Jump to content

Why wasn't Duke Williams active?


HailMary

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Livinginthepast said:

I gave up trying to convince people on here. All Duke has done since he got here was work hard and perform and all the organization has done is disrespect him.  Duke should have made the team at the end of the preseason instead he's cut. He finally gets his chance off the practice squad and produces in the exact game on the line scenario he thrives in, scores the winning TD.   He gets 2 more games (one of which he got hurt) and then never again.  The idiotic assessment by the coaching and management of this guy has cost this team wins. Today was another example of where he could have been used but instead we have the useless Mckenzie or mediocre Foster.

Exactly, that td in Tennessee was huge and thank god we won that game otherwise we are looking at not making it into the playoffs. But fans will constantly tell us Daboll and McDermott always make the right decisions. Gore is also done by the way. this guy shouldn’t even be in the nfl at this point. He’s a hall of famer but stick a fork in that guy already. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Best Player Available said:

Just wondering Whats your nfl coaching resume look like? 

Do fans not pay attention to the nfl? There are numerous examples of players looking good in preseason and playing good when they get a chance just to not get a real shot in the game. Then they finally catch a break and low and behold they contribute. See fred Jackson and Stevie Johnson for obvious examples. Come on now. 

Edited by Rocbillsfan1
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Duke may not be the fastest & Duke is not under 5 '10"....my god man...play him in red zone situations.....this monster just has to reach his hands way up in the air and TD!!  He did it before......there was no reason for him being benched IMO....

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rc2catch said:

I don’t think he should be inactive but he’s not going to be this monster game changer some are making him out to be. If our tight ends can’t body a defender and catch a ball I can’t see duke being much more effective. 
Duke doesn’t change much in this game today but of course that’s just my 2 cents. 

Well, catching passes certainly would not have hurt... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rocbillsfan1 said:

Do fans not pay attention to the nfl? There are numerous examples of players looking good in preseason and playing good when they get a chance just to not get a real shot in the game. Then they finally catch a break and low and behold they contribute. See fred Jackson and Stevie Johnson for obvious examples. Come on now. 

Understood. There are also players that look good in pre season. then melt down

when the bullets fly. a single example is Nathan Peterman. Personally, there has to be something

not clicking with Williams. Or they would at least dress him. he cannot be worse than the #4 and 5 scrubs

ahead of him. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, LABILLBACKER said:

We could have used him on that last play. I'll never figure out McD. Peterman plays horrible yet he sticks it out with him for 2 seasons. Duke works hard, earns a spot, plays well over 2 games then is locked in the basement?

This I believe is the same reason for the bias vs Duke. McD insanely stuck with Peterman just like he insanely stuck with useless crazy Zay Jones. These coaches never like to admit a mistake and TBH most of them are not the sharpest knives in the drawer. Add to this some anti CFL bias and Duke is the irrational odd man out, week after week. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Not at the table Karlos said:

You don’t think all those drops contributed to the loss?

It hurt, yes.

 

Our offensive line did not help that much today either.

 

Still, despite all of that, we had a chance to tie this game and send it to overtime, potentially.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, stony said:

Yup. Pretty much this x100

You know like what I’d like to see is a wr that can catch the ball pass the line of scrimmage  . How many did foster and McKenzie have today? How many jet sweeps did foster and McKenzie get today. For the love of god put a freaking wr on the field that can catch and the only one that has done that and shown the skill set for that is duke. I don’t care if he is on the roster next year but next week his ass better be on the active roster. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

 

I respect Joe B but that is stupid take. Duke would never be on the special teams anyway. And besides what does it matter currently, our kick return game is garbage. In addition, he "doesn't strain the defense"?  yeah except when he caught that TD in Tennessee? and the entire point of Duke is he DOESNT NEED Separation to be effective. He can catch contested balls. Good grief, its like the poor guy has been blacklisted with the team and its "company line" media.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Livinginthepast said:

I respect Joe B but that is stupid take. Duke would never be on the special teams anyway. And besides what does it matter currently, our kick return game is garbage. In addition, he "doesn't strain the defense"?  yeah except when he caught that TD in Tennessee? and the entire point of Duke is he DOESNT NEED Separation to be effective. He can catch contested balls. Good grief, its like the poor guy has been blacklisted with the team and its "company line" media.

yet we were starting Kelvin Benjamin last year who is even slower and has hands of stone   There is more to it than this explanation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just going to go in the record ... Duke needs to be activated. Kind of an obvious no brainier . Instead this offense and coaching staff like to see Josh bomb it down the field 40 yards in the wind on 3rd and short. Does anyone remember Eric moulds? Quick slants . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, JROC INTEL said:

I'm just going to go in the record ... Duke needs to be activated. Kind of an obvious no brainier . Instead this offense and coaching staff like to see Josh bomb it down the field 40 yards in the wind on 3rd and short. Does anyone remember Eric moulds? Quick slants . 

