Jump to content

The Big Gamble: Hydroxychloroquine


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, GG said:

So essentially, you're applauding a technocrat's cold-hearted calculation to preserve mask capacity, even though he knew the masks are effective in slowing down the spread and that would have been most impactful in February. 

 

But let's post a few more memes to deflect from the decisions and advice given in February.  

 

Hey everyone, go see a movie!


Um I didn’t hire the guy - I’m just telling you what Fauci said. He also reports to Trump. Don’t get all pissy with me when Trump ignored the intelligence in November 2019.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Warcodered said:

alternatively it could of caused an even greater shortage of masks having even worse effect on the medical professionals we need during this pandemic. In the end maybe he was right maybe he was wrong but he made a choice with the information he had and when that information indicated he should change that policy he did. What difficult choice have you made in the last 6 months?

Why not tell people to make their own masks? That there was a shortage and those who couldn’t buy masks should make their own?

 

Oh, because we have to lie to the American people because we know what’s best for them. And then wonder why they have lost trust in us. Classic move.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems like the mask shortage was caused by China, who bought up all of the world's PE while hiding the fact that the virus was present and not capable of being transmitted by people. Idiots like BillSlime perpetuate this November 2019 lie because the truth doesn't fit their narrative. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, BillStime said:


Um I didn’t hire the guy - I’m just telling you what Fauci said. He also reports to Trump. Don’t get all pissy with me when Trump ignored the intelligence in November 2019.


Don’t get all pissy when the election didn’t go your way. Do better next time. 
 

And a “wise” man once said “elections have consequences”. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Warcodered said:

alternatively it could of caused an even greater shortage of masks having even worse effect on the medical professionals we need during this pandemic. In the end maybe he was right maybe he was wrong but he made a choice with the information he had and when that information indicated he should change that policy he did. What difficult choice have you made in the last 6 months?

 

At least you admit that he made a difficult cold-hearted choice when he knew that masks were effective in slowing the spread.  Of course, that choice wasn't as bad as forcing nursing homes to take in sick patients or transferring sick patients across hospitals who weren't prepared for the cases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, GG said:

 

At least you admit that he made a difficult cold-hearted choice when he knew that masks were effective in slowing the spread.  Of course, that choice wasn't as bad as forcing nursing homes to take in sick patients or transferring sick patients across hospitals who weren't prepared for the cases.

I don't really see how him making a decision trying to do what would help us the most in this crisis is cold hearted. I can see how it is difficult and something that likely weighs on him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

I don't really see how him making a decision trying to do what would help us the most in this crisis is cold hearted. I can see how it is difficult and something that likely weighs on him.

 

It also reinforces the narrative that you can't trust leaders.

 

My mother who is 76 years old bought masks in February when everyone was saying that it wasn't necessary because Italian women born during fascism know never to trust their leaders and she was proven right.

Edited by meazza
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

I don't really see how him making a decision trying to do what would help us the most in this crisis is cold hearted. I can see how it is difficult and something that likely weighs on him.

 

Of course it was cold hearted, because it was a risk analysis calculation he made by protecting the healthcare delivery side instead of the prevention side.   I'm not blaming him for the decision, because he was in a tough spot and he knew that he was dispensing the wrong advice.   

 

But It's also an instructive note to the mouth breathers here, who are quick to assign blame without examining the full real life considerations of what goes into a pandemic response.

 

Remember the news story that floated quickly where scientists postulated that there would have been tens of thousands LESS infections and commensurate deaths in the Northeast if preventative measures would have been in place even a week before March 13.   Why do you think that story died quickly?

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well lookie here now. But is that a bonafide Clinical trial? I’ve been told that nothing can be trusted unless it’s undergone real clinical trials. Several posters were adamant that this doesn’t work and it can even kill people. You know, kill, like what this virus does. 

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Nanker said:

Well lookie here now. But is that a bonafide Clinical trial? I’ve been told that nothing can be trusted unless it’s undergone real clinical trials. Several posters were adamant that this doesn’t work and it can even kill people. You know, kill, like what this virus does. 

