Jump to content

Why Do the Bills Need a New Stadium ??


T master

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Limeaid said:

 

I'd tell you want to put down but I'd get warning points.  You should since I have never used drugs unlike you and your LSD, etc.

 

What school did you not go to?  You're unintelligible.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, corta765 said:

 

Much cheaper is a relative thing. The cost is around $500 million for Reno vs a new which could be the same potentially or in the $600-700 million range. Neither situation is cheap straight up. It's going to be a massive investment in either scenario and for the team, region, politicians, etc.. its a valid question to ask whether to rebuild or go new when the costs are massively different. The studies have been done on locations a few years ago.

 

I get that your one of the fans which things are perfect and if for eternity things never changed for Bills stadium you would be fine with that. There however are many who are not that way and wayy more forces then just us fans at play that will dictate will the Bills play. If you don't think the city of Buffalo would love to take in the tax revenue that Orchard Park gets plus the general aura/prestige of having the team downtown your dead wrong. Doesn't mean there going back either, but the grand picture is massive.

 

 

In my estimation, the amount of upheaval and cost downtown would be much more than $100-$200 million worth.  I think we are talking $200-$400 million range.  Land acquisition, demolition, disposal (likely hazardous materials mixed in there), numerous additional engineering studies, re-building a piece of 190 and access/egress, rebuilding roads, pipes, electric, etc.  There is a LOT of work that needs to be done.  When it is all said and done.... why?  10 games and a few concerts. The same new stadium could be built in place with virtually no 'overhead' costs they (we) need to pay for downtown.  If we were a bigger city and could build something and attract the volume and prestigious events that Dallas and Atlanta could get, I would be all for it.  If it were a baseball stadium with 81+ dates a year, or even an ampitheater that gets 20-30K down there 40+ times, sign me up.  Football stadiums, as has been proved by many studies, do not help or revitalize an urban area

 

This has nothing to do with nostalgia of Orchard Park.  I kind of loathe the drive down there, I live in the north towns.  Its just economical.

 

Also, not sure how the 'city of buffalo' would receive tax revenue from a downtown stadium. 

Edited by May Day 10
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never understood the "new stadium" nonsense. I live in Charlotte and there was a lot of talk about how once the Panthers were sold, they would "have" to build a new stadium to replace the old, outdated one. 

I've been to a few games there (mostly all Bills games). It's a pretty nice damn stadium, compared to NEF. And I LOVE New Era Field. Some of my greatest memories are there as a kid. I just feel building a new stadium will alienate a HUGE portion of the fan base that simply won't be able to afford single-game tickets, let alone PSL's. Lets face it, Buffalo isn't exactly a white-collar town, where people just have 25 grand laying around (per seat) to throw down for a PSL.

Did you watch the game when the Bills played in Atlanta last year in their big fancy new stadium? The home of the defending NFC champions, who took the previous year's Super Bowl to overtime, in the early part of the season.... you'd think there'd be TONS of hype. The place was EMPTY. 

If you want to kill the gameday experience and have a half-empty stadium, that nobody wants to pay for in the first place...... then yeah, go ahead and build a new stadium.

Edited by CLTbills
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/4/2018 at 11:01 PM, BUFFALOBART said:

Older guys tend to be OVER 'trendy bars', and there is always going to be a small percentage of idiots at any stadium, regardless of the price of admission. If you want 'a new, and different experience', start going to away games. You 'won't buy season tickets again', but you want everyone else to pay the freight for your expensive change of scenery.

Some fan..............

Some fan?  Yeah....that would be a person who is a fan of the 'event', not just the game.  People can be a fan of the game or a team just as much from home as they can from the stadium, or be just as much of a fan watching in from more comfortable seats in a nicer venue as they do surrounded by concrete. It drives me crazy that people say to be a 'real' fan of the team you need to watch it in person at one of the oldest stadiums in the league.  Wanting a nice experience doesn't have to  make someone less of a fan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BUFFALOBART said:

The current facility provides a 'nice' experience.

