Jump to content

Texans and Cowboys players test positive


Cal

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, ScottLaw said:

We are talking about young, healthy athletes though.... The real concern would be if some of these coaches came down with it....and yes you are right it can be lethal to more than half of America, considering most don’t have clue what a healthy diet is or how to take care of themselves. 
 

People under 40 are not immune to Covid 19.   They are dying as well.  It is a myth that younger people don't have to worry.  We should all be taking precautions.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, longtimebillsfan said:

People under 40 are not immune to Covid 19.   They are dying as well.  It is a myth that younger people don't have to worry.  We should all be taking precautions.


Immune From Covid, no. With no Comorbidities though, U40 is an extremely low risk group for death. Some healthy U40 people have died but those cases are the “dog bites man” “shark attack” stories that get the news their eyeballs. 
 

U40 people may get ill from Covid. That’s a fact. Nearly all of them will recover. 
 

 

Edited by Sundancer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, ALLEN-2-DIGGS-TD!! said:

Might be a good move for the NFL to allow teams to carry more than 53 players as a buffer. Thoughts?

If players start testing positive to the point where they need larger rosters to replace those battling covid, there probably isn’t going to be NFL football this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Sundancer said:


Immune From Covid, no. With no Comorbidities though, U40 is an extremely low risk group for death. Some healthy U40 people have died but those cases are the “dog bites man” “shark attack” stories that get the news their eyeballs. 
 

U40 people may get ill from Covid. That’s a fact. Nearly all of them will recover. 
 

 


Waht about Tommy Boy? He is not U40!!!! Think of his life!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Doc Brown said:

Or they pass it on to a buddy who passes it to his girlfriend who passes it to her friend who passes it to her father who passes it to his cousin who happens to work in a nursing home.  Now five people in a nursing home die because this world class athlete unknowingly passed it to his girlfriend.

Cmon Doc, logically where do we stop this. Person A  works in a grocery store,  person B comes into store, person B girlfriends father's wife is asymptomatic covid, person B is now asymptomatic positive, ,Person B gives to Person A...and run your scenario from there. Should we require all groceries to be delivered to your home so no one in a nursing ever gets sick again? Tell me where the line is drawn...I am all for a TOTAL lockdown for 3 weeks...and i mean n o one leaves their freaking house, and essentials are delivered ala China...absent of that..we just whistling at the wind

12 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

That’s how I interpreted it, also - I didn’t think he was talking about the chance of an individual player dying, but the chance that if all 2,176 players in the league contracted COVID-19 at least 1 or 2 might die or at least be seriously ill for months.  

 

I’m not sure on the math of 50% chance - it read like “TLAR stats” to me.  But bearing in mind that a bunch of the players on both sides of the line may be obese (high BMI, high body fat % to “beef up), some probably have hypertension (two principle risk factors) and a bunch of players are closer to 30 than 20.  So if all 2000-ish players in the league got covid-19, from the current best estimates I’ve seen on hospitalization/morbidity in that age range and what I’ve heard from physicians in Atlanta and StL and Boston on the relatively young healthy people they see coming into hospital, I think there’s a realistic chance that perhaps 10-20 would require hospitalization and 1 or 2 might die.

 

I don’t know, but I have the sense that would be unusual for an NFL season, that it would typically be maybe 3 or 4 players are hospitalized for different conditions and no one dies.

 

 

 

 

We have 4-8 deaths per average in high school football every year...lets shut it down to...forever. As a matter of fact,  according to this study football causes detah by ALS and Alzheimer's, so by the logic of "someone may die" we should shut it down,  and it needs to be permanent.

 

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/249912

11 hours ago, BringBackFergy said:

Exactly. But Zeke didn’t disclose it (based on my reading of his Tweet). He needs to understand once he is intending to access a facility where others are gathered (team workout room, office, house for sale, bank, etc) others have a right to know who is infected or who exhibits signs of infection. Once that happens, all bets are off when it comes to health privacy. Open book. Will become the “Scarlett letter” of “C” (even though most would agree better to get it now and know you had it)

Pretty soon all of your biological  and genetic info is going to known in "order to contain the virus"...and then people will really get cranky when they cant get health insurance or life insurance

11 hours ago, ScottLaw said:

We are talking about young, healthy athletes though.... The real concern would be if some of these coaches came down with it....and yes you are right it can be lethal to more than half of America, considering most don’t have clue what a healthy diet is or how to take care of themselves. 
 

lethal to half of America??? My lord, the panic porn has grown deep in our society. [Edit: please see my response -Hap]

8 hours ago, longtimebillsfan said:

People under 40 are not immune to Covid 19.   They are dying as well.  It is a myth that younger people don't have to worry.  We should all be taking precautions.

we should take precautions...no worries there. But people under 40 die for a ton of reasons, but  the infesteimal number caused by Covid is a blip..the vast majority of deaths 10-45 is caused by unintentional injury...so if we all just stayed home forever that would take that away!

