Jump to content

What areas of the team has Beane actually improved?


Yeezus

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, Fadingpain said:

One thing Beane did which was positive is move a lot of bad contracts out the door.  Next year in particular we are going to have huge amounts of cap space.

 

 

 

 

 

To spend on who?

 

There is a ton of cap space available around the league.  

 

Teams lock up their players or trade them and the few good ones that make it to FA have their choice of a dozen teams with plenty of cap room each year.

 

Until the next CBA at least the value in FA is going to be guys like Lorax or Zach Brown or Hyde/Poyer......under radar/projection types.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Whaley built the 2015 roster which was infinitely more talented than anything Beane has got close to building yet. His greatest fault was not saying "No" on the Rex hire. 

 

I guess?  We made a troubled DT a franchise cornerstone despite numerous red flags. That's really what ended up undoing everything.  Dareus had 10 sacks and was 1st team all-pro.  Then he got paid and has 7.5 sacks since.  

 

He spent 2 first round picks on a non-QB who isn't even probably a top 5 receiver in the 2014 draft class (Beckham, Landry, Evans, Cooks, Adams, Benjamin).  Drafted Kouandjio in the same draft - swing and a miss.  Outside of Watkins, we got 1 use-able player in the entire draft in preston brown.

 

Married himself to Manuel instead of taking another shot in 2014 with someone like Garoppolo, Carr, or Bridgewater.  Used all his ammo up on the watkins trade.  This also caused us to not even have a shot at a QB in 2015 - as again - we were incredibly short of picks.  

 

Then in 2016 doubled-down on Rex and Tyrod for some reason and burned a draft class on a bunch of mediocre players.  Instead of looking at the 2 QBs at the top of the draft - and the 2 teams who wanted to trade down.  He tried to save his job and get that playoff spot, instead of build a franchise built to sustain.

 

EDIT - Add on the bryce brown trade, signing harvin twice, and extending Tyrod as things that damage his credibility.  He didn't really sniff an NFL job after his tenure here either.  

Edited by dneveu
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Whaley built the 2015 roster which was infinitely more talented than anything Beane has got close to building yet. His greatest fault was not saying "No" on the Rex hire. 

 

 

Yeah pretty much.

 

I am starting to get concerned about this much heralded personnel department.   

 

They were being spoken about in hushed tones like they were something spectacular and we aren't seeing any more gems unearthed than when Modrak was GM'ing poolside in Florida for the Jauron regime.    In fact..........probably seeing less than any GM since Polian was hired.    

 

I think they can Jauron ball their way thru another season again but they need to find some dudes before they can play toe-to-toe with the good teams in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

To spend on who?

 

There is a ton of cap space available around the league.  

 

Teams lock up their players or trade them and the few good ones that make it to FA have their choice of a dozen teams with plenty of cap room each year.

 

Until the next CBA at least the value in FA is going to be guys like Lorax or Zach Brown or Hyde/Poyer......under radar/projection types.   

To spend on Trent Murphy and Star L. types

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Yeezus said:

 

Then why did Philly win the Super Bowl 2 years after doing exactly what we did? 

 

Jaguars hired Marrone and are now a top AFC team. 

 

The Rams were forever a 7-9 team, last year they had more success then we had in the last 20 years. 

 

Stop giving excuses. Turnaround time in the NFL is usually around 3 years. anything more and something clearly isn't working 

 

So wait a minute...

 

You start this thread, criticizing Brandon Beane for not doing enough to improve the Bills roster.  (Keeping in mind, this was Beane's FIRST year handling Free Agency and his FIRST year running the draft.  AND ALSO keeping in mind the 2018 season hasn't even started yet).

 

Then when I point out that Beane needs another offseason before we can judge his success, you respond to my post with the following quote:  "Turnaround time in the NFL is usually around 3 years."

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Mango said:

 

Fully agreed. This isn’t the 90’s anymore. Teams don’t take that long to turn around these days. If you aren’t difinitevly better after 3 years, you’ve failed IMO. That’s just the NFL in 2018. 

 

29 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

Yeah pretty much.

 

I am starting to get concerned about this much heralded personnel department.   

