BillsFan8083 Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 (edited) I wasn't watching ... what did he say? Hey buffalobills fans... toss on GMFB ...I'll tell you how Buffalo can get their QB of the future. Edited April 23, 2018 by BillsFan8083 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seanbillsfan2206 Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 They said Ryan Fitzpatrick was a good QB, but he was somebody else’s backup. Tyrod Taylor was a good QB, but he was someone else’s backup. Aj McCarron is a good QB, you get the picture. They said in 2004 we waited and got the fourth QB and that obviously was a mistake. We need to get to 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thurst44 Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 3 minutes ago, Seanbillsfan2206 said: They said Ryan Fitzpatrick was a good QB, but he was somebody else’s backup. Tyrod Taylor was a good QB, but he was someone else’s backup. Aj McCarron is a good QB, you get the picture. They said in 2004 we waited and got the fourth QB and that obviously was a mistake. We need to get to 2 In fairness, in 2004, we wouldn't have had to move up any higher than 10 to get franchise QB (and imo, that 4th out of 3 is looking likely to be drafted as early as 1st right now). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlonce Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 Trade up to 6 then trade to 2. Give the colts both 1sts and a 2nd then give the Giants our number 1 next year. Thats what they put forward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thurst44 Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 3 minutes ago, dlonce said: Trade up to 6 then trade to 2. Give the colts both 1sts and a 2nd then give the Giants our number 1 next year. Thats what they put forward. Did they say who they thought the Bills would draft in this scenario? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloHokie13 Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 1 minute ago, thurst44 said: Did they say who they thought the Bills would draft in this scenario? I would imagine this is an extension of the "somehow, some way, Sam Darnold will be a Buffalo Bill" prediction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Murica Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 Speaking of GMFB 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sammy Watkins' Rib Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 2 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said: I would imagine this is an extension of the "somehow, some way, Sam Darnold will be a Buffalo Bill" prediction. Would love that. But can't see the Browns passing on him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnBonhamRocks Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 I do think to get up to #2, then it has to be either (1) two trades made by OBD or (2) a three-team trade. Not like that's the hottest of takes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sammy Watkins' Rib Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 1 minute ago, Captain Murica said: Speaking of GMFB Funny because it's true. Sadly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Murica Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 1 minute ago, Sammy Watkins' Rib said: Funny because it's true. Sadly. Yup, deep burn by that Ryan Seacrest wannabe I mean what do we expect when we trot out career back-ups as our starting QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 17 minutes ago, dlonce said: Trade up to 6 then trade to 2. Give the colts both 1sts and a 2nd then give the Giants our number 1 next year. Thats what they put forward. If this is what they put forward, that show should be off the air. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sammy Watkins' Rib Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 1 minute ago, Happy Gilmore said: If this is what they put forward, that show should be off the air. Why do you say that? It seems reasonable to me for the circumstances of this draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 I like this idea less and less as the off-season has played out. I think Darnold goes 1. Go to 5 or 6 and get Rosen (he’s my guy anyways). Preserve your 2019 pick because this team isn’t going to be great. Offer the Colts 12, 53, 65 and a 2019 4th. That’s more than enough. You still get your QB, LB, WR and OL before pick 100. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sammy Watkins' Rib Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 1 minute ago, Kirby Jackson said: I like this idea less and less as the off-season has played out. I think Darnold goes 1. Go to 5 or 6 and get Rosen (he’s my guy anyways). Preserve your 2019 pick because this team isn’t going to be great. Offer the Colts 12, 53, 65 and a 2019 4th. That’s more than enough. You still get your QB, LB, WR and OL before pick 100. Can't see the Colts accepting for such little value. Switch out either 53 or 65 with 22 and I can see that trade happening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thurst44 Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 33 minutes ago, Sammy Watkins' Rib said: Funny because it's true. Sadly. I'm pretty sure Brandt is actually fond of the Bills if not a fan. Ditto, Schrager, but with him, it's empathy because if memory serves, he's a lifelong Browns fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elite Poster Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 