Jump to content

Beasley's skillset?


Recommended Posts

At a glance- at the combine cole was among the worst at cones and shuttles while Edelman was among the best. Just an example of how they diverge, and that while they both may be effective underneath receivers that how they get there could be a bit different.

 

i think it’s the kind of breakdown that would be fun for someone like cover 1 to do in the offseason

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, LyndonvilleBill said:

With the way Beasley plays versus how Edleman, plays on the field does this help with the preparation of the Bills defense against NE this weekend? I think shutting down Edleman will be key to beating NE. Thoughts?

Helps...what exactly? Sorry your comma placement is twisting my brain

  • Haha (+1) 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Their offense is multiple and will adjust to whatever your defense is not stopping, so you need to be capable of stopping it all.  I'm very curious how the "1/11th" mantra works out this week.  We have the skills to stop it all.  So with that mindset, it could just come down to a chess match between Brady and our defense each play.  If we don't give up big plays and get our "wins" on 3rd down and in the red zone, we will have a good chance.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, LyndonvilleBill said:

With the way Beasley plays versus how Edleman, plays on the field does this help with the preparation of the Bills defense against NE this weekend? I think shutting down Edleman will be key to beating NE. Thoughts?

I think having a receiver with a similar skill set is helpful. However, aside from skill, what has made players like Edleman, Amendola, and Welker so productive in NE is Brady's release time and accuracy in the short game. He gets the ball out so quickly and placement is so accurate, it is almost impossible to defend. Brady consistently hits his receivers underneath with even the slightest separation, and also puts the ball in a location that, far more often than not, allows the receiver the potential for YAC.

 

It has always been his strength.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Edleman and Beasley fill a similar role, but are not similar athletes.  Edleman is a superb athlete that happened to be a QB before and then played DB/WR to make it in the league, hes smart as hell and even more quick and explosive.  Beasley is not fast nor particularly quick, he works like hell and has a pretty good eye for finding soft spots, offers a lot of nothing after the catch outside of a dive forward. I see why the Cowboys couldn't have him as their best WR.  He's more of a safety blanket than a game changer.. Edleman can BURN you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, JoPar_v2 said:

Helps...what exactly? Sorry your comma placement is twisting my brain

Wow.. Getting fired up over a misplaced comma this early? You must TOTALLY freak out reading the GDT on Sundays. I didn't realize perfect gramma and punctuation was required.... My Apologies... :w00t:

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Haha (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, billsfan1959 said:

I think having a receiver with a similar skill set is helpful. However, aside from skill, what has made players like Edleman, Amendola, and Welker so productive in NE is Brady's release time and accuracy in the short game. He gets the ball out so quickly and placement is so accurate, it is almost impossible to defend. Brady consistently hits his receivers underneath with even the slightest separation, and also puts the ball in a location that, far more often than not, allows the receiver the potential for YAC.

 

It has always been his strength.

Its funny to here people say stuff like this.  Their passing game has not been good against us recently.  If we stop the run they are gonna lose.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, DCofNC said:

Edleman and Beasley fill a similar role, but are not similar athletes.  Edleman is a superb athlete that happened to be a QB before and then played DB/WR to make it in the league, hes smart as hell and even more quick and explosive.  Beasley is not fast nor particularly quick, he works like hell and has a pretty good eye for finding soft spots, offers a lot of nothing after the catch outside of a dive forward. I see why the Cowboys couldn't have him as their best WR.  He's more of a safety blanket than a game changer.. Edleman can BURN you.

I think playing with Brady has blinded people to ehat Edleman is.  He may be a better athlete than Beasley but for God's sake he doesnt burn you.   His yards per reception is exactly .6 of a yard better than Beasley over their career.    When you talk about touchdowns per season Beasley has Edleman.  The difference is really targets.  Edleman is targeted a ton and Beasley spent most of his early career as a 4th wideout.  Not saying Beasley is better at all.  But lets live in reality a bit when it comes to what Edleman is.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, formerlyofCtown said:

Its funny to here people say stuff like this.  Their passing game has not been good against us recently.  If we stop the run they are gonna lose.

I don't disagree. I think we match up better with them in the passing game than people realize and their running game has not been good this year - that is why I believe the Bills will win this game.

 

In general, however, the short passing game has been the bread and butter of Brady's career - and he has been very good at it.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, LyndonvilleBill said:

Wow.. Getting fired up over a misplaced comma this early? You must TOTALLY freak out reading the GDT on Sundays. I didn't realize perfect gramma and punctuation was required.... My Apologies... :w00t:

sorry every once in a while my meds wear off and I get a vague recognition of the idiocy surrounding all of us. We good now don’t worry.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

actually Beasley was the more explosive athlete at the combine Better 40 , better vert  Go look at the numbers  Did  more reps on the bench as well even though he is 20 lbs lighter and 3 inches shorter  Patriots have simply always used the mismatch between a quick slot guy vs a linebacker  Dabol is just scratching the surface of creating mismatches and exploiting them.  As Josh gets better diagnosing pre snap we will see more and more of Beasley and the backs underneath

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LyndonvilleBill said:

With the way Beasley plays versus how Edleman plays on the field, does this help with the preparation of the Bills defense against NE this weekend? I think shutting down Edleman will be key to beating NE. Thoughts?

Beasley is nothing like Edelman...he can't hold Edelman's jock, and that hurts to admit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thebandit27 said:

Edelman has better speed and COD skills; Beasley has him in terms of short-area quickness.

 

But in the end, they share one common trait that makes a dangerous slot receiver: they understand angles and how to make defenders change their leverage to create space.

