Jump to content

DeSantis For President in 2024?


Recommended Posts

On 8/10/2022 at 8:58 PM, Big Blitz said:

 

 

Thank you.

 

 

 

How much did "Lightyear" make btw?

 

They'll implode.  I'm not rooting for it.  But it's inevitable.  

 

Go woke.  Go broke.  

https://www.google.com/amp/s/variety.com/2022/film/news/disney-plus-subscribers-164-million-1235426552/amp/
umm, another post that hasn’t aged well. Looks like Disney swatted DeSantis away like the mosquito he is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BillStime said:

@Greg S - you think America looks at DeNazi any different than this POS?

 

FhH1aG3XEAIufB3?format=jpg&name=small

 

Judging by last night Florida certainly does. He should be the Republican nominee in 2024. Who are the Dems going to run? Biden might not be healthy enough to run. Kamala - LOL. Newsome is doing a fine job destroying CA. I will give him credit for that. Two years away is a long time and things can change but DeSantis will probably be the favorite in 2024 for the Republicans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Greg S said:

 

Judging by last night Florida certainly does. He should be the Republican nominee in 2024. Who are the Dems going to run? Biden might not be healthy enough to run. Kamala - LOL. Newsome is doing a fine job destroying CA. I will give him credit for that. Two years away is a long time and things can change but DeSantis will probably be the favorite in 2024 for the Republicans.

 

Everything DeNazi stands for was rejected last night.

 

Everything.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Greg S said:

 

Judging by last night Florida certainly does. He should be the Republican nominee in 2024. Who are the Dems going to run? Biden might not be healthy enough to run. Kamala - LOL. Newsome is doing a fine job destroying CA. I will give him credit for that. Two years away is a long time and things can change but DeSantis will probably be the favorite in 2024 for the Republicans.


Yes 2 years is a long time in politics but it sure looks like DeSantis V Newsom.   One thing to look at is FL is gaining residents while CA is losing.  I think the number one issue between them needs to be taxes.  Shine a light on the impending Dem “designed” tax increases for all in 2026. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Greg S said:

 

Judging by last night Florida certainly does. He should be the Republican nominee in 2024. Who are the Dems going to run? Biden might not be healthy enough to run. Kamala - LOL. Newsome is doing a fine job destroying CA. I will give him credit for that. Two years away is a long time and things can change but DeSantis will probably be the favorite in 2024 for the Republicans.

I think Governor Gretchen from the great state of Michigan would be an awesome candidate for the Dems 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Is DeSantis going to promise religious Conservatives to appoint pro-life judges? 

 

Inquiring minds want to know 

Why would you ask such a moronic question? Will Newsome only appoint atheists and satanists is just as justified a question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump won’t be able to handle Desantis getting attention.  He will ruin the GOP w his demented ego. 

19 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said:

Why would you ask such a moronic question? Will Newsome only appoint atheists and satanists is just as justified a question.


its because some people in the gop do not respect the constitution and the separation of church and state.  They don’t love America. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, nedboy7 said:

 


its because some people in the gop do not respect the constitution and the separation of church and state.  They don’t love America. 

Are you trying to prove your ignorance  and state you think "Separation of Church and State" is in the Constitution? Or that choosing moral people is establishing a religion? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Just trying to push this to 100 pages …

Kinky Boots Ron strikes me as smart enough to tack hard to the center as soon as Trump is out of his way. If that happens…. Can’t wait for Trump to start spilling the dirt on Ronnie. Should be fun. Nick Offerman Popcorn GIF by NBC

Here is my disconnect for RD....I listened to his victory speech....He used the word "woke" enough times to show that seems to be his primary message...really? This is what America...from a Presidential level...needs to focus on? Wokeness?....He seems like a band with one great song that opens and closes with it...He is infatuated with wokeness.  

Edited by TH3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, TH3 said:

Here is my disconnect for RD....I listened to his victory speech....He used the word "woke" enough times to show that seems to be his primary message...really? This is what America...from a Presidential level...needs to focus on? Wokeness?....He seems like a band with one great song that opens and closes with it...He is infatuated with wokeness.  

You’re right. Weird to you and to me. 
But I think he knows his audience extremely well, and his first order of business is to get enough of that Trump culture war base over to his side. And they eat this stuff up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ffs

 

 

We thank you for your service Lockdown Don.  Time to move on.    
 

That said - maybe having you close for DeSantis to completely distinguish himself from (the nonsense like this that turns off votes we need) is for the best.  

 

Everything is on the table.  
 

I’m excited and horrified at the same time.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Orlando Tim said:

Are you trying to prove your ignorance  and state you think "Separation of Church and State" is in the Constitution? Or that choosing moral people is establishing a religion? 

 

Establishment clause of First Amendment often interpreted to require separation of church and state

For approximately the first 150 years of the country’s existence, there was little debate over the meaning of this clause in the Constitution. As the citizenry became more diverse, however, challenges arose to existing laws and practices, and eventually, the Supreme Court was called upon to determine the meaning of the establishment clause.

Though not explicitly stated in the First Amendment, the clause is often interpreted to mean that the Constitution requires the separation of church and state.

 

Jefferson's metaphor of a wall of separation has been cited repeatedly by the U.S. Supreme Court. In Reynolds v. United States (1879) the Court wrote that Jefferson's comments "may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [First] Amendment." In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), Justice Hugo Black wrote: "In the words of Thomas Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and state."

Edited by nedboy7
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, nedboy7 said:

 

Establishment clause of First Amendment often interpreted to require separation of church and state

For approximately the first 150 years of the country’s existence, there was little debate over the meaning of this clause in the Constitution. As the citizenry became more diverse, however, challenges arose to existing laws and practices, and eventually, the Supreme Court was called upon to determine the meaning of the establishment clause.

Though not explicitly stated in the First Amendment, the clause is often interpreted to mean that the Constitution requires the separation of church and state.

Often interpreted does not equal meaning. You did not even source it, and I am quite sure you have no clue where the phrase "separation of church and state" because if you did you would not use it this way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said:

Often interpreted does not equal meaning. You did not even source it, and I am quite sure you have no clue where the phrase "separation of church and state" because if you did you would not use it this way.

 

I am afraid you might be the ignorant one. 

 

Did you read this part?

 

Jefferson's metaphor of a wall of separation has been cited repeatedly by the U.S. Supreme Court. In Reynolds v. United States (1879) the Court wrote that Jefferson's comments "may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [First] Amendment." In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), Justice Hugo Black wrote: "In the words of Thomas Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and state."

Edited by nedboy7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, nedboy7 said:

 

I am afraid you might be the ignorant one. 

 

Did you read this part?

 

Jefferson's metaphor of a wall of separation has been cited repeatedly by the U.S. Supreme Court. In Reynolds v. United States (1879) the Court wrote that Jefferson's comments "may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [First] Amendment." In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), Justice Hugo Black wrote: "In the words of Thomas Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and state."

Two points since you are clearly flailing and dishonest- that entire paragraph was missing. Secondly, what religion does not promote having children? 

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Orlando Tim said:

Secondly, what religion does not promote having children? 

OK, that's weird. It's ok to be anti-abortion/anti-birth control because a lot of religions encourage procreation?

And there were the Shakers, but that's a big reason why they died out.

13 minutes ago, SCBills said:

Everyone gather around .. Trump is committing seppuku on Truth Social tonight 

 

 

Poor Donny feeling rather irrelevant ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Desantis is starting to look like the republican Obama. a good leader well liked across the aisle, charismatic…Rather than battle trumps ego maybe he should stick to Florida until Donnie dies off or goes to jail so he doesn’t blow his shot. 

3 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

Trump wants to go down in flames because he knows he can’t win anymore…what a loser…

In hindsight I bet the Rs wish they indicted him

Mitt was right 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

Desantis is starting to look like the republican Obama. a good leader well liked across the aisle, charismatic…Rather than battle trumps ego maybe he should stick to Florida until Donnie dies off or goes to jail so he doesn’t blow his shot. 

If DeSantis can stay above the fray, it will just make Trump look worse- and he will lose all his supporters…Just don’t play Trump’s game and Ron will be fine…

4 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

Desantis is starting to look like the republican Obama. a good leader well liked across the aisle, charismatic…Rather than battle trumps ego maybe he should stick to Florida until Donnie dies off or goes to jail so he doesn’t blow his shot. 

In hindsight I bet the Rs wish they indicted him

Mitt was right 

I’m starting to hope he gets convicted on one of his many lawsuits…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Frankish Reich said:

OK, that's weird. It's ok to be anti-abortion/anti-birth control because a lot of religions encourage procreation?

And there were the Shakers, but that's a big reason why they died out.

Poor Donny feeling rather irrelevant ...

Huh? I’m sorry, but I’ve never seen abortion as a religious issue. It’s a shared morality issue. You don’t have to believe in a specific deity to hold that voluntarily terminating a new life in the womb, is something to be avoided at most, if not all costs. 

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...