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

Can you say more about this as it seems relevant?  Are the players and coaches expected to be a closed social group and kind of isolate outside practice/facility?  Or are they going to pubs/socializing freely on their off time?

 

From the official policy

 

"The foundation is laid with strict guidelines in the players’ own homes. They must always consider their own health, therefore showing responsibility for their team and all people. Crowds of people are to be avoided, they are to stay at home and in their own family. Just as millions of people are currently doing, they should pay attention to common hygiene measures."

 

More can be found here:

https://www.bundesliga.com/en/bundesliga/news/hygiene-concept-explained-dfl-taskforce-season-restart-coronavirus-11150

 

It should be noted that the policy was developed before the re-start. Since last weekend, the restrictions have been relaxed a bit. E.g., the substitute players on the bench do not have to wear masks anymore, as long as they practice social distancing. There is even talk about having some fans in the stadium for the German Cup final at the end of June. I do not know if the relaxation of the restrictions also addresses the social life of the players and coaches.

 

Interestingly, some players see it as advantage to play in an empty stadium. Joshua Kimmich (Bayern Munich, German National Team): “The positive thing is you can speak to everybody and maybe the focus is more on the game. It’s not like a show.”

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sundancer said:


Immune From Covid, no. With no Comorbidities though, U40 is an extremely low risk group for death. Some healthy U40 people have died but those cases are the “dog bites man” “shark attack” stories that get the news their eyeballs. 
 

U40 people may get ill from Covid. That’s a fact. Nearly all of them will recover. 

 

From the Football perspective, though, if a “mild, treat at home” case like Von Miller can knock him out for two weeks and take him a couple more to work back into shape, a more serious case could be like a season-ending injury.  

 

I “get” the viewpoint of people that in the NFL, you always have risk of injury including season ending injury - but this is risk on top of the injury risk.  I don’t see how it can fail to be a challenge, and yes, I think a bit of an expanded roster would be a reasonable mitigation

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said:

lethal to half of America??? My lord, the panic porn has grown deep in our society.

 

I think he could have phrased it more clearly, but you are misunderstanding Mr WEO, who is actually a medical professional and grounded in these things.....

 

....In context, it’s clear what’s meant is we’re back-and-forth discussing comorbidities, and his point is that roughly half of America has the comorbidities that have been associated with poor outcome/death from covid-19.  Those being obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and heart disease.  They are somewhat, but not totally, associated - meaning that when summed together, they pretty much do impact about half of America.

 

A fact which is sometimes glossed over when various media talk as though Covid can only be a serious disease if you’re so old you’re on death’s doorstep or have rare conditions.

That’s just not true.   

Football relevance: the obesity and for all we know hypertension may affect a significant # of NFL players (albeit if hypertension, I’m sure it’s controlled for them to be cleared to play and controlled hypertension does not appear to be as significant a co-morbidity.  Highly athletic, fit obesity may likewise pose less of a risk factor (though I haven’t seen any data).

 

Appreciate if you could ratchet back the sensitivity on your trigger finger for shooting at “panic porn” whatever that means.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

(he does have asthma, but overall, asthma does not seem to be a covid-19 risk factor)

 

  I will disagree with this part, although I'm not sure if it is listed officially or not.  Due to the shortness of breath and lower oxygen levels, COVID definitely exacerbates asthma issues.  My MIL was hospitalized for a week with COVID due to the low oxygen levels and having asthma. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, sabres431 said:

 

  I will disagree with this part, although I'm not sure if it is listed officially or not.  Due to the shortness of breath and lower oxygen levels, COVID definitely exacerbates asthma issues.  My MIL was hospitalized for a week with COVID due to the low oxygen levels and having asthma. 

 

I hope your MIL is recovered and doing well.