 

Does beasley win that? I don’t have it in front of me but relatively across the board it seemed Edelman was beating him athletically. Talking short area - it was drastic gaps in shuttle, cones and I think 10 yard split. 

 

No debate on the bottom half though. And to the OPs point - I’d suppose that CB can “scout team” some of Edelman’s moves decently for our defenders. 

 

I do like that the OPs returns to the thread have been 100% grammar related though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, NoSaint said:

At a glance- at the combine cole was among the worst at cones and shuttles while Edelman was among the best. Just an example of how they diverge, and that while they both may be effective underneath receivers that how they get there could be a bit different.

 

i think it’s the kind of breakdown that would be fun for someone like cover 1 to do in the offseason

 

Edelman takes big hits and catches everything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, thenorthremembers said:

I think playing with Brady has blinded people to ehat Edleman is.  He may be a better athlete than Beasley but for God's sake he doesnt burn you.   His yards per reception is exactly .6 of a yard better than Beasley over their career.    When you talk about touchdowns per season Beasley has Edleman.  The difference is really targets.  Edleman is targeted a ton and Beasley spent most of his early career as a 4th wideout.  Not saying Beasley is better at all.  But lets live in reality a bit when it comes to what Edleman is.

I think my statement was firmly based in reality. Edleman gets YAC because hes an athlete, Beasley catches the ball and falls down 50% of the time.  Edleman can take it to the house on you, Beasley is not that threat.  Is Edleman better bc of Brady? OF COURSE, but hes also better because hes flat out better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, NoSaint said:

 

Does beasley win that? I don’t have it in front of me but relatively across the board it seemed Edelman was beating him athletically. Talking short area - it was drastic gaps in shuttle, cones and I think 10 yard split. 

 

No debate on the bottom half though. And to the OPs point - I’d suppose that CB can “scout team” some of Edelman’s moves decently for our defenders. 

 

I do like that the OPs returns to the thread have been 100% grammar related though

More of a reader than a poster. I saw your first reply as it related to the combine (Thanks). It was a good place to look as a comparison for numbers. Although it didn't look to me as such a drastic difference between the two. My initial question was would it help the defense to prepare for NE. You basically answered my original question in this post. Thanks again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

 

Has anyone shut down Beasley? 

No. That goes back to my original question. Does having Beasley help the defense prepare? As NoSaint responded to my question and probably in a better way. Could he be used on the Scout Team to simulate Edelman?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, LyndonvilleBill said:

More of a reader than a poster. I saw your first reply as it related to the combine (Thanks). It was a good place to look as a comparison for numbers. Although it didn't look to me as such a drastic difference between the two. My initial question was would it help the defense to prepare for NE. You basically answered my original question in this post. Thanks again. 

 

Heres a good fast glance visual:

 

https://www.mockdraftable.com/player/julian-edelman

 

https://www.mockdraftable.com/player/cole-beasley

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LyndonvilleBill said:

No. That goes back to my original question. Does having Beasley help the defense prepare? As NoSaint responded to my question and probably in a better way. Could he be used on the Scout Team to simulate Edelman?

 

I think the answer is of course. He’s not the same guy, but anyone saying he doesn’t have similarities is lying 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, NC Book said:

I thought you were getting at that they should have Beasley cover Edelman. I was like "this guy could be on to something.." 

Maybe Beasley could make his way onto the field in a Pats uni and sabotage from within. I don't think anyone would notice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, NC Book said:

I thought you were getting at that they should have Beasley cover Edelman. I was like "this guy could be on to something.." 

Sorry. I am more of an inside the box thinker than outside the box. Although, I wouldn't mind lining up Milano or Edmunds on the LOS and knock Edleman on his butt to throw off any kind of timing with Brady...

Edited by LyndonvilleBill
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the Cinci game last week I watched them trying to jump the quick swirl or curl routes for Beasley. Time for coach to get Beasley on that out and up sideline route or try a deeper slant or seam route. We need to stretch the field on the Pats and Beasley in the seam / stick route might be a way to do it. He has more to his game and maybe this is the week that Dabol pulls it out. I know he had held onto things specifically because the Past were coming. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, LyndonvilleBill said:

No. That goes back to my original question. Does having Beasley help the defense prepare? As NoSaint responded to my question and probably in a better way. Could he be used on the Scout Team to simulate Edelman?

Could he be on the scout team, yes. Will they do that, not likely.

 

The reason: the coaches have only so many practice hours, they dedicate that time to preparing starters for their starting job. They want Beasley practicing to be a Bufallo WR. It is unlikely they would change that.

 

But to your point.. Edelman and Beasley are allot alike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, boater said:

Could he be on the scout team, yes. Will they do that, not likely.

 

The reason: the coaches have only so many practice hours, they dedicate that time to preparing starters for their starting job. They want Beasley practicing to be a Bufallo WR. It is unlikely they would change that.

 

But to your point.. Edelman and Beasley are allot alike.

 

It wouldn’t be unheard of to have him emulate a few things in a practice. And just playing him day to day in practice probably helps a little too... but it cuts both ways and practicing against Edelman every day likely in the same way helps the pats DBs as much if not more as he’s generally bigger/faster/quicker 

Edited by NoSaint
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, DCofNC said:

I think my statement was firmly based in reality. Edleman gets YAC because hes an athlete, Beasley catches the ball and falls down 50% of the time.  Edleman can take it to the house on you, Beasley is not that threat.  Is Edleman better bc of Brady? OF COURSE, but hes also better because hes flat out better.

Again Edleman has almost the exact same yards per reception as Beasley and less tds per year.  As such your assessment that one can take it to the house on you and the other falls down isnt correct.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...