 

They were being spoken about in hushed tones like they were something spectacular and we aren't seeing any more gems unearthed than when Modrak was GM'ing poolside in Florida for the Jauron regime.    In fact..........probably seeing less than any GM since Polian was hired.    

 

I think they can Jauron ball their way thru another season again but they need to find some dudes before they can play toe-to-toe with the good teams in the NFL.

 

I think you're correct BADOLBILZ.

 

McDermott gets a pass this year because of the Playoff push last year. 

 

Beane gets a pass in 2018 because he took his shot at QB and we need time to let that grow. 

 

So I think you're going to get more of 2017 in 2018. Dumping off, riding McCoy, punting and field position. But in 2019 Allen better be starting with new skill position players around him and a more aggressive offensive scheme. Because trading for a rocket armed QB at #7 doesn't make any sense if you aren't throwing +15 yard passes. 

Edited by Straight Hucklebuck
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

To spend on who?

 

There is a ton of cap space available around the league.  

 

Teams lock up their players or trade them and the few good ones that make it to FA have their choice of a dozen teams with plenty of cap room each year.

 

Until the next CBA at least the value in FA is going to be guys like Lorax or Zach Brown or Hyde/Poyer......under radar/projection types.   

So on the one hand Beane is getting criticized for not beefing up the O line this past off season, and now it's that he won't be able to next year either because guys aren't out there even if you have cap space? 

 

Makes perfect sense.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, dneveu said:

 

I guess?  We made a troubled DT a franchise cornerstone despite numerous red flags. That's really what ended up undoing everything.  Dareus had 10 sacks and was 1st team all-pro.  Then he got paid and has 7.5 sacks since.  

 

He spent 2 first round picks on a non-QB who isn't even probably a top 5 receiver in the 2014 draft class (Beckham, Landry, Evans, Cooks, Adams, Benjamin, .  Drafted Kouandjio in the same draft - swing and a miss.  Outside of Watkins, we got 1 use-able player in the entire draft in preston brown.

 

Married himself to Manuel instead of taking another shot in 2014 with someone like Garoppolo, Carr, or Bridgewater.  Used all his ammo up on the watkins trade.  This also caused us to not even have a shot at a QB in 2015 - as again - we were incredibly short of picks.  

 

Then in 2016 doubled-down on Rex and Tyrod for some reason and burned a draft class on a bunch of mediocre players.  Instead of looking at the 2 QBs at the top of the draft - and the 2 teams who wanted to trade down.  He tried to save his job and get that playoff spot, instead of build a franchise built to sustain.

Yes this was what was wrong with Whaley - he wasn't good either.  But there was a talented enough team to win and make the playoffs, just not a talented enough HC or Defensive Coaching Staff.  He was pretty good with scouting pros on other teams, just not very good with draft prospects and was in some weird twilight zone position with seemingly limited power (and probably rightfully so).  The Offensive unit that was put together under Rex was actually surprisingly effective and not too bad - the problem was that the Defense went from good to crap with bad schemes and bad coaching.  But I agree the team was not built to sustain in the long term and eventually this day would come - although I really have to disagree with getting rid of a guy like Tyrod until you have something better for sure.  Tyrod is a starter level QB in the NFL and you don't need to run him out of town to get a better guy - you just have to get other guys on the roster that prove that they are better and your worst case scenario at QB is a guy that can play mobile, game manager as a baseline.

 

Now both sides of the ball look shaky cakes on the lines and that's not a good recipe for winning in the NFL.  .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, oldmanfan said:

So on the one hand Beane is getting criticized for not beefing up the O line this past off season, and now it's that he won't be able to next year either because guys aren't out there even if you have cap space? 

 

Makes perfect sense.

 

This is actually a good discusssion, what should we have done to address said needs, especially on OL. Probably kept Glenn, swung Dawkins to RT (where he was projected), also drafted Tyrell Crosby in the 4th instead of Taron Johnson, slightly over valued there, but fills a huge need for us.  Offered EJ Gaines an extension and retain Coleman or Johnson. Secondary and OL are both improved. 