Is it shiny objects that you are attracted to??????

'New' is not always 'better'

All that glitters, is not gold....

Go watch the game in a 'trendy' restaurant if you need to satiated in such a manner....

These things will not be a determining factor on the Bills stadium nor will fans overall opinions. It will be about making money , and the Bills ability to increase revenues  in the current facility are limited. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used to love Rich Stadium,  but the time it became The Ralph it was losing luster, New Era is pretty much a second rate facility by today’s standards even with the so called “improvements”. 

 

Best experience in NFL?  Sure, if you like drinking and rowdy behavior - which I really did at one time - then New Era is fine.  I also like the parking options and tailgate set up.  Once you get inside the Stadium the experience drops because the design is so inconvenient by today’s standards.  The overall amount of drunkenness, craziness (fires, table jumping, fighting, etc), arrests, and such seem to be on rise.  

 

I am so proud of Buffalo’s comeback. I would love love to see a new modern gorgeous stadium down in the city, with plenty of parking and green space for tailgating.  Let’s it replace some of the wasted land to the south.     Design it with 80,000 seats again and shape it to be loud.  Reflect the city history in the design.  

 

Buffalo is is a city on the rise again and a new stadium would be awesome.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/7/2018 at 8:55 AM, CLTbills said:

I've never understood the "new stadium" nonsense. I live in Charlotte and there was a lot of talk about how once the Panthers were sold, they would "have" to build a new stadium to replace the old, outdated one. 

I've been to a few games there (mostly all Bills games). It's a pretty nice damn stadium, compared to NEF. And I LOVE New Era Field. Some of my greatest memories are there as a kid. I just feel building a new stadium will alienate a HUGE portion of the fan base that simply won't be able to afford single-game tickets, let alone PSL's. Lets face it, Buffalo isn't exactly a white-collar town, where people just have 25 grand laying around (per seat) to throw down for a PSL.

Did you watch the game when the Bills played in Atlanta last year in their big fancy new stadium? The home of the defending NFC champions, who took the previous year's Super Bowl to overtime, in the early part of the season.... you'd think there'd be TONS of hype. The place was EMPTY. 

If you want to kill the gameday experience and have a half-empty stadium, that nobody wants to pay for in the first place...... then yeah, go ahead and build a new stadium.

 

I was at that game, and it really wasn’t what it may have looked like on TV. There are so many bars and reastaurants a lot of people were there. The place was new and, like a new restaurant, they had not worked the kinks out of the food and beverage operations. They have super cheap concession prices, but the lines were so long I gave up a few times. A boatload of people were also just walking around to see the new “palace”.  There were more people than you might think, and WE WON! 

 

I’ve been back for MLS events since then, and they draw HUGE crowds and seem to have worked out the F&B operations. Now....if only that roof would start working.....

7 minutes ago, Bob in STL said:

I used to love Rich Stadium,  but the time it became The Ralph it was losing luster, New Era is pretty much a second rate facility by today’s standards even with the so called “improvements”. 

 

Best experience in NFL?  Sure, if you like drinking and rowdy behavior - which I really did at one time - then New Era is fine.  I also like the parking options and tailgate set up.  Once you get inside the Stadium the experience drops because the design is so inconvenient by today’s standards.  The overall amount of drunkenness, craziness (fires, table jumping, fighting, etc), arrests, and such seem to be on rise.  

 

I am so proud of Buffalo’s comeback. I would love love to see a new modern gorgeous stadium down in the city, with plenty of parking and green space for tailgating.  Let’s it replace some of the wasted land to the south.     Design it with 80,000 seats again and shape it to be loud.  Reflect the city history in the design.  

 

Buffalo is is a city on the rise again and a new stadium would be awesome.  