 

 

...Wait a minute...

 

...what are you saying?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, BillStime said:


Um I didn’t hire the guy - I’m just telling you what Fauci said. He also reports to Trump. Don’t get all pissy with me when Trump ignored the intelligence in November 2019.

https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covide-19-social-policy

I found this interesting and only looked through some of it but what the math says is that there is no major infection difference from masks. In all of the studies done fully the only way to say safe is social distancing and then hand sanitizer. One of the studies actual showed that people who wore masks for long periods every day were sick more often, likely due to touching mask after it was on face. Also since you like science you will now be anti mask person, correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covide-19-social-policy

I found this interesting and only looked through some of it but what the math says is that there is no major infection difference from masks. In all of the studies done fully the only way to say safe is social distancing and then hand sanitizer. One of the studies actual showed that people who wore masks for long periods every day were sick more often, likely due to touching mask after it was on face. Also since you like science you will now be anti mask person, correct?


I have no idea how effective but why risk it? I also live in a state that mandates use. All lives matter, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BillStime said:


I have no idea how effective but why risk it? I also live in a state that mandates use. All lives matter, right?

I am telling you that the studies- which they had at least 10 sited- all show that masks do not help and often cause illness. I thought you were the science guy and I find it interesting that when the science shows you are wrong you ignore it. Lastly don't say ALM to people it will get you stabbed by a liberal.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

I am telling you that the studies- which they had at least 10 sited- all show that masks do not help and often cause illness. I thought you were the science guy and I find it interesting that when the science shows you are wrong you ignore it. Lastly don't say ALM to people it will get you stabbed by a liberal.


Assume whatever you want 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/3/2020 at 1:49 PM, Buffalo Timmy said:

https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covide-19-social-policy

I found this interesting and only looked through some of it but what the math says is that there is no major infection difference from masks. In all of the studies done fully the only way to say safe is social distancing and then hand sanitizer. One of the studies actual showed that people who wore masks for long periods every day were sick more often, likely due to touching mask after it was on face. Also since you like science you will now be anti mask person, correct?

 

What you have linked there is a commentary on some biased site; it is not a scientific study. The guy has his own agenda (look him up on Wikipedia) and cherry-picks scientific papers that show the lack of protection by masks. The cited papers themselves are legit (peer-reviewed and published in a scientific journal). However, there are significantly more papers that come to the opposite conclusion. To judge for yourself, go to https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ and do your own search. PubMed indexes all scientific peer-reviewed journals in the medical and life sciences.  

Edited by DrW
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, DrW said:

 

What you have linked there is a commentary on some biased site; it is not a scientific study. The guy has his own agenda (look him up on Wikipedia) and cherry-picks scientific papers that show the lack of protection by masks. The cited papers themselves are legit (peer-reviewed and published in a scientific journal). However, there are significantly more papers that come to the opposite conclusion. To judge for yourself, go to https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ and do your own search. PubMed indexes all scientific peer-reviewed journals in the medical and life sciences.  

As you have stated the papers are legit and come to a completely different conclusion of a science that has "been decided". Mask are to protect everyone not wearing the mask and many people defeat the purpose of masks by touching them after touching dirty surfaces. I do wear a mask but it is not nearly as important as social distancing.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

As you have stated the papers are legit and come to a completely different conclusion of a science that has "been decided". Mask are to protect everyone not wearing the mask and many people defeat the purpose of masks by touching them after touching dirty surfaces. I do wear a mask but it is not nearly as important as social distancing.

 

Nobody can prevent you from listening just to voices confirming your point of view.

Edited by DrW
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, DrW said:

 

Nobody can prevent you from listening just to voices confirming your point of view.

The facts speak for the themselves.  It's in the data.  It's no accident that deaths are down even though cases are up.  Doctors don't listen to trolls on message boards or MSM.  Doctors prescribe medicine that will help their patients and they adjust their strategy as they learn.  Thank goodness.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, realtruelove said:

The facts speak for the themselves.  It's in the data.  It's no accident that deaths are down even though cases are up.  Doctors don't listen to trolls on message boards or MSM.  Doctors prescribe medicine that will help their patients and they adjust their strategy as they learn.  Thank goodness.   