 

The UK NHS did a big study where they looked at everyone hospitalized or passed from Covid and did what statisticians do to sort out what were the true risk factors of poor outcomes.  I need to go back and look to see what endpoints they used - may have been the Big Guy (death) and ICU admission.

 

The bottom line was that asthma on its own did not sort as a risk factor!  Neither did cigarette smoking.  Both surprising findings, but there it is.  It’s linked in the Covid-19 threads.  Of course, statistics apply to populations and that’s not to dismiss or denigrate the experience of an individual asthmatic, or to say their disease wasn’t worse than it would have been had they not had asthma.  I suspect Von Miller would concur.

 

Again, all the best to your MIL and fam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

I hope your MIL is recovered and doing well.

 

The UK NHS did a big study where they looked at everyone hospitalized or passed from Covid and did what statisticians do to sort out what were the true risk factors of poor outcomes.  I need to go back and look to see what endpoints they used - may have been the Big Guy (death) and ICU admission.

 

The bottom line was that asthma on its own did not sort as a risk factor!  Neither did cigarette smoking.  Both surprising findings, but there it is.  It’s linked in the Covid-19 threads.  Of course, statistics apply to populations and that’s not to dismiss or denigrate the experience of an individual asthmatic, or to say their disease wasn’t worse than it would have been had they not had asthma.

 

Again, all the best to your MIL and fam

 

I think she is still recovering from the shortness of breath.  That seems to take awhile to return to normal, if it ever does.  The whole family tested positive.  SIL lives next door and they treated two houses as one.  After they(MIL/FIL) knew they were exposed, they had a birthday party at MILs house. This was after my wife(a pharmacist at a local hospital) advised that they should stay separate.  Needless to say, all tested positive AND had symptoms within 3-4 days.  That's 4 adults, 3 children 16 & under.  Also the person that initially exposed them also exposed her parents who tested positive.  So 1 person took down 6 Adults and 3 children, 2 of which were hospitalized.  Her grandfather passed away after contracting COVID while in the hospital.  He was not the one who exposed the rest of the family.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

I think he could have phrased it more clearly, but you are misunderstanding Mr WEO, who is actually a medical professional and grounded in these things.....

 

....In context, it’s clear what’s meant is we’re back-and-forth discussing comorbidities, and his point is that roughly half of America has the comorbidities that have been associated with poor outcome/death from covid-19.  Those being obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and heart disease.  They are somewhat, but not totally, associated - meaning that when summed together, they pretty much do impact about half of America.

 

A fact which is sometimes glossed over when various media talk as though Covid can only be a serious disease if you’re so old you’re on death’s doorstep or have rare conditions.

That’s just not true.   

Football relevance: the obesity and for all we know hypertension may affect a significant # of NFL players (albeit if hypertension, I’m sure it’s controlled for them to be cleared to play and controlled hypertension does not appear to be as significant a co-morbidity.  Highly athletic, fit obesity may likewise pose less of a risk factor (though I haven’t seen any data).

 

Appreciate if you could ratchet back the sensitivity on your trigger finger for shooting at “panic porn” whatever that means.

all i would request is you ask people who say this is "lethal" to half America always ratchet back the sensitivity and sensationalism as well...

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said:

all i would request is you ask people who say this is "lethal" to half America always ratchet back the sensitivity and sensationalism as well...

 

Fair point.
 

10 minutes ago, sabres431 said:

 

I think she is still recovering from the shortness of breath.  That seems to take awhile to return to normal, if it ever does.  The whole family tested positive.  SIL lives next door and they treated two houses as one.  After they(MIL/FIL) knew they were exposed, they had a birthday party at MILs house. This was after my wife(a pharmacist at a local hospital) advised that they should stay separate.  Needless to say, all tested positive AND had symptoms within 3-4 days.  That's 4 adults, 3 children 16 & under.  Also the person that initially exposed them also exposed her parents who tested positive.  So 1 person took down 6 Adults and 3 children, 2 of which were hospitalized.  Her grandfather passed away after contracting COVID while in the hospital.  He was not the one who exposed the rest of the family.

 

What a horrid story.  I’m sorry for your loss, and so sorry they caused so much illness.  I’ll never understand people who know they are exposed, even have symptoms, and continue to go on about optional activities (gym, parties, Dairy Queens, etc). ESPECIALLY if a knowledgeable trusted family member explains to them.  They could have had their birthday celebration in a responsible way.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Fair point.
 