 

I don’t thi k there’s much of a chance that it will be that large. That would be hard to fill at the higher prices, and things seem to be moving to somewhat smaller spaces with more suite and protected revenue. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/7/2018 at 8:55 AM, CLTbills said:

I've never understood the "new stadium" nonsense. I live in Charlotte and there was a lot of talk about how once the Panthers were sold, they would "have" to build a new stadium to replace the old, outdated one. 

I've been to a few games there (mostly all Bills games). It's a pretty nice damn stadium, compared to NEF. And I LOVE New Era Field. Some of my greatest memories are there as a kid. I just feel building a new stadium will alienate a HUGE portion of the fan base that simply won't be able to afford single-game tickets, let alone PSL's. Lets face it, Buffalo isn't exactly a white-collar town, where people just have 25 grand laying around (per seat) to throw down for a PSL.

Did you watch the game when the Bills played in Atlanta last year in their big fancy new stadium? The home of the defending NFC champions, who took the previous year's Super Bowl to overtime, in the early part of the season.... you'd think there'd be TONS of hype. The place was EMPTY. 

If you want to kill the gameday experience and have a half-empty stadium, that nobody wants to pay for in the first place...... then yeah, go ahead and build a new stadium.

 

From what I understand... PSLs aren't that effective. Die hards will buy them, the rest get sold to ticket brokers. Brokers already help sell most of the single game tickets, so the consumer suffers with higher prices.

 

And they finance the PSL so it's not like u have to have the 50k right now.

Edited by dneveu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, BUFFALOBART said:

The current facility provides a 'nice' experience.

Is it shiny objects that you are attracted to??????

'New' is not always 'better'

All that glitters, is not gold....

Go watch the game in a 'trendy' restaurant if you need to satiated in such a manner....

Once again, I am amazed by how open minded people are on this forum....I like what I have, and if you want something different, too bad.  Geez

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Bob in STL said:

I used to love Rich Stadium,  but the time it became The Ralph it was losing luster, New Era is pretty much a second rate facility by today’s standards even with the so called “improvements”. 

 

Best experience in NFL?  Sure, if you like drinking and rowdy behavior - which I really did at one time - then New Era is fine.  I also like the parking options and tailgate set up.  Once you get inside the Stadium the experience drops because the design is so inconvenient by today’s standards.  The overall amount of drunkenness, craziness (fires, table jumping, fighting, etc), arrests, and such seem to be on rise.  

 

I am so proud of Buffalo’s comeback. I would love love to see a new modern gorgeous stadium down in the city, with plenty of parking and green space for tailgating.  Let’s it replace some of the wasted land to the south.     Design it with 80,000 seats again and shape it to be loud.  Reflect the city history in the design.  

 

Buffalo is is a city on the rise again and a new stadium would be awesome.  

  80,000 seats are too many and the entertainment dynamics are different from a few decades ago in that people have more entertainment options.  It's not like 1975 where you have the choice of going to the park, movie theater, or game and not much else.  However, I would not go the other extreme with 50,000 seats as some suggest and leave money on the table.  There will be games of high demand and games that generate little interest so my proposal would be for around 65-70 K people with the team allowed to determine how many seats will be available for each matchup.  Block off the seats the team does not plan to sell for a given game.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Bob in STL said:

I used to love Rich Stadium,  but the time it became The Ralph it was losing luster, New Era is pretty much a second rate facility by today’s standards even with the so called “improvements”. 

 

Best experience in NFL?  Sure, if you like drinking and rowdy behavior - which I really did at one time - then New Era is fine.  I also like the parking options and tailgate set up.  Once you get inside the Stadium the experience drops because the design is so inconvenient by today’s standards.  The overall amount of drunkenness, craziness (fires, table jumping, fighting, etc), arrests, and such seem to be on rise.  

 

I am so proud of Buffalo’s comeback. I would love love to see a new modern gorgeous stadium down in the city, with plenty of parking and green space for tailgating.  Let’s it replace some of the wasted land to the south.     Design it with 80,000 seats again and shape it to be loud.  Reflect the city history in the design.  

