Jump to content

Joe B All-22 from Houston playoff game


YoloinOhio

Recommended Posts

The deer-in-the headlights look on Allen's face seen often in the 2nd half told me that he unraveled big-time. We can say it's because it was his 1st playoff game but we won't know if that is true until he gets there again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

allen lost the plot for a bit late in the game, you could see a crazed look on his face.  he was putting the world on his back, partly because his teammates were letting him down save motor (brown and duke each dropping two huge balls both early and late in the game, bad line play, etc), and partly because his coaches were putting it all on him (empty set on first down in overtime?  that goofy package of lee smith, the full back, and our rb all going out in routes w max protect, did we run out of that effectively at all?  the d knew what was happening the whole time).

 

most of the players on O were worse tho, especially down the stretch.  the blocking was terrible and i don't think it's just our players being trash, missing the RDE totally on 3rd down by the OG, OT, and RB leading to the total disaster is on coaching as well.  being predictable and not practicing consistency is the problem.  most complicated O ever, and we can't execute a sweep with a 3 to 1 advantage on blockers.  teams like new england don't have that happen.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, N.Y. Orangeman said:

His standards for grading are an absolute joke and lack context.   His other stuff is decent

 

What do you think are his standard for grading and how do you disagree with them?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, mannc said:

Go watch the QB sweep right in the 4th quarter.  Knox, Ford and Morse all block ghosts, while Cunningham practically hospitalizes Allen.  You’ll be super extra-stupified.

Sometimes it's difficult to extrapolate blocking assignments, specific responsibilities etc for individual players in the modern NFL because plays seem so complex at times (for me, anyways).  But watching that reply 10x will make you wanna pull your hair out.  Sometimes you just need to smash the guy in front of you.   

 

In a game of a million "what ifs," this one takes the cake. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joe B is a good reporter but his knowledge of football is rudimentary at best. If you're looking for detailed analysis and breakdowns from and all-22 perspective I'd recommend Aaron Quinn from Cover 1, Joe Marino from the Draft Network, and Bruce Nolan from Buffalo Rumblings. 

 

I tend to ignore Joe B's all-22 analysis because like a few of you have said, his grading system is totally unexplained and illogical. I think I started to realize this after the Philly game when he graded Star so well after we got absolutely gashed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, ILBillsfan said:

Irregardless of the lateral play he got the team in position to tie the game with no timeouts.  Then in OT took the team down the field a lack of execution by the pulling center and Tr to block Kirkpatrick and then a horrible block penalty in first is what kept him from and the Bills from winning this game.

 

little over zealous on the Allen hate.

 

i love Allens passion to win and thought he did ok.  Players need to step up for the guy and also make some plays, oh and some plays to attack the middle of the field that was wide open in OT would of been nice

 

Here there's a genuine Allen issue.  Deep middle was his worst throw this year.  Now in the Nextgen summary chart it shows worse than it is because they use passer rating and that's where he threw a bunch of picks early in the year.  But essentially, teams have been daring Josh to hit the deep post route because he hasn't shown that he can.  He needs to fix this during the off-season.

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, YoloinOhio said:

He’s not good vs the run. Oliver was the better player by far at the end of the year. Is he a nice piece in the rotation - yes. But he won’t be paid what he wants by the Bills because  they won’t value him that high and that’s ok. He should get as much as he can on the open market. 

 

There's also the fact that he's [Phillips] shown a little bit of a tendency towards stats chasing.  For example, the encroachment penalty against the Steelers.  He went off the snap count, which is brilliant to penetrate the backfield like he did and he should have gotten a sack, but in a close game it's a pretty sure bet that's going to be called as a penalty.  I don't think drawing an encroachment penalty is part of "Do Your 1/11" but if uncalled, it does give you a good chance to rack up a sack.