Duke is not Moulds.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When we win not much is said about Duke being inactive. Today we lost and I think he could have made a difference. My question is rhetorical but what element does McKenzie bring to the table that we don’t already have out there? It’s his speed. We have enough speed and quickness. What we don’t have is a big bodied WR who can catch. We have guys that can do what McKenzie does but we don’t have guys that can do what Duke does. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Livinginthepast said:

I respect Joe B but that is stupid take. Duke would never be on the special teams anyway. And besides what does it matter currently, our kick return game is garbage. In addition, he "doesn't strain the defense"?  yeah except when he caught that TD in Tennessee? and the entire point of Duke is he DOESNT NEED Separation to be effective. He can catch contested balls. Good grief, its like the poor guy has been blacklisted with the team and its "company line" media.

Bingo to the part in bold. Dude, wrs should be able to separate and get open. Why would you prefer to throw contested pass vs a pass to an open wr? Why? The whole point of throwing a pass is NOT to throw to a guy who's not open. We had a couple of wide open receivers missed and too many dropped balls from OPEN receivers. You think contested throws are a better option?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SJDK said:

When we win not much is said about Duke being inactive. Today we lost and I think he could have made a difference. My question is rhetorical but what element does McKenzie bring to the table that we don’t already have out there? It’s his speed. We have enough speed and quickness. What we don’t have is a big bodied WR who can catch. We have guys that can do what McKenzie does but we don’t have guys that can do what Duke does. 

This^ I think the Duke love around here is crazy. Whenever we talk about needing a big WR, Duke is mentioned like we have Randy Moss on the practice squad or something. I’m trusting the coaches aren’t seeing much from him to make them believe he can contribute. However, what has Foster or McKenzie contributed ? Even if Duke doesn’t shine in practice, it’s clear the other two guys aren’t very useful, so why not give the big WR more of an opportunity? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SJDK said:

When we win not much is said about Duke being inactive. Today we lost and I think he could have made a difference. My question is rhetorical but what element does McKenzie bring to the table that we don’t already have out there? It’s his speed. We have enough speed and quickness. What we don’t have is a big bodied WR who can catch. We have guys that can do what McKenzie does but we don’t have guys that can do what Duke does. 

He probably is the best on our team at having to catch contested balls cuz he's not open. You're right.  Don't think coach likes throws to wrs who aren't open. I know I don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[This is an automated response]

 

As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive topic titles. A single name if far too vague to post as a title and provides little insight into what specifically the post is talking about.The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate.

 

Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Dopey said:

He probably is the best on our team at having to catch contested balls cuz he's not open. You're right.  Don't think coach likes throws to wrs who aren't open. I know I don't.

He got open enough against Tennessee 

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, SJDK said:

He got open enough against Tennessee 

4 catches for 29 yds in 50 snaps vs Tennessee.

68 snaps over 2 more games for 2 more catches and 29 yds. He didn't get open enough when he got the chance. We're not throwing contested balls when others get open on a more regular basis. 6 catches in 118 snaps. He got his chance. He's an injury fill in right now.

Edited by Dopey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Livinginthepast said:

This I believe is the same reason for the bias vs Duke. McD insanely stuck with Peterman just like he insanely stuck with useless crazy Zay Jones. These coaches never like to admit a mistake and TBH most of them are not the sharpest knives in the drawer. Add to this some anti CFL bias and Duke is the irrational odd man out, week after week. 

I agree 100%

Weird that McKenzie wasn't even a draft pick for us.  McD, Daboll and the WR's coach must have their reasons for keeping Duke inactive but it sure seems like it needs a harder look.  It's not like we are lighting up the scoreboard, and it makes sense to try a big receiver package w Foster, Duke and some TE's.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Dopey said:

Bingo to the part in bold. Dude, wrs should be able to separate and get open. Why would you prefer to throw contested pass vs a pass to an open wr? Why? The whole point of throwing a pass is NOT to throw to a guy who's not open. We had a couple of wide open receivers missed and too many dropped balls from OPEN receivers. You think contested throws are a better option?


this exactly. Activating a guy that can’t get open to throw 50/50 balls to all day seems like not a very realistic formula for sustained offensive success. Yet here we are. Every week. The same people. (These people who, btw, do not see Duke in practice, as the coaches do, who are making the (likely) wise decision to park his butt on the inactive list.)

Edited by JoPoy88
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Livinginthepast said:

I respect Joe B but that is stupid take. Duke would never be on the special teams anyway. And besides what does it matter currently, our kick return game is garbage. In addition, he "doesn't strain the defense"?  yeah except when he caught that TD in Tennessee? and the entire point of Duke is he DOESNT NEED Separation to be effective. He can catch contested balls. Good grief, its like the poor guy has been blacklisted with the team and its "company line" media.

 

Totally agree. How does he  not offer anything different than McKenzie when he's got six inches on him? And Foster isn't doing anything anyway. Awful take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MDH said:

If only the coaching staff knew as much as the fans when it comes to Duke Williams.  ?


Foster has 3 catches on the season, it’s not hard to top that. Not sure what’s going on in practice but he is pretty much useless on the field. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...