Jump to content

Terrell Owens Declined His Invitation to the Pro Football Hall of Fame Induction Ceremony


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, JoPar_v2 said:

Let’s not bring facts into this lynching now the sheep will get upset.

 

 

Many posters are always dumping on the NFL as a league for how they treat players, etc.  Yet when this time comes, it's all about "they are GIVING you this honor, now go up there and put on that jacket and give the speech for them!".

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, 4merper4mer said:

I get what you're saying but not how.  Ray Lewis is just as much about the spotlight as TO ever was.  

Of course. I'm just pointing out that there's another guy doing the exact opposite of what TO is doing. Totally cancelling him out. That's why his actions have no effect on the voting system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

 

Too bad Lewis didn't attend a "life-changing luncheon" before he decided to shield a killer form the law and destroy evidence to thwart a murder investigation.

 

All in all, it's interesting to see the "outrage" people pretend to have over TO's decision not to show up at a tourist attraction that "enshrines"  POS's like Ray Lewis and OJ.

I know, right? 

 

This isn't outrage or an endorsement of Ray Lewis. I'm just pointing out the lack of sense in TO's statement when he's clearly not leading a revolution with any sort of legs under it.

 

Actually, it'd make more sense if he pulled himself from the nominations and said they're not allowed to put a bust of him in Canton. 

 

He doesn't like the members and their rules, but he still wants to be in their club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He’s always stuck me as a look at me/narcissist type personality.  Even that time he was crying after the Cowboys playoff loss I think he was trying to draw attention to himself.  I have no doubt that’s all this HOF absence is.

 

However, I do have some appreciation for the year he was here.  I remember a few temper tantrums he threw but never too much drama.  In fact I still think that 2009 team could have been so much more if Fitz started from Day 1 and Fewell was the coach.

 

Someone recently posted highlighted from his one year with the Bills on YouTube

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LeGOATski said:

I know, right? 

 

This isn't outrage or an endorsement of Ray Lewis. I'm just pointing out the lack of sense in TO's statement when he's clearly not leading a revolution with any sort of legs under it.

 

Actually, it'd make more sense if he pulled himself from the nominations and said they're not allowed to put a bust of him in Canton. 

 

He doesn't like the members and their rules, but he still wants to be in their club.

 

It's not about the members and their rules.  It's about being made to wait (he was an easy first ballot HOF player--more so than every other inductee this year except Moss) for reasons that had nothing to do with his level of accomplishment, by a group of effete voters who sometimes choose to abuse the privilege they were given to vote on this.

 

Look, I have enjoyed commenting on TO's goofiness for years, but it should be clear to everyone that he was held back by personal bias of enough voters who just didn't like the guy.  So in that regard, TO's position is legitimate.  All this "how DARE he"  pearl clutching is very revealing of those who are having any problem with this.  

 

Voters who are on record saying they didn't vote him in earlier because they felt he wasn't a "good teammate" (to the voters?? Did they consult all his teammates before they accepted this cliche?) or he was a "locker room cancer" should have their voting privileges revoked permanently as they are clearly unfit for this task.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

It's not about the members and their rules.  It's about being made to wait (he was an easy first ballot HOF player--more so than every other inductee this year except Moss) for reasons that had nothing to do with his level of accomplishment, by a group of effete voters who sometimes choose to abuse the privilege they were given to vote on this.

 

Look, I have enjoyed commenting on TO's goofiness for years, but it should be clear to everyone that he was held back by personal bias of enough voters who just didn't like the guy.  So in that regard, TO's position is legitimate.  All this "how DARE he"  pearl clutching is very revealing of those who are having any problem with this.  

 

Voters who are on record saying they didn't vote him in earlier because they felt he wasn't a "good teammate" (to the voters?? Did they consult all his teammates before they accepted this cliche?) or he was a "locker room cancer" should have their voting privileges revoked permanently as they are clearly unfit for this task.

 

When you earn the right to vote for admission to Canton you can change it all in three seconds

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

It's not about the members and their rules.  It's about being made to wait (he was an easy first ballot HOF player--more so than every other inductee this year except Moss) for reasons that had nothing to do with his level of accomplishment, by a group of effete voters who sometimes choose to abuse the privilege they were given to vote on this.

 

Look, I have enjoyed commenting on TO's goofiness for years, but it should be clear to everyone that he was held back by personal bias of enough voters who just didn't like the guy.  So in that regard, TO's position is legitimate.  All this "how DARE he"  pearl clutching is very revealing of those who are having any problem with this.  

 

Voters who are on record saying they didn't vote him in earlier because they felt he wasn't a "good teammate" (to the voters?? Did they consult all his teammates before they accepted this cliche?) or he was a "locker room cancer" should have their voting privileges revoked permanently as they are clearly unfit for this task.

That's fine. This still doesn't validate TO's claim that he's sticking up for everyone else and leading the charge for future HOF inductees, does it?

 

His actions aren't effective for that purpose at all, IMO.

 

Are you saying that he is successfully affecting the process?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LeGOATski said:

Alex Holcomb?

In the video, the announcer says "Ryan Van Pelt"

 

Just a sad reflection of the Bills' QB situation over the years...