2 minutes ago, Ayjent said:

Yes this was what was wrong with Whaley - he wasn't good either.  But there was a talented enough team to win and make the playoffs, just not a talented enough HC or Defensive Coaching Staff.  He was pretty good with scouting pros on other teams, just not very good with draft prospects and was in some weird twilight zone position with seemingly limited power (and probably rightfully so).  The Offensive unit that was put together under Rex was actually surprisingly effective and not too bad - the problem was that the Defense went from good to crap with bad schemes and bad coaching.  But I agree the team was not built to sustain in the long term and eventually this day would come - although I really have to disagree with getting rid of a guy like Tyrod until you have something better for sure.  Tyrod is a starter level QB in the NFL and you don't need to run him out of town to get a better guy - you just have to get other guys on the roster that prove that they are better and your worst case scenario at QB is a guy that can play mobile, game manager as a baseline.

 

Now both sides of the ball look shaky cakes on the lines and that's not a good recipe for winning in the NFL.  .

 

At the time I don't think I really wanted the Schwartz hire to replace Marrone. Looking back on it, I am pretty curious what this team would look like if he were the hire and not Rex. My guess is we would have been a playoff team sooner than 2017. But still in QB purgatory (which we are still in now, until Allen pans out)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ayjent said:

Yes this was what was wrong with Whaley - he wasn't good either.  But there was a talented enough team to win and make the playoffs, just not a talented enough HC or Defensive Coaching Staff.  He was pretty good with scouting pros on other teams, just not very good with draft prospects and was in some weird twilight zone position with seemingly limited power (and probably rightfully so).  The Offensive unit that was put together under Rex was actually surprisingly effective and not too bad - the problem was that the Defense went from good to crap with bad schemes and bad coaching.  But I agree the team was not built to sustain in the long term and eventually this day would come - although I really have to disagree with getting rid of a guy like Tyrod until you have something better for sure.  Tyrod is a starter level QB in the NFL and you don't need to run him out of town to get a better guy - you just have to get other guys on the roster that prove that they are better and your worst case scenario at QB is a guy that can play mobile, game manager as a baseline.

 

Now both sides of the ball look shaky cakes on the lines and that's not a good recipe for winning in the NFL.  .

 

He did a good job adding cheap talent, but his drafts were poor - and he always seemed short-sighted.  You have to balance that win-now philosophy with building for the future, and thinking about future cap ramifications.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mango said:

 

This is actually a good discusssion, what should we have done to address said needs, especially on OL. Probably kept Glenn, swung Dawkins to RT (where he was projected), also drafted Tyrell Crosby in the 4th instead of Taron Johnson, slightly over valued there, but fills a huge need for us.  Offered EJ Gaines an extension and retain Coleman or Johnson. Secondary and OL are both improved. 

 

At the time I don't think I really wanted the Schwartz hire to replace Marrone. Looking back on it, I am pretty curious what this team would look like if he were the hire and not Rex. My guess is we would have been a playoff team sooner than 2017. But still in QB purgatory (which we are still in now, until Allen pans out)

I have mixed feelings about the Glenn trade.  we needed to make a move up to get the QB we wanted, so you had to give up something.  And as much as I liked Glenn his injury history was becoming concerning.  The middle of the O line is where we have issues, and two things stick out to me just based on yesterday.  One is Groy.  I figured he'd be a more than adequate replacement for Wood, given how ell he did when he stepped in for him a couple years ago.  But yesterday he just seemed clueless.  Two times guys pretty much just ran by him and he just stood there.  And then Ducasse and Miller.  I've said several times today that I cannot understand how a guy with Ducasses's size can be just walked back like he's not even there.  And Miller was just as bad with his penalties.  They did try to address it somewhat with Teller, and you have to imagine he starts if not opening day shortly thereafter if the two incumbents play like they did yesterday.  And you have to just hope that was one bad day for Groy.  If not then it's going to be pretty tough.

 

I'm not worried about our DB's.  Corners sometimes get beat one on one and Davis got suckered.  I expect a vet like him to bounce back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

"Preferred" is the wrong word.  I think there is no question that Beane is a more complete GM...he is not depending upon Jim Overdorf to teach him cap management, he has his own ideas and tells Overdorf what he wants.  He is also far more polished and comfortable dealing with the press.

