In Summary Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 Never. In a WR rich class trading up that high for one is just pissing away value. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LABILLBACKER Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 I would trade up to 10 for Odunze or 15 for Thomas. MHJ or Nabers would cost too much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roundybout Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 2 hours ago, CountDorkula said: Better Idea trade 28 for Higgins or Aiyuk trade a 2nd this year and a 25 1st for a 24 1st and grab Thomas Jr from LSU. profit. We can’t afford the cap hit for Aiyuk or Higgins this season Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphadawg7 Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 6 hours ago, boyst said: Should they package a trade that would include this years first, next year's first and second to pick in the top 8 for a WR? That is not enough to get into the top 8 and no way we should spend what it would take to get to the top 8 in this draft, that is QB level trade compensation. Not to mention this is the best and deepest WR draft maybe in draft history. Now if Odunze or Nabers slips into the mid to late teens, then I think you consider giving up our first next year (not also a 2nd) and go get them. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirAndrew Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 I’d trade up for MHJ, which won’t happen, but I wouldn’t for anyone else. I don’t see the bust potential being any greater for a receiver we take at 28. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nextmanup Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 No, don't trade up. Yes, we need a replacement for Stefon immediately. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoonerBillsFan Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 1 hour ago, Aussie Joe said: Take a WR at 28… and then use the Diggs pick to move up to Top 40 and take another… This could result in McConkey and Legette I would be ok with that. 3 minutes ago, Nextmanup said: No, don't trade up. Yes, we need a replacement for Stefon immediately. My comp based on stats and ability for Diggs in this draft is Ladd mcconkey. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Boy Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 Sammy Watkins was a great, can’t miss two # 1s WR…. Let’s try it again? You keep your picks, and through shrewd drafting we can be in the catbird seat Next year with multiple starters on rookie contracts. This year is a rebuilding year. Accept that for the fact it is and stop pissing away capital, both monetary and draft, on quick fix gambles. 16 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said: Not to mention this is the best and deepest WR draft maybe in draft history. 👆☝️ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrags Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 I’ll say this, this is one extremely even poll. With over 100 votes into it. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEra Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 5 hours ago, CountDorkula said: Calling my shot. Bears get 2024 1st 2025 1st late rd pick Bills get 2024 1st #9 I think it’ll take more than that. But I’d be on board. Sign me up for trading up for one of the top 3. If we don’t, I’m still happy with Mitchell or Legette. I think mcconkey could even be in play now. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CountDorkula Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 2 hours ago, Victory Formation said: Our roster is still elite. When Josh Allen is your QB, you’re going to the playoffs. We may need some help at WR but we still have Samuel, Kincaid, Knox, Shakir, Cook and it looks like Beane is about double down on WR in the draft. I am not even remotely worried. I would call this roster anything but elite. This roster is worse than last year‘s at this point 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChans Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 I don’t care. Walk away with 2 in the first three rounds. Trade up down or sideways. two rookie WR’s who we won’t even be discussing extension with until 2026 is the way. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyNoodles Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 Trading up is foolish when we have so many holes. Good WRs are three rounds deep in this draft. Let the board come to you. Until the Diggs move, I wouldn’t have bet on a round 1 WR because they still could get a nice player in the second round. Now, I’m not sure about the first round but sure hope they’re not wasting draft capital to move up in the round. This is Beane’s weakness. He can’t help himself. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brianmoorman4jesus Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 I’d go up for Harrison. That guy will probably end up being a HOF WR. I don’t care about the ramifications in cost. No matter what, it won’t be that unreasonable and you don’t have to pay this guy for 4 years. If you are going to go up, go up for the best guy. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarleyNY Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 9 hours ago, boyst said: Should they package a trade that would include this years first, next year's first and second to pick in the top 8 for a WR? If that’s the cost then I’m in. I do not trade up if it’s more or if I can’t get one of the top three WRs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 3 hours ago, In Summary said: Never. In a WR rich class trading up that high for one is just pissing away value. to be fair, we are not in the upper tier of that class at 28. I wouldn’t stress much if the debate was getting the second vs the third - whoever lands in your lap is a win. But potentially the 6th guy comes with much more risk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjmac Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 Prior to the Diggs trade, I would have voted no. Now I think we need do. To sit at 28 invites other teams to jump ahead of us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCBills Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 I won’t hate it if they do .. in fact I’ll probably geek out if I see it happen. However, I’m more open to multiple WR Green Bay method in a loaded draft class. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dablitzkrieg Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 They should trade for Justin Jefferson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yantha Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 I vote no to top 8..... but top 15, sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.