 

Buffalo is is a city on the rise again and a new stadium would be awesome.  

 

It's also worth noting that for all the professed love for football in the elements, December games are pretty empty. But Promo, the playoff drought! I'm old enough to remember the playoff years and December games were always a tough sell. The fact is there are more people who want to be comfortable at games, not risking pneumonia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Bob in STL said:

I am so proud of Buffalo’s comeback. I would love love to see a new modern gorgeous stadium down in the city, with plenty of parking and green space for tailgating.  Let’s it replace some of the wasted land to the south.     Design it with 80,000 seats again and shape it to be loud.  Reflect the city history in the design.  

I doubt we would get an 80,000 seater.  It will be smaller, like Heinz Field, Mid-60,000's. It would create more demand with less supply.

 

Aesthetically, I would love to see a stadium like Seattle has.  Or like Yankee Stadium, but built with a football configuration.  Both buildings are unique, and both "looks" would fit into downtown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

It's also worth noting that for all the professed love for football in the elements, December games are pretty empty. But Promo, the playoff drought! I'm old enough to remember the playoff years and December games were always a tough sell. The fact is there are more people who want to be comfortable at games, not risking pneumonia.

I’m not in favor of a new stadium, but December games have always been a bit of an embarrassment imo. Packer fans fill up Lambeau every week, including December. Bills fans talk a tough game about the elements, but many of them seem to stay away in December. I’d like to see how December games sell if we were consistently competitive. As you mentioned, this franchise had trouble selling tickets in December during the glory years. Football’s fanbase has certainly expanded since that time. It’s possible that a competitive Bills team would sell out December games in today’s NFL. Hopefully we are given the opportunity to find out.  

Edited by DriveFor1Outta5
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/7/2018 at 8:38 AM, May Day 10 said:

 

 

In my estimation, the amount of upheaval and cost downtown would be much more than $100-$200 million worth.  I think we are talking $200-$400 million range.  Land acquisition, demolition, disposal (likely hazardous materials mixed in there), numerous additional engineering studies, re-building a piece of 190 and access/egress, rebuilding roads, pipes, electric, etc.  There is a LOT of work that needs to be done.  When it is all said and done.... why?  10 games and a few concerts. The same new stadium could be built in place with virtually no 'overhead' costs they (we) need to pay for downtown.  If we were a bigger city and could build something and attract the volume and prestigious events that Dallas and Atlanta could get, I would be all for it.  If it were a baseball stadium with 81+ dates a year, or even an ampitheater that gets 20-30K down there 40+ times, sign me up.  Football stadiums, as has been proved by many studies, do not help or revitalize an urban area

 

This has nothing to do with nostalgia of Orchard Park.  I kind of loathe the drive down there, I live in the north towns.  Its just economical.

 

Also, not sure how the 'city of buffalo' would receive tax revenue from a downtown stadium. 

 

....I'd bet before you even start talking land acquisition and stadium cost, the necessary infrastructure improvements alone go north of $1+ BILLION....without major Interstate reconstruction, I think (PURELY opinion) traffic would be a logistical nightmare with access from only three directions due to the harbor.....imagine a Bills game AND a Sabres game on the same Sunday?.....could take weeks to get home......and the billion would have to come from the Feds who will take a minimum of 38 years with their various paralysis by analysis approval process......

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, DriveFor1Outta5 said:

I’m not in favor of a new stadium, but December games have always been a bit of an embarrassment imo. Packer fans fill up Lambeau every week, including December. Bills fans talk a tough game about the elements, but many of them seem to stay away in December. I’d like to see how December games sell if we were consistently competitive. As you mentioned, this franchise had trouble selling tickets in December during the glory years. Football’s fanbase has certainly expanded since that time. It’s possible that a competitive Bills team would sell out December games in today’s NFL. Hopefully we are given the opportunity to find out.  

Completely different now than 1992 for a number of reasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, DriveFor1Outta5 said:

I’m not in favor of a new stadium, but December games have always been a bit of an embarrassment imo. Packer fans fill up Lambeau every week, including December. Bills fans talk a tough game about the elements, but many of them seem to stay away in December. I’d like to see how December games sell if we were consistently competitive. As you mentioned, this franchise had trouble selling tickets in December during the glory years. Football’s fanbase has certainly expanded since that time. It’s possible that a competitive Bills team would sell out December games in today’s NFL. Hopefully we are given the opportunity to find out.  

 

...although I firmly believe we're on the right track with the "Mc Trio", a/k/a McBeane, McD & McDaboll, probably the best since the Polian era, consistently competitive is no guarantee for a $700-$850 (?) million dollar stadium investment....a Lucas Oil type Indy facility makes more sense with the potential for year round usage versus a scant eight home games a year......just speculation, but a stadium/smaller event center/hotel-retail complex may make more economic sense....Packers were, are and forever will be an anomaly even if -20 degrees.....hell, their season tix waiting list is like 60,000+ and the ONLY way you move up is if somebody dies.....OR...you call Uncle Nunzio to "speed things along"..:thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DriveFor1Outta5 said:

I’m not in favor of a new stadium, but December games have always been a bit of an embarrassment imo. Packer fans fill up Lambeau every week, including December. Bills fans talk a tough game about the elements, but many of them seem to stay away in December. I’d like to see how December games sell if we were consistently competitive. As you mentioned, this franchise had trouble selling tickets in December during the glory years. Football’s fanbase has certainly expanded since that time. It’s possible that a competitive Bills team would sell out December games in today’s NFL. Hopefully we are given the opportunity to find out.  

  Gotta wonder about the in-stadium attendance for Packer fans during the 1970's and 1980's.  Of course like anything else from years ago everything and everybody was tougher.  Drove 5 hours each way up hill in a blinding snowstorm to Green Bay back during the 1970's.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't need a new stadium at all. There's nothing wrong with the current venue. NFL owners spew this nonsense to get the govt to cough up money and people believe it. I have never in my life taken 'stadium cost' into consideration when deciding whether or not to attend a game. I'd rather they spent the money educating our children and paying teachers a decent wage.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, GreggTX said:

We don't need a new stadium at all. There's nothing wrong with the current venue. NFL owners spew this nonsense to get the govt to cough up money and people believe it. I have never in my life taken 'stadium cost' into consideration when deciding whether or not to attend a game. I'd rather they spent the money educating our children and paying teachers a decent wage.

I disagree. If you like bare bones then its a fine stadium. I was just at Progressive field in Cleveland and the amenities there were some of the best. Between the amazing food offerings and the craft brews makes it a great place to see a game. There is even a nice bar area that you can sit at and watch the game from. That is the kind of things that is missing at New Era Field. 

 

I guess people in Buffalo don't like change or state of the art amenities. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

It's also worth noting that for all the professed love for football in the elements, December games are pretty empty. But Promo, the playoff drought! I'm old enough to remember the playoff years and December games were always a tough sell. The fact is there are more people who want to be comfortable at games, not risking pneumonia.

 

15 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

History already shows the opposite.

 

I don't remember many empty seats at December games during the playoff years - except for maybe, and I'm not even sure about that - the record breaking cold game on 12/26/93. 

 

The Raiders 12/11/88 was the coldest game up until then.  Here's the attendance - 77,348

Now I looked up that 12/26/93 game - attendance 70,817

 

And, it was the way it should be - 3 games on the road that December.  Only that one home game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, bbb said:

 

 

I don't remember many empty seats at December games during the playoff years - except for maybe, and I'm not even sure about that - the record breaking cold game on 12/26/93. 

 

The Raiders 12/11/88 was the coldest game up until then.  Here's the attendance - 77,348

Now I looked up that 12/26/93 game - attendance 70,817

 

And, it was the way it should be - 3 games on the road that December.  Only that one home game. 