But Whaley did recognize and bring in talent, as witnessed by the fact that so many of the players he drafted are starters or contributors on other NFL teams, including last year's playoff teams.  People like to rag on him, but his downfall really was trying to adapt his roster to 3 different coaching schemes IMHO.

It is yet to be determined if Beane will be as successful in bringing in talent.... Vlad Ducasse, Russ Bodine, Mike Tolbert, Jordan Matthews, and Vonte Davis leave me underwhelmed so far.  He has a clear pattern of wanting to "swing for the fences" with sky-high ceiling/high risk/low floor guys (eg Allen, Edmunds) over "safer" picks.  He's left gimondulous holes on OL and WR in part due to the players he's brought in/drafted not panning out (eg Ducasse, Bodine, Zay Jones, Jordan Matthews). 

 

We'll see.

 

Edit: although I'm frightened by the posters with whom I seem to be in agreement.  Yikes!

 

 

Yeah I am sure he planned on having Woods forced into retirement and Incognito go straightjacket...

 

That's 75% of the problem with the OLine...trying to replace 2 highly productive pro bowl caliber players with scrubs.

 

But how much can you do in 1 offseason? This year was all about getting the QB.

Edited by matter2003
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, matter2003 said:

Yeah I am sure he planned on having Woods forced into retirement and Incognito go straightjacket...

 

That's 75% of the problem with the OLine...trying to replace 2 highly productive pro bowl caliber players with scrubs.

 

But how much can you do in 1 offseason? This year was all about getting the QB.

 

First wood retired - and most thought hey we'll be ok.  Groy did fine in that extended stretch.

 

Then we traded Glenn - fine we got dawkins who played most of his snaps last year anyway

 

Then Incognito lost his mind... and it was like ok i think we have a serious problem. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Yeezus said:

 

cap space means NOTHING unless a front office knows how to use it. 

 

Judging from past moves this current front office doesn't have the eye for talent that Whaley and his crew had. Beane is in way over his head right now. And what teams have ever been successful building their team through FA? We have so many holes on this roster its going to take multiple offseasons to fix. 

 

 

Hahaha. If Beane is over his head right now then you are sitting at the bottom of the Atlantic with Rob Ryan attached to your ankle regarding this thread. 

 

I’m not sure if Beane’s plan ultimately works, but it’s clear he has a plan and it makes sense and takes some time.  It’s much better than perennial mediocre from Whaley and his predecessors. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, dneveu said:

 

I guess?  We made a troubled DT a franchise cornerstone despite numerous red flags. That's really what ended up undoing everything.  Dareus had 10 sacks and was 1st team all-pro.  Then he got paid and has 7.5 sacks since.  

 

He spent 2 first round picks on a non-QB who isn't even probably a top 5 receiver in the 2014 draft class (Beckham, Landry, Evans, Cooks, Adams, Benjamin).  Drafted Kouandjio in the same draft - swing and a miss.  Outside of Watkins, we got 1 use-able player in the entire draft in preston brown.

 

Married himself to Manuel instead of taking another shot in 2014 with someone like Garoppolo, Carr, or Bridgewater.  Used all his ammo up on the watkins trade.  This also caused us to not even have a shot at a QB in 2015 - as again - we were incredibly short of picks.  

 

Then in 2016 doubled-down on Rex and Tyrod for some reason and burned a draft class on a bunch of mediocre players.  Instead of looking at the 2 QBs at the top of the draft - and the 2 teams who wanted to trade down.  He tried to save his job and get that playoff spot, instead of build a franchise built to sustain.

 

EDIT - Add on the bryce brown trade, signing harvin twice, and extending Tyrod as things that damage his credibility.  He didn't really sniff an NFL job after his tenure here either.  

 

My argument is not that Whaley was a great GM. My point is if we want to talk talent assembled on a roster, then the 2015 roster was about the most talented since the Superbowl years. 

 

McDermott says that talent is not enough and you need talent with habits. I agree and that might have been a downfall of the 2015 team. But habits alone are certainly not enough. Of the two talent comes first, always has and always will. 

 

This roster is undertalented in far too many areas. That, I am afraid, is a fact. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, MJS said:

We made the playoffs. Can't argue with results.

