Jump to content

Hopkins released by Arizona (7/16: signed by Titans)


HappyDays

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Big Turk said:

Titans going to turn into the new drought Bills...good enough to go 7-9, 8-8 or 9-7 but not good enough to have any real chance at winning it.

 

Stop wasting time and rebuild.

That was my first reaction, but they’ve got a couple of young QBs they’re trying to develop.  The biggest mistake McBeane made in Josh’s development was running him out there without anything even resembling a competent WR.  At least now the Titans can ease whichever QB they go with by leaning on a solid run game and a legit WR.  That has value even during a rebuild.  It didn’t cost them any draft picks and it’s not a massive contract, so this doesn’t do anything to stunt their rebuild.

  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it’s over.  I hoped we would pull in an offer and he owned up to the words of a stable team, ownership, and franchise QB.

 

His actions as always happens to show they were fake and it was only about $.

 

Too bad and now he can enjoy mediocrity in that dumpster fire in TN.  Sure theyll probably finish 9-8 or something, but Henry gets another year older ya da ya da ya da.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ScottLaw said:

The  obsession with Cook as a big difference make this year is an odd one to me…. He’s a RB and while he does have some speed as a pass catcher, he’s not a WR… fans are overrating his potential impact, IMO.

 

Agree on Kincaid, but it’s a big ask for him to come out the season making a big impact as a rookie…. McBeane have frustrated me again with their approach to the playmakers….. 

Cooks potential is chunk plays. He’s an explosive athlete. We haven’t had those types of athletes on offense.

 

His touches should double.

Edited by Buffalo_Stampede
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

AFC South is garbage. He has a far better chance to make the playoffs with Titans than he did with the Pats.

Bills and Chiefs simply did not have the cap room to compete with the teams with QBs on lesser deals.  

2 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

Cooks potential is chunk plays. He’s an explosive athlete. We haven’t had those types of athletes on offense.

 

His touches should double.

Agreed. Maybe just maybe Dorsey will figure out how to set up a screen as well 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ethan in Cleveland said:

AFC South is garbage. He has a far better chance to make the playoffs with Titans than he did with the Pats.

Bills and Chiefs simply did not have the cap room to compete with the teams with QBs on lesser deals.  

Pretty sure Tannehill's cap hit is like 2x Allen's for 2023

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 1ManRaid said:

 

Of course he's going to pull 1k yards, he's going to be the unquestioned #1 WR in that relatively weak WR room.  No way we get that sort of value out of him on our team at anywhere close to the money the Titans gave him.  In what world would it make sense to give him $10m+/year when we honestly don't really need him?  We added Cook and Kinkaid, Knox will benefit from better O-line play freeing him to go out and catch balls, and our WR signings are underrated.  Davis is fine as WR2.

Beane's reported attempt to get one of the first round WRs in this year's draft, his ultimate selection of Kinkaid, his interest in DHop and OBJ, and Davis's play on the field last season when defenses adjusted to him combined with Digg's frustration in the offense at the end of the season would suggest otherwise...

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GoBills808 said:

Fair on the trade but he did want out of a good situation

Horseshoe up their ass in 2022 aside, I'm not sure that I'd call Kirk "You like that!!!... definition of stat padding" Cousins as your QB a good situation. They're a mediocre to borderline good team that will never get over the hump with him under center.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Billl said:

That was my first reaction, but they’ve got a couple of young QBs they’re trying to develop.  The biggest mistake McBeane made in Josh’s development was running him out there without anything even resembling a competent WR.  At least now the Titans can ease whichever QB they go with by leaning on a solid run game and a legit WR.  That has value even during a rebuild.  It didn’t cost them any draft picks and it’s not a massive contract, so this doesn’t do anything to stunt their rebuild.

Stefon Diggs literally came in year two of joshes development

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Billl said:

That was my first reaction, but they’ve got a couple of young QBs they’re trying to develop.  The biggest mistake McBeane made in Josh’s development was running him out there without anything even resembling a competent WR.  At least now the Titans can ease whichever QB they go with by leaning on a solid run game and a legit WR.  That has value even during a rebuild.  It didn’t cost them any draft picks and it’s not a massive contract, so this doesn’t do anything to stunt their rebuild.

