KDIGGZ Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 (edited) Insider Ben Albright who has been pretty spot on with his Browns insider info says it's going to be Darnold. He posted the following tweet then deleted it. He's either trolling or the Browns have made up their mind. You decide: Edited April 26, 2018 by kdiggz 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Awwufelloff Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 Yep it’s Darnold and barkley at 2. Mayfield or Rosen at 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeGOATski Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 I believe it. And then the Giants are so committed to Barkley, that they wouldn't take 2 more first round picks for #2?? C'mon. If Darnold is taken at 1, the Bills should be able to get Rosen at 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDIGGZ Posted April 24, 2018 Author Share Posted April 24, 2018 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedingreennc Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 Thursday just needs to get here already!!! 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan17 Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 Just now, LeGOATski said: I believe it. And then the Giants are so committed to Barkley, that they wouldn't take 2 more first round picks for #2?? C'mon. If Darnold is taken at 1, the Bills should be able to get Rosen at 2. If darnold goes one, the Bille can wait until four or five most likely. The giants can get their gold jacket stud at two, forget their asking price, forget them all together. The Giants have been trending down outside from their one outlier playoff appearance. They want to take a RB second overall, so be it, they will ultimately be parting with gettleman a second time. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 I don’t get it. If he knows or thinks he knows, why did he delete it? He usually likes to throw a parade when he spouts off info. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teef Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 (edited) brady quinn was going over his possible scenarios today for the top 10. if i remember correctly, (someone let me know if you heard it) where if darnold was one, the giants would be willing to trade from two. i don't recall how, be he described a three team trade involving the colts, giants and bills. i think the colts trade to 2, the giants take the colts pick at 6(?) and the bills trade up to 2 from the colts. this way the giants can stay close to the top, and the colts get some extra picks. who did he have the bills taking at 2? allen. yup. edit: in this scenario, he somehow had barkley falling to 6, and the giants getting him anyway. again, i'm not sure if this is exactly as stated. Edited April 24, 2018 by teef Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeGOATski Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 1 minute ago, teef said: brady quinn was going over his possible scenarios today for the top 10. if i remember correctly, (someone let me know if you heard it) where if darnold was one, the giants would be willing to trade from two. i don't recall how, be he described a three team trade involving the colts, giants and bills. i think the colts trade to 2, the giants take the colts pick at 6(?) and the bills trade up to 2 from the colts. this way the giants can stay close to the top, and the colts get some extra picks. who did he have the bills taking at 2? allen. yup. That was a rumor a week ago. It's plausible. Seems that the Bills have been working with Giants/Colts and Broncos separately, in order to try to get up there. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDIGGZ Posted April 24, 2018 Author Share Posted April 24, 2018 1 minute ago, YoloinOhio said: I don’t get it. If he knows or thinks he knows, why did he delete it? He usually likes to throw a parade when he spouts off info. Either his source told him to delete it or he wants to more ceremoniously announce it somehow. Tweeting it to a bunch of millennials online isn't the most exciting way to break the most closely guarded secret in the NFL draft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeGOATski Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 3 minutes ago, BillsFan17 said: If darnold goes one, the Bille can wait until four or five most likely. The giants can get their gold jacket stud at two, forget their asking price, forget them all together. The Giants have been trending down outside from their one outlier playoff appearance. They want to take a RB second overall, so be it, they will ultimately be parting with gettleman a second time. The point of getting up to #2 is to leap-frog the Jets, so they don't take the QB we want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roundybout Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 3 minutes ago, teef said: brady quinn was going over his possible scenarios today for the top 10. if i remember correctly, (someone let me know if you heard it) where if darnold was one, the giants would be willing to trade from two. i don't recall how, be he described a three team trade involving the colts, giants and bills. i think the colts trade to 2, the giants take the colts pick at 6(?) and the bills trade up to 2 from the colts. this way the giants can stay close to the top, and the colts get some extra picks. who did he have the bills taking at 2? allen. yup. edit: in this scenario, he somehow had barkley falling to 6, and the giants getting him anyway. again, i'm not sure if this is exactly as stated. This would make sense for him to fall. 1) Darnold (Browns) 2) Rosen (Bills) 3) Mayfield (Jets) 4) Chubb (Browns) 5) Nelson (Broncos) 6) Barkley (Giants) can't see Denver taking Barkley, and everyone is happy here. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedingreennc Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 3 minutes ago, teef said: brady quinn was going over his possible scenarios today for the top 10. if i remember correctly, (someone let me know if you heard it) where if darnold was one, the giants would be willing to trade from two. i don't recall how, be he described a three team trade involving the colts, giants and bills. i think the colts trade to 2, the giants take the colts pick at 6(?) and the bills trade up to 2 from the colts. this way the giants can stay close to the top, and the colts get some extra picks. who did he have the bills taking at 2? allen. yup. edit: in this scenario, he somehow had barkley falling to 6, and the giants getting him anyway. again, i'm not sure if this is exactly as stated. The Colts trade down, then up, then down again? Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeGOATski Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 1 minute ago, kdiggz said: Either his source told him to delete it or he wants to more ceremoniously announce it somehow. Tweeting it to a bunch of millennials online isn't the most exciting way to break the most closely guarded secret in the NFL draft How do you accidentally tweet that anyway? In my experience, accidental tweets only happen when you're drunk. Is Albright drunk? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chuck Wagon Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 Darnold goes 1 Giants trade out of 2 to the Bills. Bills trade #2 + more to the Browns for Darnold Browns take Baker or Allen at 2. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlottebillsfan2 Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 Darnold barkley mayfield chubb rosen to the bills at five. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cle23 Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 (edited) John Dorsey is regarded as one of the most tight lipped GMs in the NFL. Nothing out there is known for fact. People are just speculating and hoping it sticks. Edited April 24, 2018 by cle23 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 Just now, Chuck Wagon said: Darnold goes 1 Giants trade out of 2 to the Bills. Bills trade #2 + more to the Browns for Darnold Browns take Baker or Allen at 2. do you think Gettleman would be pissed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beast Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 If the Bills are able to trade up and either of Darnold/Rosen are available, and they pass, I will **** my pants in rage. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDIGGZ Posted April 24, 2018 Author Share Posted April 24, 2018 (edited) 2 minutes ago, LeGOATski said: How do you accidentally tweet that anyway? In my experience, accidental tweets only happen when you're drunk. Is Albright drunk? He's drunk with power and his own narcissism Edited April 24, 2018 by kdiggz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teef Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 2 minutes ago, BillsEnthusiast said: This would make sense for him to fall. 1) Darnold (Browns) 2) Rosen (Bills) 3) Mayfield (Jets) 4) Chubb (Browns) 5) Nelson (Broncos) 6) Barkley (Giants) can't see Denver taking Barkley, and everyone is happy here. i think this is exactly how it fell. not sure if the broncos took nelson, but they had the browns taking chubb at 4 and skipping on barkley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickelCity Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 If we trade up for Allen when Rosen is available...oof. 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedingreennc Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 1 minute ago, NickelCity said: If we trade up for Allen when Rosen is available...oof. That will be a bad move for any team. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaw66 Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 11 minutes ago, LeGOATski said: I believe it. And then the Giants are so committed to Barkley, that they wouldn't take 2 more first round picks for #2?? C'mon. If Darnold is taken at 1, the Bills should be able to get Rosen at 2. I just don't see it. If the Giants want a QB they aren't moving back. If they love some other guy, they aren't moving back, because back means behind the Browns and maybe behind the Broncos. They'll worry that they'll lose their guy. Only way the Giants are trading back is if they don't want a QB and they aren't in love with a non-QB. Seems pretty unlikely. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFunPolice Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 PERFECT! Giants won't be tempted to go QB now, pushing everyone down a notch. I still think it's Jackson, which intrigues me, but I would love a trade up just for the excitement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RollBillsRoll Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 3 minutes ago, Binghamton Beast said: If the Bills are able to trade up and either of Darnold/Rosen are available, and they pass, I will **** my pants in rage. LOL! You owe me a new keyboard! That will for sure show them! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedingreennc Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 Spot on, too much movement. If they are going to trade it would be with you guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Murica Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 Damn, put this in the Mayfield thread about 40 minutes ago... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bag of Milk Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 7 minutes ago, LeGOATski said: How do you accidentally tweet that anyway? In my experience, accidental tweets only happen when you're drunk. Is Albright drunk? No, he is just is in love with himself and wants more attention. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaw66 Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 6 minutes ago, LeGOATski said: The point of getting up to #2 is to leap-frog the Jets, so they don't take the QB we want. Yes, it would be nice to get ahead of the Jets. But unless someone can give the Giants #4, they aren't moving back. And maybe, just maybe, the Bills and Jets want different guys. So the Browns could get their fav at 1, the Jets get their fav at 3 AND the Bills get their fav at 5. Even that seems possible, because there sure doesn't seem to be a clear consensus about the QBs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woodman19 Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 Was probably a source from Darnold that leaked it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffAlone Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 He was told that was his only early scoop. If he blew it, he'd never be in the loop again? Possible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fadingpain Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 I have believed (feared) for a while that Cleveland will take Darnold #1 overall. Has nothing to do with this tweet, but I think that's going to happen. Question is what happens next. I hope I am wrong and the Browns take Allen; don't think we will be that lucky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CommonCents Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 I can’t wait until Thursday so I don’t have to see anything from Allbright for the rest of the summer. He is his own biggest fan. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teef Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 6 minutes ago, Shaw66 said: I just don't see it. If the Giants want a QB they aren't moving back. If they love some other guy, they aren't moving back, because back means behind the Browns and maybe behind the Broncos. They'll worry that they'll lose their guy. Only way the Giants are trading back is if they don't want a QB and they aren't in love with a non-QB. Seems pretty unlikely. apparently the only qb they want that high is darnold. i think that's the basis for trades. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
US Egg Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 These "draftniks" gloat as if they're experts even when they don't get any picks right in the 1st round. Only other "profession" that kind of ineptitude be tolerated is in civil service. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFunPolice Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 could be Dorsey finally told Hue, who ran right to his buddies in the press, knowing he's on the way out anyway... EXCEPT IT WAS THE CLASSIC "RAT TRAP." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDIGGZ Posted April 24, 2018 Author Share Posted April 24, 2018 It's also worth noting that Allbright is based out of Denver and covers the Broncos primarily and it is his belief that they will be trading back with the Bills for 12 and 22 and targeting Ward at CB and Hernandez at G with those picks. Bills moving up for Allen or Rosen 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan17 Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 15 minutes ago, LeGOATski said: The point of getting up to #2 is to leap-frog the Jets, so they don't take the QB we want. I'm so confident in the Jets ineptitude, that whatever QB they want, probably is the worst one of the class. This is the same GM who drafted Hack' in the second. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sherman Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 20 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: I don’t get it. If he knows or thinks he knows, why did he delete it? He usually likes to throw a parade when he spouts off info. I was assuming it was because the NFL has asked all teams and media not to tip their picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts