Matt Miller's Team-by-Team Draft Rumors (what he's hearing about the Bills)

[Logic]

If you know Matt Miller, you know that he's one of the better voices in the scouting community. He's reasonably well connected, and he puts out good, sane, accurate content year after year.

He puts out an annual "what I'm hearing" article as the draft approaches, and it often contains good insight into which way teams are leaning. He has more info about some teams than others, but he shares at least a little something about all 32 teams.

The full version of this article is behind a paywall, but a kind soul shared a guest pass with me and I was able to read it. I may just end up subscribing to thedraftscout website anyway, because there's a lot of great content there.

https://www.thedraftscout.com/p/matt-millers-scouting-notebook-team

Here is what Miller says about the Bills:

Buffalo — A playmaker on either side of the ball is the rumor coming out of Buffalo. They’ll play the board and let talented athletes slip to them as always, but a speedy cornerback, yards-after-catch wide receiver or three-down running back would all get a lot of consideration here. That could easily be the first three picks for Buffalo.




...I don't know about the rest of you, but I find that pretty darn interesting. We all know they're looking for a more athletic and well-rounded cornerback, but the RAC receiver and three down running back tidbits -- and the lack of any mention of pass rushers or offensive linemen -- is eyebrow-raising.

p.s. Save me the "no one knows anything, it's all a smokescreen, Beane doesn't let his secrets out!" reply. Yes, the Bills run a tight ship. No, it's not impossible for certain well connected people to find out which ways they're leaning. Yes, it could all be a smokescreen -- but I doubt it. 

[YoloinOhio]

Etienne can’t pass block so must be Harris. No way they put him out there on 3rd down in this offense if he can’t pass block 

Lots of good YAC options - Elijah Moore In the 1st 

Speedy CB is a straight up NEED

[Conlan58]

No one knows anything, it's all a smokescreen, Beane doesn't let his secrets out.

[Logic]

2 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

Etienne can’t pass block so must be Harris. No way they put him out there on 3rd down in this offense if he can’t pass block 

Lots of good YAC options - Elijah Moore In the 1st 

Speedy CB is a straight up NEED

The popular wisdom is that they're taking a corner or edge rusher in round 1.

I'm starting to wonder, though, if it's actually going to be an offensive playmaker in round 1, followed by a corner in round 2. The depth of the corner class leads me to think they can reasonably select a starting caliber corner in round 2 or even round 3. 

Beane always says that playoff losses show you where you're lacking. Our loss to the Chiefs showed us lacking in coverage and pass rush, sure....but don't tell me Beane didn't notice the elite speed and playmaking capability of the KC offense, too. Whereas the Bills have a great receiving corps as is, what they DON'T have -- either in the WR or RB room -- is an "instant offense" guy like Tyreek Hill or Mecole Hardman. 

[Hapless Bills Fan]

19 minutes ago, Logic said:

If you know Matt Miller, you know that he's one of the better voices in the scouting community. He's reasonably well connected, and he puts out good, sane, accurate content year after year.

He puts out an annual "what I'm hearing" article as the draft approaches, and it often contains good insight into which way teams are leaning. He has more info about some teams than others, but he shares at least a little something about all 32 teams.

The full version of this article is behind a paywall, but a kind soul shared a guest pass with me and I was able to read it. I may just end up subscribing to thedraftscout website anyway, because there's a lot of great content there.

https://www.thedraftscout.com/p/matt-millers-scouting-notebook-team

Here is what Miller says about the Bills:

Buffalo — A playmaker on either side of the ball is the rumor coming out of Buffalo. They’ll play the board and let talented athletes slip to them as always, but a speedy cornerback, yards-after-catch wide receiver or three-down running back would all get a lot of consideration here. That could easily be the first three picks for Buffalo.




...I don't know about the rest of you, but I find that pretty darn interesting. We all know they're looking for a more athletic and well-rounded cornerback, but the RAC receiver and three down running back tidbits -- and the lack of any mention of pass rushers or offensive linemen -- is eyebrow-raising.

p.s. Save me the "no one knows anything, it's all a smokescreen, Beane doesn't let his secrets out!" reply. Yes, the Bills run a tight ship. No, it's not impossible for certain well connected people to find out which ways they're leaning. Yes, it could all be a smokescreen -- but I doubt it. 