 

What a horrid story.  I’m sorry for your loss, and so sorry they caused so much illness.  I’ll never understand people who know they are exposed, even have symptoms, and continue to go on about optional activities (gym, parties, Dairy Queens, etc). ESPECIALLY if a knowledgeable trusted family member explains to them.  They could have had their birthday celebration in a responsible way.

I forgot the part where when MIL came down with symptoms she was on the #%#%$ golf course!  After speaking with their daughter, they called another medical "professional" in the family who spouts every conspiracy theory about COVID under the sun who told them the tests were probably wrong.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

I think he could have phrased it more clearly, but you are misunderstanding Mr WEO, who is actually a medical professional and grounded in these things.....

 

....In context, it’s clear what’s meant is we’re back-and-forth discussing comorbidities, and his point is that roughly half of America has the comorbidities that have been associated with poor outcome/death from covid-19.  Those being obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and heart disease.  They are somewhat, but not totally, associated - meaning that when summed together, they pretty much do impact about half of America.

 

A fact which is sometimes glossed over when various media talk as though Covid can only be a serious disease if you’re so old you’re on death’s doorstep or have rare conditions.

That’s just not true.   

Football relevance: the obesity and for all we know hypertension may affect a significant # of NFL players (albeit if hypertension, I’m sure it’s controlled for them to be cleared to play and controlled hypertension does not appear to be as significant a co-morbidity.  Highly athletic, fit obesity may likewise pose less of a risk factor (though I haven’t seen any data).

 

Appreciate if you could ratchet back the sensitivity on your trigger finger for shooting at “panic porn” whatever that means.

 

With this stance, how can you justify playing any sport?  Doesn't your stance feel a little conservative to you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

.

 

Appreciate if you could ratchet back the sensitivity on your trigger finger for shooting at “panic porn” whatever that means.

 

Panic porn refers to the penchant for those in charge to only accentuate the negative side the virus and its risks.  If people in charge were as even handed as you in providing the full set of information, we'd be having a different discussion.   You can attribute whatever reason you want to why there's a greater propensity for fear-mongering, despite emerging evidence that we have long passed the peak.

 

I also question the probabilities of the worst case outcomes for the league.   Those statistics assume that all the players get infected, which is inconsistent with how the virus has spread.   I also think the NFL's approach of allowing teams to stay in their facilities is much safer than what NBA & NHL are proposing for a single sports campus.   

 

In any event, Bundesliga is a good example to monitor.  When training resumed in May, there were a handful of staffers who were positive, but after remediation, the league has generally stayed clean.  No reason to think that NFL will suffer a much more severe outbreak than what's happening in Germany.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, GG said:

 

Panic porn refers to the penchant for those in charge to only accentuate the negative side the virus and its risks.  If people in charge were as even handed as you in providing the full set of information, we'd be having a different discussion.   You can attribute whatever reason you want to why there's a greater propensity for fear-mongering, despite emerging evidence that we have long passed the peak.

 

I also question the probabilities of the worst case outcomes for the league.   Those statistics assume that all the players get infected, which is inconsistent with how the virus has spread.   I also think the NFL's approach of allowing teams to stay in their facilities is much safer than what NBA & NHL are proposing for a single sports campus.   

 

In any event, Bundesliga is a good example to monitor.  When training resumed in May, there were a handful of staffers who were positive, but after remediation, the league has generally stayed clean.  No reason to think that NFL will suffer a much more severe outbreak than what's happening in Germany.

 

Soccer isn't anywhere near to being a good example to monitor. There are a lot less players available, for one thing. They are much more spread out naturally within the game.

 

You also have societal differences. In Germany, people generally are going to follow rules. In the US, not so much. Evidence for that would be how relatively successful the German lockdown has been, against many other countries, the US included.

 

A soccer team will probably have no more than 24 people involved in an actual game. The 11 starters, then 5 replacements, then about the same in coaches/managers/ fitness guys. (per team)

 

There are 53 guys in the playing roster on a Sunday. Probably a minimum of a dozen coaches, plus assorted trainers/waterboys. That's even before we get into the areas of contact, from within the game itself. Soccer doesn't have numerous instances of guys piling on after tackles, or in search of a fumbled football. It will be an awful lot easier for the virus to spread through an NFL roster, than it will be through a soccer team.

