Jump to content

Why are we playing in KC two years in a row?


Virgil

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, DrDawkinstein said:

4th year in a row

 

KC played in Buffalo in 2020 (We played the entire AFCW)

Buff played in KC last year (1st place teams within conference)

Buff plays at KC this year (1st place teams in conf)

Buff plays AT KC next year (We play entire AFCW)

 

 

Since this is the second year we are playing them (because of 1st place teams in the conference), shouldn’t it rotate, by them coming to Buffalo this year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I explained this in a thread a few months ago to someone asking the same question. This question comes up every few months.

 

Teams play same-seeded division teams in the conference teams for two straight times, either both home or both away. Then it rotates for the next two times. So since Buffalo and KC finished first in their divisions, respectively, in 2020 and 2021, we played KC away two straight times. The next two times the same-seeded AFC West team will be at our home, no matter who it is or where we are seeded in our respective divisions.

 

Note: this particular rotation above doesn't apply for times our division plays all four teams in another division in the conference. That is a different rotation. So it will not apply next year when we play the entire AFC West. But the next two times after that when we play the West, the same-seeded team will be at our place.

Edited by chongli
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, chongli said:

I explained this in a thread a few months ago to someone asking the same question. This question comes up every few months.

 

Teams play same-seeded division teams in the conference teams for two straight times home or away. Then it rotates for the next two times. So since Buffalo and KC finished first in their divisions, respectively, in 2020 and 2021, we played KC away two straight times. The next two times the same-seeded AFC West team will be at our home no matter who it is or where we are seeded in our divisions.

 

Note: this particular rotation above doesn't apply for times our division plays all four teams in another division in the conference  So it will not apply next year when we play the entire AFC West. But the next two times after that when we play the West, the same-seeded team will be at our place.

So what you're saying is... the schedule makers are out to screw us.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pennstate10 said:

Hmm.....  If this has been explained so clearly, can you explain it to me like I'm 5?

 

Here is the text from the link the "explained" why Bills were playing in KC.

 

"Two games against teams from the two remaining divisions in its own conference — one game at home and one on the road. Matchups are based on division ranking from the previous season."

 

Thats pretty clear.  It boils down to Bills play the Titans and KC this year.  One home, one away.

 

Why is KC away and Titans game home?  Why not Titans away and KC at home?  THAT is the key question that hasnt been answered in the 50+ replies.

 

If there is a clear "formula" that explains this, please post a link so we all know.

Try this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NFL_regular_season#Scheduling_formula

 

Or this:

https://www.nbcsports.com/chicago/bears/everything-know-about-nfl-schedule-how-it-works

 

Or this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBZxdERnvgU


Or this:

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/news/nfl-schedule-how-made-league-opponents-272-games/a4iykr3alznrium47wyuolpd

 

 

 

Edited by Bob Chandler's Hands
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

so we can be ready for them in the playoffs!!

 

 

oh...

 

But……at OUR PLACE! 😋

 

We played in Nashville three years in a row. I actually loved it as it’s an easy road game for me in a nice city ideal for hosting football. 

 

It smells a little funny with the reigning champs (sorry, Bengals) getting a string of home games against the biggest threat. It will even out in time. It’s not the Chief’s fans making the schedule. I care more about playoff home games, and I realize this is part of how you get there, but at some point you just need to feel eager to get another shot at them. Anywhere, any time. (Except London, I hate the London games, but still…..the point remains) 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The easiest way to explain this is to look at the schedule in six year chunks.  I didn't bother to include the NFC matchups.

 

Below, I started with Josh's rookie year and went through 2023.  Columns E and G show the 2 year rotation on the games that are created by teams finishing in the same place within their divisions (1st from the East hosted 1st from the West in 2018, 2nd East Hosted 2nd West and so on).

 

In columns I and K, I flipped the alternating years highlighted in yellow to eliminate that 2 year rotation, since from what I've read, your major question is "why is the two year rotation not a 'home and home' rotation?".  If you look across the rows under that scenario, you'd see that the Bills would NEVER have the chance to host the Chiefs in a year where the AFC East played the AFC North.  KC would also NEVER have the chance to host the Bills any year the AFC East played the AFC South.

 

It boils down to, which would you rather have?  A chance at playing at the same place 3 years in a row, or knowing that anytime the Bills play the AFCN, they CAN'T host ANY AFCW team.

 

So, they could they rotate every season, but my guess is, the NFL would rather have the 2 year rotation instead of locking teams out of ANY chance of playing at a given location every time they play a certain opposite division.

 

239510803_ScheduleExplanation.thumb.jpg.05e26da47edbcae588a29ccd96745882.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are to assume with Allen and Mahomes that the Bills and Chiefs will control their respective divisions for years to come, we will end up hosting the Chiefs in 3 consecutive years (2024-2026).

 

2024 and 2025 will be based on division finish, and it just so happens those years the AFC East will host its AFC West counterpart. 2026 would be part of the regular home/away division rotation (Bills @ KC 2017, KC @ Bills 2020, Bills @ KC 2023, KC @ Bills 2026). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SirAndrew said:

I understand it’s no conspiracy, but I laugh when people say the NFL has a “formula”. It’s meaningless intellectual lingo. It reminds me of the old online dating commercial “algorithms”. I’m sure the NFL has a legitimate method, but can it actually be explained? You’d think they’d just switch home/away like college series often do. 


 

It is a formula - you can go ahead and look to see exactly which teams we play home and away for the next decade (assuming nothing gets shifted or a new division is created).

 

You don’t know exactly which team is always on tap because that is based on exactly where you finish the previous year, but it will list Away AFC West and Home AFC South for example.  The teams then get filled in.

 

They have it nicely laid out if you just look for it (already posted in this thread.

 

The NFL does rotate home and away when you play the entire division, but since you have no idea ahead of time who will finish where - it makes no sense to try and build Home/Away for that - you just set it up on a rotating basis - which is exactly what they have done.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suffice it to say any Bills fan could have checked the formulated home/ away schedule for 2022 5 years ago -with only terms such as “AFCW first and 3rd place finisher away” used instead of actual team names. It’s also likely that in 2017 none of them would have cared. Then Josh Allen happened. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, DrDawkinstein said:

4th year in a row

 

KC played in Buffalo in 2020 (We played the entire AFCW)

Buff played in KC last year (1st place teams within conference)

Buff plays at KC this year (1st place teams in conf)

Buff plays AT KC next year (We play entire AFCW)

 

 

 

Assuming both teams finish in 1st place, else it can vary.

 

 

2 hours ago, BLeonard said:

The easiest way to explain this is to look at the schedule in six year chunks.  I didn't bother to include the NFC matchups.

 

Below, I started with Josh's rookie year and went through 2023.  Columns E and G show the 2 year rotation on the games that are created by teams finishing in the same place within their divisions (1st from the East hosted 1st from the West in 2018, 2nd East Hosted 2nd West and so on).

 

In columns I and K, I flipped the alternating years highlighted in yellow to eliminate that 2 year rotation, since from what I've read, your major question is "why is the two year rotation not a 'home and home' rotation?".  If you look across the rows under that scenario, you'd see that the Bills would NEVER have the chance to host the Chiefs in a year where the AFC East played the AFC North.  KC would also NEVER have the chance to host the Bills any year the AFC East played the AFC South.

 

It boils down to, which would you rather have?  A chance at playing at the same place 3 years in a row, or knowing that anytime the Bills play the AFCN, they CAN'T host ANY AFCW team.

 

So, they could they rotate every season, but my guess is, the NFL would rather have the 2 year rotation instead of locking teams out of ANY chance of playing at a given location every time they play a certain opposite division.

 

239510803_ScheduleExplanation.thumb.jpg.05e26da47edbcae588a29ccd96745882.jpg

 

Understand the whole formula thing and agree no conspiracy going on however per your comment above

 

Last year AFC East played the AFC South and KC did host.  So you sure about what you wrote??

Edited by Ed_Formerly_of_Roch
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Jerome007 said:

So... is there an answer as to why it's always in KC?

 

At least this year the Chefs played MNF. Less time for them  to prepare.

The short week for KC does to some extent neutralize any home field advantage they might have had.  Plus, they are coming off a tough divisional game.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...