 

I mean "a playmaker on either side of the ball" seems a pretty general assertion for a team that has its QB, its WR1, and its CB1 in place, and was successful last year. 

13 minutes ago, Logic said:

The popular wisdom is that they're taking a corner or edge rusher in round 1.

 

Well, we need to get more pressure/pass rush from somewhere, and unless you think Efe Obada is "it", FA didn't do it for us.

 

On OL we obviously added a lot of pieces to provide either depth or competition.  Ditto LB.  Not so much on DL, especially at Edge.

 

13 minutes ago, Logic said:

I'm starting to wonder, though, if it's actually going to be an offensive playmaker in round 1, followed by a corner in round 2.

 

Daboll has on a couple of occasions made the point that there's only one 1st round pick on the offensive side of the ball.

 

I think Beane would disagree and point to Stefon Diggs, but the point remains that the Bills seem to have more high round picks invested in D than in O.

[YoloinOhio]

14 minutes ago, Logic said:

The popular wisdom is that they're taking a corner or edge rusher in round 1.

I'm starting to wonder, though, if it's actually going to be an offensive playmaker in round 1, followed by a corner in round 2. The depth of the corner class leads me to think they can reasonably select a starting caliber corner in round 2 or even round 3. 

Beane always says that playoff losses show you where you're lacking. Our loss to the Chiefs showed us lacking in coverage and pass rush, sure....but don't tell me Beane didn't notice the elite speed and playmaking capability of the KC offense, too. Whereas the Bills have a great receiving corps as is, what they DON'T have -- either in the WR or RB room -- is an "instant offense" guy like Tyreek Hill or Mecole Hardman. 

I listened to the interview With Dan Morgan on Eric wood’s podcast and he said without giving away their draft plans, it was clear to them some of the reasons they lost their “big games” (ie out of the 4 going to assume he means the 2 vs KC). 

[Logic]

3 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

I mean "a playmaker on either side of the ball" seems a pretty general assertion for a team that has its QB, its WR1, and its CB1 in place, and was successful last year. 

I suppose, but I also think it rules out an offensive lineman and perhaps a developmental edge rusher, as well. 

He also suggests a yards-after-catch WR and a three-down RB as being likely possibilities at that spot, which not many in Bills fan land are forecasting at the moment

[H2o]

Terrace Marshall from LSU comes to mind in the back end of the 1st as well. 

[Reed83HOF]

13 minutes ago, Logic said:

The popular wisdom is that they're taking a corner or edge rusher in round 1.

I'm starting to wonder, though, if it's actually going to be an offensive playmaker in round 1, followed by a corner in round 2. The depth of the corner class leads me to think they can reasonably select a starting caliber corner in round 2 or even round 3. 

Beane always says that playoff losses show you where you're lacking. Our loss to the Chiefs showed us lacking in coverage and pass rush, sure....but don't tell me Beane didn't notice the elite speed and playmaking capability of the KC offense, too. Whereas the Bills have a great receiving corps as is, what they DON'T have -- either in the WR or RB room -- is an "instant offense" guy like Tyreek Hill or Mecole Hardman. 

 

 

 

[TheBeaneBandit]

I like it.....a lot.

[GunnerBill]

@Logic I have been a subscriber since he soft launched in January. Lots of good content, regular ask Matt video calls, some fun member mock drafts... I think it is well worth the money and honestly I am not on the payroll!

[BuffaloBill]

29 minutes ago, Logic said:

If you know Matt Miller, you know that he's one of the better voices in the scouting community. He's reasonably well connected, and he puts out good, sane, accurate content year after year.

He puts out an annual "what I'm hearing" article as the draft approaches, and it often contains good insight into which way teams are leaning. He has more info about some teams than others, but he shares at least a little something about all 32 teams.

The full version of this article is behind a paywall, but a kind soul shared a guest pass with me and I was able to read it. I may just end up subscribing to thedraftscout website anyway, because there's a lot of great content there.

https://www.thedraftscout.com/p/matt-millers-scouting-notebook-team

Here is what Miller says about the Bills:

Buffalo — A playmaker on either side of the ball is the rumor coming out of Buffalo. They’ll play the board and let talented athletes slip to them as always, but a speedy cornerback, yards-after-catch wide receiver or three-down running back would all get a lot of consideration here. That could easily be the first three picks for Buffalo.




...I don't know about the rest of you, but I find that pretty darn interesting. We all know they're looking for a more athletic and well-rounded cornerback, but the RAC receiver and three down running back tidbits -- and the lack of any mention of pass rushers or offensive linemen -- is eyebrow-raising.

p.s. Save me the "no one knows anything, it's all a smokescreen, Beane doesn't let his secrets out!" reply. Yes, the Bills run a tight ship. No, it's not impossible for certain well connected people to find out which ways they're leaning. Yes, it could all be a smokescreen -- but I doubt it. 

 

 

Please not a RB in the first round. 

[Logic]

4 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

@Logic I have been a subscriber since he soft launched in January. Lots of good content, regular ask Matt video calls, some fun member mock drafts... I think it is well worth the money and honestly I am not on the payroll!

Thanks.

I've been spending the morning combing through the site, pondering whether or not to subscribe once my guest pass expires. I already pay for The Athletic, where Dane Brugler just released his annual "the Beast" draft guide, which is great. I'm willing to pay for good journalism and quality content, and Miller certainly provides that.

In reading past Bills nuggets from Miller, I saw him say that he believes the Bills would be "all over" Elijah Moore if he fell to them. Thought that was interesting, too.

Oh, and @Reed83HOF : That was an excellent addition to this thread. Thank you!

Edited April 14, 2021 by Logic

[Reed83HOF]

15 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

I mean "a playmaker on either side of the ball" seems a pretty general assertion for a team that has its QB, its WR1, and its CB1 in place, and was successful last year. 

 

Well, we need to get more pressure/pass rush from somewhere, and unless you think Efe Obada is "it", FA didn't do it for us.

 

On OL we obviously added a lot of pieces to provide either depth or competition.  Ditto LB.  Not so much on DL, especially at Edge.

 

 

Daboll has on a couple of occasions made the point that there's only one 1st round pick on the offensive side of the ball.

 

I think Beane would disagree and point to Stefon Diggs, but the point remains that the Bills seem to have more high round picks invested in D than in O.

Phillips is an FA next year,  star is our only 1T, we need to add there. 

 

The focus of offense vs defense, we didn't punt a whole lot last year and scored a ton of points, the defense was really not that great at getting stops. Our offense still needs work, there were too many 3rd and longs for my liking, but that could be a play calling type issue, inability to run and the d just making good plays. We couldn't switch between a run game and throwing to keep a defense honest. 

 

All that being said, the D couldn't consistently shut the door on an opponent, which allowed them to stay in the game. I place a bit more emphasis here...

5 minutes ago, Logic said:

Thanks.

I've been spending the morning combing through the site, pondering whether or not to subscribe once my guest pass expires. I already pay for The Athletic, where Dane Brugler just released his annual "the Beast" draft guide, which is great. I'm willing to pay for good journalism and quality content, and Miller certainly provides that.

In reading past Bills nuggets from Miller, I saw him say that he believes the Bills would be "all over" Elijah Moore if he fell to them. Thought that was interesting, too.

Oh, and @Reed83HOF : That was an excellent addition to this thread. Thank you!

Big fan of the RAS personally and Beane loves athleticism and intangibles(own up to your mistakes, ability to learn and retain info, leadership, etc). This covers the athleticism part.

 

Edit: also need to look at age (no old guys), we love underclassman, conference isn't a large concern, production is interesting though and it needs to be taken into context with what the player was being asked to do and the talent level (coaching and team mates) on his team, so tape needs to be taken in context. 

Edited April 14, 2021 by Reed83HOF

[JÂy RÛßeÒ]

19 minutes ago, Logic said:

Beane always says that playoff losses show you where you're lacking. Our loss to the Chiefs showed us lacking in coverage and pass rush, sure....but don't tell me Beane didn't notice the elite speed and playmaking capability of the KC offense, too. 

I love this philosophy.  Playoffs are a direct test against the best.  When you fail, you see where they were better than you and you try to shore that up so that next year that won't be the reason.  Depending on situations (needs, availability, money) you can fix in-house, via trade, FA, or the draft.

2 years ago, we lost to Houston cause we lost our composure, and we settled for FGs instead of TDs.  So the fixes were leadership and experience along with improving the weapons on offense.
 