 

Ch.2 or Ralph would have to buy the last few thousand seats to lift the blackout. Even playoff games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GreggTX said:

We don't need a new stadium at all. There's nothing wrong with the current venue. NFL owners spew this nonsense to get the govt to cough up money and people believe it. I have never in my life taken 'stadium cost' into consideration when deciding whether or not to attend a game. I'd rather they spent the money educating our children and paying teachers a decent wage.

If by “ we” you mean the general public, you are correct. The team , however has a limited revenue stream possible at the current venue. Their just aren’t enough high end amenities to attract a crowd that’s willing to pay for them. Including climate control and fewer rowdies. A new stadium with high end amenities, fewer seats and guaranteed 72 degrees at kickoff would change that. It’s about appealing to a well to do fan who currently stays at home or goes out somewhere else to watch the game. There just isn’t much pricing power at the outdated current facility. Tickets go for above face value on secondary market already , and the Bills get zero of those dollars. 

50 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

Ch.2 or Ralph would have to buy the last few thousand seats to lift the blackout. Even playoff games.

Who wants to sit in the nosebleeds and freeze? It was always a tough sell for the last few of the cheap seats, even when the team was excellent. A new stadium would probably change that. Ticket prices would be higher and capacity would decrease, so even the worst seats in the place would be relatively scarce . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jrb1979 said:

I disagree. If you like bare bones then its a fine stadium. I was just at Progressive field in Cleveland and the amenities there were some of the best. Between the amazing food offerings and the craft brews makes it a great place to see a game. There is even a nice bar area that you can sit at and watch the game from. That is the kind of things that is missing at New Era Field. 

 

I guess people in Buffalo don't like change or state of the art amenities. 

I think a lot of the negative reaction is a result of Buffalo’s traditional blue collar mentality. Upper middle class culture as a whole has become quite homogenous in this country (meaning it’s easy to figure out what the groups tastes are), and this is the group the NFL wants to target.  The league specifically targets this class with non-football luxuries that have nothing to do with the game. These are the people who the league can fleece for seat licenses. Many working class folks are simply concerned that they won’t have a seat at the table anymore. I can’t speak for everyone, but I think that’s one of the main concerns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, DriveFor1Outta5 said:

I think a lot of the negative reaction is a result of Buffalo’s traditional blue collar mentality. Upper middle class culture as a whole has become quite homogenous in this country (meaning it’s easy to figure out what the groups tastes are), and this is the group the NFL wants to target.  The league specifically targets this class with non-football luxuries that have nothing to do with the game. These are the people who the league can fleece for seat licenses. Many working class folks are simply concerned that they won’t have a seat at the table anymore. I can’t speak for everyone, but I think that’s one of the main concerns.

What is so bad about wanting better beer than GENNY LIGHT or your typical sausage or hot dog. What is so bad about wanting a bar area where you can see the game inside the stadium?

 

For me its all about the experience and amenities at the stadium. If I am going to a bare bones stadium like New Era Field I might as well stay and get a better view from my tv. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Jrb1979 said:

What is so bad about wanting better beer than GENNY LIGHT or your typical sausage or hot dog. What is so bad about wanting a bar area where you can see the game inside the stadium?

 

For me its all about the experience and amenities at the stadium. If I am going to a bare bones stadium like New Era Field I might as well stay and get a better view from my tv. 

 

Nothing is bad about having your own tastes. I’d be happy watching football with a Labatt Blue and hot dog in the bleachers. That doesn’t mean I’m right and you’re wrong. Everyone has different tastes, and there is nothing wrong with that. Some fans are simply worried that affordability goes out the window in a new stadium featuring luxurious amenities. There is nothing wrong with craft beer and decent food, but it’s likely they’d be accompanied by PSL’s and the like. As far as staying home for a better view on TV,  I’d apply that rule to every stadium in the league.  I agree that attending the game is more about the experience, but not everyone agrees on what constitutes a good experience. After all, that’s why this is such a frequent topic on TBD. 