 

That isn't to say it will happen, just that it could, and sports generally aren't a low risk occupation, due to the amount of air expended when straining. They also aren't at the top of the risk tree either, but I think you could say that their risk factor would be fairly consistent.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 123719bwiqrb said:

With this stance, how can you justify playing any sport?  Doesn't your stance feel a little conservative to you?

 

Maybe you can clarify what you see as my "stance"?  Because I don't know that I have a "stance" but I do know that I've seen people trying to "speed read" between my lines, which usually has more to do with what they think than what I think in my experience - not trying to say this applies to you.  But if my "stance" feels "conservative" to you when as far as I know I haven't come out and said what it is, it may.

 

Facts:  At this point, there have been enough patients to sort what the risk factors for serious outcome (hospitalization etc) seem to be.  Those risk factors statistically affect ~50% of the US population.

 

Basketball and soccer players are pretty much required to be mean, low-body-fat aerobic machines.  In contrast, around half of the players on each side of an NFL game play on the lines, and "Blocking Enough Daylight" matters, they're encouraged to "beef up".  Also, a good number of NFL players are closer to 30 than 20.  Not quite a fact, but an observation that's pretty straightforward to research independently.    Then there's the coaches, many of whom appear to spend far more time watching film than caring optimally for their own health (observation of NFL sidelines and interviews).

 

It's also the experience of every single physician I know or my friends know who are actively seeing covid-19 patients in hospital that they are seeing a wide spread of age groups come in seriously ill, including previously healthy people.  Yet if you flip on some channels, they talk as if this is only an "old person's disease".

 

What to do with that info, I don't know.  I want to see the NFL have a season.  I want to see colleges reopen, for that matter - I have "skin" in that game.  I see issues.  Just like college students, I don't think it's a realistic expectation that these guys will be staying home at night or socializing with a closed group and not out partying and clubbing, especially the younger guys.  And they tend to run in packs.  Some of them will get infected.  How will that be handled?

Those aren't questions for us to answer, but how the league and NFLPA handle them depends upon whether or not having a season will be a success.  If they expect these guys to wear N95 masks while they're pumping iron, it ain't gonna work too well (my prediction, from knowing what it feels like to wear a well-fit N95)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GG said:

Panic porn refers to the penchant for those in charge to only accentuate the negative side the virus and its risks.  If people in charge were as even handed as you in providing the full set of information, we'd be having a different discussion.   You can attribute whatever reason you want to why there's a greater propensity for fear-mongering, despite emerging evidence that we have long passed the peak.

 

I would like to defer the peak/post peak question to the covid-19 discussion thread, rather than respond, if you can roll with that.  Thanks.  I accept that's what "panic porn" means to you and I appreciate the kind words, but I have been quite fervently attacked (not necessarily here) for distributing "panic porn" or "gloom and doom" myself when I think I'm providing even-handed information - so I'm not sure that's actually how everyone uses the term.

 

Quote

I also question the probabilities of the worst case outcomes for the league.   Those statistics assume that all the players get infected, which is inconsistent with how the virus has spread.   I also think the NFL's approach of allowing teams to stay in their facilities is much safer than what NBA & NHL are proposing for a single sports campus.   

 

In any event, Bundesliga is a good example to monitor.  When training resumed in May, there were a handful of staffers who were positive, but after remediation, the league has generally stayed clean.  No reason to think that NFL will suffer a much more severe outbreak than what's happening in Germany.

 

I don't know what the worst case outcomes are for the league  - no season?  curtailed season?  play a full season and have a body count?  How do you see it?

 

In any event, I don't think it's reasonable or realistic to expect the players to "cloister up" and not go out and club and party.  So what happens will depend upon their communities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Bferra13 said:

Man this threads a trainwreck. 

Bc the moderators on TWS are hypocrites 

4 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

I think he could have phrased it more clearly, but you are misunderstanding Mr WEO, who is actually a medical professional and grounded in these things.....

 

....In context, it’s clear what’s meant is we’re back-and-forth discussing comorbidities, and his point is that roughly half of America has the comorbidities that have been associated with poor outcome/death from covid-19.  Those being obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and heart disease.  They are somewhat, but not totally, associated - meaning that when summed together, they pretty much do impact about half of America.