 

We really backed into the playoff on a miracle play by Andy Dalton and a delayed controversial call against the Colts on their two point conversion. 

 

We also had a team with many metrics relative to the rest of the league that were worse than the year before.

 

Last year was a mirage.  We were very fortunate to make the playoffs.  It was fun, but it was a mirage.

 

Get ready for some reality this year.

 

If we actually make the playoffs this year, I would be VERY, VERY surprised.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Peter said:

 

We really backed into the playoff on a miracle play by Andy Dalton and a delayed controversial call against the Colts on their two point conversion. 

 

We also had a team with many metrics relative to the rest of the league that were worse than the year before.

 

Last year was a mirage.  We were very fortunate to make the playoffs.  It was fun, but it was a mirage.

 

Get ready for some reality this year.

 

If we actually make the playoffs this year, I would be VERY, VERY surprised.

 

So would I. But that doesn't matter if we see good things from Allen and to a lesser extent Edmunds. The problem is how do we evaluate Allen when we can't get him on the field because we don't trust 5 blokes to stand there and block for him?

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GunnerBill said:

 

So would I. But that doesn't matter if we see good things from Allen and to a lesser extent Edmunds. The problem is how do we evaluate Allen when we can't get him on the field because we don't trust 5 blokes to stand there and block for him?

 

I would be very wary of playing Allen behind that OL.  He is raw to begin with.  He certainly has some potential.  How much, I do not know, but I would hate to see him get ruined playing behind these jokers.  I suspect that AJ or NP likely would get rid of the ball more quickly given that they have more experience (and what I saw of Josh yesterday).

 

P.S.  Although I was Arsene Knows Best, I like the way Unai is handling the team and that he does not appear to be taking any BS from our 350k per week diva.  Unai will get the best out of him or he will not play for Arsenal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

So would I. But that doesn't matter if we see good things from Allen and to a lesser extent Edmunds. The problem is how do we evaluate Allen when we can't get him on the field because we don't trust 5 blokes to stand there and block for him?

 

Probably would want to address that well before August 2018...

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, reddogblitz said:

 

Doug gets a bad wrap.  If Rex (not Doug's choice) had been able to coach D, the drought would have ended in 2015.

 

That was made more difficult by the fact that the team's star player decided to go on strike that year (not to mention some injuries).  And, in case, there was any doubt about that, ask anyone with the Dolphins what they thought of Mario the next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Peter said:

 

We really backed into the playoff on a miracle play by Andy Dalton and a delayed controversial call against the Colts on their two point conversion. 

 

We also had a team with many metrics relative to the rest of the league that were worse than the year before.

 

Last year was a mirage.  We were very fortunate to make the playoffs.  It was fun, but it was a mirage.

 

Get ready for some reality this year.

 

If we actually make the playoffs this year, I would be VERY, VERY surprised.

 

If the Bengals had played earlier and the Bills later, the narrative would be different even if the games played out exactly the same. The Bills would have been in a "win and you're in" scenario.

 

They won 9 games. They had a horrendous 3 game stretch that made their defense look a lot worse than it actually was.

 

They got a lot of turnovers, took care of the football, and had a good running game, winning against a bunch of teams that many thought they had no chance of beating.

 

There is no such thing as "backing in to the playoffs". You get in or you don't. You win enough games against the right opponents, or you don't.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MJS said:

 

If the Bengals had played earlier and the Bills later, the narrative would be different even if the games played out exactly the same. The Bills would have been in a "win and you're in" scenario.

 

They won 9 games. They had a horrendous 3 game stretch that made their defense look a lot worse than it actually was.

 

They got a lot of turnovers, took care of the football, and had a good running game, winning against a bunch of teams that many thought they had no chance of beating.

 

There is no such thing as "backing in to the playoffs". You get in or you don't. You win enough games against the right opponents, or you don't.

 

I disagree.  Last year was a classic example of backing into the playoffs.  It was a mirage that is about to get very real this year.

 

We are going to find out very clearly this year just how lucky we were last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Peter said:

 

That was made more difficult by the fact that the team's star player decided to go on strike that year (not to mention some injuries).  And, in case, there was any doubt about that, ask anyone with the Dolphins what they thought of Mario the next year.

