Jump to content

Dawson Knox - he improved greatly, but was it enough? 2022 is his contract year


Hapless Bills Fan

Recommended Posts

On 1/30/2022 at 1:12 PM, Hapless Bills Fan said:

This was spurred by comments I made in the Gronk thread

 

Knox improved greatly this season, but did he improve enough?

 

When you look at his productivity per game, it's an improvement, but a smaller improvement than one might like to see

 

In 2020, he had 40.5 snaps per game. 

In 2021, he had 61.1 snaps per game (87% of offensive snaps)

That's a 51% increase in snaps per game.

 

In 2020, he had 2.2 receptions per game

In 2021, he had 3.3 receptions per game

That's a 50% increase in receptions per game

 

In 2020, he gained 24 yards per game

In 2021, he gained 39 yards per game

That's a 63% increase in yards per game

 

But the  bottom line - while 587 yds is much better productivity than 287 yds last year, his productivity in the passing game improved only slightly relative to the increased number of snaps he saw. 

 

I don't have a good sense as to how often he was used in the passing game (or open) relative to how much he was asked to block.

 

He improved in other ways, of course:

 

His catch % improved markedly, from 54.5% to 69%

So did his yards per target from 6.5 to 8.3

 

His drops stayed constant, 3, which means as a percentage of targets, they improved from 9.1% to 5.6%

Most critically - last year he had 2 fumbles.  This year he did not fumble.

 

I'm not Joe Expert, but to my perception his blocking showed a big improvement this season, as did his route running to the point where they actually were able to line him up as a receiver.  His physicality as a route runner improved markedly, as well.

 

How was he relative to other TE across the league?  I had to pull data from PFR and sort it myself to get this. 

 

Among TE, Knox was:

13th for Y/G with 39

14th for Y/Tgt with 8.3

15th for Y/R with 12

14th for 1D with 41

28th in Catch% (of TE with more than 25 targets) at 69%

Tied for 1st in TD with 9 (4 way tie)

 

So except in TDs, kind of middling

 

Obviously Knox has developed into a competent NFL TE who shows flashes of better.  And some of the above comparison is unfair, as it lumps him in with TE who are primarily WR while Knox is asked to block quite a bit.

 

This is Knox's contract year, and while I think he's worth the $2.7M he'll count against the cap in 2022, does his production merit a big payday?  Being the #12-18 TE would slot him in currently for an AAV around $6.5-8M AAV, or a contract between $16M and $29M

 

IMHO, this is reason to draft a young TE in what is supposed to be a deep TE draft class, because while Knox has improved, it seems to me that he has not yet become that Star TE we were hoping to draft and develop.  He has not become Allen's Kelce or Kittle or Andrews, or even Goeddert or Waller.  He is a good young TE, though.

 

Thoughts?

 

Good post. I will add the TE rankings from Football Outsiders (Knox ranked 8th in overall value):

 

1727996235_DawsonKnoxDYAR(2).thumb.jpg.fe266538009ea5888f1cc961058dfbb0.jpg

 

For those unfamiliar with the categories:

 

DYAR, or Defense-adjusted Yards Above Replacement. This gives the value of the performance on plays where this TE caught the ball, compared to a replacement-level TE in the same game situations and then translated into yardage. YAR is related to DYAR, but isn't adjusted based on opponent

 

DVOA, or Defense-adjusted Value Over Average. This number represents value, per play, over an average TE in the same game situations. The more positive the DVOA rating, the better the player's performance. VOA is related to DVOA, but isn't adjusted based on opponent

 

The simple version: DYAR means a tight end with more total value. DVOA means a tight end with more value per play.

 

Effective Yards (EYds) translate DVOA into a yards per attempt figure. This provides an easy comparison: in general, players with more Effective Yards than standard yards played better than standard stats would otherwise indicate

 

Catch Rate represents the percentage of passes to this receiver completed.

 

Of the top ten listed in the FO chart above, Knox had the 2nd fewest targets and receptions, but had the 2nd highest TD%.

 

I believe Knox was moving into the top tier of TEs in the league this year. I think he is one of the more physically gifted tight ends who was, arguabl much more raw coming out of college. I think he is going to really evolve into a top 5 TE this year. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting and relevant snippet from a Buff News article today reviewing the offense in 2021:

 

Quote

 

This season, the use of the four wide set dropped to 7% overall, third in the NFL. But that’s deceiving. It was only 2.5% the last 11 games, after the Jacksonville loss. The league average for 10 personnel was 1.8%, according to Sharp Football.

