Jump to content

Herbert deal signed : 262M - 5 yrs extension


TBBills Fan

Recommended Posts

NFL has a salary cap but a perfect illustration of the differences in owners..

 

Talk of Burrow needing to take less in guaranteed money because his owner doesn’t have the ability to keep enough money in escrow to play cap games in order to attempt to keep their Big 3 together, let alone guys like Boyd, Reader and their pass rushers.  
 

Meanwhile..
 

Jets owe Aaron Rodgers over 100M next year.  Obviously they’re not paying that, and will likely spread the hit out over void years.. 

 

Pegula seemingly gives Beane a blank check to any, and everything, under the cap. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, BuffaloBillyG said:

I agree the Burrow contract will be huge. However, I think you're going to see less in guaranteed money than most people want to think. 

 

Burrow isn't stupid. He knows that his best path to success is keeping his WR core intact. I'm willing to bet he will take less in guaranteed cash knowing that the Brown Family is cash strapped/frugal. This allows them to put some of that money in escrow for Higgins and soon Chase to stay. 

 

A top tier QB is going to see almost every dime of their contract because barring injury that alters their career or a shocking drop off of talent teams aren't moving on from them.  He's got time to take a bit less in guaranteed money now and parlay that into more down the road. 

But it’s not Burrow’s job or responsibility to take less money to make things work. That’s up to the GM (who also makes a lot of money) and his guys to figure out. It’s also up to the billionaire owner to have enough money to pay these guys. As fans of these teams obviously we want to the team to have enough money to sign as many good players as possible, but people need to realize that it’s not up to the players to make that happen 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Bob Jones said:

LOL. Being rich doesn’t necessarily mean that you are smart, and NFL owners definitely fall in to this group. Exhibit A would be the recent Ocean Gate deep sea implosion, which killed some dumb rich guys. Most people…even poor ones…would not have gotten inside that death trap for free, let alone paid $250k for the trip.

 

And there are countless other examples, throughout history which demonstrate the same principle. Why do filthy rich people sometimes kill themselves by OD ing on drugs? Are they smart to do that?


Yeah, stupid NFL billionaire owners. 
 

Your arguments are amusing.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

so many millions so little time.😗

 

The salaries of these elite athletes to me are mind boggling. So Much Money........whoa. Yeah I could scrape by it's a burden but someone has to do it

 

lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Ya Digg? said:

But it’s not Burrow’s job or responsibility to take less money to make things work. That’s up to the GM (who also makes a lot of money) and his guys to figure out. It’s also up to the billionaire owner to have enough money to pay these guys. As fans of these teams obviously we want to the team to have enough money to sign as many good players as possible, but people need to realize that it’s not up to the players to make that happen 

And yet...players do make that happen. There are a ton of cases where a player could really cash in and takes a touch less to help field a team around him. Especially when their own success is tied into the skill of the players around them. Now, I'm not saying that Burrow is going to sign for $20M a year and only $50M guaranteed. He will get his. But I'm not going to be shocked if he takes less than he probably should to keep his WR core intact for as long as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, FireChans said:

Has the salary cap percentage allocated changed all that much in say the last 20 years? I honestly don’t know. 

Great question. I honestly don't know.  I do however remember the owners (and players) being angry at QBs like Jamarcus Russell and Sam Bradford getting contracts for 50 - 60 million coming out of college. Granted, Herberts and Hurts have proven to be very good players, but if I was an owner I would be afraid of them getting hurt and having to give them 50 million or so.

 

Watson's contract is fully guaranteed as I recall. If he goes down this year, would the owner be on the hook for 200 million or so? It makes me wonder just how much money these owners have. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bill from NYC said:

Great question. I honestly don't know.  I do however remember the owners (and players) being angry at QBs like Jamarcus Russell and Sam Bradford getting contracts for 50 - 60 million coming out of college. Granted, Herberts and Hurts have proven to be very good players, but if I was an owner I would be afraid of them getting hurt and having to give them 50 million or so.

 

Watson's contract is fully guaranteed as I recall. If he goes down this year, would the owner be on the hook for 200 million or so? It makes me wonder just how much money these owners have. 

to me, the economics of the NFL are fascinating. It’s truly where rubber meets the road in terms of positional value and risk management. 