 

A fact which is sometimes glossed over when various media talk as though Covid can only be a serious disease if you’re so old you’re on death’s doorstep or have rare conditions.

That’s just not true.   

Football relevance: the obesity and for all we know hypertension may affect a significant # of NFL players (albeit if hypertension, I’m sure it’s controlled for them to be cleared to play and controlled hypertension does not appear to be as significant a co-morbidity.  Highly athletic, fit obesity may likewise pose less of a risk factor (though I haven’t seen any data).

 

Appreciate if you could ratchet back the sensitivity on your trigger finger for shooting at “panic porn” whatever that means.

So you get to continue talking about coronavirus and making it into a thread about this but other people aren’t? As long as they agree with you right? You’re way too biased to be a moderator. How about some objectivity please. 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Overweight, no; obesity yes as a covid-19 risk factor.  Of course obesity tends to coincide with hypertension and type II diabetes but it aparently still shows as a risk factor when they try to sort out the confounding factors. 

Football relevance: since "blocking enough daylight" is considered a Good Thing in a DL or OLman and even TE are expected to have a bit of heft to them, those guys may not be the "lean mean health machines" that we might commonly expect of pro-athletes and some of them by body fat % would probably count as obese - some of them may be in higher "risk categories" than one thinks

 

If you look at retired OLmen like Eric Woods, wow do some of them look skinny next to their playing weights

 

 

Um.  Hypertension per se is not a risk factor that "leads to diabetes" [note to ScottLaw: correlation is not causation. current thinking common underlying cause]
Quite a number of people have hypertension who are not obese or even overweight.  For some people, losing some weight can reduce hypertension, but not for all people
 

And I think Gugny's point may have been that a lot of Americans eat fast food regularly and are not obese or even overweight

Again, you keep citing ‘misinformation’ yet don’t even realize you’re just promoting your own POV. You’re not the authority in any of this and your cited authorities aren’t objectively experts. If you can’t handle that you shouldn’t be allowed to moderate anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Stampede2020 said:

Again, you keep citing ‘misinformation’ yet don’t even realize you’re just promoting your own POV. You’re not the authority in any of this and your cited authorities aren’t objectively experts. If you can’t handle that you shouldn’t be allowed to moderate anything.

 

Dude, if you have complaints about me as a moderator, @SDS the board owner receives PMs.  There's also the Report function, where mods by consensus don't clear reports about ourselves so the other mods can see them and weigh in (this takes place in the moderator's forum, not on the main board for those who don't know).

 

If you're curious about my background or how I see it, you could also PM me.  Fair warning, I expect people who PM to be civil: avoid insults, bad language etc.

 

One way or the other, you will stop derailing this thread by making it about me.  I say the same to anyone who was engaging in repeated posts specifically directed at any individual poster.  Once happens, twice could be a habit, three times belongs in PM one way or another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GoBills808 said:

How do I file counter complaint on behalf of Hapless Billsfan for wasting time dealing w idiot poster...where is that button

Awww poor whittle GoBills808 is ? 

 

Maybe learn how to handle alternate POVs instead of promoting shutting them down? Echo chambers are no good for anyone 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Stampede2020 said:

Awww poor whittle GoBills808 is ? 

 

Maybe learn how to handle alternate POVs instead of promoting shutting them down? Echo chambers are no good for anyone 

I didn’t know you existed until this thread.  I wish I had kept it that way.  ?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/15/2020 at 9:28 AM, Logic said:

I remain pessimistic about a full season happening.

I stick with my position that the season will be started, but will not get the chance to finish.



 

 

I think fans in the stands is a pipe dream at this point. I think if the NFL hopes to start a new season it will be without fans

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Stampede2020 said:

Awww poor whittle GoBills808 is ? 

 

Maybe learn how to handle alternate POVs instead of promoting shutting them down? Echo chambers are no good for anyone 

Your ‘alternative POV’ might be better served checking out the OTW COVID discussion wherein the moderator in question has dedicated an extraordinary amount of time and professional expertise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GoBills808 said:

Your ‘alternative POV’ might be better served checking out the OTW COVID discussion wherein the moderator in question has dedicated an extraordinary amount of time and professional expertise. 

Oh ok sounds good 

6 minutes ago, NewEra said:

I didn’t know you existed until this thread.  I wish I had kept it that way.  ?