 

You missed the point. I responded to a post discussing masks. Do you really think that there are many doctors who tell their patients that masks are useless? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, DrW said:

 

Nobody can prevent you from listening just to voices confirming your point of view.

You stated it is legitimate studies and simply stated the guy has a bias, which from what I read is not conservative but liberal. I am not stating it is the be all end all but these must be considered when the newer studies are not double blind or peer reviewed fully. In medicine I follow science but even full doctors can disagree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DrW said:

 

You missed the point. I responded to a post discussing masks. Do you really think that there are many doctors who tell their patients that masks are useless? 

Do you think we should should mandate masks moving forward to prevent catching and spreading the flu?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, realtruelove said:

Do you think we should should mandate masks moving forward to prevent catching and spreading the flu?

 

As long as a vaccine is available, I do not think it is necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


 


 

Good Lord....do you Trump taint lickers ever google the guys you quote?

 

This dudes employer had to pay a $12 million fine for his fraudulent practices....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Reality Check said:

Yikes! I’m wearing a MASK next time I go anywhere near a doctor! 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TH3 said:

Good Lord....do you Trump taint lickers ever google the guys you quote?

 

This dudes employer had to pay a $12 million fine for his fraudulent practices....

 

His employer.  LOL! 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, TH3 said:

Good Lord....do you Trump taint lickers ever google the guys you quote?

 

This dudes employer had to pay a $12 million fine for his fraudulent practices....

He was so popular of a surgeon that he could not keep up with demand so his hospital set up a unit where he was doing 4 surgeries at once where he was bouncing from one to the next. He was not sued for poor results but people paid the hospital a premium for him and got a different doctor because he is exceptional. Dude is currently the head of surgery at one of the top 100 hospitals in the USA but please tell me about how unqualified he is 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

He was so popular of a surgeon that he could not keep up with demand so his hospital set up a unit where he was doing 4 surgeries at once where he was bouncing from one to the next. He was not sued for poor results but people paid the hospital a premium for him and got a different doctor because he is exceptional. Dude is currently the head of surgery at one of the top 100 hospitals in the USA but please tell me about how unqualified he is 

 

Oh, the hypocrisy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

He was so popular of a surgeon that he could not keep up with demand so his hospital set up a unit where he was doing 4 surgeries at once where he was bouncing from one to the next. He was not sued for poor results but people paid the hospital a premium for him and got a different doctor because he is exceptional. Dude is currently the head of surgery at one of the top 100 hospitals in the USA but please tell me about how unqualified he is 

He was sued for fraud....and lost...because he LIED to his patients.

 

So a Fox News Prostrate surgeon is an expert on pandemics?

 

He literally just tweeted “POTUS has done everything right in response to the pandemic”

 

Please tell me how qualified this tweet is......
 

 

Edited by TH3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TH3 said:

He was sued for fraud....and lost...because he LIED to his patients.

 

So a Fox News Prostrate surgeon is an expert on pandemics?

 

He literally just tweeted “POTUS has done everything right in response to the pandemic”

 

Please tell me how qualified this tweet is......
 

 

He is the head of surgery at Lenox Hill- to state he is a Fox News talking head is like saying Obama is some basketball fan- it is either done to be humorous, as ESPN did it, or astoundingly stupid. I do disagree that Trump has done everything right since he clearly should have stopped Cuomo from putting the sick back in with the most likely to die.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

He is the head of surgery at Lenox Hill- to state he is a Fox News talking head is like saying Obama is some basketball fan- it is either done to be humorous, as ESPN did it, or astoundingly stupid. I do disagree that Trump has done everything right since he clearly should have stopped Cuomo from putting the sick back in with the most likely to die.

 

You may want to update your information. Samadi is now at St. Francis on Long Island.

https://nypost.com/2019/11/23/embattled-surgeon-dr-david-samadi-has-a-new-gig-on-long-island/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...