I personally think that emotionally and for a leadership standpoint, he's big for the Bills but I imagine they want to pay him as a rotational DT sharing snaps with Ed Oliver and he wants to be paid Big Money

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, YoloinOhio said:

I don’t really understand the grading concept either 

 

Agreed, any more than I like the grades people toss out here without giving any basis or details.  Maybe I do Joe an injustice, but I thought it was telling that he was all over Star Lotulelei in Twitter for an awful game against the Eagles, then after McDermott on the podium discussed the selflessness of the DT position and quietly said "I thought Star had a good game", Joe reversed course and graded him high.  I think his grades are subjective "TLAR" stuff and don't add value.

 

Compare and contrast to someone like Jim Kubiak writing for TBN who grades Allen quarter by quarter each game.  He's in no way a Homer.  He gives criticism where due.  But he gives the base data he's working with (play selection, completions/incompletions and score) and explains what he's seeing and why it's good or poor and having actually played QB and coached it, he knows a lot more of what he's talking about.  I expect if you asked him to explain his grading, bring a beer or a big cup of coffee and grab a chair.

 

Then there's another step to some of the guys like Brett Kollsman (Film Room guy) who openly says how little any of us know or see compared to the coaches and players, but whose assessments play-by-play spot things that others miss and who brings in commentary about the play design and how well or poorly it matches what the defense is doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, stony said:

Sometimes it's difficult to extrapolate blocking assignments, specific responsibilities etc for individual players in the modern NFL because plays seem so complex at times (for me, anyways).  But watching that reply 10x will make you wanna pull your hair out.  Sometimes you just need to smash the guy in front of you.   

 

In a game of a million "what ifs," this one takes the cake. 

 

sadly very very true.  knox was going too fast/too far upfield and missed dude, but morse literally just didn't see him.  i'm a broken record on this, but i'm convinced our overwrought goofy O has guys trying to learn and thus do too much, without any bread and butter plays everyone on the team can execute perfectly. 

 

on D, our tackling issues give me pause at times, but frazier has them in the position to win the vast majority of the time.  the soft cover on 3rd and 18 (simple enough call) woulda had everyone stopped short, and that blitz prior to the RB pass which killed us was blitzed perfectly and woulda stopped them COLD.

 

how many times a game do we have our O in a position to make a great play like that where it looks like our players understand their assignments and are in a position to make them?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

11 hours ago, CincyBillsFan said:

 

They did?  I'm a simple football fan and in spite of all that went before if either Knox or Morse make that block on a perfectly called QB sweep Allen possibly takes it to house.  Or at worst we're in FG range to win it in OT.

 

My problem with Joe B is that he often can't see the forest for the trees.  Take a look at how other young QB's fared in their first playoff game.  Those stats have been posted all over 2BD the last few days.  A lot of great QB's had ugly first playoff games - even in games their teams won.  The bottom line is that the Bills asked to much of Allen.  Which is both good & bad.  It's good because they were confident he could handle it.  It was bad because when he had a bad play he lost it for a couple of series at a crucial point in the game.

 

And why is Joe B surprised that after the fumble Allen hesitated on some of his throws in order to make sure he didn't turn the ball over again?  I mean this was his FIRST 4th quarter in a playoff game and his FIRST ever OT game.    On the drive that should have won the game for the Bills but for a BS penalty on Ford and missed blocks on a perfectly called QB sweep I saw Allen get his feet back under him and make two great throws to gain 1st downs on 3rd & long. 

 

The fact is that this was as classic a TEAM loss as you're ever going to see in a close game that goes to OT.  And as I've posted elsewhere, if I had to choose the top 5 plays that lost the game Allen's play would NOT make the list.  Here's the list off the top of my head and tell me I'm wrong:

 

1)  missed block on QB sweep

2)  ref calling a blindside PF on Ford

3)  ref NOT calling targeting on the Texan who drilled Allen in the head on the QB sweep.

4)  the defense allowing Houston to convert a 3rd & 18 in OT

5)  Milano not wrapping up on Watson for a sack on that Texan FG drive that won the game.

