Jump to content

Good Teams Start with Competent Coaching


Kevinpop

Recommended Posts

Let's get this straight.... McDermott's directive was to stall our own momentum after Allen throws two darts against a Cleveland "prevent defense" by huddling up, run 30 seconds off the clock,  and settling for the game tying 53 yard field goal on the foot of Stephen Hauschka?  I have always questioned McDermott's time management skills and this further underscores his inability to handle the clock during a big moment. 

 

Folks- this is the Dick Jauron conservative mentality all over again.  

 

How would a competent coach like Bellecheck and the Patriots have handled the last 1:44 left and 1 timeout left in the game?  In a much more efficient and organized manner, and would have won the game!  

Edited by Kevinpop
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sort of understand the idea of playing for the field goal and winning in overtime. 
 

But they were marching and moving the ball well. You have to send the message to your QB that you believe in him to win it NOW, not in OT. They played scared football and sent a message that they didn’t believe Josh could deliver in the moment. They might erode Josh’s confidence by teaching him to play Tyrod ball. They can teach ball security while at the same time allowing Josh to sling it. And I’m afraid they might ruin what makes him a potentially good QB. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Trey Roberts said:

I sort of understand the idea of playing for the field goal and winning in overtime. 
 

But they were marching and moving the ball well. You have to send the message to your QB that you believe in him to win it NOW, not in OT. They played scared football and sent a message that they didn’t believe Josh could deliver in the moment. They might erode Josh’s confidence by teaching him to play Tyrod ball. They can teach ball security while at the same time allowing Josh to sling it. And I’m afraid they might ruin what makes him a potentially good QB. 

How do you sort of understand stalling on the 35 yard line and playing for a 53 yard field goal when you have 49 seconds and a timeout left?  There’s zero excuse for it.  It’s getting to be a disturbing trend happening with McDermott 

  • Like (+1) 5
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, reddogblitz said:

I would have been happy with a FG.  But we really should have tried to get closer instead of wasting time.  Especially since HauschMoney missed a chip shot earlier in the game and one against the Eagles.

 

isn't that settling for OT, which can be a crap shoot?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, nucci said:

you play to win and kick the FG when necessary. With OT only 10 minutes it's more difficult to win that way

Right. Josh hasn't thrown a pick since Tennessee. Try to get closer, to score a TD, and if it doesn't work, odds are you still have the ball and are closer for Hauschka anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Allen gets a pass deflected and Singletary makes the bone headed attempt to catch it for a loss. Near disaster. If I recall the next play Singletary fails to get out of bounds. Then the next play is run without taking the timeout and Allen tosses up and afterthought effort at a fly route down the sideline. And that was all the coach’s fault? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Kevinpop said:

Let's get this straight.... McDermott's directive was to stall our own momentum after Allen throws two darts against a Cleveland "prevent defense" by huddling up, run 30 seconds off the clock,  and settling for the game tying 53 yard field goal on the foot of Stephen Hauschka?  I have always questioned McDermott's time management skills and this further underscores his inability to handle to clock during a big moment. 

 

Folks- this is the Dick Jauron conservative mentality all over again.  

 

How would a competent coach like Bellecheck and the Patriots have handled the last 1:44 left and 1 timeout left in the game?  In a much more efficient and organized manner, and would have won the game!  

Time management and time outs were not good enough,  conversative play calling on both sides of ball in final two drives were Jauron JR level.  I have been saying since he was first hired that the guy is a Dick Jauron clone and you better not be counting on him to out coach the other side for wins.

 

Like why we're they playing prevent defense on that final drive?

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BuffaninSarasota said:

 

isn't that settling for OT, which can be a crap shoot?

 

Who said anything about settling.  I was thinking as we tried to get closer we may have very well gotten a TD.  Why does it have to be one or the other?

