Jump to content

The Rosen Era Has Begun in Arizona


26CornerBlitz

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said:

 

Hey little buddy. How ya been taking "right" josh's benching?

 

Pretty good or nah?

 

1. He's not benched

2. Just because Rosen is playing bad doesn't mean Allen is good. They are both bad. Quite possibly the 2 worst QBs in the entire league right now

3. My screen name isnt because I'm a Rosen fan or a fan of another team. It's because I'm NOT an Allen fan and think the Bills drafting his was a terrible move. If you want a guy that runs and can't throw for more than 200 yards then why not just keep Tyrod and use the picks on other offensive weapons?

Edited by WRONG JOSH
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, WRONG JOSH said:

1. He's not benched

2. Just because Rosen is playing bad doesn't mean Allen is good. They are both bad. Quite possibly the 2 worst QBs in the entire league right now

3. My screen name isnt because I'm a Rosen fan or a fan of another team. It's because I'm NOT an Allen fan and think the Bills drafting his was a terrible move. If you want a guy that runs and can't throw for more than 200 yards then why not just keep Tyrod and use the picks on other offensive weapons?

Allen ran for less than 20 yards this past game and did pass for over 200 yards.  Just FYI.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, WRONG JOSH said:

1. He's not benched

2. Just because Rosen is playing bad doesn't mean Allen is good. They are both bad. Quite possibly the 2 worst QBs in the entire league right now

3. My screen name isnt because I'm a Rosen fan or a fan of another team. It's because I'm NOT an Allen fan and think the Bills drafting his was a terrible move. If you want a guy that runs and can't throw for more than 200 yards then why not just keep Tyrod and use the picks on other offensive weapons?

well kid, if you're not an allen fan, you're not a bills fan. but, if you're a rosen fan, well then, you're an arizona fan.

 

it's that simple. so why don't you pack up your username and head to your QB's board because you really have a bad look here, a real bad look.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WRONG JOSH said:

 I represent the fans who can actually think for themselves and don't blindly follow a team which is led by different people every 3 years anyhow.

 

Give me a friggin break.  You represent these people?

No, you don't.

 

You represent your own delusion and poor people skills.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, WRONG JOSH said:

Allen is getting yards by running around like an idiot. It's not a sustainable model for success. He will either get injured or eventually be too slow after years of abuse. I just think it's funny that fans of the NFL's lowest rated passer are making fun of the 2nd lowest rated passer or vice versa. If it makes you guys feel any better, I think Allen is a better fit for our team because he can run around and improvise behind this horrible line. Rosen will have his starters back next year and his OL will be much better. I had Rosen and Mayfield 1a and 1b. I'll take the pocket passer every time for lasting long term success

 

Rosen has the lowest passer rating in the NFL when throwing from the pocket, so be glad we didn't draft him :lol:

 

DuuOWj3W0AAUcHC.jpg

 

And don't you think it's a bit silly to criticize Allen for producing offense however he can?

 

It may not be sustainable, but the first team to take the run away from him got beat with his arm on Sunday, so, ya know, there's that.

Edited by thebandit27
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, thebandit27 said:

 

Rosen has the lowest passer rating in the NFL when throwing from the pocket, so be glad we didn't draft him :lol:

 

And don't you think it's a bit silly to criticize Allen for producing offense however he can?

 

It may not be sustainable, but the first team to take the run away from him got beat with his arm on Sunday, so, ya know, there's that.

They got beat by our defense and missed extra point

I wouldn't be bragging about the worst or 2nd worst QB in the NFL (whatever chart you want to look at) putting up 14 points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

one of the best QB's in the league won a game last night with only putting up, get this, 12 points!!

13 minutes ago, WRONG JOSH said:

They got beat by our defense and missed extra point

I wouldn't be bragging about the worst or 2nd worst QB in the NFL (whatever chart you want to look at) putting up 14 points.

like I said, you have a real bad look here and you're undeniably outclassed by thebandit27 in this petty argument of yours.

Edited by DaBillsFanSince1973
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, WRONG JOSH said:

They got beat by our defense and missed extra point

I wouldn't be bragging about the worst or 2nd worst QB in the NFL (whatever chart you want to look at) putting up 14 points.