6)  Brown not staying in bounds on the failed toe tap catch that would have given us first & goal at the 2.

7)  Duke not making a tough catch for a TD at the end of the first half.

 

Look. More then 5 plays and not one involved Allen doing something bad.  Go figure. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Add Singletary completely whiffing on a block, that lead to a huge sack. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, mannc said:

Funny, I thought the weather was fine in the dome on Saturday.  How did so many Bills “lose their footing” on the same play?

 

I'm just guessing here, but I think at that point the Bills D was pretty gassed (and I'll point out, they do have some control of that). 

 

The D knew they could get off the field on that play and turn the chance for the win back to the O and they tried to put it all out there.

 

The problem is that the difference between putting it all out there and landing on your face is pretty slim, and if your stabilizing muscles are done for the day Down you Go.  It may be a S&C issue where they need the guys all doing more Pilates or other stuff that strengthens those guys but 'Zo is a Pilates instructor and down he went, too.

 

5 minutes ago, colin said:

 

sadly very very true.  knox was going too fast/too far upfield and missed dude, but morse literally just didn't see him.  i'm a broken record on this, but i'm convinced our overwrought goofy O has guys trying to learn and thus do too much, without any bread and butter plays everyone on the team can execute perfectly

 

on D, our tackling issues give me pause at times, but frazier has them in the position to win the vast majority of the time.  the soft cover on 3rd and 18 (simple enough call) woulda had everyone stopped short, and that blitz prior to the RB pass which killed us was blitzed perfectly and woulda stopped them COLD.

 

how many times a game do we have our O in a position to make a great play like that where it looks like our players understand their assignments and are in a position to make them?

 

I am absolutely convinced of this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, CincyBillsFan said:

 

They did?  I'm a simple football fan and in spite of all that went before if either Knox or Morse make that block on a perfectly called QB sweep Allen possibly takes it to house.  Or at worst we're in FG range to win it in OT.

 

My problem with Joe B is that he often can't see the forest for the trees.  Take a look at how other young QB's fared in their first playoff game.  Those stats have been posted all over 2BD the last few days.  A lot of great QB's had ugly first playoff games - even in games their teams won.  The bottom line is that the Bills asked to much of Allen.  Which is both good & bad.  It's good because they were confident he could handle it.  It was bad because when he had a bad play he lost it for a couple of series at a crucial point in the game.

 

And why is Joe B surprised that after the fumble Allen hesitated on some of his throws in order to make sure he didn't turn the ball over again?  I mean this was his FIRST 4th quarter in a playoff game and his FIRST ever OT game.    On the drive that should have won the game for the Bills but for a BS penalty on Ford and missed blocks on a perfectly called QB sweep I saw Allen get his feet back under him and make two great throws to gain 1st downs on 3rd & long. 

 

The fact is that this was as classic a TEAM loss as you're ever going to see in a close game that goes to OT.  And as I've posted elsewhere, if I had to choose the top 5 plays that lost the game Allen's play would NOT make the list.  Here's the list off the top of my head and tell me I'm wrong:

 

1)  missed block on QB sweep

2)  ref calling a blindside PF on Ford

3)  ref NOT calling targeting on the Texan who drilled Allen in the head on the QB sweep.

4)  the defense allowing Houston to convert a 3rd & 18 in OT

5)  Milano not wrapping up on Watson for a sack on that Texan FG drive that won the game.

6)  Brown not staying in bounds on the failed toe tap catch that would have given us first & goal at the 2.

7)  Duke not making a tough catch for a TD at the end of the first half.

 

Look. More then 5 plays and not one involved Allen doing something bad.  Go figure.