 

And I'd take a crap shoot over a loss any day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CaptnCoke11 said:

How do you sort of understand stalling on the 35 yard line and playing for a 53 yard field goal when you have 49 seconds and a timeout left?  There’s zero excuse for it.  It’s getting to be a disturbing trend happening with McDermott 

 

Its not like we clocked it - we ran a play.  I think a timeout might have been smart though.  Think through what you want to do, and execute.  Can use the middle of the field and clock it and assume 20 seconds off.  From there you can run either sidelines or EZ plays, or a single over the middle type play to get you to the preferred hash, and maybe tack on 5-10 more yards and clock it for the kick.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Seasons1992 said:

Josh needs to put his sack out there and go AGAINST what the coaches want, and make it work. Do that once or twice and he earns the benefit of the doubt.

How do you know that he didn't it?  What if that was actually his call on third down?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CaptnCoke11 said:

How do you sort of understand stalling on the 35 yard line and playing for a 53 yard field goal when you have 49 seconds and a timeout left?  There’s zero excuse for it.  It’s getting to be a disturbing trend happening with McDermott 


I don’t get going for a 53 yard FG by any means. What I do understand (barely) is having faith that you can win it if you can just get it to OT. But yes agree, it’s a disturbing trend with McDermott. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CaptnCoke11 said:

How do you sort of understand stalling on the 35 yard line and playing for a 53 yard field goal when you have 49 seconds and a timeout left?  There’s zero excuse for it.  It’s getting to be a disturbing trend happening with McDermott 

Here here! Ya play to win the game not fiddle faddle week in and week out. They even had time to run the freakin ball with a TO left. Browns were so spread out it would of been smart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

Allen gets a pass deflected and Singletary makes the bone headed attempt to catch it for a loss. Near disaster. If I recall the next play Singletary fails to get out of bounds. Then the next play is run without taking the timeout and Allen tosses up and afterthought effort at a fly route down the sideline. And that was all the coach’s fault? 

Why not take a timeout after singletary doesn't get out of bounds?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, for those advocating moving on from McDermott, who do you want as a replacement?  Who do you believe is the next great coach?  Not saying it's necessarily a terrible idea, but if you're going to fire everyone, again, you  better have a viable option, not just "someone else".  Been there, done that.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Kevinpop said:

Let's get this straight.... McDermott's directive was to stall our own momentum after Allen throws two darts against a Cleveland "prevent defense" by huddling up, run 30 seconds off the clock,  and settling for the game tying 53 yard field goal on the foot of Stephen Hauschka?  I have always questioned McDermott's time management skills and this further underscores his inability to handle the clock during a big moment. 

 

Folks- this is the Dick Jauron conservative mentality all over again.  

 

How would a competent coach like Bellecheck and the Patriots have handled the last 1:44 left and 1 timeout left in the game?  In a much more efficient and organized manner, and would have won the game!  

 

Lets get this straight, you're an idiot!

 

As soon as you state "it was McD's directive"  you become a complete idiot.  You can question why they wasted time, but  highly doubt that's what he told them to do and it's something only an idiot would think of!

Edited by Ed_Formerly_of_Roch
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Gray Beard said:

Well, however it happened, a go route with a QB who is terrible at long throws is a really stupid play call on 3rd and 4. 

Whose decision was it?  It wasn’t a good decision.

It wasn’t a go. It was an option route. JA threw the option (Back shoulder), brown stuck with the go, but brown said after the game he should have taken the option because he didn’t beat his man.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Kevinpop said:

Let's get this straight.... McDermott's directive was to stall our own momentum after Allen throws two darts against a Cleveland "prevent defense" by huddling up, run 30 seconds off the clock,  and settling for the game tying 53 yard field goal on the foot of Stephen Hauschka?  I have always questioned McDermott's time management skills and this further underscores his inability to handle the clock during a big moment. 

 

Folks- this is the Dick Jauron conservative mentality all over again.  

 

How would a competent coach like Bellecheck and the Patriots have handled the last 1:44 left and 1 timeout left in the game?  In a much more efficient and organized manner, and would have won the game!  

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, BarleyNY said:

 

That would’ve been reasonable, but it would’ve been their last TO.  I can also understand why he’d want to preserve that TO for the FG attempt. 

 

Why do you need a TO for a fg attempt? They would have had 60 seconds and no timeouts. 3rd and 4. If you get the first down, spike the ball. If it's incomplete, you're in the same position as what ended up happening except you have 50 seconds.

