Jump to content

Bring in Reid Ferguson on obvious passing downs


snafu

Recommended Posts

I know this may not be a well received idea, but sometimes creative solutions are necessary.

I believe our offensive line is more well suited for running plays, not pass protection.  Allen has a cannon for an arm, so now that he's going to be the starting QB, it may make sense to put the long snapper in for 3d down passing plays.  Allen can line up 15 yards behind the line and take the snap, giving him much more time to read the play and make the throw downfield. Groy can be kept in as a fullback to play near the line behind Ferguson.

 

Unconventional, yes, but I'm convinced that it would work.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Haha (+1) 6
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, snafu said:

I know this may not be a well received idea, but sometimes creative solutions are necessary.

I believe our offensive line is more well suited for running plays, not pass protection.  Allen has a cannon for an arm, so now that he's going to be the starting QB, it may make sense to put the long snapper in for 3d down passing plays.  Allen can line up 15 yards behind the line and take the snap, giving him much more time to read the play and make the throw downfield. Groy can be kept in as a fullback to play near the line behind Ferguson.

 

Unconventional, yes, but I'm convinced that it would work.

 

 

  The defense would adjust to the long snapper coming in very easily.  Have a couple DB's slant in on both edges.  A DL comes out and is replaced by a LB for coverage.  I have my fingers crossed that either a TE or WR is ready to emerge for us to pry the defense loose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RochesterRob said:

  The defense would adjust to the long snapper coming in very easily.  Have a couple DB's slant in on both edges.  A DL comes out and is replaced by a LB for coverage.  I have my fingers crossed that either a TE or WR is ready to emerge for us to pry the defense loose.

 

If the DBs slant in, then a receiving RB or a TE would fill in behind them for a pass. LB can't cover Shady out of the backfield. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, snafu said:

I know this may not be a well received idea, but sometimes creative solutions are necessary.

I believe our offensive line is more well suited for running plays, not pass protection.  Allen has a cannon for an arm, so now that he's going to be the starting QB, it may make sense to put the long snapper in for 3d down passing plays.  Allen can line up 15 yards behind the line and take the snap, giving him much more time to read the play and make the throw downfield. Groy can be kept in as a fullback to play near the line behind Ferguson.

 

Unconventional, yes, but I'm convinced that it would work.

 

 

Do you watch much football?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, snafu said:

I know this may not be a well received idea, but sometimes creative solutions are necessary.

I believe our offensive line is more well suited for running plays, not pass protection.  Allen has a cannon for an arm, so now that he's going to be the starting QB, it may make sense to put the long snapper in for 3d down passing plays.  Allen can line up 15 yards behind the line and take the snap, giving him much more time to read the play and make the throw downfield. Groy can be kept in as a fullback to play near the line behind Ferguson.

 

Unconventional, yes, but I'm convinced that it would work.

 

 

 

You do know that the defense will line up over him and blow right through him, knocking him on his ass, right? Just because you put a long snapper in for a regular offensive down doesn't mean he gets the same special teams rule protections.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This puts the long-snapper at a disadvantage (as noted above) and puts him at risk of injury. On punts and FGs, the long-snapper is protected by a rule that says DTs can't line up over the nose of the ball; no such protection exists for non-kicking plays.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, snafu said:

 

If the DBs slant in, then a receiving RB or a TE would fill in behind them for a pass. LB can't cover Shady out of the backfield. 

  The defense no doubt will make it a match of us having to put in 2 or 3 non linemen to block defensive players which I doubt we can do.  If we start putting additional linemen at the LOS that pretty well tips our hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, snafu said:

I know this may not be a well received idea, but sometimes creative solutions are necessary.

I believe our offensive line is more well suited for running plays, not pass protection.  Allen has a cannon for an arm, so now that he's going to be the starting QB, it may make sense to put the long snapper in for 3d down passing plays.  Allen can line up 15 yards behind the line and take the snap, giving him much more time to read the play and make the throw downfield. Groy can be kept in as a fullback to play near the line behind Ferguson.

 

Unconventional, yes, but I'm convinced that it would work.

 

 

 

This is so hilarious that it’s brilliant

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, WhoTom said:

This puts the long-snapper at a disadvantage (as noted above) and puts him at risk of injury. On punts and FGs, the long-snapper is protected by a rule that says DTs can't line up over the nose of the ball; no such protection exists for non-kicking plays.