 

Right On, and that's not to mention that the fumble involved Josh hesitating to tuck it and run because he saw Beas coming open, in a situation where he (should have had) D-Dawk, Singletary, and Kroft to handle 1 defender.  Josh shouldn't have had the ball where it was, gripped as it was, but the defender shouldn't have been near it either.    And being patient a bit to seek the throw instead of just taking off is exactly the maturation we wanted from him.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Dopey said:

Offense didn't make the plays they had in front of them. Td dropped at the end of the half. Pass dropped w a minute left in regulation that would have shifted the field. Worse was a kick ass play in ot that just wasn't blocked right. 1 block and Josh is still running. That was a game winning call. That play perfectly illustrates the fact that a play not working isn't always cuz of a bad play call.The players are to blame for this loss, not Daboll.

 

Daboll consistently schemed up good plays all season only for the Bills players to not execute.


Whether it was missed blocks, penalties, missed deep balls to wide open targets or dropped passes. 

 

I don't see how anyone could have watched this season and felt Daboll didn't do a good job, given the mental errors by his players and the limited resources he had at his disposal. 

 

Personnel issues were questionable at times, but for the most part I think he did a really good job calling plays. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

No, nor do I. I usually just stop reading after the article finishes and don't bother with the grades.

Same. I like the write ups, as they provide a perspective that I don’t have as I just watch the broadcast. Aside from that, I used to look at the grades but realized they don’t mean anything as I don’t know how he arrives at them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

The fumble was a huge momentum swing, but that was not all on Allen IMHO.


Sure Hap. But I’m sure there is some technique to help him there. Yeah in general be it blockers or pass catchers, if feel like extending the play needs to be a point of emphasis next camp. 
 

Personally i think this loss and all the stupid miscues might be the best thing for the growth of this team.
 

The journeymen vets just in it for a paycheck maybe won’t take it hard, but I have a feeling the young core will grow from this outcome more than any other. 
 

The close loses seem to drive  more introspection than the lopsided ones. 

Edited by Over 29 years of fanhood
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

Sure Hap. But I’m sure there is some technique to help him there. Yeah in general be it blockers or pass catchers, if feel like extending the play needs to be a point of emphasis next camp.

 

I'm not an expert, but yes, that's what I meant by saying elsewhere that Josh shouldn't have had the ball where it was, gripped as it was, but the defender shouldn't have been near it either.    Josh was holding the ball in a throwing grip, but at the numbers and in front of his body, ready to transition to a running grip.  His second hand was off the ball. 

 

In that grip, the QB's hand is on the top of the ball (what will be the back of the ball when transitioned to throwing position) and the ball is vulnerable to a leverage hit at the bottom.  Down and in front of his body is good, it means someone can't attack his raised arm from behind, but as far as I know, there's essentially no way to have the ball in a throwing grip and keep it from being leveraged out by that kind of hit with 258 lbs of Flying Fortress behind it (if you have a football, pick it up in a throwing grip, hold it with the long axis vertical, and try punching the bottom - you'll see what I mean).  If he had his 2nd hand on the ball he has a much better chance to protect it, but it's harder to run that way.  But the ball could be in closer to his body with his 2nd hand on it I think.

 

There's also an element of pocket awareness.  If he stays behind D-Dawk's great big comfy butt (picture on L), he gets an extra fraction of a second to throw and Dawkins has position on Mercilus.  But, he continues forward about 3-4 yds (picture on R), which Mercilus can see and adjust to, but Dawkins needs super-feet to achieve with a position of ordinary blocking leverage. (Dawkins also has some options I think, and I do loop back to "3 of you?  C'mon Man!")