Ryan Van Pelt, Alex Fitzpatrick, Todd Johnson, Rob Collins, J.P. Edwards, Trent Losman....

 

It's all kind of modular isn't?  Change the names around, same result.

 

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Augie said:

 

I’ll take your word for it. Not a big fan of the diva. I honestly hope you enjoyed it. He’s not a guy I’ll tune in for. 

Yeah, nor am I. I just watched due to the connection, and the diva response. That man will never change

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I loved the Fitzpatrick to T.O. Combo we had for that one year.

 

A little sad to see that speech, T.O. Is still very bitter. Wish he went to the Hall of Fame ceremony. Hands down one of the best players to ever play in the NFL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah i liked T.O. when he was here, i wish he would've stayed longer tbh, but i remember I couldn't believe we ever got him here. Quite possibly the biggest name player we've had here in 15 years other than Shady. We even friggin gave T.O. the key to the city too haha... priceless. I wonder if he still has it lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I appreciate what TO did and why he did it.  I was never a Big TO fan, minus the one year with the Bills, but he should’ve been a 1st ballot HoFer because he was that good and accomplished that much on the field.  He said that the reason he wasn’t at the induction and speaking at his alma mater is because the writers didn’t have the intentions of the HoF in mind when voting, but voting based on their personal bias.  That was perfect imo.  Good for you TO.  Love you some you.  If you can’t, no one else can

9 minutes ago, Seanbillsfan2206 said:

He’s all about himself and this was his one last chance to make it all about himself. If he wasn’t a team cancer throughout most of his career he may have been a first ballot hall of famer....

If the voters voted for him based on his performance on the football field, he would’ve been a first ballot HoFer.

Edited by NewEra
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, NewEra said:

I appreciate what TO did and why he did it.  I was never a Big TO fan, minus the one year with the Bills, but he should’ve been a 1st ballot HoFer because he was that good and accomplished that much on the field.  He said that the reason he wasn’t at the induction and speaking at his alma mater is because the writers didn’t have the intentions of the HoF in mind when voting, but voting based on their personal bias.  That was perfect imo.  Good for you TO.  Love you some you.  If you can’t, no one else can

If the voters voted for someone based on his performance on the football field, he would’ve been a first ballot HoFer.

The HoF is just a place. It has no intentions. The HoF Selection Committee only has to align with it's own intentions, which are probably not the best. There's probably some BS politics going on there, which is just a fact of life in every organization.

 

Their selection criteria obviously includes more than just on-field accomplishments. If TO was true to himself, I think he would accept that he wasn't an "NFL role model" and that he wasn't going to win over the Selection Committee right away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LeGOATski said:

The HoF is just a place. It has no intentions. The HoF Selection Committee only has to align with it's own intentions, which are probably not the best. There's probably some BS politics going on there, which is just a fact of life in every organization.

 

Their selection criteria obviously includes more than just on-field accomplishments. If TO was true to himself, I think he would accept that he wasn't an "NFL role model" and that he wasn't going to win over the Selection Committee right away.

And the HoF committee came out of this looking like a bunch of complete idiots according the most people.  Sure, some that really hate TO agree with them.  To each is there own.  But he should have been 1st ballot.  2nd ballot at the very least.  Making him wait his 3rd go around was absurd imo.  Then, when he says he’s not going to attend, they decide to cut him out completely and make themselves look like 2nd graders while TO goes out on his own accord.  Loving him some him.  

 

Thats just how how I see it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NewEra said:

And the HoF committee came out of this looking like a bunch of complete idiots according the most people.  Sure, some that really hate TO agree with them.  To each is there own.  But he should have been 1st ballot.  2nd ballot at the very least.  Making him wait his 3rd go around was absurd imo.  Then, when he says he’s not going to attend, they decide to cut him out completely and make themselves look like 2nd graders while TO goes out on his own accord.  Loving him some him.  

 

Thats just how how I see it.  

Yeah, their reaction wasn't good, either. Someone could've taken the high road. I would've rather seen TO go to the Canton ceremony and give that speech to their faces.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, NewEra said:

And the HoF committee came out of this looking like a bunch of complete idiots according the most people.  Sure, some that really hate TO agree with them.  To each is there own.  But he should have been 1st ballot.  2nd ballot at the very least.  Making him wait his 3rd go around was absurd imo.  Then, when he says he’s not going to attend, they decide to cut him out completely and make themselves look like 2nd graders while TO goes out on his own accord.  Loving him some him.  

 

Thats just how how I see it.  

 

Not surprising.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, NewEra said:

I appreciate what TO did and why he did it.  I was never a Big TO fan, minus the one year with the Bills, but he should’ve been a 1st ballot HoFer because he was that good and accomplished that much on the field.  He said that the reason he wasn’t at the induction and speaking at his alma mater is because the writers didn’t have the intentions of the HoF in mind when voting, but voting based on their personal bias.  That was perfect imo.  Good for you TO.  Love you some you.  If you can’t, no one else can

If the voters voted for him based on his performance on the football field, he would’ve been a first ballot HoFer.

But HoF isn't just about pure performance its also about contribution to the overall game.  Attitude and history are a part of that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...