 

 

What actually triggers this rule going into effect? It seems it would have to be based on the offensive formation.  Since fake punts and fake  field goals are legal plays and there’s no rule against attempting a field goal or punting on first through third down, in theory why couldn’t you line up in field goal or punt formation every down to gain this protection for your long snapper? 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, snafu said:

I know this may not be a well received idea, but sometimes creative solutions are necessary.

I believe our offensive line is more well suited for running plays, not pass protection.  Allen has a cannon for an arm, so now that he's going to be the starting QB, it may make sense to put the long snapper in for 3d down passing plays.  Allen can line up 15 yards behind the line and take the snap, giving him much more time to read the play and make the throw downfield. Groy can be kept in as a fullback to play near the line behind Ferguson.

 

Unconventional, yes, but I'm convinced that it would work.

 

 

 

When Groy gets flagged for holding on first down, allows the sack on second down, Allen will now have to complete the 45-yard pass instead of what's asked for on 3rd and 30.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Koko78 said:

 

You do know that the defense will line up over him and blow right through him, knocking him on his ass, right? Just because you put a long snapper in for a regular offensive down doesn't mean he gets the same special teams rule protections.

 

Yes, I know that. It is why you keep Groy in as a fullback. The fullback and RB would line up in their customary positions. 

 

5 minutes ago, BurpleBull said:

 

When Groy gets flagged for holding on first down, allows the sack on second down, Allen will now have to complete the 45-yard pass instead of what's asked for on 3rd and 30.

 

Allen has a cannon. 

 

1 hour ago, nucci said:

Do you watch much football?

 

Of course I do. Do you? Are you afraid of change? What's going right with the line now?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't matter how good Allen's arm is. No matter what, it is easier to throw the ball 10-15 yards for a first down than 25-30.

 

Essentially, you are asking Allen to convert a 3rd and 25 instead of a 3rd and 10. How often are those converted in games? Almost never.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, MJS said:

It doesn't matter how good Allen's arm is. No matter what, it is easier to throw the ball 10-15 yards for a first down than 25-30.

 

Essentially, you are asking Allen to convert a 3rd and 25 instead of a 3rd and 10. How often are those converted in games? Almost never.

 

A receiver only needs to go 10 yards downfield on a 3d and 10.  Yes, Allen would need to throw the ball farther than normal, but by the time the snap gets to him, his receivers would already be nearly 10 yards upfield.  It is nothing like asking Allen to convert a 3d and 25. 

 

#bringinfergy

 

 

 

 

Edited by snafu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, snafu said:

 

A receiver only needs to go 10 yards downfield on a 3d and 10.  Yes, Allen would need to throw the ball farther than normal, but by the time the snap gets to him, his receivers would already be nearly 10 yards upfield.  It is nothing like asking Allen to convert a 3d and 25. 

 

#bringinfergy

 

You're wrong. That's exactly what it is like. The ball is in the air for more than double the normal time, giving defenders more than double the time to react to it and make a play on it. Also, just like a long 3rd down, defenders would know that they do not need to defend the run. They can drop into coverage and wait for the ball.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, MJS said:

 

You're wrong. That's exactly what it is like. The ball is in the air for more than double the normal time, giving defenders more than double the time to react to it and make a play on it. Also, just like a long 3rd down, defenders would know that they do not need to defend the run. They can drop into coverage and wait for the ball.

 

Theres a big difference in time between waiting for a receiver to run 25 yards vs. running 10 yards. Moreso than throwing a ball that same extra 15 yards (especially with a strong armed QB like Allen). Receivers running the extra 15 yards requires the QB to wait in the pocket closer to the line of scrimmage for a longer period of time, and with a bad pass protecting line, that's doom.  There is a huge difference between what I'm proposing and a 3d and 25 play. 

 

As as to your second point, the thread title says "obvious passing downs". Defenders never feel the need to defend the run in obvious passing downs. That's why defenses bring in extra defensive backs and pass rushing specialists. If defenses can adjust for obvious passing situations, then why can't an offense?

 

Thanks for helping me explore the merits of this idea. 

 

 

 

Edited by snafu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Greatdane21 said:

Unlike kicks where they cannot line up over the center . They would put a 330 lb . Nose tackle right over the undersized long snapper 

and beat the hell out of him . He wouldn’t last a half.

 

My idea has Groy waiting just behind the line for the nose tackle. All Ferguson needs to do is snap the ball and get down.  I wouldn't expect that they would bring him in on every 3d down.  I'm thinking maybe 4 or 5 plays per game.  Also, earlier in the thread, it was mentioned that the rule prohibiting the scenario you bring up (for punts and field goal plays) might remain in effect even in my proposal.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...