Jump to content

Let's say we take Mayfield at #7


Recommended Posts

And Lamar Jackson and Mason Rudolph are sitting there at #22, do you guys think a team like Pittsburgh or New Orleans would jump ahead of New England at #23? We could really screw New England out of a QB replacement to Tom Brady if we play our cards right.

Edited by NewDayBills
Grammar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Buffalo Barbarian said:

I would be ecstatic about Mayfield but not sure at what your getting at?

 

Should we draft another QB or trade our 22nd pick?

 

 

 

Sorry if I wasn't clear! New England picks at 23 and we are directly before them at 22. I'm wondering if there would be a team interested in trading up for a QB at 22 so we can rooster block New England at 23. It may actually make more sense to trade out of 22 than staying put, just for the simple fact that we can screw the Patriots.

Edited by NewDayBills
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, NewDayBills said:

 

Sorry if I wasn't clear! New England picks at 23 and we are directly before them at 22. I'm wondering if there would be a team interested in trading up for a QB at 22 so we can rooster block New England at 23. It may actually make more sense to trade out of 22 than staying put, just for the simple fact that we can screw the Patriots.

 

that and get more picks so I would always trade back in the first round unless getting a QB.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, NewDayBills said:

And Lamar Jackson and Mason Rudolph are sitting there at #22, do you guys think a team like Pittsburgh or New Orleans would jump ahead of New England at #23? We could really screw New England out of a QB replacement to Tom Brady if we play our cards right.

As long as there willing to pay to get where we are why not.  Also depends on who's on the board at #22 if a player we had rated highly is there we just take him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Preventing New England from getting their QB can't be a factor when making a decision on if you get trade offers to trade back from 22 in that situation.  Will moving back prevent you from picking a quality player at #22 that you think will help this franchise?  Moving back is tempting given our increasing amount of roster holes, but don't pass on a player you really covet because you think you might screw over New England.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, NewDayBills said:

And Lamar Jackson and Mason Rudolph are sitting there at #22, do you guys think a team like Pittsburgh or New Orleans would jump ahead of New England at #23? We could really screw New England out of a QB replacement to Tom Brady if we play our cards right.

sure why not. we will need to regain a couple o picks anyway, so that kills 2 birds wit one stone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New England is in love with the QB from Richmond.  If anybody wanted to just get a QB to prevent NE then they are going to have to seriously over reach.

 

We need to do what is best for us and only that.  Now, if that includes taking the kid early in the 3rd, provided we still have 2 3rds, I wouldn't hate throwing a wrench in Bellicheats plans if we were to somehow miss on the others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm starting to believe that there is a high probability that the Jets go with Mayfield.  I think Rosen is the QB that will drop and would be great news for us, I'm thinking anywhere from 4-10 is a possible trading destination in order to get him.   I don't believe anyone in their natural drafting order will select Rosen before Miami and he probably wouldn't even be selected by them.  The biggest fear is having someone jump up to scoop him, at least from my perspective.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, NewDayBills said:

And Lamar Jackson and Mason Rudolph are sitting there at #22, do you guys think a team like Pittsburgh or New Orleans would jump ahead of New England at #23? We could really screw New England out of a QB replacement to Tom Brady if we play our cards right.

Successful teams don't make moves that are just intended to "screw over" other teams. Can't worry about the Pats 6 years from now. 

 

It would all depend on who is on the board for us at that point. If I'm Buffalo and LVE is sitting there at 22 I take him. Unless a team wants to make it worth my while. 

 

Build your own team first and foremost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the patriots are interested in Jackson and they will probably be able to get Rudolph at #31.

 

At #23 I think the patriots will be looking for an OT to replace the holding machine Nate Solder.

 

We could use an OT as well so if McGlinchey is available we could take him to help our line and to screw them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, NewDayBills said:

And Lamar Jackson and Mason Rudolph are sitting there at #22, do you guys think a team like Pittsburgh or New Orleans would jump ahead of New England at #23? We could really screw New England out of a QB replacement to Tom Brady if we play our cards right.

 

Mayfield will be gone by #7 so this thread is pointless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Buffalo has drafted a QB at #12, a trade down from #22 is certainly in play.  It depends less on what Buffalo can do to screw up NE's draft than what players are available to Buffalo at 22 and what they can get by trading the pick.  Picking up another 2nd or 3rd round pick would be terrific, however, because you figure you can get a starter in that range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

 

I think it would be 12 and next years first. depends how strong beane thinks this class is i'd guess. 

 

Way too much to move up 5 spots IMO

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Epstein's Mother said:

 

Exactly.  This scenario does not exist.

 

39 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

 

well based on what the jets gave to move up 3 spots and with us probably bidding against miami it might not even be enough

 

Does it really change anything? So we trade up and take Rosen, Darnold or Allen, does that detail really matter?

 

We trade up and take a QB at 7, Rudolph and Jackson is there at 22, do we intentionally trade out with a QB needy team to screw NE?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NewDayBills said:

 

 

Does it really change anything? So we trade up and take Rosen, Darnold or Allen, does that detail really matter?

 

We trade up and take a QB at 7, Rudolph and Jackson is there at 22, do we intentionally trade out with a QB needy team to screw NE?

 

nope we get our qb and with the extra pick moving down get another prospect for the roster. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, NewDayBills said:

 

 

Does it really change anything? So we trade up and take Rosen, Darnold or Allen, does that detail really matter?

 

We trade up and take a QB at 7, Rudolph and Jackson is there at 22, do we intentionally trade out with a QB needy team to screw NE?

 

No we don't.

Edited by Epstein's Mother
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, NewDayBills said:

Does it really change anything? So we trade up and take Rosen, Darnold or Allen, does that detail really matter?

 

We trade up and take a QB at 7, Rudolph and Jackson is there at 22, do we intentionally trade out with a QB needy team to screw NE?

What does matter is who else is available at 22. Our team's roster priorities will come before trying to screw NE based on what we think they might do. They've got 23 & 31. If they want a QB they can easily jump over Arizona and take one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DefenseWins said:

First, Mayfield isn't making it out of the top 5... You can take that to the bank... Elway isn't gonna sit there with Mayfield staring him in the face and not draft him...  And the Bills will either trade up to #2 or #4...

Cant see that happening. Neither Brownsor Giants will want to more than a couple spots.

If Bills try to trade to 6-9 teams are going to want everything. There will be nothing left to get to 2 or 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

Jets gave up a couple of 2nd round picks.

 

They gave up 3 actually. I say we keep our two seconds this year and the second next year and just do the two firsts. If it’s both firsts this year fine. But I think I’d rather do this year and next years first

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

 

They gave up 3 actually. I say we keep our two seconds this year and the second next year and just do the two firsts. If it’s both firsts this year fine. But I think I’d rather do this year and next years first

 

one is next year.

 

3 2nds to put them in position to get their guy?  That's nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...