 

Ah, they got beat by the defense that scored zero points and allowed 2 early TDs that put the team behind?

 

Got it!

 

And drop the agenda man. Nobody is bragging; we're just pointing out that you're way off base.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BarkleyForGOATBackupPT5P said:

I've learned a lot about Josh Rosen these past few pages.

 

Keep up the football X's and O's talk boys

 

I'm more than happy to talk details about Rosen. 

 

My my only major criticisms of him as a prospect were (a) that he got rattled under pressure and (b) he had way too many tipped passes for my liking--both seem to remain problematic for him at this point.

 

I had him as my QB1 (of course, I did say that Baker was 1A :lol: ), and I still think he'll be very good. I also think that folks like WRONG JOSH need to take a step back and look at Allen's performance in an honest light.

 

Both guys are in lousy situations, but one guy is clearly inspiring confidence, while the other has more or less floundered.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Josh Rosen is seriously bad, I mean very bad.  We dodged that bullet thanks Bean. So glad myself and the other armchair GM's on this message board don't get to make the picks. The definition of a "Franchise QB" in my opinion is an exciting playmaker that always gives your team a chance to win whenever he is on the field. Personally, I believe Allen has that I've seen quite enough. 


I'm pretty positive in fact if Allen did not go down with Injury our team would have a better record than it does currently. Which isn't bad for the kids first season

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, WRONG JOSH said:

Allen is literally the lowest rated passer of the starting QB's in the entire NFL. His stats are very Tebow-esque. You don't have much of a leg to stand on either. Are you really that excited for a guy that completes 50% of his passes? If the defense didn't bail them out time and time again I think you guys wouldn't be so excited about an offense that only put up 14 points

Serious question, how many of JA's games have you actually watched?

On 12/18/2018 at 11:14 AM, WhyteDwarf said:

 

I liked Rosen too, but then I watched him in pre-season and some some of his reactions to bad plays and, yeah, I don't think he's very mentally tough.

Hes going to end up being a softer Jay Cutler with less of an arm.  

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, BillsFan692 said:

Josh Rosen is seriously bad, I mean very bad.  We dodged that bullet thanks Bean. So glad myself and the other armchair GM's on this message board don't get to make the picks. The definition of a "Franchise QB" in my opinion is an exciting playmaker that always gives your team a chance to win whenever he is on the field. Personally, I believe Allen has that I've seen quite enough. 


I'm pretty positive in fact if Allen did not go down with Injury our team would have a better record than it does currently. Which isn't bad for the kids first season

So you’re saying there were not 9 mistakes before him?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

thing is, allen hasn't been benched for poor play.

 

Josh Rosen benched for Mike Glennon during blowout loss

 

Josh Rosen was benched for Mike Glennon late in the Arizona Cardinals’ blowout 40-14 loss to the Atlanta Falcons on Sunday.

 

Rosen went just 13/22 for 132 yards, no touchdowns, and two interceptions. He was also sacked six times and lost a fumble.

 

After four straight possessions in the second half that quickly ended in a punt, the Cardinals finally had Mike Glennon step in.

 

The team was down 40-7 and he immediately led a touchdown drive to make it 40-14.

 

After scoring on a rushing touchdown by David Johnson on their first possession, Arizona’s offense went 11 straight drives without scoring. That included a fumble, two interceptions, and eight punts.

 

Rosen has failed to throw for 150 yards in four of his last five starts.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DaBillsFanSince1973 said:

thing is, allen hasn't been benched for poor play.

 

Josh Rosen benched for Mike Glennon during blowout loss

 

Josh Rosen was benched for Mike Glennon late in the Arizona Cardinals’ blowout 40-14 loss to the Atlanta Falcons on Sunday.

 

Rosen went just 13/22 for 132 yards, no touchdowns, and two interceptions. He was also sacked six times and lost a fumble.

 

After four straight possessions in the second half that quickly ended in a punt, the Cardinals finally had Mike Glennon step in.