Edited by DriveFor1Outta5
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DriveFor1Outta5 said:

Nothing is bad about having your own tastes. I’d be happy watching football with a Labatt Blue and hot dog in the bleachers. That doesn’t mean I’m right and you’re wrong. Everyone has different tastes, and there is nothing wrong with that. Some fans are simply worried that affordability goes out the window in a new stadium featuring luxurious amenities. There is nothing wrong with craft beer and decent food, but it’s likely they’d be accompanied by PSL’s and the like. As far as staying home for a better view on TV,  I’d apply that rule to every stadium in the league.  I agree that attending the game is more about the experience, but not everyone agrees on what constitutes a good experience. After all, that’s why this is such a frequent topic on TBD. 

It seems like a lot of the people on this board are older fans that are not into the way the new football and baseball stadiums are built aside from the PSL's. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

Ch.2 or Ralph would have to buy the last few thousand seats to lift the blackout. Even playoff games.

also 80,000 seats back then.....a few thousand means 77,000 tickets were sold...5K more than it seats now...average attendance was always upper 70s

Edited by nucci
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MILFHUNTER#518 said:

Please elaborate. 

Stadium is smaller now

 

Regionalization, nfl is more popular, and a larger pool of fans.  Visiting teams travel better.

 

Internet, online sales, secondary market, speculation, etc.  

4 hours ago, DriveFor1Outta5 said:

So you’re saying if we were a Super Bowl contender, we’d be selling out the stadium in December?  I think that’s definitely possible. 

 

Id say, even if they were on par with someone like baltimore... season tickets would be capped with a locked on waiting list.  Right when home playoff games are a realistic possibility

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/7/2018 at 8:38 AM, May Day 10 said:

 

 

In my estimation, the amount of upheaval and cost downtown would be much more than $100-$200 million worth.  I think we are talking $200-$400 million range.  Land acquisition, demolition, disposal (likely hazardous materials mixed in there), numerous additional engineering studies, re-building a piece of 190 and access/egress, rebuilding roads, pipes, electric, etc.  There is a LOT of work that needs to be done.  When it is all said and done.... why?  10 games and a few concerts. The same new stadium could be built in place with virtually no 'overhead' costs they (we) need to pay for downtown.  

hey, it would keep people employed!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, DriveFor1Outta5 said:

So you’re saying if we were a Super Bowl contender, we’d be selling out the stadium in December?  I think that’s definitely possible. 

Not necessarily. Even in the glory years, there were plenty of games the Bills didn't sell out in December.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jrb1979 said:

I disagree. If you like bare bones then its a fine stadium. I was just at Progressive field in Cleveland and the amenities there were some of the best. Between the amazing food offerings and the craft brews makes it a great place to see a game. There is even a nice bar area that you can sit at and watch the game from. That is the kind of things that is missing at New Era Field. 

 

I guess people in Buffalo don't like change or state of the art amenities. 

Heck, I would just like to be able to run to the men’s room during a commercial break and then make it back to my seat without missing a play.  It can be down in modern well laid out facilities.  

 

Not having some drunk piss in the sink would be an added bonus.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jrb1979 said:

I disagree. If you like bare bones then its a fine stadium. I was just at Progressive field in Cleveland and the amenities there were some of the best. Between the amazing food offerings and the craft brews makes it a great place to see a game. There is even a nice bar area that you can sit at and watch the game from. That is the kind of things that is missing at New Era Field. 

 

I guess people in Buffalo don't like change or state of the art amenities. 

Yea I can't wait to run into you at the nice bar area enjoying craft brews enjoying amazing food offerings  *barf*

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, BUNCH OF MULARKEY said:

Yea I can't wait to run into you at the nice bar area enjoying craft brews enjoying amazing food offerings  *barf*

Whats wrong with craft brews and wanting to eat something better then sauages or hotdogs. Oh I know its too sophisticated for you. You just want your Genny light and a bench to watch the game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...