 

Anyway, for Allen, it's fundamentally a "Should I Stay or Should I Go Now?" issue where Allen needs to be more decisive about if he's going to stay or go.  If he's gonna go, tuck the ball away safely.  If he's gonna stay, stay in the shadow of Dawkins' butt. (The LOS is the 47 yd line and Allen is still 4 yds behind it)

 

image.thumb.png.93ab9a0927cca44a4fe3d46e3df7d632.pngimage.thumb.png.dccb7a4eda99b074d9d2805967f4f467.png

 

Then there's the issue of Nsekhe, who has probably held Watt and wrestled him to the ground and is getting up looking at the ref with a "see mom No hands!" posture of innocence.  I think if Allen heroically completes that play, it gets called back for holding - which begs the question, "if it's a hold before the pass, isn't it a hold before the fumble?"  But that's a tale for another day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Here there's a genuine Allen issue.  Deep middle was his worst throw this year.  Now in the Nextgen summary chart it shows worse than it is because they use passer rating and that's where he threw a bunch of picks early in the year.  But essentially, teams have been daring Josh to hit the deep post route because he hasn't shown that he can.  He needs to fix this during the off-season.

 

 

 

I haven’t looked at the data but this would make sense as it was not attacked all year.  Didn’t know if it was coordinate thing or QB thing as it’s been open a lot and it is where most TE’s live 

 

hopefully it becomes an area to attack as that is exactly the area attacked by the Ravens 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ILBillsfan said:

I haven’t looked at the data but this would make sense as it was not attacked all year.  Didn’t know if it was coordinate thing or QB thing as it’s been open a lot and it is where most TE’s live 

 

hopefully it becomes an area to attack as that is exactly the area attacked by the Ravens 

 
Isn’t deep post is more a wr route to split cover 2 safeties? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, colin said:

i'm a broken record on this, but i'm convinced our overwrought goofy O has guys trying to learn and thus do too much, without any bread and butter plays everyone on the team can execute perfectly. 

 

You're spot on here.  I asked elsewhere, "What is our identity on offense?" and got zero responses.  Daboll talks about being "multiple" which seems to mean, equally bad at everything, not great at anything.  Allen will be better for surviving all of this, but I suspect his talent won't truly shine until he gets to work with a better, sounder OC and a simplified approach.

Edited by Coach Tuesday
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ILBillsfan said:

I haven’t looked at the data but this would make sense as it was not attacked all year.  Didn’t know if it was coordinate thing or QB thing as it’s been open a lot and it is where most TE’s live 

 

hopefully it becomes an area to attack as that is exactly the area attacked by the Ravens 

 

Hmmm I'm not sure about the idea of TE living deep middle? 

 

But the most straightforward Blitz 0 beater is max protect and a deep post because you know there's no safety there.  Allen must improve in his ability to hit those.  Keep in mind this is a "passer rating" chart so it is heavily weighted by INTs., but the message is clear - don't worry about the deep middle with Allen, just take away the "Honey Spot".

 

A complicating factor is that for a team with really good DE (like the Texans) our protections seem very vulnerable to showing a rush, but dropping many of the guys back into middle coverage to smother that "Honey Spot" while rushing from both sides where you get a DE on a TE or RB while half the actual OL blocks air.

 

Allen has got to fix this in the off-season.

 

image.thumb.png.62844a1dc5810bba1e717281ae58d534.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Hmmm I'm not sure about the idea of TE living deep middle? 

 

But the most straightforward Blitz 0 beater is max protect and a deep post because you know there's no safety there.  Allen must improve in his ability to hit those.  Keep in mind this is a "passer rating" chart so it is heavily weighted by INTs., but the message is clear - don't worry about the deep middle with Allen, just take away the "Honey Spot".

 

A complicating factor is that for a team with really good DE (like the Texans) our protections seem very vulnerable to showing a rush, but dropping many of the guys back into middle coverage to smother that "Honey Spot" while rushing from both sides where you get a DE on a TE or RB while half the actual OL blocks air.

 

Allen has got to fix this in the off-season.

