Jump to content

Bills one of 6 teams in on Leveon Bell


Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Mat68 said:

I think Warrow could easily say Bill's are out...  When they are he would be one of the guys who would know.  

 

I didn't realize Wawrow had inside Bills connections.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, blacklabel said:

 

He covers the Bills for the Associated Press. I'm sure he has some people he talks to for info. He breaks a story every now and then.

I'm not really commenting on his news breaking more his accuracy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, richNjoisy said:

Wawrow has always been an accurate source. I have not noticed any change when McDermott/Beane took over. He has been, IMO, pretty consistent. My 2 cents. 

Fair enough.  If he threw water on it I would be more inclined to believe it.  He more or less stoked it imo.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, YoloinOhio said:

Texans lost out on some guys yesterday and have a lot of money to spend. It’s a better team than the Jets too. If I’m bell I’m seriously considering it. 

 

Yea I'm not buying that it's only the Jest in on Bell at this point.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Buffalo Bills Fan said:

 

Right they used the wrong leak for Bell lol. 

 

Talking about a guy who said Nah to  15 million dollars last year because he didn't want to bow to a teams demands. I don't think "you have three hours to decide mister, and then we're taking our ball and going home." is the right play here. But hey... It worked with Barr.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, YoloinOhio said:

Texans lost out on some guys yesterday and have a lot of money to spend. It’s a better team than the Jets too. If I’m bell I’m seriously considering it. 

 

Makes some sense, but that O-line is horrible. I guess with all that space they have room to add a couple of guys, but right now I'd say that line is worse than the Bills on paper. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think we are spending much more money. We have spent a lot so far and still need money for the draft and a few small free agents here and there. We need to roll over some money for the players we drafted who's contracts we will re negotiate.Trey White, Milano, Dawkins ect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wppete said:

I don't think we are spending much more money. We have spent a lot so far and still need money for the draft and a few small free agents here and there. We need to roll over some money for the players we drafted who's contracts we will re negotiate.Trey White, Milano, Dawkins ect.

 

Bell is intriguing because we could basically take the money from moving Shady and cutting Ivory to make up a good portion of the $$$

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, wppete said:

I don't think we are spending much more money. We have spent a lot so far and still need money for the draft and a few small free agents here and there. We need to roll over some money for the players we drafted who's contracts we will re negotiate.Trey White, Milano, Dawkins ect.

Buffalo has to spend like 65 plus mil to reach its 3 year minimum for the cap.  So they probably have 1 big contract left.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...