 

They also used a TO AFTER the 2 minute warning, while the clock was stopped, and immediately before giving up the big play to Landry.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Ed_Formerly_of_Roch said:

 

Lets get this straight, you're an idiot!

 

As soon as you state "it was McD's directive"  you become a complete idiot.  You can question why they wasted time, but  highly doubt that's what he told them to do and it's something only an idiot would think of!

 

Bottom line.  They did.  The buck stops with him.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Trey Roberts said:

I sort of understand the idea of playing for the field goal and winning in overtime. 
 

But they were marching and moving the ball well. You have to send the message to your QB that you believe in him to win it NOW, not in OT. They played scared football and sent a message that they didn’t believe Josh could deliver in the moment. They might erode Josh’s confidence by teaching him to play Tyrod ball. They can teach ball security while at the same time allowing Josh to sling it. And I’m afraid they might ruin what makes him a potentially good QB. 

They've already ruined him. He rarely scrambles anymore like last year. He's so paranoid over ints. that all his long throws are overthrows. Daboll draws up routes that take 20 minutes to develop.  This poor kid doesn't stand a chance between mcdermott's conservativism and Daboll's moron game plan. He's a gunslinger. Let him sling it.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Trey Roberts said:

I sort of understand the idea of playing for the field goal and winning in overtime. 
 

But they were marching and moving the ball well. You have to send the message to your QB that you believe in him to win it NOW, not in OT. They played scared football and sent a message that they didn’t believe Josh could deliver in the moment. They might erode Josh’s confidence by teaching him to play Tyrod ball. They can teach ball security while at the same time allowing Josh to sling it. And I’m afraid they might ruin what makes him a potentially good QB. 


you shouldn’t understand this, because it’s a proven fallacy. It was bourne out of water-headed, risk-averse, traditional coach-think that has no rational basis.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Chemical said:

 

Why do you need a TO for a fg attempt? They would have had 60 seconds and no timeouts. 3rd and 4. If you get the first down, spike the ball. If it's incomplete, you're in the same position as what ended up happening except you have 50 seconds.

 

They also used a TO AFTER the 2 minute warning, while the clock was stopped, and immediately before giving up the big play to Landry.


I said it would be reasonable to save the TO, but I didn’t say anything about the huddle.  It doesn’t look like that was on McD so I wasn’t holding it against him.  It was definitely a mistake by Allen (or maybe Daboll) though.  Going up to the line and running a play would’ve been fine too.  That’s all I was saying.  I should’ve been clearer on the last part.  The TO would’ve given the Bills more ability to work the middle of the field. It could’ve also given them a chance to give the FG team more time to set up.  Sure, they’re NFL players and they should be able to run out and go, but Hauschka hasn’t exactly been stellar this season. I was just thinking some extra time could’ve helped him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Kevinpop said:

Let's get this straight.... McDermott's directive was to stall our own momentum after Allen throws two darts against a Cleveland "prevent defense" by huddling up, run 30 seconds off the clock,  and settling for the game tying 53 yard field goal on the foot of Stephen Hauschka?  I have always questioned McDermott's time management skills and this further underscores his inability to handle the clock during a big moment. 

 

Folks- this is the Dick Jauron conservative mentality all over again.  

 

How would a competent coach like Bellecheck and the Patriots have handled the last 1:44 left and 1 timeout left in the game?  In a much more efficient and organized manner, and would have won the game!  

 

mike Schopp sighting

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ed- McDermott has the autonomy as the "Head Coach" to use his last timeout and over-ride Daboll on a very low percentage deep ball call on 3rd down. I don't highly doubt it at all given his track record of ultra conservative play calling.  He demonstrates poor situational play calling as the Head Coach.   His team- his directive. 

Edited by Kevinpop
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Jigsaw2112 said:

So, for those advocating moving on from McDermott, who do you want as a replacement?  Who do you believe is the next great coach?  Not saying it's necessarily a terrible idea, but if you're going to fire everyone, again, you  better have a viable option, not just "someone else".  Been there, done that.  

 

6-3 and we're back down the "fire everyone" rabbit hole. ?‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...