 

Neither of them will amount to much. Willis should never step on an NFL field again. Levi's is meh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

Stefon Diggs literally came in year two of joshes development

Year 3, actually. Allen started 2018, Diggs first year in Buffalo was 2020. I don't think the mistake was in the WR corp in 2018, though, I think it was in the QB room. They were undergoing a roster makeover. Allen's first season as a Bill was not supposed to be his first season starting, but for the mess that was AJ McCarron and Nate Peterman forcing him into action, when he truly did have no one to throw to. 2019 he had John Brown and Cole Beasely, so I would hardly say he was "without anything even resembling a competent WR" as @Billl states, though he may have been soley referencing 2018.

Edited by transient
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deals like this show such little foresight. Is Hopkins currently a HOF'er? I would say no. 1 Super Bowl and all of a sudden he is. Over the course of their life don't you think a HOF'er easily makes up the $ difference between signing with a good team and a bad team? Appearances, media deals, endorsements etc. Seems like a no brainer to me. We will never hear from Hopkins again now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Doc said:

 

Dang, forgot about Levis.  That's 2-day 2 QBs they've taken in successive drafts.

I kinda like it. who knows (doubtful) it works out, but something we shouldve been doing during the drought! this type of strategy couldve easily landed us russell wilson. that said **** the titans. not cause of DH or their drafts, just cause i truly hate that team!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, HappyDays said:

 

I looked at the Chiefs salary cap table. No you can't.

 

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/kansas-city-chiefs/cap/

 

MVS is the only obvious choice but his dead cap hit is almost equivalent to his cap hit, and they signed him last year.

 

I chose Poyer, Hines, and Settle as my Bills examples because they are all players who were seen as reasonable candidates to cut or let walk heading into the offseason. Beane instead chose to bring them all back. With Hines and Settle he unwisely gave them pay cuts instead of cutting them outright and letting them find out for themselves how poor their market would be.

 

 

Gabe Davis had critical drops in each of the 3 regular season games we lost last year. Miami he dropped a TD, NYJ he dropped a critical 3rd down and dropped the final 4th and forever bomb, Minnesota I admittedly don't remember his drop but he is recorded as having a drop in that game.

 

If any one of those catches is made, we are likely the #1 seed last year even accounting for everything else that went wrong.

 

Of course there were multiple reasons that we lost games last year, but in Hopkins we had a realistic way of immediately fixing one of those problems. Pointing out other flaws on the team last year adds nothing to the conversation.

 

It's possible we can still get to the Super Bowl with Davis as the #2 target, but such a feat hasn't been accomplished in at least the last 6 seasons.

You're really going out of your way on this:

1. Hines and Settle: didn't both these guys carry cap hits if cut?  Do you recall the savings?  Which players do we target to replace them, what would have been their cap hits VS these 2 players?

 

2. Poyer: very few thought we'd be able to resign him, then when we did, most thought his cap hits were good values.  He and Hyde formed a top 5 safety tandem, and when Jordan missed games LY, we were a different defense.  He's worth the value he brings, and leadership in the secondary.

 

3. KC: you can't give them the benefit of the doubt with MVS contract (dead cap), then not Buffalo.  Beane made decisions on all players you mentioned, before Dhop became a FA. 

 

4. Gabe: all games you mentioned were lost for several reasons, to pin it on a Gabe drop is just a vendetta. 

    a. Miami: heat exhaustion, OL played on 

         a torn ACL, etc. End of half and game           clock mgt

    b. Jets: Josh worst game of season. Dline (as I mentioned) got ran over, Jaquan missed several key tackles that would ha e stopped drives, OL surrenders pressure all game/sacks on mostly 4 man rushes.

   c. Vikings: you really think Gabe cost us this game.  This is definition of having a vendetta and focusing on 1 player.  Our defense gave up several "game changing" plays, from Cam Lewis to poor tackling, and then the QB sneak that blew the game.

 

You're being unrealistic/biased in your opinion.  And who cares if we clinched the #1 seed LY, we were destined to be defeated by either Cincy or KC in the AFCCG, if we even got past Jacksonville. 

 

Our play in the trenches almost cost us Miami game in December and playoffs, not to mention the losses to Jets and Bengals (playoffs).  We aren't winning a SB until we get better up front, which is why Beane has spent the resources he has to get better there.  Now, go ahead and debate his choices, which haven't been great, but he's focused on the right area of need(s).

    

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...