 

I disagree Peter.  Even it what you say is true, the whole D just flat out stunk.  I went to the Pittsburgh game and it was the WORST display of tackling I have ever seen. I think a big part of the problem was Rex' style.  Club Rex.  He wasn't Coach Ryan, he was Rex their buddy.  After he left, last year the guys could once again tackle.  that had more to do with than scheme IMHO.   That and only 10 men on the field on the biggest play of his tenure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, reddogblitz said:

 

I disagree Peter.  Even it what you say is true, the whole D just flat out stunk.  I went to the Pittsburgh game and it was the WORST display of tackling I have ever seen. I think a big part of the problem was Rex' style.  Club Rex.  He wasn't Coach Ryan, he was Rex their buddy.  After he left, last year the guys could once again tackle.  that had more to do with than scheme IMHO.   That and only 10 men on the field on the biggest play of his tenure.

 

I respect your opinion, but disagree.

 

The 10 on the field was the result of Gilmore (if I recall correctly) getting hurt.  We had a number of times last year when we did not have the proper number of players on the field as well. I seem to recall one time when we actually had 15 guys on the field or some crazy amount like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Peter said:

 

I respect your opinion, but disagree.

 

The 10 on the field was the result of Gilmore (if I recall correctly) getting hurt.  We had a number of times last year when we did not have the proper number of players on the field as well. I seem to recall one time when we actually had 15 guys on the field or some crazy amount like that.

 

Talent means nothing if it’s accompanied by a lazy attitude. See:

 

gilmore

dareus

 

glad theyre out the door

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, dneveu said:

 

He did a good job adding cheap talent, but his drafts were poor - and he always seemed short-sighted.  You have to balance that win-now philosophy with building for the future, and thinking about future cap ramifications.  

No dispute about that from me.  Unfortunately we always seem to have the pendulum swing too far in the other direction when the team makes changes.  I think we may see the same thing unfolding again - they have gutted this team too much to have any consistency and now they better be damn good at talent evaluation or this team isn’t going anywhere.  You can cut and replace with many positions, but dropping your talent level at QB and OL will hurt you bad for a long time unless you hit on your replacements and that is where many GMs and FOs have tried this route and failed because they couldn’t get it all to work out with the right pieces at the same time.  Odds are not in their favor, but maybe they got it right. I just have a hard time seeing how going with guys that have less than 10 starts combined is better than keeping around a QB that may not be great, but provides stability and continuity to the most important position in the sport.   I said the same thing with Fitz and it’s not because I particularly thought he or Tyrod were great (Tyrod is better btw), but they are guys that can play decent QB and it’s better to keep them until you know you can bench them for the better option you’ve added to the roster.  It signals to the team that you are keeping the path while trying to improve.  

 

When you make the playoffs and then hit reset at QB with the only returning QB being a 5th round draft pick from the year before with one of the worst halves of QB play in NFL history and having full knowledge of the losses on the OL that would plague you if not adequately addressed (but still ignored) - what exactly is the expectation?  It’s like saying hey we know this looks bad, but we’re really awesome at this, just trust us.  Some are willing to trust and some are skeptical.   Let’s put it this way - I’ll trust someone who shows me they know what they are doing and I’m not willing to trust this process quite yet. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Whaley built the 2015 roster which was infinitely more talented than anything Beane has got close to building yet. His greatest fault was not saying "No" on the Rex hire. 

You said it way better than me.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, oldmanfan said:

So on the one hand Beane is getting criticized for not beefing up the O line this past off season, and now it's that he won't be able to next year either because guys aren't out there even if you have cap space? 

 

Makes perfect sense.

 

 

He traded a high quality starting LT in Cordy Glenn and signed Bodine and Newhouse......."not beefing up" is a pretty vague/unrepresentative way of putting it........he's made his moves..........now it's about the results.

 

Beane has gotten a lot of credit for trading away highly paid players.........but the reason they were trade-able is because they were talented guys who can alter game results.

 

And contrary to popular belief here those moves helped those teams get to places they haven't been in a long time.........division titles, championship games, a SB victory..........none of those teams got shafted.