Oh darn I’m so sorry for you. You gonna manage bud?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, plenzmd1 said:

Cmon Doc, logically where do we stop this. Person A  works in a grocery store,  person B comes into store, person B girlfriends father's wife is asymptomatic covid, person B is now asymptomatic positive, ,Person B gives to Person A...and run your scenario from there. Should we require all groceries to be delivered to your home so no one in a nursing ever gets sick again? Tell me where the line is drawn...I am all for a TOTAL lockdown for 3 weeks...and i mean n o one leaves their freaking house, and essentials are delivered ala China...absent of that..we just whistling at the wind

I agree with you completely. I was just referring to the simplistic post where the poster said, "Now they have to have at least an 85 IQ not to to visit the in firmed,  old folks and nursing homes while during infectious stages."  Does he realize that he shouldn't visit ANYBODY while infected and self quarantine? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/15/2020 at 12:21 PM, Cal said:

Per NFL.com

 

Need to call off the 2020 season imo. You can't socially distance in a team sport like football. Its inevitable that players will continue to test positive.

 

 

Or those two players can separate themselves for 2 weeks.

 

It gets to this whole debate, which transcends sports: does everyone have to be quarantined or just the sick?  

 

I believe, especially at this point, we all have to take safety precautions, but when some get sick everything should not be shut down.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dollars 2 donuts said:

 

 

Or those two players can separate themselves for 2 weeks.

 

It gets to this whole debate, which transcends sports: does everyone have to be quarantined or just the sick?  

 

I believe, especially at this point, we all have to take safety precautions, but when some get sick everything should not be shut down.


It gets tricky fast, though, even if you're only quarantining the sick.

Let's say it's a crucial divisional matchup to decide a playoff spot in the AFC. For the sake of argument, let's say its Bills vs Patriots.

The Patriots enter the game with no COVID infections and a pretty complete roster. The Bills, on the other hand, see Josh Allen, Stefon Diggs, and Tremaine Edmunds sidelined due to COVID. Is this the type of season we even want to watch? Sure, you can argue that there are injuries every year, but I think there's a good chance COVID infections will be much more prevalent.

Players also come into such close contact, both in locker rooms and on the field, that it seems unrealistic to think that COVID won't affect wide swaths of players as the season wears along. Many analysts expect there to be so many positive COVID cases throughout the season that each team would have to have a whole "taxi squad" of replacement players at the ready. How far into the bench of replacement players do we want to go? At what point is it no longer a fair representation of each team and, thus, a risk not worth putting people through?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure NFL teams will test players as they report to camp, and monitor symptoms closely day by day.  That may not completely eliminate the risk, but should keep the risk at acceptable levels.  Players who have it now should be over it and immune by the time camps start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TigerJ said:

I'm sure NFL teams will test players as they report to camp, and monitor symptoms closely day by day.  That may not completely eliminate the risk, but should keep the risk at acceptable levels.  Players who have it now should be over it and immune by the time camps start.


As I understand it, there is not yet proof that COVID infection confers future immunity.

From the CDC website:

"Are you immune to the coronavirus disease after recovering from it?


The immune response, including duration of immunity, to SARS-CoV-2 infection is not yet understood."
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Buddo said:

 

Soccer isn't anywhere near to being a good example to monitor. There are a lot less players available, for one thing. They are much more spread out naturally within the game.

 

You also have societal differences. In Germany, people generally are going to follow rules. In the US, not so much. Evidence for that would be how relatively successful the German lockdown has been, against many other countries, the US included.

 

A soccer team will probably have no more than 24 people involved in an actual game. The 11 starters, then 5 replacements, then about the same in coaches/managers/ fitness guys. (per team)

 

There are 53 guys in the playing roster on a Sunday. Probably a minimum of a dozen coaches, plus assorted trainers/waterboys. That's even before we get into the areas of contact, from within the game itself. Soccer doesn't have numerous instances of guys piling on after tackles, or in search of a fumbled football. It will be an awful lot easier for the virus to spread through an NFL roster, than it will be through a soccer team.

 

That isn't to say it will happen, just that it could, and sports generally aren't a low risk occupation, due to the amount of air expended when straining. They also aren't at the top of the risk tree either, but I think you could say that their risk factor would be fairly consistent.

 

 

The primary avenue for spreading the virus is in a closely confined space.  That would be the locker room or the training facility.   In this, there's far less difference for potential exposure between soccer & NFL football facilities.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...