 

The explanation was simple. Dawson Knox. He developed into an all-around asset at tight end, and the Bills couldn’t take him off the field. Knox played 87% of the snaps in the 17 games he played. Last year, Knox played 45% of the snaps. He ranked 15th among NFL tight ends in receiving yards and tied for second in touchdowns by tight ends.

 

“Yes,” Daboll said, referring to the simple explanation. “We’ve talked about this before, the tight end position is – I’m not saying it’s a dying breed but it certainly is different than it used to be, particularly at the collegiate level. Dawson was a guy who never put his hand in the ground. He was basically a big slot receiver at Ole Miss. Obviously a walk-on quarterback. To make the transition he’s made in his short time here I think speaks volumes – No. 1, to him and the work he’s put in. And No. 2, to Rob Boras, his position coach. He’s a good player for us. When you have a tight end, there’s more offense you can run. But you have to have confidence and faith in that guy, and we certainly do with Dawson.”

 

 

As Daboll said, good all-around TEs are tough to find, and Knox developed into a good one pretty quickly. His star is still on the rise. He wasn't a top-5 TE in the league last year but some team will pay him with the expectation that he will continue to develop into one. He'll be tough to keep but man, I sure want him to stick around.

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/3/2022 at 12:03 PM, JakeFrommStateFarm said:

The biggest problem with Knox is that he's not a natural pass catcher which is holding Josh back.  Josh can't really use him as a safety valve.

 

I would put a transition tag on him and let him test the market.

 

If he's offered too much money, let him go.  If the money is reasonable 4-5 million, bring him back.

 

Either way you still have to go back to the draft and find your Dallas Goedert.

This. He makes exceptional contested catches, he just isn’t fluid. Does anyone think he could have a ten catch 100 yd game? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, recovery96 said:

This. He makes exceptional contested catches, he just isn’t fluid. Does anyone think he could have a ten catch 100 yd game? 

 

He's had a 5 catch 117 yard game, a 6 catch 80 yard game, a 7 catch 60 yard game and a 5 catch 89 yard game... just this past season. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, ArdmoreRyno said:

 

He's had a 5 catch 117 yard game, a 6 catch 80 yard game, a 7 catch 60 yard game and a 5 catch 89 yard game... just this past season. 

Yea, the point is he is not a possession receiver, he isn’t going to have a ten catch game, at least where he is right now at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/4/2022 at 10:37 AM, billsfan1959 said:

 

Good post. I will add the TE rankings from Football Outsiders (Knox ranked 8th in overall value):

 

1727996235_DawsonKnoxDYAR(2).thumb.jpg.fe266538009ea5888f1cc961058dfbb0.jpg

 

For those unfamiliar with the categories:

 

DYAR, or Defense-adjusted Yards Above Replacement. This gives the value of the performance on plays where this TE caught the ball, compared to a replacement-level TE in the same game situations and then translated into yardage. YAR is related to DYAR, but isn't adjusted based on opponent

 

DVOA, or Defense-adjusted Value Over Average. This number represents value, per play, over an average TE in the same game situations. The more positive the DVOA rating, the better the player's performance. VOA is related to DVOA, but isn't adjusted based on opponent

 

The simple version: DYAR means a tight end with more total value. DVOA means a tight end with more value per play.

 

Effective Yards (EYds) translate DVOA into a yards per attempt figure. This provides an easy comparison: in general, players with more Effective Yards than standard yards played better than standard stats would otherwise indicate

 

Catch Rate represents the percentage of passes to this receiver completed.

 

Of the top ten listed in the FO chart above, Knox had the 2nd fewest targets and receptions, but had the 2nd highest TD%.

 

I believe Knox was moving into the top tier of TEs in the league this year. I think he is one of the more physically gifted tight ends who was, arguabl much more raw coming out of college. I think he is going to really evolve into a top 5 TE this year. 

Thanks for the info.  TEs seem to be getting paid these days.  I see Knox as a guy who is in the fat part of the bell curve amongst TEs, but those guys are still getting surprisingly fat contracts.  From a value standpoint it makes sense that Knox does very well since he is on his rookie contract.  I’m a lot less excited about what that value would be if he was getting paid north of $10M/season.  We will have to wait and see the contract he gets and who signs him to it. 