 

image.thumb.png.62844a1dc5810bba1e717281ae58d534.png

if it came across as deep middle it was to be in the 10-20 yard range as it was open in OT and for a lot of the game. I get he deep middle form your original post but i'm referring to the mid middle

25 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

 
Isn’t deep post is more a wr route to split cover 2 safeties? 

i'm referring to the 10-20 yard range not the deep middle

Edited by ILBillsfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, stony said:

Sometimes it's difficult to extrapolate blocking assignments, specific responsibilities etc for individual players in the modern NFL because plays seem so complex at times (for me, anyways).  But watching that reply 10x will make you wanna pull your hair out.  Sometimes you just need to smash the guy in front of you.   

 

In a game of a million "what ifs," this one takes the cake. 

Love Knox but he blew that play

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said:

 

You're spot on here.  I asked elsewhere, "What is our identity on offense?" and got zero responses.  Daboll talks about being "multiple" which seems to mean, equally bad at everything, not great at anything.  Allen will be better for surviving all of this, but I suspect his talent won't truly shine until he gets to work with a better, sounder OC and a simplified approach.

 

so two things

 

1.  while a couple of great O's run real high tech schemes (KC comes to mind, but fat andy is a wizard at this) if you look at teams like NE, Baltimore, and even Houston, you see really really similar plays run out of several formations, and different plays run out of the exact same formation.  the exact same formation lets you make the D pick their poison (OBV) but running the exact same play out of different formations gives you free reps (without the D knowing) at your bread and butter.  we just MAKE ME CRAZY seeing all these goofy mish mash mix ups without any results.  we go max protect w smith and the fullback, but we have yet to run effectively out of it, so we ain't fooling anyone.  the fact that we waited until the post season to figure out ways to get the RB the ball on screens and allen the ball on sweeps was sad.  the biggest issue we have on O is that when we have success, it isn't repeatable because we are simply not consistent.

 

2.  i watch a lot of analytic videos and all 22 stuff.  i like what these guys do and it's interesting, but something has always bothered me about them, and i couldn't quite figure it out.  they tend to be coach's pets.  i remember guys (often related to the coach, or a coach anyhow) on the team would say "if we ran it right how it was drawn up we'd have made that first".  this is when the whole friggen team know the opposition had a drop on that play and it wouldn't work.  these analytic guys just sort of take for granted execution at every level, and then key in one or two things which they say made the difference.  that's fine, but they miss the plot when you have a TE blocking a pro bowl rusher on 3rd and long, or you don't have an outside WR who can get open or whatever.  PFF are the biggest squad of never played and just make up nerdery dorks ever.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Ethan in Portland said:

The line fell apart in the 4th qtr and overtime. Singletary missed blitz pick up. Allen choked. Just about everything unraveled.  

That is on the coaching staff. 

On to next year. Schedule will be tougher but roster will be better too.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, JR in Pittsburgh said:

No surprise re Allen. You could make this conclusion watching the game in real time. He reverted to hero ball.

 

it didn’t help that Daboll refused to run Singletary a single time in OT, or even really line a RB up in the backfield. 

In Josh's defense, he had to play hero ball. When play call after play call has 5 wides and an empty backfield facing 8 in the box, it's just fortunate he wasn't annihilated. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, yungmack said:

In Josh's defense, he had to play hero ball. When play call after play call has 5 wides and an empty backfield facing 8 in the box, it's just fortunate he wasn't annihilated. 


exactly right— plenty of blame to go around. 
 

I was hoping McD would call a TO in the 4th or OT and regroup with Josh and Daboll. Josh was playing out of control, and it would have actually helped to go to a run heavy set and try to reestablish the run with Singletary. That would have helped reign Josh in some. 
 

josh was playing great early because they were running well and throwing quick passes.  He came apart when they went empty and put the game on his back. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ILBillsfan said:

if it came across as deep middle it was to be in the 10-20 yard range as it was open in OT and for a lot of the game. I get he deep middle form your original post but i'm referring to the mid middle

i'm referring to the 10-20 yard range not the deep middle

 

That range, yes, should be Money for TE and Josh can hit that.  But for some reason it's not in our vocabulary much.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/9/2020 at 9:15 PM, CincyBillsFan said:

 

 

On 1/9/2020 at 9:15 PM, CincyBillsFan said:

 

They did?  I'm a simple football fan and in spite of all that went before if either Knox or Morse make that block on a perfectly called QB sweep Allen possibly takes it to house.  Or at worst we're in FG range to win it in OT.

