Jump to content

Trade Deadline (Nov 1) Bills Rumors / Speculation


Warriorspikes51

Recommended Posts

I am torn on him.  He sometimes dominates.  He sometimes plays like dirty did against the Chiefs.   Maybe it's being in a crap offense.  He would be a great red zone target for us.  

 

I feel like I'd want to improve elsewhere first but I would not dislike snagging him by any means.

1 minute ago, JayBaller10 said:

From what I’ve seen of Claypool, he has all the physical gifts in the world, but bad things happen when he’s targeted, sort of like a much bigger McKenzie. I’d pass. If I was the Packers I’d pass too.

Agree except on the Packers.  He could do damage there.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

for a 7th rounder, sure.  Not much more.  Like others have said: sometimes he is on, other times he is just way off.  Not sure if Hall could get more consistently good play over him, or not.  He's also a bit of a headcase.  Steeler fans down here would LOVE to see him go, for what it's worth--although most Steeler fans are over reactionary.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, thenorthremembers said:

I think he is a lot like Gabe Davis.  Don't think he fills a need at the moment.

 

Gabe has more game speed, better route running, is more physical and has better hands than Claypool.  

 

Claypool is more of a possession receiver that can get vertical on jump balls. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SCBills said:

 

Gabe has more game speed, better route running, is more physical and has better hands than Claypool.  

 

Claypool is more of a possession receiver that can get vertical on jump balls. 

Gabe is a better route running thats for sure.    I think thats where the game speed probably comes in, but Claypool is a better athlete in my opinion.

 

What I really meant is that I think the role Claypool would play in this offense is boundary wide receiver, and we already have a larger boundary player in Gabe Davis.  If we are looking to trade or sign a wideout, I'd think we'd like someone who can play the slot for the majority of the time they spend on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Loved Claypool at Notre Dame. I wanted us to draft him that year something bad. He's 6'5", 240lbs, with 4.4 speed. At ND he had excellent hands, excellent body control, and was a solid route runner for a guy his size. He wasn't just a "Go Route" WR. He's had a solid start to his career getting 800+ yards per season on 14+ yards per reception. This year has been down, but look at their QB situation. One thing I have noticed about Claypool on the field, an area I knew needed to and thought he would improve, that has been lacking is his understanding of defenses and his route adjustments according to. There are times where he could flatten off a route, use that big body, and make a play. Instead he rounds it off and allows the DB to undercut. Another thing, his personality has changed. At ND he seemed like a humble kid. Now he's out here running his mouth, getting into post club night fights, and doing things that cost his team like stalling to celebrate after making a catch for a 1st late in a game. I'd take him for a late rounder, but I don't think he really would fit the culture around here unless he humbled himself. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...