To me this year's loss to KC showed areas of concern on both sides of the ball.  Our D couldn't stop their playmakers and our O couldn't keep up (and again we lost composure in the process).  And the one thing this approach doesn't address, at least to the naked eye, is coaching.  How could the coaching be improved to alter the outcome?

[Pete]

I love it!  We have deepest team in NFL- give us play makers!  No matter a CB, Edge, RB, TE, S- get us some more play makers!

[Logic]

I'm still combing through old mocks and articles on Miller's website. 

As I was going through his "7 days, 7 rounds" series, I saw him make the following picks in the first three rounds for the Bills:

Round 1: RB Travis Etienne
Round 2: CB Eric Stokes
Round 3: WR Anthony Schwartz

I know that a running back in the first round upsets a lot of people around here, but for me? The idea of adding the speed and "instant offense" that Etienne and Schwartz would bring while ALSO still getting an athlete like Stokes at CB2? That would be a home run.

Also, the recent Cover 1 video showing the Bills moving to more of an outside zone running scheme has me wondering if they ARE, in fact, taking a long look at Etienne. Miller describes him as the ideal angle-busting, one-cut-and-go, outside zone runner, and compares him to Dalvin Cook. 

Anway....draft season is fun. 

[Reed83HOF]

 

 

 

[Process]

2 minutes ago, Logic said:

I'm still combing through old mocks and articles on Miller's website. 

As I was going through his "7 days, 7 rounds" series, I saw him make the following picks in the first three rounds for the Bills:

Round 1: RB Travis Etienne
Round 2: CB Eric Stokes
Round 3: WR Anthony Schwartz

I know that a running back in the first round upsets a lot of people around here, but for me? The idea of adding the speed and "instant offense" that Etienne and Schwartz would bring while ALSO still getting an athlete like Stokes at CB2? That would be a home run.

Also, the recent Cover 1 video showing the Bills moving to more of an outside zone running scheme has me wondering if they ARE, in fact, taking a long look at Etienne. Miller describes him as the ideal angle-busting, one-cut-and-go, outside zone runner, and compares him to Dalvin Cook. 

Anway....draft season is fun. 

Never heard of Schwartz until you mentioned him here. 6'1 and runs a 4.26? Sheesh. 

[NewEra]

6 minutes ago, JÂy RÛßeÒ said:

I love this philosophy.  Playoffs are a direct test against the best.  When you fail, you see where they were better than you and you try to shore that up so that next year that won't be the reason.  Depending on situations (needs, availability, money) you can fix in-house, via trade, FA, or the draft.

2 years ago, we lost to Houston cause we lost our composure, and we settled for FGs instead of TDs.  So the fixes were leadership and experience along with improving the weapons on offense.
 

To me this year's loss to KC showed areas of concern on both sides of the ball.  Our D couldn't stop their playmakers and our O couldn't keep up (and again we lost composure in the process).  And the one thing this approach doesn't address, at least to the naked eye, is coaching.  How could the coaching be improved to alter the outcome?

After being aggressive the entire season (and to start the AFCCG going for it on 4th down on our 1st possession) McD reverted back to his old tendencies, kicking FGs while the oppostion scores TD after TD.  Coaching not to lose as opposed to coaching to win the game.  
 

the afccg showed me that we need a better CB2.  McD was coaching scared on D.  Almost as if he had zero confidence in the players in coverage.  We didn’t have a defender in position to stop one pass the entire game. That was the worst defensive performance we had all year and it looked like (to me) that McD was worried about getting beat overtop on every play.

[H2o]

Another guy, a sleeper to watch, is Payton Turner. He is solid getting after the QB and is solid against the run as well. In 5 games this year he had 10.5 tfl and 5 sacks. Competition wasn't elite, but he gets after it. Not sure he's a 1st Round guy at all, but a 2nd Round selection would be fine by me. 6'6" and 270lbs. I think he also has that kick inside on passing downs versatility as well.  Former teammate of Ed O @ Houston.  

Edited April 14, 2021 by H2o

[BillsVet]

47 minutes ago, Conlan58 said:

No one knows anything, it's all a smokescreen, Beane doesn't let his secrets out.

 

Why anyone believes anything coming out 2 weeks before the draft is beyond me.  These people get "scoops" and it's just disinformation meant to throw other front offices off. 

 

Don't believe the hype.

[Logic]

5 minutes ago, Process said:

Never heard of Schwartz until you mentioned him here. 6'1 and runs a 4.26? Sheesh. 

Yeah. 

He doesn't seem to offer much short area quickness, but his long speed is unreal. 

Defensive coordinators already have their hands full with Diggs, Sanders, Beasley, Davis. Add in a guy with Schwartz' speed? Yikes.

Just now, BillsVet said:

 

Why anyone believes anything coming out 2 weeks before the draft is beyond me.  These people get "scoops" and it's just disinformation meant to throw other front offices off. 

 

Don't believe the hype.

There he is!

This week's "It's all a smokescreen" guy! I knew he'd show up in this thread eventually!



 

[JÂy RÛßeÒ]

2 minutes ago, NewEra said:

After being aggressive the entire season (and to start the AFCCG going for it on 4th down on our 1st possession) McD reverted back to his old tendencies, kicking FGs while the oppostion scores TD after TD.  Coaching not to lose as opposed to coaching to win the game.  
 

the afccg showed me that we need a better CB2.  McD was coaching scared on D.  Almost as if he had zero confidence in the players in coverage.  We didn’t have a defender in position to stop one pass the entire game. That was the worst defensive performance we had all year and it looked like (to me) that McD was worried about getting beat overtop on every play.

Right so game plan and game-day coaching was a thing at all levels.   Is learning from experience alone enough to fix what went wrong there?  There's no coaches draft, no coach trades (almost).

[MJS]

9 minutes ago, NewEra said:

After being aggressive the entire season (and to start the AFCCG going for it on 4th down on our 1st possession) McD reverted back to his old tendencies, kicking FGs while the oppostion scores TD after TD.  Coaching not to lose as opposed to coaching to win the game.  
 

the afccg showed me that we need a better CB2.  McD was coaching scared on D.  Almost as if he had zero confidence in the players in coverage.  We didn’t have a defender in position to stop one pass the entire game. That was the worst defensive performance we had all year and it looked like (to me) that McD was worried about getting beat overtop on every play.

Do you mean Frazier? He calls the defense.

[Logic]

2 minutes ago, JÂy RÛßeÒ said:

Right so game plan and game-day coaching was a thing at all levels.   Is learning from experience alone enough to fix what went wrong there?  There's no coaches draft, no coach trades (almost).

I will say that McDermott and Daboll seem to be constantly self-scouting, constantly trying to improve at what they do. Both have improved as coaches each year that they've been here. Neither seem too proud to admit that something isn't working or to try to do things differently. 

[BillsVet]

1 minute ago, Logic said:

There he is!

This week's "It's all a smokescreen" guy! I knew he'd show up in this thread eventually!

 

Logic (and I find your screen name ironic) here goes.

 

It is logical to conclude that this close to the draft those in the NFL Insider club are deliberately manipulated for purposes of subterfuge.  They get some clicks, but none of them knows anything for sure.  And Buffalo isn't about to let out a secret, at least nothing specific.  A savvy NFL front office doesn't tip their hat on a draft pick even late in the 1st round. 

 

Because I'm all good with not knowing anything but realizing Buffalo's front office is confusing others about their intentions.  Or, are you that me-first that you think you know while minimizing that some guy revealed Buffalo is leaky with their decision?  Up to you "Logic."

 

[YoloinOhio]

11 minutes ago, Logic said:

Yeah. 

He doesn't seem to offer much short area quickness, but his long speed is unreal. 

Defensive coordinators already have their hands full with Diggs, Sanders, Beasley, Davis. Add in a guy with Schwartz' speed? Yikes.

There he is!

This week's "It's all a smokescreen" guy! I knew he'd show up in this thread eventually!



 

People believe what fits their own narratives. If they don’t like it, it’s a smokescreen. If they do, there are probably “legit sources”. The beat goes on. 

[Logic]

6 minutes ago, BillsVet said:

 

Logic (and I find your screen name ironic) here goes.

 

It is logical to conclude that this close to the draft those in the NFL Insider club are deliberately manipulated for purposes of subterfuge.  They get some clicks, but none of them knows anything for sure.  And Buffalo isn't about to let out a secret, at least nothing specific.  A savvy NFL front office doesn't tip their hat on a draft pick even late in the 1st round. 

 

Because I'm all good with not knowing anything but realizing Buffalo's front office is confusing others about their intentions.  Or, are you that me-first that you think you know while minimizing that some guy revealed Buffalo is leaky with their decision?  Up to you "Logic."

 

First of all: Kudos on the super original jab at my screen name. No one has ever said that before!!!!!!

Look, everyone knows that there are smokescreens and disinformation leading up to draft season. Everyone ALSO knows that it absolutely IS possible to glean legitimate intel about which way teams are leaning. A few analysts knew with certainty and insisted for weeks that the Bills were all in on Josh Allen. It was known by everyone that they loved Ed Oliver. Yes, the Bills run a tight ship. No, it's not an impenetrable steel trap of information.

The idea that absolutely nothing of value can be taken from all of the pre-draft rumors is silly. Conversely, to assume that ALL pre-draft rumors are true is also silly. The job of us fans -- and remember, this is all just for fun, because sports are supposed to be fun -- is to look over the whole basket of rumors and decide what we think is true and what we think is false. I suppose that you could just automatically assume that EVERYTHING is false and that it's 100% impossible for anyone to know anything before the draft, but I think that's naive, and I think that history has proven it false. Also, where's the fun in that? Because, again: following sports is supposed to be FUN!

At least that's how I feel about it, "BillsVet".

Edited April 14, 2021 by Logic

[Reed83HOF]

16 minutes ago, NewEra said:

After being aggressive the entire season (and to start the AFCCG going for it on 4th down on our 1st possession) McD reverted back to his old tendencies, kicking FGs while the oppostion scores TD after TD.  Coaching not to lose as opposed to coaching to win the game.  
 

the afccg showed me that we need a better CB2.  McD was coaching scared on D.  Almost as if he had zero confidence in the players in coverage.  We didn’t have a defender in position to stop one pass the entire game. That was the worst defensive performance we had all year and it looked like (to me) that McD was worried about getting beat overtop on every play.

Great post!

 

He sure was and that is why I'm zeroed in on a cb or 2 right now.  The pass rush up front can be neutralized with a quick passing attack, so coverage is even more important. It's our biggest need.

[NewEra]

11 minutes ago, JÂy RÛßeÒ said:

Right so game plan and game-day coaching was a thing at all levels.   Is learning from experience alone enough to fix what went wrong there?  There's no coaches draft, no coach trades (almost).

it has to be.  The great coaches learn from it.  The coaches that aren’t so great, don’t.  Let’s just hope that McD continues to improve.  I thought he showed a different level aggressiveness last year.  

11 minutes ago, MJS said:

Do you mean Frazier? He calls the defense.

Yeah, I’m sure it’s all Frazier

[Rocky Landing]

1 hour ago, Logic said:

If you know Matt Miller, you know that he's one of the better voices in the scouting community. He's reasonably well connected, and he puts out good, sane, accurate content year after year.

He puts out an annual "what I'm hearing" article as the draft approaches, and it often contains good insight into which way teams are leaning. He has more info about some teams than others, but he shares at least a little something about all 32 teams.

The full version of this article is behind a paywall, but a kind soul shared a guest pass with me and I was able to read it. I may just end up subscribing to thedraftscout website anyway, because there's a lot of great content there.

https://www.thedraftscout.com/p/matt-millers-scouting-notebook-team

Here is what Miller says about the Bills:

Buffalo — A playmaker on either side of the ball is the rumor coming out of Buffalo. They’ll play the board and let talented athletes slip to them as always, but a speedy cornerback, yards-after-catch wide receiver or three-down running back would all get a lot of consideration here. That could easily be the first three picks for Buffalo.




...I don't know about the rest of you, but I find that pretty darn interesting. We all know they're looking for a more athletic and well-rounded cornerback, but the RAC receiver and three down running back tidbits -- and the lack of any mention of pass rushers or offensive linemen -- is eyebrow-raising.

p.s. Save me the "no one knows anything, it's all a smokescreen, Beane doesn't let his secrets out!" reply. Yes, the Bills run a tight ship. No, it's not impossible for certain well connected people to find out which ways they're leaning. Yes, it could all be a smokescreen -- but I doubt it. 

"A playmaker on either side of the ball..." 

That's some deep insight, there...

[Logic]

3 minutes ago, Rocky Landing said:

"A playmaker on either side of the ball..." 

That's some deep insight, there...

As I previously pointed out in this thread: It would seem to rule out an offensive lineman and, arguably, a developmental pass rusher. It would seem instead to point to a cornerback, receiver, running back, or linebacker instead.

The term "playmaker" as it relates to the draft usually refers to adding some electricity, some speed, some home run threat, a turnover-creator, something like that. So it sort of DOES narrow things down a bit, in my opinion.

 

[stinky finger]

47 minutes ago, BillsVet said:

 

Why anyone believes anything coming out 2 weeks before the draft is beyond me.  These people get "scoops" and it's just disinformation meant to throw other front offices off. 

 

Don't believe the hype.

 

Ok, thanks for setting us straight. 

[Royale with Cheese]

41 minutes ago, BillsVet said:

 

Logic (and I find your screen name ironic) here goes.

 

It is logical to conclude that this close to the draft those in the NFL Insider club are deliberately manipulated for purposes of subterfuge.  They get some clicks, but none of them knows anything for sure.  And Buffalo isn't about to let out a secret, at least nothing specific.  A savvy NFL front office doesn't tip their hat on a draft pick even late in the 1st round. 

 

Because I'm all good with not knowing anything but realizing Buffalo's front office is confusing others about their intentions.  Or, are you that me-first that you think you know while minimizing that some guy revealed Buffalo is leaky with their decision?  Up to you "Logic."

 

There isn’t any conclusion.  It’s all just discussions.

[HappyDays]

Meh I'm sure Matt Miller has connections, but "playmaker on either side of the ball" is as vague as it gets.

[billieve420]

Playmaker term is so vague could mean anything. We could use playmakers at DE, CB, OL, RB, TE, and WR. As long as they can contribute Year 1 is what is more important. 

Edited April 14, 2021 by billieve420

[Paup 1995MVP]

40 minutes ago, Reed83HOF said:

Great post!

 

He sure was and that is why I'm zeroed in on a cb or 2 right now.  The pass rush up front can be neutralized with a quick passing attack, so coverage is even more important. It's our biggest need.

It is a huge need.  No way any team should be going into an NFL conference championship game w Levi Wallace as one of your two starting boundary CB's.  His athletic ability to cover in what is now a very heavy passing league is simply not good enuf, and probably will never be.  He can't play press man coverage because he doesn't have the fast twitchiness needed.  We improve our starting CB2, we improve our defense considerably.  

[Logic]

8 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

Meh I'm sure Matt Miller has connections, but "playmaker on either side of the ball" is as vague as it gets.

 

4 minutes ago, billieve420 said:

Playmaker term is so vague could mean anything. We could use playmakers at DE, CB, OL, RB, TE, and WR. As long as they can contribute Year 1 is what is more important. 

I'll just copy and paste what I already said in this thread:

It would seem to rule out an offensive lineman and, arguably, a developmental pass rusher. It would seem instead to point to a cornerback, receiver, running back, or linebacker instead.

The term "playmaker" as it relates to the draft usually refers to adding some electricity, some speed, some home run threat, a turnover-creator, something like that. So it sort of DOES narrow things down a bit, in my opinion. 

In an offseason in which many here are penciling in an edge rusher to the Bills, Miller's take would seem to call that idea into question. It obviously doesn't completely rule out a big man with pick #30, but typically the term "playmaker" is not used to describe, say, a guard, tackle, or developmental edge rusher.

[billieve420]

1 hour ago, NewEra said:

After being aggressive the entire season (and to start the AFCCG going for it on 4th down on our 1st possession) McD reverted back to his old tendencies, kicking FGs while the oppostion scores TD after TD.  Coaching not to lose as opposed to coaching to win the game.  
 

the afccg showed me that we need a better CB2.  McD was coaching scared on D.  Almost as if he had zero confidence in the players in coverage.  We didn’t have a defender in position to stop one pass the entire game. That was the worst defensive performance we had all year and it looked like (to me) that McD was worried about getting beat overtop on every play.

 

Doesn't matter how good of a secondary you have if the pass rush can't get to the QB. Even the best CBs are going to be beat if you can't bring pressure. We struggled bringing pressure with the front 4 without blitzing.

 

I am all for taking whoever is highest on the board at #30 whether that be a CB, DE, or OL as the primary needs. DT, RB, TE, LB, S and WR are secondary.