 

The team was down 40-7 and he immediately led a touchdown drive to make it 40-14.

 

After scoring on a rushing touchdown by David Johnson on their first possession, Arizona’s offense went 11 straight drives without scoring. That included a fumble, two interceptions, and eight punts.

 

Rosen has failed to throw for 150 yards in four of his last five starts.

Allen has multiple games of throwing for under 100 yards and probably should have been benched against GB or Tennessee (he was awful).  

 

But it as I said before, I thought Rosen would be further along and he hasn’t been.  But I’m not making any proclamation about any of these guys yet, except maybe Mayfield.  Hard to talk about how bad Rosen has been when our qb has a lower qb rating.  I will say that Allen is a real threat on the ground so at this point, I would rank him higher.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

Allen has multiple games of throwing for under 100 yards and probably should have been benched against GB or Tennessee (he was awful).  

 

But it as I said before, I thought Rosen would be further along and he hasn’t been.  But I’m not making any proclamation about any of these guys yet, except maybe Mayfield.  Hard to talk about how bad Rosen has been when our qb has a lower qb rating.  I will say that Allen is a real threat on the ground so at this point, I would rank him higher.  

because you feel he probably should of been? he wasn't benched. my point. the other kid was.  I wont say he's not had a bad game, I'm pointing out he doesn't nor has been as bad as the kid in arizona.

 

that lower QB rating you speak of, changes nothing when it comes to who has been the much better competitor on the field of the two, that clearly to this point goes to allen.

 

I'll make no proclamations either but I can say that I'm really glad the bills did not pick that kid in arizona.

Edited by DaBillsFanSince1973
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

Allen has multiple games of throwing for under 100 yards and probably should have been benched against GB or Tennessee (he was awful).  

 

But it as I said before, I thought Rosen would be further along and he hasn’t been.  But I’m not making any proclamation about any of these guys yet, except maybe Mayfield.  Hard to talk about how bad Rosen has been when our qb has a lower qb rating.  I will say that Allen is a real threat on the ground so at this point, I would rank him higher.  

 

He should've been benched against Tennessee? It was a one-score game the entire game, and they ended up winning.

 

You wanted to see them shelf the rookie in a situation where he could manage a 4th quarter comeback win?

 

At least against GB you can say that (a) he played his worst game of the season and (b) it would've been a mercy (like Rosen on Sunday).

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

Allen has multiple games of throwing for under 100 yards and probably should have been benched against GB or Tennessee (he was awful).  

 

But it as I said before, I thought Rosen would be further along and he hasn’t been.  But I’m not making any proclamation about any of these guys yet, except maybe Mayfield.  Hard to talk about how bad Rosen has been when our qb has a lower qb rating.  I will say that Allen is a real threat on the ground so at this point, I would rank him higher.  

Two out of those three games he did not play a full game.  One was the Baltimore game that he didn't start.  The other was the Houston game that he got injured.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/18/2018 at 2:12 PM, C.Biscuit97 said:

Their passing numbers are very similar.  

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/A/AlleJo02.htm

 

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/R/RoseJo01.htm

 

i also think the talent around them is very similar.  The Cards oline is terrible, Johnson lacks explosion, and Fitz is the only good receiver they have and he isn’t the same.  

 

I will say say that I definitely expected Rosen to be further along than Allen and that clearly isn’t the case.  So that’s good on Allen.  Long way to go and both will need to get their qb ratings out of the 60s.

 

Good post. 

The narrative coming into the season was that Arizona had, in Rosen, drafted a relatively pro-ready pocket passer who could read the field and make all the throws, but was limited in mobility while Buffalo had, in Allen, drafted a Howitzer-armed project with some mobility who needed to learn how to read the D and make decisions, and needed to improve his accuracy (that is, when they weren't even more negative about Allen).

 

The fact is, to date, Rosen and Allen are putting up very similar numbers as passers. 

Rosen is 56% completion, 170 YPG, TD/INT ratio of 0.71, AY/A of 4.8 and <1 TD per game while taking close to 3 sacks per game.