 

Side note, my daughter has waited on him (restaurant) and said that he is very nice.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel pretty strongly that this dude is going to be elite soon. He is already pretty much the best tight end we have ever had. 

 

It doesn't mean you don't keep looking, because this is the kind of guy someone offers an absurd contract to. Knox's first 3 years are on par with everything Hunter Henry was doing. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, BarleyNY said:

Thanks for the info.  TEs seem to be getting paid these days.  I see Knox as a guy who is in the fat part of the bell curve amongst TEs, but those guys are still getting surprisingly fat contracts.  From a value standpoint it makes sense that Knox does very well since he is on his rookie contract.  I’m a lot less excited about what that value would be if he was getting paid north of $10M/season.  We will have to wait and see the contract he gets and who signs him to it. 

 

Side note, my daughter has waited on him (restaurant) and said that he is very nice.

I hope the FO is not taking the "wait and see" approach.  Pay the man, and pay him early.  It's the advantage you get from having drafted him.   The move is to ink your good draft picks a year early to market price deals.   The player likes it because they get big money a year early.  The team gets continuity and helps maintain/stregthen the culture.  Dawson is a keeper and the Bills FO needs to recognize it now.

 

And I think you should get over the sticker shock because TE's are already going north of $10M.  Jonnu and Hunter around $12M last year.  The market will be set for Knox with Schultz and Tonyan.  The Bills will need to be in that area and do it a year early so Knox never hits the open market.  

 

The FO has stated in the past, they like to sign their own.  Knox is in that wheelhouse.  Additionally, TEs take time to develop, you don't want to start from scratch again.  To me, it's a no-brainer to apply the FO principle to Knox, where it starts to get murky is with Edmunds and Singletary.

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/7/2022 at 6:33 PM, recovery96 said:

This. He makes exceptional contested catches, he just isn’t fluid. Does anyone think he could have a ten catch 100 yd game? 

Does it matter when he is scoring TDs at that rate? And yes I think it’s easily doable, but who gets less targets to accomplish that? It’s kind of a problem that really isn’t a problem in the grand scheme of the offense. 

 

Go Bills!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posted some harsh criticism on Knox prior to this season, and was annoyed when we cut Hollister with no proven TE on the roster. Knox made me eat my words. He's not only good enough, but he's the stud TE we've been looking for forever. I hope we do lock him up a year early.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure why so many are placing such a huge importance on the #2 TE to the point where they want to spend to get one.

 

This offense features the slot role more so than 2 TE's going over the middle.

 

I can see it in the red zone or run/pass out of the 12 formation but would try that with a late draft pick or JAG at the tail of FA.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, filthymcnasty08 said:

Not sure why so many are placing such a huge importance on the #2 TE to the point where they want to spend to get one.

 

This offense features the slot role more so than 2 TE's going over the middle.

 

I can see it in the red zone or run/pass out of the 12 formation but would try that with a late draft pick or JAG at the tail of FA.

 

 

The TE2 spot is a big weakness. 

It's a long season and TE is a position that gets beat up.  People upstream were complaining about Knox in the Jax game - Knox wasn't ready, he was coming back from the hand injury too early because we had nothing behind him - Sweeney was a complete failure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Einstein's Dog said:

The TE2 spot is a big weakness. 

It's a long season and TE is a position that gets beat up.  People upstream were complaining about Knox in the Jax game - Knox wasn't ready, he was coming back from the hand injury too early because we had nothing behind him - Sweeney was a complete failure.

Fair enough!  Good point.  I see some are ready to spend on Gisecki, Gronk, Ertz, etc.  Those are not cheap trinkets considering our cap and other needs.  

 

Gerald Everett is probably the more appropriate level imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, filthymcnasty08 said:

Not sure why so many are placing such a huge importance on the #2 TE to the point where they want to spend to get one.

 

This offense features the slot role more so than 2 TE's going over the middle.

 

I can see it in the red zone or run/pass out of the 12 formation but would try that with a late draft pick or JAG at the tail of FA.

 

 

 

I'd think the offense needs to continually evolve. Players will come and go as that's the nature of the biz. Scheme may change because of this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ian Thomas of the Panthers has been mentioned a bunch of times here by others. I think he is a really good number 2 tight ed to pair with Knox. There was also a lot of smoke from us around Thomas during pre-draft times. I like Tommy Sweeney, but the fact that he was a frequent healthy scratch at the end there is a worrisome. 