 

My problem with Joe B is that he often can't see the forest for the trees.  Take a look at how other young QB's fared in their first playoff game.  Those stats have been posted all over 2BD the last few days.  A lot of great QB's had ugly first playoff games - even in games their teams won.  The bottom line is that the Bills asked to much of Allen.  Which is both good & bad.  It's good because they were confident he could handle it.  It was bad because when he had a bad play he lost it for a couple of series at a crucial point in the game.

 

And why is Joe B surprised that after the fumble Allen hesitated on some of his throws in order to make sure he didn't turn the ball over again?  I mean this was his FIRST 4th quarter in a playoff game and his FIRST ever OT game.    On the drive that should have won the game for the Bills but for a BS penalty on Ford and missed blocks on a perfectly called QB sweep I saw Allen get his feet back under him and make two great throws to gain 1st downs on 3rd & long. 

 

The fact is that this was as classic a TEAM loss as you're ever going to see in a close game that goes to OT.  And as I've posted elsewhere, if I had to choose the top 5 plays that lost the game Allen's play would NOT make the list.  Here's the list off the top of my head and tell me I'm wrong:

 

1)  missed block on QB sweep

2)  ref calling a blindside PF on Ford

3)  ref NOT calling targeting on the Texan who drilled Allen in the head on the QB sweep.

4)  the defense allowing Houston to convert a 3rd & 18 in OT

5)  Milano not wrapping up on Watson for a sack on that Texan FG drive that won the game.

6)  Brown not staying in bounds on the failed toe tap catch that would have given us first & goal at the 2.

7)  Duke not making a tough catch for a TD at the end of the first half.

 

Look. More then 5 plays and not one involved Allen doing something bad.  Go figure. 

 

 

Ultimately, all losses are team losses and there's plenty of blame to go around. But please don't tell me Josh didn't get rattled and his play and decisions take a downturn after the fumble.  And Daboll's play calling in OT was just awful. It's not out of bounds to criticize Josh. He's our guy and if we're going to take the next step seeing him get the yips was concerning. Only year two, but Joe B's observations were accurate and stats telling.The good thing about Josh is his focus on improving. He starts hitting long balls and better seeing where pressure is coming from we'll be golden. Next year ( I can't imagine Beane won't deliver) he'll have a few more playmakers and some more help upfront. As for Daboll, when the games on the line I want to see Devin behind Josh and not and empty backfield  with Pat DeMarco split out wide creating all those "mismatches." Go Bills.

Edited by Green Lightning
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Green Lightning said:

 

Ultimately, all losses are team losses and there's plenty of blame to go around. But please don't tell me Josh didn't get rattled and his play and decisions take a downturn after the fumble.  And Daboll's play calling in OT was just awful. It's not out of bounds to criticize Josh. He's our guy and if we're going to take the next step seeing him get the yips was concerning. Only year two, but Joe B's observations were accurate and stats telling.The good thing about Josh is his focus on improving. He starts hitting long balls and better seeing where pressure is coming from we'll be golden. Next year ( I can't imagine Beane won't deliver) he'll have a few more playmakers and some more help upfront. As for Daboll, when the games on the line I want to see Devin behind Josh and not and empty backfield  with Pat DeMarco split out wide creating all those "mismatches." Go Bills.

 

I have no problem with honest and fair criticisms of Allen.  He has much to improve and warrants criticism. 

 

And I've posted on other threads that Allen did in fact get rattled after the fumble but we're only talking two series here.  In the end he got the Bills into position to tie the game with a FG.