 

It's easy to sell players that help other teams win........it's time to get on the buying end of difference maker market.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, SoTier said:

 

What is "the right way"?  What I see is McDermott and Beane bringing in their pals from Carolina or gambling on guys with injury issues or guys who've failed on other teams.   I see them basically trying to copy the Carolina Panthers, but somewhat on the cheap.   I'd rather have them try to copy the Philadelphia Eagles ... a team that went from 7-9 under Chip Kelly to 13-3 and Super Bowl champs two seasons later.

I was just playing on a typical McDermott sound bite. They always say we want to do things.... the right way. I think interpret that to mean our way. Morally and Faith based

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

He traded a high quality starting LT in Cordy Glenn and signed Bodine and Newhouse......."not beefing up" is a pretty vague/unrepresentative way of putting it........he's made his moves..........now it's about the results.

 

Beane has gotten a lot of credit for trading away highly paid players.........but the reason they were trade-able is because they were talented guys who can alter game results.

 

And contrary to popular belief here those moves helped those teams get to places they haven't been in a long time.........division titles, championship games, a SB victory..........none of those teams got shafted.

 

It's easy to sell players that help other teams win........it's time to get on the buying end of difference maker market.

 

Glenn was hurt pretty much all last year.  He was good and I'd like to still have him but if he'd have gone to RT or inside to G.  Dawkins will be OK.

 

They have a plan.  They needed QBs on offense and defense.  They drafted both this past draft.  Hopefully.  To do that they needed to move up and Glenn was the price.

 

Next year I hope they draft a solid WR and a bunch of linemen.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Yeezus said:

 

cap space means NOTHING unless a front office knows how to use it. 

 

Judging from past moves this current front office doesn't have the eye for talent that Whaley and his crew had. Beane is in way over his head right now. And what teams have ever been successful building their team through FA? We have so many holes on this roster its going to take multiple offseasons to fix. 

 

Just when I think that you could not possibly put out a more moronic post.....

 

You prove me wrong......I owe you a beer

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Beane traded a lot of established players (Dareus being the only one on a bad contract) and ended up with a lot of draft capital that he spent all of to get Allen and Edmunds. All those trades left a lot of holes on the roster. If Allen and Edmunds pan out and we have a strong 2019 draft / FA then we really could be a contender. If that doesn't work out we're probably looking at a new GM in 2020. 

 

The Loulelei contract in particular is a major red flag to me. Grossly overpaid for a guy just because they knew him from Carolina. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

Just when I think that you could not possibly put out a more moronic post.....

 

You prove me wrong......I owe you a beer

 

John, there was nothing moronic about his post. Take off the blinders and see. 

 

You make yourself look foolish with comments like this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oldmanfan said:

Glenn was hurt pretty much all last year.  He was good and I'd like to still have him but if he'd have gone to RT or inside to G.  Dawkins will be OK.

 

They have a plan.  They needed QBs on offense and defense.  They drafted both this past draft.  Hopefully.  To do that they needed to move up and Glenn was the price.

 

Next year I hope they draft a solid WR and a bunch of linemen.

 

 

 

Well Trent Murphy and Vontae Davis were hurt pretty much all last year and that didn't stop him from investing in them.

 

Bottom line is stop making excuses..........Beane made his moves...........now it's about results.

 

The early returns on Vontae Davis, Star Lotulelei,  Trent Murphy, Newhouse and Bodine...........basically ALL of the free agents of note that he signed......have been disappointing.

 

 If that remains the case throughout the season it would be remembered as perhaps the worst FA class the Bills have ever signed.

 

 But hopefully that changes and the preseason proves to be a mirage.

 

 Davis might get healthier and regain some explosion in his stiff old legs and perhaps Lotulelei is just doing his best Alan Branch imitation(laziest preseason player ever) etc...

 

We shall see.......but Beane will be judged on his results.......as it should be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Whaley built the 2015 roster which was infinitely more talented than anything Beane has got close to building yet. His greatest fault was not saying "No" on the Rex hire. 

Buddy Nix.  Not Whaley.

Edited by BringBackOrton
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...