 

Gerald Everett was mentioned in the thread. He did a lot of good things fr the Rams as their number two. If we are going to see some Rams wrinkles courtesy of Kromer, then he could make some sense as well. 

 

Knox is the clear 1. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, aceman_16 said:

In addition to his catching qstats I would mix in his win rates as a blocker. They are very good in relation to other TEs. He is a very good overall TE.

 

I was actually looking for this type of information.  Josh Allen says he's the best blocking TE in football, though of course Josh will always talk up his guys.

 

2 hours ago, MrEpsYtown said:

Ian Thomas of the Panthers has been mentioned a bunch of times here by others. I think he is a really good number 2 tight ed to pair with Knox. There was also a lot of smoke from us around Thomas during pre-draft times. I like Tommy Sweeney, but the fact that he was a frequent healthy scratch at the end there is a worrisome. 

 

Gerald Everett was mentioned in the thread. He did a lot of good things fr the Rams as their number two. If we are going to see some Rams wrinkles courtesy of Kromer, then he could make some sense as well. 

 

Knox is the clear 1. 

 

It's more than worrisome.  It's basically saying "he couldn't contribute enough in the short passing game to counteract his deficiencies as a blocker". 

 

He basically didn't see an offensive snap after Week 15, and was also inactive Week 14.  So inactive 4 of the last 5 games.  He had no receptions and only 2 targets after Week 9.

 

He doesn't play ST either.  He's gone.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I havent read all 10 pages but I think OP is discounting how impressive it is that Knox was able to increase his snap count significantly (increased confidence in his ability by the coaches) while also improving receiving stats. Its like the difference between being an off-the-bench spot up shooter and a ball handler volume shooter but having a better 3 point %.

 

The fact that hes on the field more means they trust him blocking, instead of having to bring in Lee Smith. Leaving him on the field more means uncertainty by the defense if hes out there for runs and passes. This is all stuff that wont show up in his personal stats.

 

Knox absolutely earns his contract if he repeats in 2022

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jletha said:

I havent read all 10 pages but I think OP is discounting how impressive it is that Knox was able to increase his snap count significantly (increased confidence in his ability by the coaches) while also improving receiving stats. Its like the difference between being an off-the-bench spot up shooter and a ball handler volume shooter but having a better 3 point %.

 

The fact that hes on the field more means they trust him blocking, instead of having to bring in Lee Smith. Leaving him on the field more means uncertainty by the defense if hes out there for runs and passes. This is all stuff that wont show up in his personal stats.

 

Knox absolutely earns his contract if he repeats in 2022

Agree with all you said up until the last line.  I've seen enough and I hope the FO has as well.  You lock Knox up this season.  Do not let him hit Free Agency.  Pay him respectable, the market rate.  Give him Schultz/Tonyan money along w signing bonus or guarantee and do it early. 

 

Knox is a poster child for sign your own.  He's worked hard, culture guy.  Emerging talent.  Pay him.  Pay him now.  A secondary advantage of getting a draft pick that works out is the ability to negotiate and sign them a year early to market rates.  The market just keeps going up, so getting them a year early is actually a bargain.  Just did it with Josh, you do it with Knox.  You give Josh/Dorsey/Brady some continuity - players for the long haul.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Knox’s trajectory has been up consistently from his rookie campaign . He was good enough to start his 1st season, though blocking was often suspect and had very real issues with dropped balls. He came in stronger his 2nd season, notably better in blocking and had numerous Marvelous catches while still being plagued by drops through lack of concentration. This past season he took a noticeable step up in concentration and receptions, more nuanced still in blocking/shielding defenders away from ball carriers, still more chiseled and noticeably better at making difficult catches (over the shoulder/tipped balls/reaching-diving-falling) to the tune of 13 TDs!

 

Is he elite? I don’t know what nuance separates great from elite, but he’s established himself as our starting tight end and an electrifying player on an incredibly potent Offense.  If the underlying question in this thread is ‘do we offer him a great 2nd contract?’, I say yes.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Knox was still a bit inconsistent this year, but I always lean towards keeping a player that scores TDs. Knox is our best weapon in the red zone not named Josh Allen. He was tied for the lead in most receiving TDs scored by a TE despite missing 2 games. His TDs are not easily replaceable. I'd pay him.

 

Edited by HappyDays
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...