It's interesting to see.  "Trump is an arrogant, lying #######!" and then "DeSantis doesn't have Trump's personality!"  :lol:

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/12/2023 at 9:16 PM, BillStime said:

Putin love fest continues

 

image.thumb.jpeg.d31cccaab6ec7fdde23ae64fce6148ba.jpeg

DeSantis is just a POS 

1 minute ago, Orlando Tim said:

Good to know you are for cluster bomb usage, we called Russia war criminals for using them but that seems to be right in line for you, politics over morals. 

https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/cluster-bombs-ukraine-biden-congress/

 

They literally used them on civilian areas, Ukraine will use them against the occupiers 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every day I am astounded by this new "Republican Party." It is like an old classic rock band that has lost all its original members, now touring as The New Ramones or something. So we will not sell weapons to a country if it could "escalate" a war. Does that apply if the de-escalation involves allowing the aggressor to simply win outright and then declare a peace? Does it apply to selling arms to Israel or Our Friends the Saudis and their never-ending proxy wars against Iran? Does it apply to South Korea? Maybe we should just let a Peace of The New Millennium to descend upon them under the leadership of their very strong, very shrewd leader.

 

I guess I could understand some kind of Kissinger type justification, some geopolitical realpolitik defense of keeping out of certain conflicts that don't impact our direct interests. But this "we will bend over and take it" justification is to advocate for a weak America on the world stage. Ladies and Gentlemen, I bring you "The New Republicans," not to be confused with any prior use of the term "Republican."

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Every day I am astounded by this new "Republican Party." It is like an old classic rock band that has lost all its original members, now touring as The New Ramones or something. So we will not sell weapons to a country if it could "escalate" a war. Does that apply if the de-escalation involves allowing the aggressor to simply win outright and then declare a peace? Does it apply to selling arms to Israel or Our Friends the Saudis and their never-ending proxy wars against Iran? Does it apply to South Korea? Maybe we should just let a Peace of The New Millennium to descend upon them under the leadership of their very strong, very shrewd leader.

 

I guess I could understand some kind of Kissinger type justification, some geopolitical realpolitik defense of keeping out of certain conflicts that don't impact our direct interests. But this "we will bend over and take it" justification is to advocate for a weak America on the world stage. Ladies and Gentlemen, I bring you "The New Republicans," not to be confused with any prior use of the term "Republican."

 

 

I think a major issue people on the Right have is that the US played a big part in instigating Russia’s aggression in this conflict by breaking our post- Soviet agreements of not expanding NATO to the east, and then aiding Ukrainian Nazis to overthrow a democratically elected government that was friendly with Russia…

 

Its almost like if America just stayed out of it 10 years ago, 350,000 Ukrainians might still be alive today…Constantly funding and arming Ukraine seems to just be making the situation worse…

 

 

 

Edited by JaCrispy
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

Its almost like if America just stayed out of it 10 years ago, 350,000 Ukrainians might still be alive today

Almost certainly under Russian control.

This is what I'm talking about - to these New Republicans freedom isn't worth any price at all.

"Mr. Gorbachev, fortify this Wall and stay within your designated sphere of influence and we'll get along just fine."

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

I think a major issue people on the Right have is that the US played a big part in instigating Russia’s aggression in this conflict by breaking our post- Soviet agreements of not expanding NATO to the east, and then aiding Ukrainian Nazis to overthrow a democratically elected government that was friendly with Russia…

 

Its almost like if America just stayed out of it 10 years ago, 350,000 Ukrainians might still be alive today…Constantly funding and arming Ukraine seems to just be making the situation worse…

 

 

 

 

Those are good reasons, and they make sense.

 

They're just not the reasons why Russia started the war. Yevgeniy Prigozhin straight up told the world why Russia started the war. It has nothing to do with historical grievances, broken treaties, or anything else that makes sense to a reasonable person.

 

It has everything to do with a naked land and resource grab for Russia's billionaire class, and to boost Russian prestige by making America look weak. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Almost certainly under Russian control.

This is what I'm talking about - to these New Republicans freedom isn't worth any price at all.

"Mr. Gorbachev, fortify this Wall and stay within your designated sphere of influence and we'll get along just fine."