Allen is 52% completion, 163 YPG, TD/INT ratio of 0.67, AY/A of 5.3 and <1 TD per game while taking close to 3 sacks per game.

 

Stat mavens, of whom I am one, can not look at this and differentiate the "pro ready passer" from the "major project".  They both need to get better, much better, as passers if they are to succeed in the NFL.  Neither is out of the range of "rookie year" numbers some successful QB have put up.

To be fair to both, it has to be said they are both playing behind sieve-like OL without strong talent to throw to or much of a running game.  Rosen has the advantage in WR experience, but Fitz has clearly fallen off and without other talent, DB can cover him like a blanket. 

Allen has shown a 'wild card' of rushing ability no one saw coming.  People knew he was athletic, no one saw him being as effective a rusher as he's proven to be.  He must have been dogging it big-time at the Combine (or just not training for it).  To his credit, Rosen has shown more mobility than I thought he had - he's evidently been working at it - but he's nothing on Allen.

  • Like (+1) 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Good post. 

The narrative coming into the season was that Arizona had, in Rosen, drafted a relatively pro-ready pocket passer who could read the field and make all the throws, but was limited in mobility while Buffalo had, in Allen, drafted a Howitzer-armed project with some mobility who needed to learn how to read the D and make decisions, and needed to improve his accuracy (that is, when they weren't even more negative about Allen).

 

The fact is, to date, Rosen and Allen are putting up very similar numbers as passers. 

Rosen is 56% completion, 170 YPG, TD/INT ratio of 0.71, AY/A of 4.8 and <1 TD per game while taking close to 3 sacks per game.

Allen is 52% completion, 163 YPG, TD/INT ratio of 0.67, AY/A of 5.3 and <1 TD per game while taking close to 3 sacks per game.

 

Stat mavens, of whom I am one, can not look at this and differentiate the "pro ready passer" from the "major project".  They both need to get better, much better, as passers if they are to succeed in the NFL.  Neither is out of the range

To be fair to both, it has to be said they are both playing behind sieve-like OL without strong talent to throw to or much of a running game.  Rosen has the advantage in WR experience, but Fitz has clearly fallen off and without other talent, DB can cover him like a blanket. 

Allen has shown a 'wild card' of rushing ability no one saw coming.  People knew he was athletic, no one saw him being as effective a rusher as he's proven to be.  He must have been dogging it big-time at the Combine.  To his credit, Rosen has shown more mobility than I thought he had - he's evidently been working at it - but he's nothing on Allen.

He does NOT look like a 4.75 guy when he decides to take off. Looked more like a 4.5 guy on that TD run against Detroit. Definitely the wildcard in this debate is Allen's unexpected video game rushing numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BillsSB2020 said:

He does NOT look like a 4.75 guy when he decides to take off. Looked more like a 4.5 guy on that TD run against Detroit. Definitely the wildcard in this debate is Allen's unexpected video game rushing numbers.

 

Agreed.  It's not just his speed, though he does have an unheralded "afterburner".  It's his awareness of the bodies on the field.  He is able to juke and sidestep and stiffarm and make guys miss.  It's like he's been watching film with Shady and catching his moves or something along with their stupid "swag" TD dances.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Agreed.  It's not just his speed, though he does have an unheralded "afterburner".  It's his awareness of the bodies on the field.  He is able to juke and sidestep and stiffarm and make guys miss.  It's like he's been watching film with Shady and catching his moves or something along with their stupid "swag" TD dances.

Agreed on the attributes that make him a far better than expected runner but also his ability to immediately accelerate. He went from 0 to 60 in a flash as soon as he decided he was going to run on the TD against Detroit.

 

A QB doesn't put up these kind of rushing numbers without some serious talent. It's not a surprise that he's mobile, but I don't think anyone saw THIS coming. Would love to see him stay in the pocket more, but he's gotta get it any way he can get it at this stage of his career.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, WRONG JOSH said:

Allen is getting yards by running around like an idiot. It's not a sustainable model for success. He will either get injured or eventually be too slow after years of abuse. I just think it's funny that fans of the NFL's lowest rated passer are making fun of the 2nd lowest rated passer or vice versa. If it makes you guys feel any better, I think Allen is a better fit for our team because he can run around and improvise behind this horrible line. Rosen will have his starters back next year and his OL will be much better. I had Rosen and Mayfield 1a and 1b. I'll take the pocket passer every time for lasting long term success

 

If you characterize what Allen does as "running around like an idiot", you either don't actually watch many games or you don't understand what you're watching when he runs.

He's running around all right, but it's not at all "like an idiot".  He's got a very good slide, a very good awareness of the bodies around him and how to make them miss when he runs, a very good sense of the angles he needs to take to minimize the chance of a tackle, and a stiff-arm.

 

He may get injured, but it's more likely to be on a 4th-and-1 head-on collision or when he stays in the pocket and gets slammed.

 

It's not a sustainable model for QB success, though, correct, because Job 1 for a QB is to deliver the ball to his teammates and let them make plays.  Allen needs to improve at Job 1.

 

 

Just now, BillsSB2020 said:

A QB doesn't put up these kind of rushing numbers without some serious talent. It's not a surprise that he's mobile, but I don't think anyone saw THIS coming. Would love to see him stay in the pocket more, but he's gotta get it any way he can get it at this stage of his career.

 

I'd like to see Allen have a more solid pocket he could stay in.  I just hope Beane is committed to a serious upgrade on OL.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

 

 

 

I'd like to see Allen have a more solid pocket he could stay in.  I just hope Beane is committed to a serious upgrade on OL.

No doubt. I was just saying it would be ideal to see more plays from the pocket. With this OL, he really has no choice but to move around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, BillsFan692 said:

Josh Rosen is seriously bad, I mean very bad.  We dodged that bullet thanks Bean. So glad myself and the other armchair GM's on this message board don't get to make the picks. The definition of a "Franchise QB" in my opinion is an exciting playmaker that always gives your team a chance to win whenever he is on the field. Personally, I believe Allen has that I've seen quite enough. 


I'm pretty positive in fact if Allen did not go down with Injury our team would have a better record than it does currently. Which isn't bad for the kids first season

 

...seriously?...way, WAY too early to categorize ANY of these kids from this class as "boom or bust".....if so, it's personal animus, asinine based.....but then again, by TBD expert proclamation, " 14 games in  is hereby defined as "a career and subject to any bust label deemed appropriate according to the by-laws citing our judgmental omnipotence"......"any and all opinions to the contrary shall be considered as treasonous, without merit and punishable to the fullest extent of the law with execution so favored"...........

Edited by OldTimeAFLGuy
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, BillsMafia13 said:

Serious question, how many of JA's games have you actually watched?

 

 

It would appear somebody came in with a preconceived notion, so why watch? If you do watch with the built-in bias, you see what you expect. I’m not anointing Josh the savior at this point, but there’s a lot to be encouraged about. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/18/2018 at 7:37 AM, thebandit27 said:

 

Ok, well, what are/were your expectations of a kid that played 2 years at Wyoming?

 

I've said this before, but it's worth noting again: most people have no idea how hard it is to be a rookie--any rookie--in the NFL, let alone a QB.

 

When you come into the league as a rookie, you've been practicing, training, and competing from August to December as a college player.  When that ends, you immediately begin training for the draft, which is a 3-1/2 month run of constant workouts, interviews, visits, studying, etc.  After the draft, you have about 2 weeks to get your bearings before you start rookie camp--a process that includes finding a place to live, moving any family that will be coming with you, taking care of other life stuff, etc..  After that, you've got a week before OTAs begin, and that's when the off-season basically ends for NFL veterans. By the time a rookie completes their first NFL season in December, they've been in season-mode for about 17 consecutive months (and that's if they don't make the playoffs).

 

Read the above back to yourself, and then stop and ask: what did you really expect from a kid that was playing at Wyoming 11 months ago?

Good post.

On 12/18/2018 at 7:40 AM, WhyteDwarf said:

 

But all rookie QB's go through that correct?  Some play better than others?  Watson, Mayfield, Jackson etc.

That is just as true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

If you characterize what Allen does as "running around like an idiot", you either don't actually watch many games or you don't understand what you're watching when he runs.

He's running around all right, but it's not at all "like an idiot".  He's got a very good slide, a very good awareness of the bodies around him and how to make them miss when he runs, a very good sense of the angles he needs to take to minimize the chance of a tackle, and a stiff-arm.

 

He may get injured, but it's more likely to be on a 4th-and-1 head-on collision or when he stays in the pocket and gets slammed.

 

It's not a sustainable model for QB success, though, correct, because Job 1 for a QB is to deliver the ball to his teammates and let them make plays.  Allen needs to improve at Job 1.

 

 

Good observations and I would add that Allen has taken his scariest hits while sitting in the pocket.  He has actually looked quite composed when he runs the ball and executes a nice slide to avoid the big hit. 

 

I slightly disagree about the running not being sustainable for Allen.  Sure, trying to run for over a 100 yards every game isn't going to cut it in the long run but Allen's ability to gain 20 yards on 3rd & 18 will be a HUGE part of his game throughout his career.  If on average he makes 3 or 4 big runs per game then he will be a difficult QB to defense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Doc said:

Josh Rosen sucks.  He'll be out of football in a couple years.

This is the topic, people!

 

And I agree. I also think JR is a DB in addition to a chitty, weak, scrawny-ass QB.

Edited by BUFFALOKIE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, CincyBillsFan said:

 

Good observations and I would add that Allen has taken his scariest hits while sitting in the pocket.  He has actually looked quite composed when he runs the ball and executes a nice slide to avoid the big hit. 

 

I slightly disagree about the running not being sustainable for Allen.  Sure, trying to run for over a 100 yards every game isn't going to cut it in the long run but Allen's ability to gain 20 yards on 3rd & 18 will be a HUGE part of his game throughout his career.  If on average he makes 3 or 4 big runs per game then he will be a difficult QB to defense. 

 

The way I would put it is...if Allen can continue to make serious gains in his ability to "hit the bunnies" accurately (the short 'gimmee' passes) and to read the D and know where the open receivers may be, his running ability will give him that "oh CRAP there he goes!" extra edge that Rodgers has.

But he has to focus on becoming more of a QB as his primary goal, because otherwise you get into the "make him be a QB" strategy on D

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

The way I would put it is...if Allen can continue to make serious gains in his ability to "hit the bunnies" accurately (the short 'gimmee' passes) and to read the D and know where the open receivers may be, his running ability will give him that "oh CRAP there he goes!" extra edge that Rodgers has.

But he has to focus on becoming more of a QB as his primary goal, because otherwise you get into the "make him be a QB" strategy on D

One thing I'd like to see in the playcalling as it pertains to gimmie passes is routes that allow the receiver to continue to run. Seems like we throw a ton of short passes that don't allow for that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

The way I would put it is...if Allen can continue to make serious gains in his ability to "hit the bunnies" accurately (the short 'gimmee' passes) and to read the D and know where the open receivers may be, his running ability will give him that "oh CRAP there he goes!" extra edge that Rodgers has.

But he has to focus on becoming more of a QB as his primary goal, because otherwise you get into the "make him be a QB" strategy on D

I agree.  But Allen has the potential to trigger a lot of cussing among our opponents fans as he turns 3rd & 15's into first downs with his legs. 

 

I suspect that once he establishes his ability to hit anywhere on the field with his passing game (he's close already) then his QB runs, while not used often, will routinely generate chunk yardage. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎12‎/‎18‎/‎2018 at 5:34 PM, WRONG JOSH said:

Allen is getting yards by running around like an idiot. It's not a sustainable model for success. He will either get injured or eventually be too slow after years of abuse. I just think it's funny that fans of the NFL's lowest rated passer are making fun of the 2nd lowest rated passer or vice versa. If it makes you guys feel any better, I think Allen is a better fit for our team because he can run around and improvise behind this horrible line. Rosen will have his starters back next year and his OL will be much better. I had Rosen and Mayfield 1a and 1b. I'll take the pocket passer every time for lasting long term success

 

Someone's bitter because they were wrong

  • Haha (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...