 

And while I consider myself agnostic on Daboll (there's a lot to like and a lot not to like) his play calling in OT was fine.  The QB sweep call should have won the game but for an egregious missed block.  In fact the Bills were driving so I have to assume Daboll's play calls were at least okay here.  And after Allen took a wicked shot to the head because of the missed block I'm not sure he was operating at 100%.

 

But judging Daboll's OT play calling is hampered by the fact that the Bills got only one possession in OT. 

 

Like you I'm confident that Bean will get Allen more play makers and shore up the O-line.  I'm also confident that Allen will continue to improve because he'll work hard to improve and he seeks out the coaching in the off season that enables him to improve. 

 

I also think that going from years 2 to 3 and 3 to 4 are where you see the biggest improvements in most young QB's. So we do have reason to be optimistic.

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CincyBillsFan said:

 

I have no problem with honest and fair criticisms of Allen.  He has much to improve and warrants criticism. 

 

And I've posted on other threads that Allen did in fact get rattled after the fumble but we're only talking two series here.  In the end he got the Bills into position to tie the game with a FG.

 

And while I consider myself agnostic on Daboll (there's a lot to like and a lot not to like) his play calling in OT was fine.  The QB sweep call should have won the game but for an egregious missed block.  In fact the Bills were driving so I have to assume Daboll's play calls were at least okay here.  And after Allen took a wicked shot to the head because of the missed block I'm not sure he was operating at 100%.

 

But judging Daboll's OT play calling is hampered by the fact that the Bills got only one possession in OT. 

 

Like you I'm confident that Bean will get Allen more play makers and shore up the O-line.  I'm also confident that Allen will continue to improve because he'll work hard to improve and he seeks out the coaching in the off season that enables him to improve. 

 

I also think that going from years 2 to 3 and 3 to 4 are where you see the biggest improvements in most young QB's. So we do have reason to be optimistic.

 

 

 

 

On your last point that's my thinking and hope! It's hard to keep in tune with that timeline when you see Mahomes, Jackson and to some extent Watson have these amazing breakout years. Then again there is  Mayfield who came out blazing and then completely sucked the next year. I'd rather see a steady progression then a boom then bust. As I said if Josh can read pressure better and hit some of those long throws next year were gold. Fingers crossed!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Green Lightning said:

On your last point that's my thinking and hope! It's hard to keep in tune with that timeline when you see Mahomes, Jackson and to some extent Watson have these amazing breakout years. Then again there is  Mayfield who came out blazing and then completely sucked the next year. I'd rather see a steady progression then a boom then bust. As I said if Josh can read pressure better and hit some of those long throws next year were gold. Fingers crossed!

 

Mahomes is a modern day Marino - a complete outlier at QB.  Marino threw for over 5,000 yards in his 2nd season.  And you can't look at Mahomes success without considering the extraordinary talent he has surrounding him on offense.  You would be hard pressed to find a QB with a better collection of play making skill players then Mahomes has.

 

Jackson is unusual in that he went to a playoff caliber team that retooled it's entire offensive philosophy & talent pool to match his strengths at QB.  I don't think another team in the NFL would have done this.  And this is not a knock on Jackson who I believe should be the NFL MVP this year but he generates no where near the numbers he did with the Ravens on any other NFL team.

 

As for Watson, I believe that Allen is on a similar timeline.  This is Watson's 3rd year.  Last year in his 1st playoff game Watson had a similar game to Allen's including a loss.  IMO Watson is still improving as evidenced by his struggles in the first half against the Bills. 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously Josh Allen has a very long way to go if he's ever going to take this team to a championship. Let's just hope he continues to develop. Give him a top echelon OL and another solid possession WR and let's see where we stand, but I'm still a very long way from convinced that he's going to be our franchise QB.

 

Singletary is exceptional, so let's amplify his effect on the offense by adding a couple elite blockers in front of him. That will make Allen's job much easier and we won't have to rely on his weak accuracy as much.

Edited by GreggTX
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...