Now, this is just kind of silly…😉

 

Its a completely different situation now, that has zero to do with communism attempting to overtake Europe like during the Cold War…

 

Russia does not seem to want control over Ukraine- just judging from their war strategy…it’s only very specific to a particular region, whose people are ethnically Russian, and who voted to become autonomous, and who the Ukrainian Nazis were slaughtering…

 

Remember what Bill Clinton’s Secretary of State once said back in the 90s- that no politician, in their right mind, would dare think about expanding NATO one foot to the east because it would be seen as an act of war- due to the agreements the west had with Russia…

 

1000 miles, and many countries later, you can understand why Russia might be skeptical of the U.S…

 

Unfortunately, just like with the Native Americans, the US has gone back on its word and has essentially declared war on Russia long ago…I don’t like that Russia invaded its neighbor, as I detest war…However, at the same time, I can’t really blame them…

 

And if China had an agreement with the US that they would not set up military bases in Mexico, and then did it anyway, I wouldn’t blame America for doing the same…👍

16 minutes ago, Coffeesforclosers said:

 

Those are good reasons, and they make sense.

 

They're just not the reasons why Russia started the war. Yevgeniy Prigozhin straight up told the world why Russia started the war. It has nothing to do with historical grievances, broken treaties, or anything else that makes sense to a reasonable person.

 

It has everything to do with a naked land and resource grab for Russia's billionaire class, and to boost Russian prestige by making America look weak. 

I actually also agree with this…

 

All wars are fought over economics, whether it’s Russia invading or the U.S. funding Ukraine…

Edited by JaCrispy
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

All wars are fought over economics, whether it’s Russia invading or the U.S. funding Ukraine…

Two particular regions. The Crimea counts too.

 

3 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

Unfortunately, just like with the Native Americans, the US has gone back on its word and has essentially declared war on Russia long ago…

Talk about silly - "the U.S. has gone back on its word?" Remember the post-Soviet agreement. Ukraine surrenders its Soviet nukes, the new Russian Federation agrees to respect Ukraine's territorial integrity. It is like the U.S. Government and the Native American nations, but the party reneging on its obligations is Russia.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Big Blitz said:



 

“He gets results and has been a successful chief executive…..he knows all the issues…..he fights……….but his campaign sucks he isn’t Trump.”  
 

You should stay home Cerno - style is more important then substance and results now?  

 

 

Trump - 2 years with GOP control of DC.  We got the SCOTUS.  Huge absolutely.  His greatest legacy.  
 

What else?  Was MAGA implemented?  Did we purge the Deep State?  How did 2018 go?    

 

Now Trump is somehow going to be able to do these things as a lame duck president and an unknown makeup of Congress.  Yea.  Again, that’s reason enough alone to move on.  

 

 

DeSantis - razor thin win in 2018 - manages to implement most every significant MAGA policy in Florida and wins majorities in the legislature while doing so.   Time to move on Cerno.  If DeSantis actual resume and results aren’t good enough then no one is.  And you bet your **s his Covid policies are what matters most.  Never forget that.  Ever.  Because it reveals much more about the man than any fancy ad or slogan or tweet ever will.  


Covid policies aren’t as relevant, as seeing where campaign funds are coming from. A better analysis is to look at the data. And the data shows that DeSantis is taking the most money from Big Pharma than anyone. We know the revolving door between Pharma and the FDA/CDC.
 

A logical conclusion is that DeSantis is draining no swamps. DeSantis is using the rhetoric of a reformer, but his campaign contributions clearly show he will deliver zero change, while doing the bidding of Big Pharma.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dr.Sack said:


Covid policies aren’t as relevant, as seeing where campaign funds are coming from. A better analysis is to look at the data. And the data shows that DeSantis is taking the most money from Big Pharma than anyone. We know the revolving door between Pharma and the FDA/CDC.
 

A logical conclusion is that DeSantis is draining no swamps. DeSantis is using the rhetoric of a reformer, but his campaign contributions clearly show he will deliver zero change, while doing the bidding of Big Pharma.  

Where did you see he gets money from Big Pharma? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Almost certainly under Russian control.

This is what I'm talking about - to these New Republicans freedom isn't worth any price at all.

"Mr. Gorbachev, fortify this Wall and stay within your designated sphere of influence and we'll get along just fine."

Do you are against trying to find a peaceful end? You are against ensuring our money is not being spent to make the Ukraine government rich? You believe that National Socialists should be supported without question? It is funny that liberals who will give up every  freedoms in the USA are so worried about Ukrainian freedoms. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

Combine DCBC where access to funds vs. physical money can be controlled with ESG personalized social credit scores that determine what "privileges" you have "earned" and you get the idea of what the plan is for you is when you're transformed into a subject of the State vs. a citizen of the Republic.  The fight is against concentration of government and corporate power and control.  Break up the government, break up the corporations!  Push power back to the local level.  Just what those old-fashioned liberals used to fight for decades ago.  Today's libs, just the opposite.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...