59 minutes ago, Seanbillsfan2206 said: They said Ryan Fitzpatrick was a good QB, but he was somebody else’s backup. Tyrod Taylor was a good QB, but he was someone else’s backup. Aj McCarron is a good QB, you get the picture. They said in 2004 we waited and got the fourth QB and that obviously was a mistake. We need to get to 2 This is a phenomenal post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffalostu2 Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 Metro sexual morning football is hardly the place to go for Bills or any other football info. It makes the old Mike and Mike show look hardcore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 1 hour ago, Sammy Watkins' Rib said: Why do you say that? It seems reasonable to me for the circumstances of this draft. Why give up a #1 next year? Pretty expensive, as well as a risk, given how many other positions need to be addressed. I can see fans in a chat site talking like this, but the GMFB hosts shouldn't get as caught up in the QB hype. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lagoon Blues Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 1 hour ago, Kirby Jackson said: I like this idea less and less as the off-season has played out. I think Darnold goes 1. Go to 5 or 6 and get Rosen (he’s my guy anyways). Preserve your 2019 pick because this team isn’t going to be great. Offer the Colts 12, 53, 65 and a 2019 4th. That’s more than enough. You still get your QB, LB, WR and OL before pick 100. If any way possible to preserve the 22nd and get a MLB and still get our QB that would be one hell of a job by our GM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reed83HOF Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 1 hour ago, Kirby Jackson said: I like this idea less and less as the off-season has played out. I think Darnold goes 1. Go to 5 or 6 and get Rosen (he’s my guy anyways). Preserve your 2019 pick because this team isn’t going to be great. Offer the Colts 12, 53, 65 and a 2019 4th. That’s more than enough. You still get your QB, LB, WR and OL before pick 100. This ties in nicely with what Peter king said this am... • There will be some trades in this draft that might seem one-sided. Several team officials told me in the past few days that they value Day 2 picks (rounds two and three) so highly that they’d be willing to take slightly less in compensation to move down. Where could this come into play? Cleveland (four), Indianapolis (six), Baltimore (16), Seattle (18), New England (23, 31), New Orleans (27), Philadelphia (32). “This is not your typical draft,” said one veteran club official Sunday. “The second, third and even fourth rounds are gold. You can take less than the trade-value chart says and still make a very good trade if you get multiple picks in those rounds.” 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JÂy RÛßeÒ Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 1 hour ago, Seanbillsfan2206 said: They said Ryan Fitzpatrick was a good QB, but he was somebody else’s backup. Tyrod Taylor was a good QB, but he was someone else’s backup. Aj McCarron is a good QB, you get the picture. They said in 2004 we waited and got the fourth QB and that obviously was a mistake. We need to get to 2 Nick Foles, Super Bowl winning QB, was somebody else's backup. Jimmy Garrapolo, who everybody is going nuts over, etc etc etc. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBillyG Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 1 hour ago, Kirby Jackson said: I like this idea less and less as the off-season has played out. I think Darnold goes 1. Go to 5 or 6 and get Rosen (he’s my guy anyways). Preserve your 2019 pick because this team isn’t going to be great. Offer the Colts 12, 53, 65 and a 2019 4th. That’s more than enough. You still get your QB, LB, WR and OL before pick 100. This is where I've been for a while now. This team isn't a QB away from constant playoff seasons. Where we are at now we need that QB, but also 2 solid drafts and a nice FA crop between them. Beane will make a move IMO but he is building a team and needs to find the best value. Thursday can't come soon enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ndirish1978 Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 20 minutes ago, buffalostu2 said: Metro sexual morning football is hardly the place to go for Bills or any other football info. It makes the old Mike and Mike show look hardcore. This would be wrong. Schrager actually has insight and doesn't just take uneducated dumps on the team like the rest of the national media. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
US Egg Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 Getting a good QB in the draft ? It's at best, about a 5% success rate and dependent mostly on luck (not Andrew, who may never play again and why Indy may be in play for a QB). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuvian Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 I'd rather watch the View than those millennial scum who think that they know football Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlonce Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 2 hours ago, thurst44 said: Did they say who they thought the Bills would draft in this scenario? i don’t think so. 17 minutes ago, stuvian said: I'd rather watch the View than those millennial scum who think that they know football They know very little but it’s between them and ESPN who only pimps the NBA. Not interested in basketball to the degree they discuss it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 (edited) 2 hours ago, Sammy Watkins' Rib said: Can't see the Colts accepting for such little value. Switch out either 53 or 65 with 22 and I can see that trade happening. I think that we’ve lost sight of what trades cost. The Bills are paying a big premium in that case: https://www.pro-football-reference.com/draft/draft_trade_value.htm Edited April 23, 2018 by Kirby Jackson 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanForever19 Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 34 minutes ago, Ifartalot said: Getting a good QB in the draft ? It's at best, about a 5% success rate and dependent mostly on luck (not Andrew, who may never play again and why Indy may be in play for a QB). Getting a good QB to come to Buffalo in Free Agency? It's at best about a 0% success rate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 7 minutes ago, BillsFanForever19 said: Getting a good QB to come to Buffalo in Free Agency? It's at best about a 0% success rate. Why (other than good QBs don’t hit the market often)? The Bills though have always recruited well in free agency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanForever19 Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 3 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said: Why (other than good QBs don’t hit the market often)? The Bills though have always recruited well in free agency. Mainly the first part. But when they do - we aren't even an afterthought. Small market and a small history of success equate to them looking elsewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mead107 Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 DC Tom DC Tom DCTom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
transplantbillsfan Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 2 hours ago, BuffaloHokie13 said: I would imagine this is an extension of the "somehow, some way, Sam Darnold will be a Buffalo Bill" prediction. Yep Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 2 hours ago, Sammy Watkins' Rib said: Funny because it's true. Sadly. And every other team in the league.....but anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Who Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 1 hour ago, stuvian said: I'd rather watch the View than those millennial scum who think that they know football Did you just call Kay Adams scum? Pistols at dawn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 13 minutes ago, BillsFanForever19 said: Mainly the first part. But when they do - we aren't even an afterthought. Small market and a small history of success equate to them looking elsewhere. That hasn’t been the case with other free agents. They go where they get paid. It’s irrelevant anyways because no good QBs are hitting FA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Formerly_of_Roch Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 3 hours ago, dlonce said: Trade up to 6 then trade to 2. Give the colts both 1sts and a 2nd then give the Giants our number 1 next year. Thats what they put forward. LOL, you'll need to give up a lot more than that to get to #2 And likely you'll have given up more than just 12 and 22 t o get to 6, probably throw in a second round pick. Then throw in our other 2nd and maybe both 3rds to get to #2. The Giants are rumored to have already said NO to three first rounders, why would they consider this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mojo44 Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 1 hour ago, Ifartalot said: Getting a good QB in the draft ? It's at best, about a 5% success rate and dependent mostly on luck (not Andrew, who may never play again and why Indy may be in play for a QB). The Colts drafting a quarterback would be earth shattering news. That would mean that they think Luck is a dead duck. Changes everything. However, I haven’t heard one little peep of information along these lines. At this point, I find this to be very unlikely. But, who knows? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sammy Watkins' Rib Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 45 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: And every other team in the league.....but anyway https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/B/BradTo00/splits/ The Bills have beaten Brady only twice in games that matter. He's 28-3 against us when he starts. Compare that to the Dolphins and Jets whom he is 21-10 and 25-7 against respectively. He's human against Denver and Kansas City, 7-6 and 4-3 winning records against them respectively. Throwing out the teams that are 0-4 and 0-5 against Brady we have the worst winning percentage against Brady. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsCelticsAngelsBama Posted April 23, 2018 Share Posted April 23, 2018 9 minutes ago, Sammy Watkins' Rib said: https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/B/BradTo00/splits/ The Bills have beaten Brady only twice in games that matter. He's 28-3 against us when he starts. Compare that to the Dolphins and Jets whom he is 21-10 and 25-7 against respectively. He's human against Denver and Kansas City, 7-6 and 4-3 winning records against them respectively. Throwing out the teams that are 0-4 and 0-5 against Brady we have the worst winning percentage against Brady. feel better now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts