Jump to content

49ers tried to trade 3rd overall pick and a bunch of other stuff for Aaron Rodgers, Packers said no


Logic

Recommended Posts

Shows what they think of Love. 

 

If you truly believe he is the heir apparent and QB of the future. You take the 3rd overall pick, keep your other 1st round pick, and begin to build around him. Take Kyle Pitts at 3, now you have Adams and Pitts. 

 

I think them turning this trade down shows they don't think Love is ready.  

 

To be absolutely fair, I think Rodgers is the best QB to ever grace a football field and he's still currently the best playing. However, if you truly believe Love is your guy, this could set you up for 10 years and not have to deal with Rodgers contract yearly for the next 4-6. 

Edited by warrior9
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Process said:

Hm, Maybe try reading it again? Lmao. 

 

I don't think they should trade Rodgers. 

I did read it again.  What am I missing?  There is zero indication that they intend to trade Rodgers...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Brennan Huff said:

The Packers should have jumped on it. Then trade the pick to a QB needy team. They drafted Jordan Love last year so obviously they’ve already started the post Rodgers plan. 

That was their thinking a year ago.  Maybe after a year watching Love, they realized he isn't what they hoped.  And so, with a team last year that almost made it to the SB, the Packers have to decide whether to ride Rodgers another season and hope for the best, or step back a bit and let the future come to them.  It's a tough choice, but the key factor is the Packers understanding what they've got with Love.

  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Bangarang said:


The 49ers don’t have a 1st round pick next year. They traded their 1st in 2022 and 2023 to move up to 3.

 

Rodgers may be 37 but he’s one of the best in the league. Losing him would take the Packers from being a SB contender to a mediocre team at best. 


Garoppolo is not an exciting replacement either and I doubt the 49ers are willing to part with any of their best players as part of this deal. 
 

There’s really not much to consider here. 



the dude your opinion GIF


(I forgot about the "no 1st round pick next year" bit. You're probably right overall, but I'll never wave the white flag because I'm a stubborn sonofabitch)
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Bangarang said:


The 49ers don’t have a 1st round pick next year. They traded their 1st in 2022 and 2023 to move up to 3.

 

Rodgers may be 37 but he’s one of the best in the league. Losing him would take the Packers from being a SB contender to a mediocre team at best. 


Garoppolo is not an exciting replacement either and I doubt the 49ers are willing to part with any of their best players as part of this deal. 
 

There’s really not much to consider here. 


You are right, and that’s a problem! The Packers haven’t built a Super Bowl caliber team around Rodgers. If you have arguably the best QB ever, and if he’s 37, there needs to be a serious plan in place to either a) win the Super Bowl now, or b), trade him away and use the picks to build for the future. Instead of either of those choices, the Packers have evidently opted for c) use Rodgers’ greatness to elevate an otherwise mediocre team to be almost, but not quite, good enough to win a Super Bowl. Option c is what the Packers have chosen pretty much Rodgers’ whole career. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Brennan Huff said:


I’m wondering if they can’t trade Jimmy G this weekend are they just going to have him killed? Seems like they really don’t want him on the roster...

I’m certain Bill Belichick knows someone who can take care of that for them...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, RyanC883 said:

so, the packers get a TON of picks, plus Gimmy J, and they said no.  Then why on earth did they draft a QB in the first round last year?  Just Packers are wtf.  

 

Well to be fair, they didn't know he wouldn't have it when they drafted him.  I think they assumed that they would always just be able to replace one HOF with another, and so on...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Brennan Huff said:

The Packers should have jumped on it. Then trade the pick to a QB needy team. They drafted Jordan Love last year so obviously they’ve already started the post Rodgers plan. 

Nah, the NFC is ripe fir the taking, good shot at a SB appearance this year with Rodgers, pretty unlikely with Love or Jimmy G.  Also, if they thought love was ready to take them to the promised land, I’m sure it would have been an option, but you are asking them to give up one of the top 3 QBs in the game right now for one of the top 3 QBs (no clue which ones) in this draft,  would you? Not this guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could see Rodgers just retiring and hosting Jeopardy 

 

He's got plenty of $$ and Green Bay just refuses to actually go for it all, preferring to halfway everything. 

 

Drafting Love was totally, completely stupid. If Love was a 3rd rounder or less, OK then MAYBE it makes sense. But for a team in the NFC, where there are only a few real contenders, to not use your high picks on playmakers to WIN something now is totally indefensible. 

 

The plan is to have Love for the QB "in a few years" and they use prime assets to get that guy in when they can't quite seem to get over the NFC Title Game hump?

 

Drafting Love was guaranteed to anger Rodgers, plus they get nothing for that 1st round pick for years. 

Edited by TheFunPolice
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheFunPolice said:

I could see Rodgers just retiring and hosting Jeopardy 

 

He's got plenty of $$ and Green Bay just refuses to actually go for it all, preferring to halfway everything. 

 

Drafting Love was totally, completely stupid. If Love was a 3rd rounder or less, OK then MAYBE it makes sense. But for a team in the NFL, where there are only a few real contenders, to not use your high picks on playmakers to WIN something now is totally indefensible. 

 

The plan is to have Love for the QB "in a few years" and they use prime assets to get that guy in when they can't quite seem to get over the NFC Title Game hump?

Would jeopardy even want him? He was pretty awful. Way too dry and monotone.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, B-Man said:

 

 

All (other) 3 AFC EAST teams mentioned on NFL Live as possible spots for Rodgers.

 

:wallbash:

 

I only think Miami is in play. NE could make an offer but Miami can blow them away so I wouldn't worry about that. The Jets have the draft capital but they are going ot want to rebuild with a rookie and the rest of their draft picks as Rodgers doesn't fit their timeline esp if they have to trade away most of their assets to get him. Miami on the other hand can offer 3-4 premium picks in the 2021 draft tonight and two firsts in 2022. 

1 minute ago, TheFunPolice said:

Jets would make more sense for Rodgers than Miami. 

 

Now, If I'm Jacksonville do I make a phone call? 

 

Why do the Jets make more sense? Their roster is pretty bad and Rodgers won't make them that much better if they have to give up most of their picks to get Rodgers. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, billsfan89 said:

 

I only think Miami is in play. NE could make an offer but Miami can blow them away so I wouldn't worry about that. The Jets have the draft capital but they are going ot want to rebuild with a rookie and the rest of their draft picks as Rodgers doesn't fit their timeline esp if they have to trade away most of their assets to get him. Miami on the other hand can offer 3-4 premium picks in the 2021 draft tonight and two firsts in 2022. 

 

Why do the Jets make more sense? Their roster is pretty bad and Rodgers won't make them that much better if they have to give up most of their picks to get Rodgers. 

 

I was thinking from Green Bay's perspective. This way they would have the #2 overall pick to take a safety for that defense! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder sometimes about these teams...

 

If you know you have a real issue with Rodgers AND you love your young QB so much, you'll never be able to cash in and get a boatload in return more than you will now. 

 

By digging in, the Packers lose. Rodgers can just retire. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, TheFunPolice said:

I could see Rodgers just retiring and hosting Jeopardy 

 

He's got plenty of $$ and Green Bay just refuses to actually go for it all, preferring to halfway everything. 

 

Drafting Love was totally, completely stupid. If Love was a 3rd rounder or less, OK then MAYBE it makes sense. But for a team in the NFC, where there are only a few real contenders, to not use your high picks on playmakers to WIN something now is totally indefensible. 

 

The plan is to have Love for the QB "in a few years" and they use prime assets to get that guy in when they can't quite seem to get over the NFC Title Game hump?

 

Drafting Love was guaranteed to anger Rodgers, plus they get nothing for that 1st round pick for years. 

They basically punted on their entire 2020 draft. Backup QB, backup RB, and a healthy scratch TE with their first 3 picks.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DCOrange said:

They basically punted on their entire 2020 draft. Backup QB, backup RB, and a healthy scratch TE with their first 3 picks.

 

It's incredible how badly they drafted in 2020.

 

For a team that never signs free agents they need to hit on the draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Logic said:

So for all those claiming that I was nuts to say the Packers should consider accepting the 49ers deal,  there's this...
 

 

 

I would rather take a better deal from Miami. Give me pick 6, 18, 36 and 81 in 2021 and their 1st and the 49ers 1st in 2022 along with swapping picks in the second round. The Packers have Jordan Love at QB, go all in with him and get 4 premium picks and two future firsts to surround him with talent on a rookie deal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Logic said:

So for all those claiming that I was nuts to say the Packers should consider accepting the 49ers deal,  there's this...
 

 

 

Weird timing.

 

Word leaks the 49ers have offered a trade for Aaron Rodgers (which was turned down), and within a couple hours Rogers is complaining about the Packers organization.  Could it be possible that he is pushing the team to reconsider?

 

Don't forget that Rodgers is a California-native, and played college there.  I believe his family lives in California.  Coming into the NFL, it was expected for months that San Francisco was going to draft him at #1 (they eventually went with Alex Smith instead).  There may be a part of him that always wanted to play for the Niners.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

And why does anyone think he'll go to an AFCE team?  The 49'ers have the best offer out there and I doubt he'd want to play for the Jets.

 

What exactly is the 49ers offer? Jimmy G, pick 3, a pair of future 2nd round picks and what else? Unless Bosa is in there I wouldn't really be that fond of that offer over what Miami can offer which is 3 picks in the top 36 (including pick 6) and a pair of future firsts in 2022 among other picks. 

Edited by billsfan89
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...