 

I think I saw that Derek Carr’s giant contract a few years back was 17% of the cap at the time of signing. Herbert’s new one is in the low 20’s, depending on the year. That doesn’t seem super crazy to me. Especially as the cap goes up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, quinnearlysghost88 said:

I remember when we signed rob johnson to $25m/5 years and it was crazy. 

And in retrospect, what a deal we got!

Herbert: the Rams have owned the LA market since the Chargers moved north. But the fate of the franchises is about to change. Fans like exciting QBs! This year it'll be Herbert vs. the carcass of Stafford, with a healthy serving of Stetson Bennett or Brett Rypien ...

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even as the cap goes up, the QB salary has risen from about 13% of the cap in the early 2000s to now in the 20s. As the NFL has transformed into a QB dependent passing league, the value is reflected in the numbers. The only way it’ll start to become more equitable, where the lowest paid positions are given more, is if someone like Burrow takes a massive discount to help spread the wealth. Won’t happen though as I can’t see any of these QBs willingly taking 10s of millions less for his team to be more competitive. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

For this millionth time, this is not how it works at all. Unless you are going to do this for every top qb that gets signed. “Wow, Dan Marino is a steal!”

 

and he is a stud but it’s funny how Lamar Jackson gets crushed for not winning enough while everyone loves Herbert. 

 

not me bro!

 

 I mean they had to pay this guy whatever.  But not exactly eye of the tiger right there...

 

1 playoff game where he and his team choked away a 20 point halftime lead....to Trevor Lawrence (despite his 4 ints)!!  After going up 27-0, here are all of the Chargers subsequent possessions: punt, FG, punt, end of half, punt, FG, missed FG, punt.

 

Tons of yards and TDs (regular season) though...

 

 

Edited by Mr. WEO
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Bob Jones said:

Please explain this take. Dont the owners make most of their money from TV and media contracts, and it doesn’t matter whether their team sucks or they are a top contender? Don’t teams that suck still have pretty good attendance? Didn’t the Bills have good attendance during the 17 year playoff drought?

youre looking at this way too short term, like the league might fold by 2030 lol not to mention they have to spend it one way or another. they going to improve their value by handing other positions that $$? but yes, the billionaires are certainly the dumb ones 🤣

Edited by BillsShredder83
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ya Digg? said:

But it’s not Burrow’s job or responsibility to take less money to make things work. That’s up to the GM (who also makes a lot of money) and his guys to figure out. It’s also up to the billionaire owner to have enough money to pay these guys. As fans of these teams obviously we want to the team to have enough money to sign as many good players as possible, but people need to realize that it’s not up to the players to make that happen 

Exactly. It’s annoying to deal with as a fan, but I’ll never fault someone for holding out and getting as much as they can. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With each one of these deals, the NFL's QB with the top salary stands for Not For Long...  I remember when Kelly signed his then top salary of 5M/yr and we were all wowed by the number.  5M bonuses are now thrown around as stat achievements.  Crazy.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, buffblue said:

Herbert has all the tools you need. There's just something about him that screams lack of fire/determination to be great. Maybe I'm biased, or maybe it's because I watched him become the definition of Charlie Checkdown last year.

 

Scorned Fantasy Owner

I also suffered at the hand of Herbert in fantasy...i dont dislike him tho, kinda like him.  

 

However, one of my good friends is a chargers die hard and has said almost verbatim what you said.  Being in mahomes division, you have to have that extra spiciness because, like the rest of the AFC east during brady, making the playoffs is even harder without a auto bid for division winners 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BuffaloBillyG said:

And yet...players do make that happen. There are a ton of cases where a player could really cash in and takes a touch less to help field a team around him. Especially when their own success is tied into the skill of the players around them. Now, I'm not saying that Burrow is going to sign for $20M a year and only $50M guaranteed. He will get his. But I'm not going to be shocked if he takes less than he probably should to keep his WR core intact for as long as possible.

 

His cap hit next year already jumps from 11.5M to 29.5.  Can probably convert some of it to a bonus and spread it across the deal, but the new money probably starts at probably 50M per year.  

 

You can take less when you're a bit older and you've comfortably made more money than you can probably even spend.  But the first deal out of the rookie contract is when you chase a bag.  

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, FireChans said:

Has the salary cap percentage allocated changed all that much in say the last 20 years? I honestly don’t know. 

Individual teams must spend a minimum of 89% of the cap on players over a four year period. The league as a whole must spend at least 95% over that period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...