Jump to content

NFL is making plans to experiment with a sky judge in 2020


Recommended Posts

https://wccoradio.radio.com/articles/radiocom/nfl-sky-judge-proposal-would-put-official-in-replay-booth
 

thank goodness. I’ve written a letter to goodell after each of the last 8 seasons.  Each saying the same exact thing.  You need to fix your officiating.  Bring in an eye in the sky that has access to multiple cameras.  You run a multi billion$ industry.  More camera angles and officials in the sky can assure that referee catastrophes are less likely.  All it took was the XFL to show us that it works. 

Edited by NewEra
  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a great idea.  and with advances in video analytics, we're 1 step away from being able to go full blast AI for officiating.  8k cameras from multiple angles plus some computing power, you could in realtime build a 3d model of every single play and examine it from every possible angle.  The officiating in the NFL has been so terrible for so long, and with major outcome effecting mistakes in playoff games, the NFL really needs to fix this

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, HOUSE said:

This is great for the NFL, more commercial time while the officials review video.

 

Will the real Jakes from State Farm stand up? - Chicago Tribune4

If they can do it the way the XFL did it really didn't take too much time.

Edited by Warcodered
Autocorrect
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, dorquemada said:

It's a great idea.  and with advances in video analytics, we're 1 step away from being able to go full blast AI for officiating.  8k cameras from multiple angles plus some computing power, you could in realtime build a 3d model of every single play and examine it from every possible angle.  The officiating in the NFL has been so terrible for so long, and with major outcome effecting mistakes in playoff games, the NFL really needs to fix this

 

AI officiating? Yuck. How many uncalled penalties would it pick up? Games would last 30 hours.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, What a Tuel said:

 

AI officiating? Yuck. How many uncalled penalties would it pick up? Games would last 30 hours.

 

With advanced video analytics platforms you can decide exactly what threshold you want for penalties.  things like holding, neutral zone infractions, etc, you could dial it in and end up with the same amount of penalties as today, but rather than some significant fraction of them being BS, each would be a clear cut violation of the rules.  I work in this space and I'm telling you, it's gotten really good, and is getting better every day. There's plenty of existing footage to 'train' the systems with, and we know what a good call is versus a bad call.

 

edit:  defensive pass interference would be a perfect example of what could be made right with AI and Video Analytics

Edited by dorquemada
thought of somethign else
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, dorquemada said:

 

With advanced video analytics platforms you can decide exactly what threshold you want for penalties.  things like holding, neutral zone infractions, etc, you could dial it in and end up with the same amount of penalties as today, but rather than some significant fraction of them being BS, each would be a clear cut violation of the rules.  I work in this space and I'm telling you, it's gotten really good, and is getting better every day. There's plenty of existing footage to 'train' the systems with, and we know what a good call is versus a bad call.

 

edit:  defensive pass interference would be a perfect example of what could be made right with AI and Video Analytics

 

They could even program it to use a different standard when NE* or Pittsburgh is playing!

 

 

Seriously, I can't see how it could be worse so WTH, bring it on.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, What a Tuel said:

 

AI officiating? Yuck. How many uncalled penalties would it pick up? Games would last 30 hours.

 

Or players would adjust and start playing clean.

 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with the OP about more camera angles. Every end zone pylon should have a pair of them at right angles. How about movable cameras on the LOS and the first-down marker too?

 

Twenty HD cameras would be a tiny investment and take a lot of the guesswork out of officiating.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This idea is so great and simple the NFL will certainly mess it up. The eye in the sky only calls definite rules which degree does not matter( face mask, illegal motion are first I think of) and you take that off the plate of officials on ground who can focus on the calls where details matter( holding, late hits, PI). If you eliminate 30% of thee calls a guy must make you can expect the call accuracy to improve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, frostbitmic said:

Sky Judge ? .... Does that mean the NFL has hired GOD to officiate games ?

 

Belichick is screwed.

 

Nah - they'll just put a dome on Gillette field.

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good, 


And Give him/her the final say. Sky Judge needs to be in charge of the team. 

 

 

Lets get full transparency and show the officials discussing it like the XFL did, It was very refreshing to watch the reviews happen live on TV. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, What a Tuel said:

 

AI officiating? Yuck. How many uncalled penalties would it pick up? Games would last 30 hours.

 

Call no penalties during the game. Tuesday morning, hand out suspensions for everything including holding, off sides, delay of game and grounding leading to lifetime bans. That's how the real world works. No more winning just because you get away with breaking the rules.

Edited by beavis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, beavis said:

 

Call no penalties during the game. Tuesday morning, hand out suspensions for everything including holding, off sides, delay of game and grounding leading to lifetime bans. That's how the real world works. No more winning just because you get away with breaking the rules.


shut up beavis

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with those that feel the league will screw this up, there is no chance that they won’t want to “enhance” it and in doing so they will do a botch  job on it, jmo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/22/2020 at 12:39 PM, NewEra said:

https://wccoradio.radio.com/articles/radiocom/nfl-sky-judge-proposal-would-put-official-in-replay-booth
 

thank goodness. I’ve written a letter to goodell after each of the last 8 seasons.  Each saying the same exact thing.  You need to fix your officiating.  Bring in an eye in the sky that has access to multiple cameras.  You run a multi billion$ industry.  More camera angles and officials in the sky can assure that referee catastrophes are less likely.  All it took was the XFL to show us that it works. 


about time they are doing this. A sky judge should have been added 5 years ago. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My 1st thought was "There's an accident waiting to happen." I'm just waiting for the 1st time one of those things gets in the way of a punt or pass. Maybe gets blown into some Bills fan's beer by the gusty winds in Orchard Park. Cue the drone jokes...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A sky judge is an idea whose time has come.  They can look for the obvious misses.  If it can't be determined by the next play then it is to close to overturn.  Add some constraints so the minor issues are not turned into penalties and only critical misses are fixed.

 

They should also not be part of a crew but rotate to different crews.  16 games (week off) with 16 different crews.  They should also rate and deliver the reviews to the crew they worked.

 

This can be done without complicating and once the bugs worked out, eliminate the challenge system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if anyone posted it already, but the sky judge has been denied for the 2020 regular season.  It will be used in preseason.  
 

Nfl and their puppet Riveron with at least one more year of total domination 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/23/2020 at 11:43 AM, Buffalo_Stampede said:

I didn't read the article but there should also be a 1 minute time clock on reviews. Have 2 sky judges per game. If they both have the same call after 1 minute of review then that's the call. If they disagree then the call stands. 

 

Pretty simple.

 

Completely agree.  If you need 5 minutes to review a play, then maybe the call on the field wasn't so bad.  

 

I'm thinking specifically of the Kelvin Benjamin TD against the Pats a couple years ago.  Questionable catch (it was Benjamin after all), but called a TD on the field.  Replays were inconclusive.  5-10 minutes of real time replay review and the TD was overturned.

 

I don't need every call to be 100% correct.  I just want the overly egregious errors corrected.  It's why I didn't like the Pass Interference challenges last year -- correct the blatantly bad miscalled.  Don't challenge anything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/27/2020 at 6:03 PM, NewEra said:

Not sure if anyone posted it already, but the sky judge has been denied for the 2020 regular season.  It will be used in preseason.  
 

Nfl and their puppet Riveron with at least one more year of total domination 


Riveron is out - I think they want to experiment and it will become an item for 2021.

 

They need to see and adjust to the new technology.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...